Community Feeds

Popular Content


Community Dashboard

Tagged: movies

  • Drew Goddard Talks Bad Times At The El Royale And The Current Status Of His X-Force Movie

    2 days ago


    We're entering the second weekend of release for the ambitious, beautifully shot and utterly fascinating character study that is Bad Times At The El Royale.

    The movie, centered quite literally at a hotel that straddles the California/Nevada border, is a deeply immersive film chock full of some of the most interesting actors working today, from known names like Jeff Bridges, Dakota Johnson, Jon Hamm, and Chris Hemsworth to names you will know very soon, like Lewis Pullman and Cynthia Erivo. This is the kind of movie that grows on you and grows on you and grows on you until you suddenly realize you're watching it for the dozenth time.

    You can probably tell I like this movie quite a bit. It feel tailor made for me, with the period aesthetic and early Motown soundtrack, this one is right up my alley.

    I was lucky enough to get to chat a bit with writer/director Drew Goddard about the film, his directorial follow-up to cult favorite Cabin in the Woods. We talk a bit about the origins of the project, how we're both convinced Lewis Pullman walks out of this one a superstar and even a little bit about how the Fox/Disney merger could have an effect on his proposed X-Force movie. 



    Drew Goddard: Eric! How are you, my friend? How's life?

    Eric Vespe: It's good. It's been a while since we talked!

    Drew Goddard: How's the new job treating you?

    Eric Vespe: It's good, man. Rooster Teeth has been treating me well. It's definitely a different kind of job than the Ain't It Cool days, but I'm pretty much doing the same thing... just bullshitting about movies with people.

    Drew Goddard: Good. I hope it's satisfying and fulfilling for you.

    Eric Vespe: Very much so.

    Drew Goddard: Did I also see that you were playing Fallout 76?

    Eric Vespe: I did! I got to play about 3 hours of it.

    Drew Goddard: I know our time is limited, but can we just talk about that for 15 minutes? (laughs)

    Eric Vespe: What do you want to know? We can do a quick rapid-fire!

    Drew Goddard: No, no. I actually like to not know things going in, but I'm very jealous of you.

    Eric Vespe: I get that, man. I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Fallout fan, so I was very excited to play a little bit of the new one. Fallout 3 was a seminal game for me. It was the first time a video game gave me the feeling of watching a great movie.

    Drew Goddard: Interesting. Have you played Witcher, by chance?

    Eric Vespe: I've only played Witcher 3.

    Drew Goddard: That's the one I meant. That's another one. I was just blown away by the cinematic writing of it. I was like “Wow, I can not believe what they're doing with it.” I felt the same way about Fallout. They're making some real leaps in storytelling.

    Eric Vespe: I remember Roger Ebert, before he passed, voiced some strong opinions on how video games can't be art, like movies are, and I think time has proven him wrong on that one.

    Drew Goddard: Yep. When video games do it there's a level of immersion that happens. It's different from the cinematic experience, but it can be incredibly effective.

    Eric Vespe: Alright, now that I know you're a Fallout fan you gotta promise me you'll go make a kickass Fallout series some day. 

    Drew Goddard: Okay, I'm on the case!

    Eric Vespe: When you guys get the rights and need any pointers I'm always around. I know my shit!

    Drew Goddard: (Laughs) You got it!

    Eric Vespe: Congratulations on the movie. I loved it. It was great watching it at Fantastic Fest specifically. It was such a good fit for the bizarre and awesome energy that encompasses that festival.

    Drew Goddard: I was so sad I couldn't be there. I had to be in Spain. I mean, I was in Spain, so I shouldn't feel too sad, but Fantastic Fest is where I'm the most comfortable. That's where I feel like I'm the most in my own skin.

    Eric Vespe: You've had a bunch of projects on your plate since Cabin in the Woods. You've done a lot of writing for other directors and adapting other people's material, but what made this the right time for you to get back behind the camera with your own original project?

    Drew Goddard: I think it was a confluence of a few things. I've always wanted to do a crime movie. I've loved crime fiction my whole life. I love crime cinema. I think I was aware that I needed to achieve a certain level of maturity to deal with it. The danger with crime cinema or any crime story is you can very quickly fetishize it and become the very darkness that crime cinema is meant to explore, if that makes sense.

    I wanted to have that maturity to deal with it. I reached a point in my life where I was ready to tackle the bigger issues the film tackles. Similarly, I tend to not like to repeat myself, do the same movie. I think I was coming off of (writing) The Martian, which is in many ways the opposite of this movie. It takes place in many locations across the galaxy, it's science-fiction and bright and shiny and I kind of wanted to go in the opposite direction.

    Eric Vespe: Well, poop potatoes do figure strongly into both films.

    Drew Goddard: That's right. Look, I'm still me! (Laughs) I still have to put my little spin on it. I think it was kind of a mixture of all of those things, quite honestly. It just felt like the time was right.

    Eric Vespe: Bad Times is a refreshing movie. It's nice to see this period, character-driven A-list style movie where every character is a shade of gray. Nobody is exactly as they seem at first blush, even the charismatic cult leader that Chris Hemsworth plays. You see the facade crack a little bit.

    Drew Goddard: That was very much the goal: Take these 7 people and start from a place where you think you get who these characters. The audience can say “I already know the shorthand of who this character is” and then reveal that they're more three-dimensional people with a lot more to them, including Billy Lee (Chris Hemsworth). That was our approach with all of this.

    Eric Vespe: Is it a coincidence that the Jeff Bridges character is named Flynn or are you a big Tron fan?


    Drew Goddard: It wasn't intentional, but I'm very much aware of it. One of the things that happens when you cast Jeff Bridges is he's got, what? At this point 40 year career in film? Something like that. I was doing movies with Jane Greer when he was a baby. It's very hard not to reference a Jeff Bridges movie in one way or another. We had a laugh about it, thought about changing the name, but we just liked the name. We thought “You know what? If it intersects with Tron, that's not the worst thing in the world.”

    Eric Vespe: You also get the benefit of the movie-savvy people bringing in the baggage from associating that name. In Tron Flynn is a big personality, but he's a wholly good and pure character. Maybe the name can set up an expectation and give you room to surprise people here. I did have a thought during the movie that might have been intentional on your part.

    Drew Goddard: It really wasn't. To be honest I needed a good Irish-Catholic name. I wanted a whiskey priest character. I wrote it before I even thought of Jeff and we decided to keep it because I liked it.


    Eric Vespe: The whole cast of the movie is phenomenal. Everybody shows up to play here, but the two stand-outs to me were Cynthia Erivo and Lewis Pullman.

    Drew Goddard: Oh, wow. Thanks!

    Eric Vespe: Perhaps there's an expectation of greatness from the bigger names you have in the movie and the newer people stand a better chance at surprising the audience, but Lewis in particular wowed me. His character is the one that stuck with me after seeing the movie.


    Drew Goddard: That's very gratifying to hear. That was certainly my intent, to have this character who is hiding in the background... you sort of dismiss him very quickly. You get what he's about early, and dismiss him. I knew that at their core, both Lewis and Cynthia's characters get dismissed early and then become the soul and spine of the film.

    It's really fun, quite honestly... Even at the premiere I was standing with Lewis and I told him, “You know, your life is about to change. All of these people are walking into this theater not knowing who you are, but every single one of them is going to know you when they walk out.”

    Even on the red carpet people were obviously clamoring to take pictures with Jeff Bridges and Jon Hamm and Lewis and I were standing off to the side. When we walked out of the theater Lewis could not take two steps because he was so mobbed. It was one of those remarkable moments that I was so happy to be around. Lewis is such an extraordinary person and talent and I'm excited for the world to fall in love with Lewis the way I have.

    Eric Vespe: Before I let you go I wanted to ask you about some of the other projects you've been attached to, specifically X-Force. The big question on my mind is what's going on with that considering the Fox/Disney merger is going forward.


    Drew Goddard: The truth is I don't have anything exciting to update. I tend to focus very intensely on one project at a time and I've been very much in this world. Ryan (Reynolds) has simultaneously shooting another movie and then we do have the Fox/Disney stuff. I'm not going to sit here and pretend I have any insight into that at all.

    Eric Vespe: I've talked to people at both studios and very few feel like they have a handle on what to expect when it goes forward.

    Drew Goddard: These issues are so far above our pay grade! When you're dealing with billion dollar mergers that stuff does not trickle down to people like me. I think what's going to happen is we'll finish up Bad Times, Ryan will finish up his movie and when the Fox/Disney stuff is settled we'll all sit down and talk. Certainly X-Force is a comic I've always loved. These are characters I love, I love working with Ryan in a team with Josh (Brolin) and Zazie (Beetz). If there's a place for it I'd be very excited. We'll figure it out in the back half of this year.

    Eric Vespe: That's good to hear. I just love your work, man. I'd love to see what you'd do with a superhero group film like X-Force. You bring a cinematic eye to everything you do, going back to Cabin in the Woods, which was made when found footage was still the go-to style. Now The Conjurings have brought genre back to a more measured, higher production value style, but I do remember being impressed that you went that route back then.

    Drew Goddard: The thing that I love about (the Conjuring) movies is they're so artfully done. They're not afraid to let the camera sit in one place. At the time of Cabin it was very much either found footage or highly shaky/fast-cut approaches, which is fine. There's no right or wrong way to make a movie, but we were certainly trying to do something different. Similarly with Bad Times there's only one handheld shot in the whole movie.

    Eric Vespe: That might be a good place to end the interview, talking about how achieved the look of Bad Times. It's a rich, vibrant world that isn't afraid to be a bit pulpy and even though it's a period movie you don't go out of your way to put the “period movie look” filter on.

    Drew Goddard: I kind of wanted it to be its own thing. In this particular case the movie has its own quality. I was very inspired by David Lynch and films like Vertigo... films that have a very clear color palette or color theory. It helps define the movie. In the case of this movie we took our color seriously and our visual approach seriously. Nothing is arbitrary in this movie, for better or for worse. We wanted to have a thought and an emotion behind every decision.


    Eric Vespe: Well, it certainly comes across. It certainly doesn't feel like a movie slapped together without any thought, but it's also entertaining. It's always good when you can get that combination of entertaining and thoughtful.

    Drew Goddard: That's the hope. It's always tricky to find that balance, but that was definitely the hope, so it's very gratifying to hear you say that, Eric. It means a lot.

    Eric Vespe: Cool, man. Thanks for taking the time to talk with me. Good luck with the movie!

    Drew Goddard: Thanks, Eric. Good luck at Rooster Teeth. I'm sure we'll talk again.

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 119

    4 days ago



    MADHERO: Hey everyone, sorry if this episode is a tad late. You know how it is, what with traveling to the moon to get away from the serial killer that haunted you almost 40 years ago.  Takes a while to settle on the moon and junk, but I think we finally got away. Jason might've gone to space, but Michael Myers sure hasn't.

    STICKMAN: Not yet, anyway. If this one does well, who knows. HEY.

    LARRY: But wait.....look at our BANNER. AAAAAAHHHHHHH


    MADHERO: Oh  shit. I think it might be best to talk news soon before its the last piece of news we'll ever tell




    It feels like we've spoken about James Gunn every episode since his sudden termination from GotG3 sent shockwaves through the internet. We know the story of how and why  it happened, we know that Disney had no plans to hire him...and it seems Gunn has taken that very much to heart, because he's defected to the enemy, as it were. Originally rumoured, now confirmed, the GotG director has signed on to write and potentially direct a "fresh take" on the Suicide Squad franchise for the DCEU, the previous film of which we all here were pretty comfortable in naming our least favourite film of 2016 by some margin.

    This is a pretty crazy outcome to this situation, being fired from Marvel and then jump ship to work on a DCEU franchise that was very much propositioned as an equivalent to GotG, in terms of the vibrant style, cast of misfit characters with questionable moral standards (Not too dissimilar from Disney themselves) but ultimately a sense of comradery and heart.  Obviously GotG succeeded big time in that department, whilst Suicide Squad crashed and burned so hard the crater can be seen from space...but with Gunn himself on board to try the idea again? DC and Warner Bros could very well end up with the crowd-pleasing heartfelt smash hit that Marvel and Disney previously had with the GotG films. Regardless of how this actually turns really is a bitch.

    MADHERO: Top 10 Anime betrayals

    LARRY: This news fills me...with so much joy. Even if its out of spite.

    MADHERO: I'm obviously still disappointed they didn't manage to make up, but this is one hell of a middle finger to give, even if that's probably reading too much into it.

    LARRY: I don’t think it’s reading too much into it at all. This is absolutely revenge

    STICKMAN: He probably had a lot of offers from different studios, but I'd imagine DC spent a lot getting him to jump ship. It's quite the statement.

    LARRY: DC struck while the iron was hot and now they have a genuinely great director redoing their grandest fuck up thus far.

    MADHERO: I guess out of all the properties, Suicide Squad makes the most sense for Gunn since that tried and failed to tap into what made Guardians of the Galaxy great. Obviously its not the first time a MCU director has jumped ship (Joss Whedon) but its still pretty wild

    STICKMAN; Look what happened with Joss, even if the situation was far from ideal.

    MADHERO: Either way, its made me the teeny tiniest interested in the new Suicide Squad, which I thought to be impossible after that first one. Good on you, WB.

    LARRY: I am now VERY interested, especially if it’s closer to a redoing than a sequel.



    Alright, here is where I draw the line. THIS IS IT. RIGHT HERE. Ahem. Disney will be remaking "Lilo and Stitch," arguably their most successful and popular post-Renaissance project (but not the best, because The Emperor's New Groove exists). Up-and-coming Hollywood horror scribe Mike Van Waes will be writing it (cause yeah, that makes sense), and Aladdin producers Dan Lin and Jonathan Eirich will produce. So, in case you thought Disney maybe would possibly try to maybe MAYBE put any rhyme or reason in remaking their older films....ugh. I was on board with these live action remakes, but the last few haven’t been particularly good, and I love "Lilo & Stitch," it's one of my all-time favorite Disney films and features some of the most nuanced family dynamics you'll ever see in an animated film, so to see it get this treatment just... makes me sad. BUT WHATEVER MONEY HAHA. I'm sure Lin and Elrich are reaping the spoils of their time in Aladdin-land. Speaking of which...

    We got our first official teaser for Aladdin, and it's fine, I guess. Some beautiful musical arrangements of classic Aladdin-tunes, our first look at the Cave of Wonders and Aladdin himself, portrayed by Mena Massoud, and some sandy dunes. Yay. But also, fuck you Disney.

    MADHERO: Uhoh, Larry has finally snapped

    STICKMAN: And I thought i was fed up with live-action remakes.

    LARRY: Why the FUCK is a HORROR WRITER writing a LILO AND STITCH REMAKE. That makes no sense.

    MADHERO: I mean, just because they've worked on horror doesn't necessarily disqualify them for this. The Jungle Book screenwriter worked on Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun Li and that turned out fine.

    LARRY: Gee, that movie turned out so well written (it didn’t).

    STICKMAN: I thought everyone loved The Jangle Book.

    LARRY: It was okay. The writing was not the star.

    MADHERO: While I have a lot of fondness for Lilo and Stitch, I don't really hold it sacred and don't think its unremakable or unadaptable


    STICKMAN: I don't see why doing a horror screenplay has anything to do with it though. Are you saying horror films can't be well writtteenn. You wanna fight bruv.

    LARRY: I’m saying Lilo and Stitch isn’t a horror film.

    STICKMAN: I mean it could be. I'd watch that. It's scary that this film is happeninnnginingg.

    MADHERO: I mean, Pleeklee is pretty terrifying. This is probably so they can sell more merchandise in Japan. They love Stitch over there

    LARRY: There’s one scene that you can maybe do horror for and that is Stitch’s arrival. Das it. This is dumb.

    STICKMAN: Writing horror doesn't mean you can only write horror. Ya dang. But how 'bout that Aladdin.

    MADHERO: That suuuuuuuuure was a teaser

    LARRY: The teaser didn’t do much for me. Solid slow arrangement of Friend Like Me tho.

    MADHERO: I imagine we'll get something more substantial in the future for Aladdin. More of a "hey this is happening." Guess we'll see next summer

    LARRY: I think Genie is what’s gonna make or break them. Until we get that, I have no strong feelings.

    STICKMAN: Make Tron 3 you bastards.



    So some you may remember The Chronicles of Narnia movies from back in the day. Y'know, the Walden Media/Disney one that was pretty much Lord of the Rings but with more Jesus Lion. The series, adapted from CS Lewis' classic seven part series, really hit the ground running with the 2005 original, before losing steam with Prince Caspian and eventually Voyage of the Dawn Treader. which ended being distributed by Fox. While murmurs were going around that Walden Media wanted to continue with the Silver Chair, it all seemed unlikely since the original kids were all adults now. And now its super dead with the announcement that Netflix has acquired the rights of the series.

    Seemingly out of nowhere, Netflix announced they had not only obtained, but will get to work on not only adapting the books into movies, but several into tv shows as well. This strategy actually makes a lot of sense considering the incredibly fractured timeline and scale of the stories, with books like Magician's Nephew and The Horse and His Boy now much more likely to be adapted. As a big fan of the books as a kid, I'm very curious what Netflix can come with both from film and television front, but I guess we'll have to wait a while

    STICKMAN: My indifference is painful.

    MADHERO: You should have that looked at

    LARRY: I read the Narnia books, and liked them a lot. Not sure if we really need all of them adapted, they vary in quality

    MADHERO: They do, but I would like to see a full adaptation of the whole series, and I think some books could work as a movie and the other as a tv show

    LARRY: I just don’t really care to see “The Magician’s Nephew” on the big screen. Or on TV for that matter. It’s kiiiiiiinda a snoozer.

    MADHERO: That's probably the one along with The Horse and His Boy that you can probably skip. Its been ages since I last read them or watched the movies for that matter.

    STICKMAN: I have only read Lion Witch & Wardrobe. I only watched the first movie and I was not a big fan.

    LARRY: Cuz that one is most telling for what Narnia is. Its imagery is definitely the starkest. Also C.S. Lewis and Christianity and such. I saw Lion and then Caspian. Skipped Treader.

    STICKMAN: That one has a dragon though. You messed up.

    LARRY: And bad writing too apparently.

    STICKMAN: Must've been written by a horror writer  AMIRITE.

    MADHERO: Dawn Treader was one that probably could've been a tv show cause boy howdy is it slow. I'm personally excited by the news, but with Netflix its hard to say when this actually kicks off

    STICKMAN: It won't be for a whiiille. All these big fantasy things take ages to prepare.

    MADHERO: And it'll be like "surprise, its out" like with all Netflix releases


    Adam McKay, known initially for his comedic work in films like "Anchorman" and "Step Brothers," really made a splash when "The Big Short" was as good as it was, and now, in a sort of follow-up to that, McKay is bringing us another dramatized expose, this time on the life and times of Dick muthafuckin' Cheney. Vice, directed and written by McKay, looks to tackle Cheney's rise to the vice presidency, and how his actions regarding the war on terror (and other things) would change the direction of American and world history.

    We finally get our first official look at some of the film's transformations, particularly Christian Bale as old, fat, bald Cheney, and Sam Rockwell as good ol' George W. Bush, who looks to be stealing the show. Plus we get some Steve Carrell and some Amy Adams, which is never a bad thing. Ultimately, based on the trailer editing and pacing, this looks to be a similarly toned piece a la "The Big Short," but perhaps even more extravagant and polished. Then again, "The Big Short" turned out to be a very verite, very unpolished film as a whole. So who knows what the fuck this will turn out to be. All I know is that I prefer this McKay over any other McKay previously, so I'll gladly indulge.

    MADHERO: Sam Rockwell eating chicken wings gives me life.

    STICKMAN: But is he a racist?

    MADHERO: I mean, he's George Bush so...... possibly?

    LARRY: Probably**

    MADHERO: I'd make a Kanye joke, but well.....y'know. Anyway yeah this looks really good so far.

    LARRY: I’m here for more satirical McKay. I really enjoyed The Big Short.

    STICKMAN: Christian Bale got fat for YOUR entertainment.


    LARRY: I guess they some sort of...agreement.

    STICKMAN: Maybe he filmed a remake of Super Size Me to get there.

    LARRY: Well now I’m just gonna ponder how one remakes a documentary.

    MADHERO: Its a pretty remarkable transformation, and it will be a bit of a rude awakening for those who thought the Bush era wasn't so bad, which I did cause i was a dumb kid.

    LARRY: It was VERY bad. We just didn’t know all of the crazy bad shit until like 5 years after it happened. If the Bush era was as transparent as Trump’s, we’d be in hell.

    STICKMAN: I always thought it was terrible, it just feels...preferable in comparison to these daaays.

    MADHERO: Oh America, you clods.

    LARRY: That’s kinda what Vice is going for, I imagine. Possibly shedding even more light on Cheney.

    STICKMAN: Mainly it just makes me want to smack Christian Bale's potbelly.

    MADHERO: Quickly before he loses it again for The Machinist 2

    STICKMAN: Oh god. His poor doctor.



    So hey, some not so fun studio news. While we all here at AtS are big fans of A24, its important not to forget one of the other modern auteur production company: Annapurna. The company, owned by Oracle heiress Megan Ellison, estimated to be worth over 60 billion dollarydoos has been founded to give auteur filmmakers the money needed to make the films they wanted. That has led to some great films like The Master, Her and Foxcatcher. And they seemed to be growing, having stepped up to distribution, even handling the new Bond film domestically. There's only one issue: they aren't making money.

    While Annapurna continued to make movies, they didn't seem to put much effort in actively marketing them. Detroit bombed pretty hard and their most recent movie, The Sisters Brothers, cost more than 40 million to make but hasn't even made a million yet. This has now caused their head of film production Chelsea Bernard to be fired, as well as dropping their high profile Fox News/Roger Ailes movie, 2 weeks away from start of production. Larry Ellison, Megan's dad has now stepped in and will coarse correct the company to make money. This isn't a total collapse just yet, but these aren't the signs of a healthy studio. Hopefully they can recover so they can continue to make great films.

    STICKMAN: Oy vey. This'd be a big loss.

    MADHERO: I don't think they're gone just yet. Its not like Telltale which just completely collapsed. We see companies like Global Road still be around somehow after bomb after  bomb

    STICKMAN: True, but who knows these days.

    LARRY: Let’s hope Buster Scruggs does well for Netflix and maybe gets a nom or two.

    STICKMAN: LAIKA just partnered up with them too, I don't want my LAIKA to get hurt any moooore.

    LARRY: Not LAIKA....Weren’t they struggling too?

    MADHERO: I mean, a Coen Bros film will probably get some love. Still though, its both a bit surprising and not very. They really need to know how to market their films better. Releasing Detroit in August probably wasn't the best idea.

    STICKMAN: Detroit was a hard watch too. Hardly summer fare.

    LARRY: To be fair, that film can’t be easy to market... “Hey, come see this devastating protest film.” It doesn’t have inherent mainstream appeal.

    STICKMAN: No but then you market and budget it accordingly.

    MADHERO: That's just one example though. It just seems like they don't really do great at awards season. Does make you wonder what's going to happen to the likes of Vice and now the Roger Ailes movie

    LARRY: Yeah they haven’t had a major awards contender in a while.

    STICKMAN: There's still a lot of good projects coming out of that studio. Problem is awards are kinda the bread and butter of studios who make that kinda thing.

    LARRY: Exactly. Detroit coulda done well in that regard had they been smarter.

    STICKMAN: A24 is very similar but does a lot better when it comes to awards.

    LARRY: They also handle budget a lot better. A lot of their awards contenders stay on the cheaper side.

    MADHERO: We'll see what happens next. They're still owned by a billionaire so they have some money in the tank. Hopefully they can get off the ground soon and continue to release great films.

    STICKMAN: Please save my LAIKA.



    OH SHIT, sometimes we get boring stories on here, and then other days? We get the bIG NEWS. Remember Dance Dance Revolution? One of many game franchises of Konami that no longer seems to exist? Well it's a post-apocalyptic action movie. Wait, what. In what will no doubt eventually fall under the 'Never gonna happen' folder of video game movie adaptations (Remember that space epic Tetris trilogy that was being made?) , DDR is being propositioned for a feature movie by newly founded studio 'Stampede Productions' and the basic premise is that the world is on the brink of total destruction, and only the power of dance can unite, and save the world. Presumably they've taken the titular Revolution of Dance a little literally? But there you go. That's all we know, and it'll probably never happen...but hoOOOOo WEE, what a fucking funny news story this is. And since we're here, fuck Konami.

    MADHERO: Gonna hit all the arrows in the right direction to some jammin' J-pop

    STICKMAN: Gotta take those shoes off for maximum stomp dude.

    LARRY: Oh my Lordy Who in the world is writing this?

    MADHERO: This could be a fun parody or skit, but this seems like a bit of a stupid idea, but stupid enough to be fun

    STICKMAN: This sounds like a Collegehumor skit that got out of hand.

    LARRY: Yeah exactly. This is the sketch that comes after that Tetris announcement

    MADHERO: I feel like there have been similar movies that couldn't use the license but now here we are.

    LARRY: I guess this is basically Step Up meets Cloverfield?

    STICKMAN: I can't see this film ever happening but it's hilarious that it's even being propositioned.

    MADHERO: Konami's gotta make money to things besdies pachinko somehow

    STICKMAN: Konami can fuck my dick. The last movie they had a hand in was Silent Hill Revelation and that was garabbaage. They'll sell this shit to anyone and I'm not here for it...even if I kinda am for DDR Apocalypse.

    LARRY: Oh.

    MADHERO: Hopefully Vogt-Roberts can keep them out for Metal Gear Solid then

    STICKMAN: God that film is going to be either amazing or the worst thing ever. He's clearly a huge MGS fanboy and that means he's gonna play it too close to the games, which are nonsensical...BUUUT...we're talkin DDR here, which is going to win the Oscar for Best Popular Film one day.


    MADHERO: Alright, I think about does it for the news. Now we're still definitely running away from Michael Myers on the moon, but you know who else is on the moon? Ryan Gosling, who's now playing Neil Armstrong in Damien Chazelle's First Man. Y'know, that guy that really impressed in that Kubrick movie. It feels somewhat weird that there hasn't been a movie till now, but here we are, and Sticky and Larry have both seen it.

    LARRY: Time for us to rocket into review mode. Har har

    STICKMAN: Oh dear.

    MADHERO: Alright you rocket men. What did you think of First Man? Is it the Oscar campaigner they're hoping for? Stickman, tell me your thoughts?



    DIRECTOR: Damian Chazelle (Whiplash, La La Land)

    STARRING: Ryan Gosling, Jason Clarke, Claire Foy, Kyle Chandler, Corey Stoll, Christopher Abbott

    SYNOPSIS: A look at the life of the astronaut, Neil Armstrong (Gosling), and the legendary space mission that led him to become the first man to walk on the Moon on July 20, 1969.

    STICKMAN: WELLLLL, I think it's safe to say this is a early Oscar frontrunner in a lot of categories. Damien Chazelle has already proven himself a great director with Whiplash, and then last year's surprisingly enjoyable (For me who doesn't like musicals) La La Land, both completely different but high quality productions. Once again with First Man he's made yet another completely different film in tone, experience and even visuals...and yet once again made another amazing experience, this being perhaps his most absorbing to date.


    On the surface this may seem like a standard biopic about an important part of American history, we’ve seen a lot of those before, and this one certainly goes to places you will expect. However...the real star of the show isn't the history, it's the intimacy. Both in terms of characters and the space exploration itself. The space sequences are mostly pretty fucking terrifying, in a way I've never experienced in a space-set movie before, there's a real grounded and dangerous feel to the way it's filmed and the sound design especially, it's pretty stressful to watch but amazing in that respect. The performances are also great, Ryan Gosling plays a beautifully melancholic and stubborn father who deals with grief in a perhaps...not particularly ideal way? Wheras Clair Foy plays his desperately struggling wife who's trying to keep everything together. They work great together, and the terrifying and beautiful space sequences are played ...and filmed quite jarringly but also fittingly different.  All in all this is a slow, but terrific and moving experience. But that's just MY thoughts, what say you Larry.

    LARRY: Yeah I agree with everything you said, Sticky. Chazelle has definitely cemented himself as a chameleon of a filmmaker with "First Man," what feels like if you took parts of "Gravity," "Dunkirk," "2001," and "Tree of Life," and made something wholly engrossing. Chazelle shoots it all as though you were watching a home video the whole time and it works wonders. And yeah, this is one of Gosling's strongest performances to date, with Claire Foy also giving a tremendously nuanced performance. I also wanna give a shout-out to Justin Hurwitz, a man who has proven that he's not just a good jazz composer but a great composer period. The score here is fucking phenomenal. I think, at times, it can get just a bit repetitive in how the plot moves from point to point, but that's really being nitpicky. For me, this is easily one of the year's best and second only to "Whiplash" as the best in Chazelle's filmography.

    STICKMAN: That score was fuckin crazy yeah. Never thought I'd hear the theremin in a film like this.

    MADHERO: On the spoopy space travel scale, where does it rank between your average space adventure and Gravity?

    LARRY: I was not the biggest fan of Gravity, though I marvel at its craftsmanship. But it definitely channels the isolation of Gravity while stripping away the polish.

    STICKMAN: It's a lot more grounded for the most part than say...Gravity or Interstellar, but the way the moon sequence is shot certainly goes for the same fantastical angle. I really liked the way it used different cameras for different portions of the film.

    LARRY: Yes the moon sequence does stick out as one of the movie's grander sequences. The home video, grainy camera in his personal life versus the digital beauty of space.


    MADHERO: A lot of people have played up the realism to its space travel and how terrifying it really was. That's what interests me the most for sure.

    STICKMAN: You have a old vintage look for the majority, then it gets IMAX cameras for the moon sequence, and then afterwards it has a refreshed look, like its following the advancement of space travel. I watched this shit in IMAX and I tell you what, two of the space sequences in this film gave me some real anxiety.

    LARRY: Oh yeah, the film opens with one of the most intense sequences of the year.



    MADHERO: 0/10 Communist anti-America garbage. But hey, probably not. I'm really excited by this film. Is the more nuanced subdued family drama worth the wait for the grand spectable of space travel? Its almost 2.5 hours which is pretty long

    STICKMAN: It feels long but I was never bored. The family stuff is almost as compelling as the space race  at times, thanks to the performances and score. There's a sequence on the moon that's fucking genuinely heartbreaking.

    LARRY: I would say it does feel long but yes, never not engaging. Every scene feels warranted to be within the piece. And yeah, I know what scene Sticky is talking about, and I completely agree. I was about ready to sob.

    STICKMAN: It was the tragic remake of A Grand Day Out I never expected.

    MADHERO: Alright, you sad space cowboys, let's wrap it up. Anything you want to say before and give your final thoughts?


    LARRY: Anyone who tells me La La Land is Chazelle's best film can go take a fucking hike. That's all I'll say, this man is capable of so much beautiful filmmaking.

    STICKMAN: Watch this in IMAX if you can, I'll say that much. That moon sequence is filmed with IMAX cameras and it's worth every penny to see that bit alone. One of the best IMAX sequences I ever did see.


    MADHERO: Damn, I mean I preferred Whiplash but I guess that's high praise. Anyway, we've got ANOTHER REVIEW HOT AND READY TO GO! Drew Goddard is best known for his work with Joss Whedon on Buffy, but he showed his mettle with Cabin in the Woods as a new director to watch. He sure took his sweet time, but he finally has a new movie out that definitely looks stylish as heck. Larry, you're the only one that's seen it from us. Unlike its characters, did you have a Good Time at the El Royale?

    STICKMAN: Oh SHiIIET I didn't see this film, I get to drink orange juiiiice.


    DIRECTOR: Drew Goddard (Cabin in the Woods)

    STARRING: Jeff Bridges, Cynthia Erivo, Dakota Johnson, Jon Hamm, Cailee Spaeny, Chris Hemsworth, Lewis Pullman, Nick Offerman

    SYNOPSIS: Seven strangers, each with a secret to bury, meet at Lake Tahoe's El Royale, a rundown hotel with a dark past. Over the course of one fateful night, everyone will have a last shot at redemption - before everything goes to hell.

    LARRY: Oh boy, did I. "Bad Times at the El Royale" is another artful, unpredictable genre-bender from the masterful mind of Drew Goddard. You can't help but be stunned by Goddard's ability to take a studio-driven film (marketed poorly but expectedly as this crazy action-thriller) and make some genuinely excellent storytelling out of it. Part Chrstie-esque mystery, part-60's crime thriller, Bad Times at the El Royale showcases an incredible cast at work with a script that gives each one of them their own unique presence.

    They each fit like puzzle pieces in the story at large, but the film certainly doesn't play it safe in regards to how long you'll be with them. Add to that gorgeous cinematography, lovely period production design, a solid soundtrack of Motown hits, and an unpredictable plot pushed by poignant tension, and you got yourself one hell of a good time at the theater.  Not every loose end is tied up, and the third act (or fifth act? idk this film's structure warrants a second viewing) leaves a little to be desired, but I would still thoroughly recommend this one to anyone looking for something a little smarter than your average blockbuster.

    MADHERO: Cabin in the Woods was marketed pretty poorly as well so I guess that's his curse.

    LARRY: You can't market smart blockbusters without dumbing them down, apparently.

    STICKMAN: I thought this seemed a little generically zany..if that's even a thing. Like, big all-star cast, weird premise where everyone gets to chew the scenery...that kinda thing.

    LARRY: Well, it's not. As I said, marketed poorly.

    MADHERO: I think its more so hard to market without giving away the mystery or what the movie is really about. Cabin's twists were best kept as a surprise. Are there any similar surprises here?

    STICKMAN: Marketed very poorly then. Cabin in the Woods wasn't even mentioned in the stuff over here and that film's great.

    LARRY: To be honest, the trailers definitely give away some important shit. If I were to recommend one sees it, I wouldn't show them the trailer.

    MADHERO: How much fun is it and does it take a while to get going? I'm interested, but the length is kinda throwing me off honestly


    LARRY: I did have a lot of fun trying to solve the mystery and see how the pieces fit together. To be honest, it's doesn't take very long at all, 15-20 at the most. One of the most important parts kickstarts the juicy shit. It does ultimately feel long, but that's because it moves slowly thanks to the excellent tension.

    STICKMAN: What's the tone like on this film, is it a dark comedy like the trailer suggests or what.

    LARRY: It's much more a crime thriller than a dark comedy, but there are some darkly comedic moments.

    MADHERO: Who's the highlight out of the 7 mystery men and women? It looks like Dakota Johnson and Chris Hemsworth are having a lot of fun. Any highlights?

    LARRY: Personally, my favorite performance came from Cynthia Erivo. She's a beloved theatre actress just getting her start in this and McQueen's "Widows," but this is a phenomenal debut for her. Personally Hemsworth is also good but for all of the wrong reasons. He is NOT who you expect from the trailers.

    MADHERO: Nice, great to see more of an unknown shine through. Any final thoughts?


    LARRY: Go see it, it's excellent storytelling done with studio backing. More films like this deserve to be treated this way, and if Goddard just kept doing this forever, I wouldn't even be mad.


    MADHERO: Alright, we may have 2 reviews, but there's even more movies coming out. I hope you're ready, because its October so things are about to get a little.... spooky.

    STICKMAN: Yeyeyeyeye

    LARRY: Ooh BOI

    MADHERO: Great to see you guys hyped for Goosebumps 2. But I guess we'll take a look at this other appropriate release first



    DIRECTOR: David Gordon Green (Our Brand is Crisis, Stronger)

    STARRING: Jamie Lee Curtis, Judy Greer, Andi Matichak, Will Patton, Nick Castle

    SYNOPSIS: Laurie Strode (Curtis) comes to her final confrontation with Michael Myers (Castle), the masked figure who has haunted her since she narrowly escaped his killing spree on Halloween night four decades ago.

    STICKMAN: Yeaahh bOOOIIIi. I don't even know why I'm excited cuz I don't hold the original up that highly but I'm exciiiited.

    MADHERO: Michael Myers is back, but more importantly, Jamie Lee Curtis is fucking pissed.

    LARRY: I keep seeing the long-take trailer for this before movies and I never get tired of it.

    STICKMAN: Jamie Lee Curtis is the real Halloween. She's gonna fuckin murder everyone.

    MADHERO: That would be a twist worthy of the sequels. Luckily this is a clean slate. No getting his ass kicked by Busta Rhymes, no occult shit, no origin story. Just some straight slasher goodness

    STICKMAN: Who knew the world would be excited for a Halloween sequel in 2018, but here we are. This is gonna make all the moneys.

    LARRY: Well, when you retcon the canon....

    STICKMAN: You can never retcon Halloween 3. NEVER.

    MADHERO: Maybe when the Myers saga receives proper closure, we can finally get the Halloween 3 sequel we deserve. The Silver Shamrock must live

    STICKMAN: Please Blumhouse, PLEASE.

    LARRY: I totally get these references because I have 100% seen that.

    STICKMAN: Season of the Witch is objectively the best Halloween film Larry. Unless...this one surpasses it? DUN DUN DUUUUN.


    DIRECTOR: Ari Sandel (The DUFF, When We First Met)

    STARRING: Wendi McLendon-Covey, Madison Iseman, Jeremy Ray Taylor, Caleel Harris, Chris Parnell, Ken Jeong

    SYNOPSIS: Two boys (Ray Taylor, Harris) find a manuscript in an abandoned house called "Haunted Halloween." When they open it, they release Slappy who plans to create the Halloween Apocalypse with the help of his Halloween monster allies.

    STICKMAN: Oh dear. The return of the weirdly handsome werewolf.

    LARRY: Jack Black actually agreed to do this. What a world.

    MADHERO: Its weird. Ive heard literally no one talk about this. I guess the lack of Jack Black kinda made no one care, even if they have the chubby kid from IT

    STICKMAN: Jack Black is in the film though. They were trying to keep it a secret for no reason. And then they realised people weren't gonna see it so they were like OH BUT WAIT HE'S HEEERE.

    MADHERO: Yeah. Not in it much, so kinda weird they went that direction. Guess they thought that dummy was the real star

    STICKMAN: And that werewolf. I'd let him bump MY goose, if you know what I mean. Because I sure don't.


    DIRECTOR: George Tilman Jr. (Faster, The Longest Ride)

    STARRING: Amandla Stenberg, Regina Hall, Russell Hornsby, KJ Apa, Issa Rae, Anthony Mackie, Common

    SYNOPSIS: Starr (Stenberg) witnesses the fatal shooting of her childhood best friend Khalil at the hands of a police officer. Now, facing pressure from all sides of the community, Starr must find her voice and stand up for what's right.


    STICKMAN: Time for that IMDB rating to plummet because that's what happens to all socially relevant and challenging RELEASES.

    LARRY: So apparently the black community is not supporting this movie so much anymore because it's "trauma porn."

    STICKMAN: At least they watched it, unlike IMDB.

    MADHERO: Not sure if that applies to everyone. I hadn't heard much in the way of controversy, but I can sorta see why when this film tackles real life and they'd rather wanna see Black Panther.

    LARRY: I'm just interested in seeing it, the cast looks good and the message is important.

    STICKMAN: I'm not particularly interested but if it's  good, then greaaat. I ain't gonna GIVE it HATE. Hhuhu.

    MADHERO: The reviews from critics has been really good, but its IMDB and RT Audience Score is rather low-ish. Probably no campaign going on there. Nope, no siree

    STICKMAN: I'm sure a quick trip to Twitter dot Com will sort this mystery out.

    LARRY: I love having to sift through ridiculous controversy. Can't we movies and like them or not like them.

    STICKMAN: When did they plant the FLAG, LARRY. WHEN.


    DIRECTOR: Jonah Hill (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Sunny Suljij, Lucs Hedges, Katherine Waterston, Gio Galicia

    SYNOPSIS: Stevie (Suljij), a thirteen-year-old in 90s-era LA who spends his summer navigating between his troubled home life and a group of new friends that he meets at a Motor Avenue skate shop.

    STICKMAN: Jonah Hill's wild 2018 continues.

    LARRY: Maniac90s......I tried

    MADHERO: He's been having a pretty good year what with Maniac and now his directorial debut. Always nice to see an actor give that a shot, especially for something that seems personal to his own upbringing somewhat

    STICKMAN: We've come a long way since Superbad.

    LARRY: We really have. He seems to have matured a lot since those days.

    STICKMAN: Jonah Hill has always been weirdly an Oscar favourite despite his feels like a natural progression.

    MADHERO: He had a pretty interesting interview with Michael Cera about that film's legacy and their lives since then. I just kinda hope the A24 logo made from skateboards is in the actual film. Also more PS1 shoutout with my boi Atreus

    STICKMAN: A24 skateboard logo, no doubt soon to be a hipster t-shirt on their online store.


    DIRECTOR: Marielle Heller (The Diary of a Teenage Girl)

    STARRING: Melissa McCarthy, Richard E. Grant, Dolly Wells, Jane Curtin, Ben Falcone

    SYNOPSIS: When Lee Israel (McCarthy) falls out of step with current tastes, she turns her art form to deception.

    MADHERO: No. Haha, Got eeeeeem.

    STICKMAN: This film looks weiiiird.

    MADHERO: Melissa McCarthy in SERIOUS ACTOR mode. Apparently she's really good in it, with some critics buzzing it might get her an Oscar nomination.

    LARRY: I mean, I kinda hope she's good in it. I'd like some antidote to the crap she's been putting out.

    STICKMAN: The real question is does she fall down and make a fat joke at any point.

    MADHERO: She got an Oscar nom for Bridesmaids, so y'know, its happened. I think its nice for her to branch out and do more serious work. Also nice to see charactor actor Richard E. Grant in a bigger role.

    STICKMAN: Richard E Grant is the scenery chewiest actor in the world, but that's kinda fun in the right places, so who knows.

    LARRY: Not wrong. In Logan he really just dug his teeth for the 20 min he got.

    MADHERO: He tends to disappear in some films despite the chewing, but its nice to see him have a bigger part. Also good on McCarthy.

    STICKMAN: I mean. I'm not a fan of her but maybe she can prove me wrong.

    LARRY: If she's good, then I'll give her credit.

    MADHERO: Soon itll be Academy Award Melissa McCarthy and there will be nothing you can do about it.

    STICKMAN: AAAGGHH. This truly is Halloween.


    MADHERO: With that nightmare cast upon your minds, its now time for MOVIE OF THE WEEK! While getting into the real spoops and japes is something for next episode, we've still got some pretty good picks for you, including something spooky to get into the mood.

    STICKMAN: Let's get spooky, bitches.

    LARRY: Not yet, Stix. NEXT episode ya ding.


    MADHERO: What about it, Sticky. Do you have anything truly spoopy to share?


    STICKMAN: WeLLLL my pick isn't a horror film straight up, but it is a violent revenge thriller the likes of which you've probably never seeeen? Sooo? Yeaaah? Now, let's preface that by saying ...YES...revenge thrillers have been done a lot, and no this one doesn't cover new ground broadly speaking, but how it does the tropes, and the way it presents itself? Hoooo boy what an amazing experience. I'm talking about REVENGE, the lazily titled subversion rape revenge thriller that's not an easy watch, but it's a fucking great one all the same. Rapeploitation thrillers are never easy sells, I get that, but this one is a gooden.

    This is a French, female led, written and directed film that gets that nasty detail out of the way pretty quickly and then gets straight down to the revenge, which is what you want. Not only that but it's a truly jaw-dropping visual achievement, which some incredible sound design to boot. Every frame is dripping with style, not to mention blood...a LOT of blood, this film gets real nasty, but generally deservingly so, given the context. If you like your thrillers overloaded with style, oozing with blood and pulsing with violent, snyth-heavy energy? This is the fuckin' film for yoooou.

    LARRY: Damn yo, I didn't even know Rapesploitation was a genre.

    STICKMAN: I mean that's not what people call it, but that's what it generally is. Justifying generally male-gazey rape scenes with ensuing revenge violence.

    MADHERO: Oh Larry, you sweet summer child. Soon enough you'll learn about films I Spit on your Grave and Hatchet

    LARRY: Okay I just didn't know it had a name, geez.

    MADHERO: This film has been on my list for a while. Heard nothing but great things about it honestly.

    STICKMAN: It's one of those films I really wish I'd got to see at the cinema, it's such an amazing experience and it deserves to be seen on the biggest screen you can find.

    LARRY: Yeah sounds epic.

    STICKMAN: There's a lot of dude butts in this film, that's all I'll say in addition. Evil dude butts.

    MADHERO: The worst kind of butts

    LARRY: I'm sure that is a sell for you.

    STICKMAN: Butts are to be treasured, Larry. ALRIGHT WHO'S NEXT

    MADHERO: Alright, i've got something real spooky: A NETFLIX ORIGINAL! MUHAHAHHA! But hey, this one, like Hold the Dark is pretty dang good and anticipated. Sticky and I are both big fans of Indonesian action movies The Raid and Raid 2, and it was gonna be interesting what director Gareth Evans would do next. Would he continue his ass kicking, or would we see something really different to show he's a much more versatile director than expected. As it turns out with Apostle, its the latter.

    Apostle takes things slow with its Victorian horror, which sees Dan Stevens as a former missionary entering a remote cult who have kidnapped his sister. The first half is very Wicker Man (the one one, not the Cage one) and the horror comes from a more psychological angle, and then it gets quite bloody in the 2nd half.  Its a tad slow, but the atmosphere sucks you in and once it let up, it does not stop.

    STICKMAN: Heeyyy I saw this one tooooo.

    LARRY: I didn't. So, I'mma just dive in a hole real quick.

    MADHERO: Larry, you can't. Tis the season. I'm not sure its quite the right Halloween movie, but it does deliver on the creepy atmosphere if you want to go that route.

    LARRY: It's like...human mutilation, right? The trailer looked to be really unsettling.

    STICKMAN: Gareth Evans proved with The Raid 2 that he was more than just an action director (even if he is a bloody amazing one) and to see his take on horror? It's pretty amazing. I wish it'd been a bit faster paced, but that last 30 minutes is fucking insane.

    MADHERO: Yeah, this film gets pretty nasty at points, and oh god that last half hour

    LARRY: Yeah I don't really lovvvvve nasty.

    STICKMAN: But Larry it builds up to it pretty nicely. But if you're not into mutilation in films maybe don't watch this film. Cuz...hoooooo.

    LARRY: Yeah, exactly. So, pass from me.

    MADHERO: Well Larry, what do you love then? What's your Movie of the Week?

    LARRY: My film is ALSO a Netflix release, in partnership with Annapurna, but it actually ISN'T available yet and won't be until November. I was lucky enough to get tickets to see "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" as part of the 56th New York Film Festival! Directed by the Coen Brothers, "Scruggs" is a wonderful Western anthology with a distinct attention to period detail and an eclectic cast of top-notch performers.

    It tells six frontier tales, and while they vary on narrative strength and pacing, each one provides a unique experience. Whether it be singing cowboys or morbid stagecoaches, the film never stops being engaging, with moments ranging from sardonically hysterical to emotionally powerful. Perhaps it would have been a bit more consumable episodically (it does run a bit long), but there is value to be found in its entirety and the similar motifs found through every story. Whether you catch it on the big screen or via Netflix, I thoroughly recommend this one. It's hard to go wrong for a Western when you have one of the few modern directors who understand the genre.

    MADHERO: O hey, I can't see this one yet cause I don't live in New Yawk

    STICKMAN: I don't get the pizza or the films. What a jib.

    MADHERO: I ain't walkin there. Anyway pretty neat to hear that its good. Do you notice that it was originally supposed to be a show?

    LARRY: Apparently that's a false rumor. In an interview with the Coens, they said that they never really ever solidified what the format would be. That being announced was a result of them partnering with Netflix. But they said them doing it in a movie version was never something they were forced into, it was always something they imagined.

    MADHERO: Yeah, I don't buy that one bit that this wasn't supposed to be a series originally when that was announced, but hey, if it got us a good movie, then I guess its ok for them to be LIARS!

    STICKMAN: So Larry, as someone who finds Westerns generally quite boring, will this entertain meeee?

    LARRY: ...I mean, they certainly work well together as six stories in one anthology. There are very similar motifs in all six. But...yeah, it does run long and is perhaps better for some if consumed one by one.

    MADHERO: Its almost like it was a series at one point

    STICKMAN: Oh shit. What a ballad this has been.

    LARRY: lol aight Mad To be very honest, this is a true blue Western, so if you don't enjoy the genre, I'm not sure you'll like it. Each one is based on a Western subgenre, tho they all sorta genrebend a tad.

    STICKMAN: But is there any HORROR!?

    LARRY: One is more comedic, one is a musical, one is indeed a horror/Twilight Zone-esque one. It's a really eclectic mix.

    STICKMAN: So many things.

    LARRY: But it won't be for everyone, it stays true to Western conventions. Lots of gunslinging and such.

    STICKMAN: Coming out just in time for the post-Red Dead Redemption 2 release blues.

    MADHERO: Guess we'll find out when people can actually see it and not just the liberal New York elite.

    LARRY: Shrug. That's me.


    MADHERO: Alright, that about wraps it. Get ready for next time as we truly enter the BONE ZONE with some truly demonic depictions of cinema. The terrifying trailers will come and get you. I am of course talking about future ho

  • CRF Revival

    1 week ago


    Ever since the later 3rd of this year, I've decided to bbring back a trend that I started back in 2011 (my post-grad year) known as CRF (which stands for Camp Revolutional Freakshow) & do even more with it than I did 7 years ago & aside from Bam Margera's CKY crew being an inspiration for this (through Viva La Bam) I've been thinking about not only adding my interest in Jackass, Smosh & Rooster Teeth into it but also other things I'm into from different forms of music to the kinds of comic books, videogames, tv shows & movies that I've come to know & enjoy over the years & aside from that there's the friendship part of it that I want to grow more of in terms if where I live which is west of Calgary (between it & Brooks) by coming across people around my age who are into some or most of the things that I'm into & even find true love along the way (through a blonde woman whp's accepting of me) as well & for next year, that's what I plan to do more of as I continue to set-up for CRF's return for the remainder of 2018 in a way that I feel is right & positive (not only for myself but for those who want to be a part of it) & correct for me & the future that I've envisioned for myself without looking back on any form of bad past memories.

  • 8 or Higher, Bro! (September 2018)

    2 weeks ago


    Another month has come and gone, which means it's once again time for me to post another IMDb list! This is certainly a modest selection with only two films and three TV shows, but there's still some really great stuff here. Also, for the second month in a row, this list contains an RT thing! YAY!

    Go read the thing!...

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 118

    2 weeks ago



    MADHERO: Well, folks. This is it. The long-awaited awaited film that will finally ask the important questions. Questions like: Is Zendaya Meechee? Is LeBron James Gwangi? But most important, how goopy is dat boi Venom and how far do his turds go in the wind? Oh, and something about an possible Best Picture nominee, but ehhhh

    LARRY: You really never know what will break into the meme sphere.

    STICKMAN: I don't want to think about Venom's goopy, airborn turds but here we are now. Thinking about it. In graphic detail.

    LARRY: Which kind of turd are you? Goopy Venom turd? Channing Tatum Yeti turd? Best Picture nominee turd? A BuzzFeed quiz waiting to happen.

    STICKMAN: I'm just a piece of shit.

    MADHERO: Its either that or his gross phallic tongue. I'm sure we'll talk all sorts of turds, but lets focus on our new turds.

    LARRY: Good shit. Cuz turds




    Last time we checked on the James Bond franchise, it's 25th entry was left in limbo after previous director Danny Boyle dropped the project due to the good ol' CD, creative differences. But, don't fret, because the film is now back in line to begin filming in March for a February 2020 release date., breaking its long streak of opening on October/November (since GoldenEye in 1995). But the BIG news is that acclaimed director Cary Joji Fukunaga will be replacing Boyle, which makes him the first American-born director EVER to tackle a 007 adventure!! Hooray for further distancing Bond from its British roots!!!!!!!!!!

    Anyway, you may know Fukunaga from his film "Beasts of No Nation," which was nominated for a Golden Globe, or his television work on the first seasons of "True Detective" and, most recently, "Maniac." Maniac in particular has been getting a lot of buzz for being very, VERY weird, so it'll be interesting to see how his style translates to the Bond format. Either way, I'm always down for a shake-up, especially with a franchise like Bond which is  c e r t a i n l y  in need of one.

    STICKMAN: Well, this is a surprise, but if Maniac did anything, it was show us how versatile a director this DUDE is.

    LARRY: Maniac is so fucking weird

    MADHERO: If Maniac is any indication, we can look forward to Bond going into some WILD directions. Also gonna at least one great tracking shot moment, like the one good thing in Spectre.

    STICKMAN: As long as it has autonomous poop robots.

    MADHERO: I think that he's such a surprising choice not only cause he's the first American, but also cause he's not exactly known for being a yes man. He famously left the IT reboot and left True Detective Season 2 as well

    STICKMAN: A tried and true safe pair of hands this ain't, which could prove great...if he sticks around. If he don't, I guess we'll just chuck Bond in the bin, I dunno.

    LARRY: I dunno, just feels odd that he's gonna helm the last Craig feature as opposed to genuinely starting his own thing and really starting fresh.

    STICKMAN: That'd be the same for any director Larrrry. Danny Boyle, if anything, was an even weirder choice, but he was a prominent British director so I guess it wasn't completely out of left field.

    LARRY: I know, but Fukunaga especially who clearly is gonna shake things up. I'd call Fukunaga a much weirder choice.

    MADHERO: They can't really afford to lose another director after the Boyle exit, but hey, they've already delayed it now.

    STICKMAN: There's one episode in Maniac which visually exuded a style not that different from the previous two, so maybe he's gonna be more by the book than you think. Maybe.

    MADHERO: I do think he's one hell of a great choice. Maniac is of course his most recent work, but with Beasts of No Nation and True Detective, he's shown to be one hell of a director, so I'm very curious how that translates to something as huge as Bond. I'm really stoked with this choice, more so than Boyle honestly

    STICKMAN: I'm a Boyle boy, so I guess anything else is gonna be disappointing, but I'm curious to see how this film turns out, given the messy road to production.

    LARRY: Yeah he's a great choice overall, here's hoping all goes smoothly. Perhaps he can let Craig go out with a bang.


    Last episode we talked about the first look images from Marvel's next release, and it's first female led production, Captain Marvel. Those images came with the announcement of the first trailer's impending release...and well, now we have that trailer. Although vague (As first trailers often are) on the overall story of the film, we certainly got quite a good look at Brie Larson in the titular role. Introduced as a cosmic hero who arrives on earth and starts to question her own identity. There's a sense that she has a lost past which will be discovered over the course of the story...all the while those pesky Skrulls will be about, one supposes.

    Beyond an already iconic granny punch and the inclusion of a Blockbuster, the trailer didn’t really do much than show hero shots of Captain Marvel and tease a lot of the supporting cast, including a de-aged 90s Nick Fury and space-Jude Law. Although it was far from bad, I found the trailer to be a little disappointing, particularly given the calibre of teasers/trailers for MCU films in the past couple years. Thor Ragnarok, Black Panther, Infinity War, hell…even Ant-Man & The Wasp all delivered ones with more personality, this came across as pretty generic. STILL….early days yet, sure the film will turn out a gooden.

    MADHERO: I'm here for Carol Danvers: Puncher of Grandmas

    STICKMAN: They had it coming.

    LARRY: Oy, that sure must be weird for those unaware of the lore. Not a lot of Skrull in this trailer. Whoever edited that moment must be so happy with themselves.

    STICKMAN: That's what all the analysis articles and videos on the internet are for. WHO did Captain Marvel PUNCH!? Red circle around fist. Exclamation marks.

    MADHERO: Not that you know of at least. For all we know everyone in the trailer is a Skrull.

    STICKMAN: For all I know, YOU'RE a Skrull.

    MADHERO: Oh fuck.....uh yeah, so this trailer didnt really do it for me besides the afformentioned grandma punching. I dunno, its fine, but I felt it lacked a certain "O I gotta see this now" moment

    STICKMAN: Same here. I have no doubt the film will turn out well but this wasn't particularly exciting.

    LARRY: I mean...I'm not like meh about it, I like the trailer. It's not one of their best but the moment when you get a glimpse of the suit with helmet really got me by surprise. Also, MORE GLOWY EYES

    MADHERO: I actually do like the amnesia angle they're going for. Something tells me the Skrulls are going to be a bit more complicated than just being enemies of the Kree and the Kree are probably going to be complete dicks and Jude Law the villain.

    STICKMAN: I think the Captain Marvel in the trailer is a Skrull and it's all a big TWIST. That's why they have confused memmoriiess.

    LARRY: Yeah Jude Law aka Villain McVillainVillain looks so evil.

    MADHERO: Y'know, that wouldn't surprise if that was true, but I'm gonna for now stick to Team Human.

    STICKMAN: Team Green always. Gotta go with what you know.



    Another day, another bunch of comic book movies in development on both sides of the Marvel/DC spectrum. While Marvel has kept their cards close to their chest as to what is in development after Avengers 4, we can add The Eternals to the list, with Chloe Zhao (The Rider) attached to direct. Zhao broke through with 2017's The Rider, considered by critics one of the best films of the year, and follows a similar trajectory to the likes of Taika Waititi. As for who the Eternals are, we have to dive into Jack Kirby cosmic territory, but they're essentially proto-humans experimented on by the ancient Celestials, and its probably important to note that Thanos is descended from them. This movie will apparently focus on the romance between Ikaris and Sersi, who I don't know anything about, but Marvel has managed to introduce the Guardians of the Galaxy to the mainstream, so we'll see how this goes.

    Of the million projects in development at DC, we know at least one that's officially happening: Birds of Prey, which has received a February 2020 release date and will be directed by Cathy Yan. Birds of Prey is much easier to explain: a group of superheroines. The film will largely focus on Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn (who's also producing), with her being joined by Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Huntress and Jurney Smollet-Bell as Black Canary (Bell is bi-racial, so expect a lot of not very fun comments there). Other members, reported to be Renee Montoya and Cassandra Cain, have not been cast yet. All in all, a lot happening in the world of superheroes, and its interesting to see two Asian women from indie backgrounds getting such a big opportunity.

    LARRY: I got a taste of "The Rider" a week or so ago, and if that's the mind at work for Eternals, I'm all in. From what I saw, she's definitely got chops.

    STICKMAN: I wish it was The Ghost Rider.

    MADHERO: Ah, then you're way more informed than I am, cause I haven't seen it.

    STICKMAN: I think mainly I'm just....wondering why we have at least one new DC film update to talk about every day. Like...what's going on over there. Chaos reigns.

    MADHERO: Like many, I have no real idea who The Eternals are, and their origin, being a part of Jack Kirby's cosmic stint, always feel like they're made for a very specific niche, and they aren't exactly popular. But the same was also the case with the GOTG

    STICKMAN: I'm down for more crazy cosmic MCU stuff...I just wish there wasn't a big cosmic elephant in the room right now when it came to that branch of the series.

    LARRY: Well they are still using his script, so the plan for all Cosmic stuff hasn't changed. Still tho, yeah, weird to see all of these developments.

    MADHERO: Yeaaaaaaahhhhh. On the DC end, I am curious about Birds of Prey even if its status as a Suicide Squad spin-off makes me gag, but Yan is supposed  to be an interesting upcoming director and an all female group of superheroines is not something we've really seen yet.

    STICKMAN: I'm sure the DCEU will find a way to waste all that diversity and talent on another shitty movie nobody wanted but people will viciously defend to the ends of the earth. If we even have a DCEU  any more, like...jeez. What a mess.

    LARRY: At least the casting is solid. Above all else in this ridiculous news cycle.

    STICKMAN: I wasn't a fan of Harley Quinn in Suicide Squad but then I wasn't a fan of any of Suicide Squad.

    MADHERO: I'm hoping that the interesting new releases of Shazam and Joker are at least an sign that they're doing something different from what we got before.

    LARRY: Yeah the Joker movie definitely looks to be adding in some new aesthetic elements. Which, I for one, am a fan of.

    MADHERO: I will just say that its great to see 2 big superhero movies being handled by 2 Asian women from independent backgrounds. That wouldn't be a thing 5 years ago, so good on both for progress.

    LARRY: Yeah that's always good. It's good for them to be getting these opportunities period.

    STICKMAN: Diversity is great, always good to see, now let's make the movies good too. I'm talking to YOU, DC.


    So, in Fox's desperate attempts to wring out as much cash out of the X-Men as they can before they become a part of the MCU, we have a few more mutant movies to look forward to, and the one first one on the docket is Dark Phoenix. Based on the "Dark Phoenix Saga" in the X-Men comics. the story revolves around young Jean Grey's (Sophie Turner) transformation into the ultimately powerful Phoenix. And, of course, the X-Men can't handle her UNLIMITED COSMIC POWER and Magneto is there fucking shit up. Oh, and also Jessica Chastain. Neat.

    It kinda looks like every other X-Men movie as of late. Edgy music, cinematic shots, lots of familiar faces and ambiguous "we're in danger" dialogue. It's interesting to see Xavier now genuinely taking blame for something in this god damn universe, and you can't go wrong with Michael Fassbender as Magneto. As long as we keep the timey-wimey crazy shit out of the picture, maybe this'll let me turn off my brain for a bit. Either way, looks like we'll have to wait a little while longer than the trailer says, because news just recently broke that the film is actually being pushed from February 14th to June 7th. That makes this the second time the film has been pushed, so...yeah, not the best news to coincide with a trailer launch. Aw well.

    MADHERO: The trailer having its release date on February 14 and then having it changed 2 days later shows that things are going very well at Fox

    LARRY: Oh, clearly. All for a PG-13 re-release of a famously-known-for-being-R franchise.

    STICKMAN: They really have their finger on the pulse

    MADHERO: Well Battle Angel had to move otherwise it'd be killed in the Christmas slaughter. Dark Phoenix is one of the most famous arcs in comics history. The way Last Stand handled it was.....oof. The trailer did very very little for me though

    LARRY: Yeah THIS is one trailer I am very meh about. For all of the Phoenix shit this trailer totes around and we see very little of it.

    STICKMAN: I've never been a fan of the standard X-Men series, with the exception of First Class. This one looks very similar to the previous two, neither of which I liked...sooooo... I want to see The New Mutants but that's increasingly becoming the carrot on the end of a stick that keeps being dangled further away until you just KNOW it'll be a huge mess.

    MADHERO: As good as Fassbender is, I am kinda tired of his Magneto, or rather how he's always used as a villain, which is what he is, but after doing that for 3 films its very tiring. Maybe the trailer is bamboozling us, but I doubt it

    LARRY: Well when the producer of those films directs one of his own, it's bound to feel a bit reminiscent.

    STICKMAN: At least it's not Bryan Singer, right?

    MADHERO: Well if stories are to be believed, Apocalypse wasn't much of Singer either. For what is undoubtedly the end of this version of the X-Men and something I've been a fan of, it feels weird to feel so meh towards this trailers

    LARRY: Yeah, I am a fan of McAvoy and Fassbender together so it'll be bittersweet to end it. At the same time, yeah, it looks kinda pants.

    STICKMAN: This does feel like the awkward unplanned final outing that nobody really cares about. Can't wait for Take 3 on the WACKY SLOW MOTION QUICKSILVER SCENE.



    Back in 2015, the thought of further sequels to Kingsman: The Secret Service would have sent joy straight to the hearts of many a filmgoer. The campy, fun and violent take on classic Bond was a hit, and hopes for the 2017 sequel were high....emphasis on WERE. It's since come out, and is generally considered to be pretty disappointing, and a step too far in the direction of most of the things people didn't like about the original film, in addition to a gratuitous Elton John role. STILL, it made a decent sum of money, and a sequel was quickly put into production. Now we know just when said sequel will arrive, and it's in a very familiar release spot.

    We know next to nothing about Kingsman 3 at this point, and it's not set to enter filming until January 2019...but Fox have set the release in place for November 9th of that same year, which as you'll recall, was the original sequel spot for the franchises inspiration, James Bond. Like I said, if you'd asked me in 2015 or anytime before seeing Kingsman 2? I'd be thrilled. As it stands, I really couldn't give a toss about Kingsman 3...but for those who do, you don't have long to wait really

    MADHERO: Gotta say that its quite cheeky of them to take the Bond date. Of course with Fox these days you don't know if they'll actually keep it

    STICKMAN: It'll be delayed at least 4 more times.

    LARRY: I find it hysterical that it took the Bond slot. That’s literally parody becoming real life. Maybe it’ll convince them how to make a better third instalment.

    MADHERO: I'd feel way more excited about this if The Golden Circle wasn't a thing, which basically felt like the first film but of lesser quality and way too long.

    LARRY: Personally I didn’t mind The Golden Circle, I thought it was fine. But it definitely lacks the panache the first one had. And it honestly doesn’t leave a lot of momentum for a third.

    STICKMAN: It was more awkward than funny for me, but at least it wasn't as bad as Kick Ass 2.

    MADHERO: There's some fun moments there, but GC felt more disappointing cause it was directed by Vaughn himself, who hadn't really had a dud up to that point.

    STICKMAN: Why was Elton John there. So so much.

    LARRY: You could ask the same thing about every character. What was Julianne Moore doing there? What was Jeff Bridges doing there?

    STICKMAN: Eating a burger. Being drunk.

    MADHERO: Well she was fun as the villain. Moving on from Golden Circle dunking, there's a current rumor that this film will be a prequel in WW1 starring Ralph Fiennes. I feel like that might sound very un-Kingsman, which is rather over the top, but I dunno, would be something different at least.

    STICKMAN: Ralph Fiennes is an underrated comedy actor.

    LARRY: Um............what. Where the hell did THAT rumor start? I do like Fiennes very much, I’ll admit, but that sounds so out of left field.

    MADHERO: The Daily Mail, so don't take it too seriously, but y'know, could be interesting, but we'll probably hear more soon. Lets hope for the best



    Dread it, run from it, but the Monstars still arrive. Its been god knows how long since we've been threatened with the return of Space Jam, always with Lebron James attached as the one to replace Michael Jordan's role. Its been on and off again, but now, its definitely on, with the news that none other than Black Panther director Ryan Coogler is going to be producing the film, with Terence Nance, best known for his absurdist comedy show Random Acts of Flyness in the directing seat, with plans to start filming in the 2019 off-season, with a 2020 release. Word is also suggesting that will be a reboot, not a sequel to the original, which sort of makes sense in that Space Jam is almost 22 years old now, but with the rise of legacy sequels, seems a weird move, but oh well.

    This whole thing continues to feel rather strange, especially now that its really moving forward. I have some nostalgia for Space Jam, but that's cause I was a 90's kid and didn't know much better, because its not that great a film. Still, you have to admire this sequel/reboot's attempt to get young African American talent involved (Nance was 13/14, Coogler 9 and James 11 when Space Jam came out). Will it be any good? I honestly don't know, but I'm at the very least curious

    STICKMAN: Hey Dee Jaaayy

    LARRY: Welcome to the jam.

    MADHERO: If a remake of that song doesn't happen, its not worth doing.

    STICKMAN: I want like, a massive remake collaboration song. Like LiveAid but bigger. The biggest musical event in history.

    MADHERO: But yeah, I guess its now happening for realsies. Its felt somewhat innevitable with how much its been talked about, but its still pretty wild. Also funny to hear Lebron speak about the original with such reverance.

    LARRY: I’m sure it inspired some kids, no question.

    STICKMAN: Space Jam...was garbage. Sorry. Like, I enjoyed it as a kid but it was an adaptation of an advert...loaded with product placements....very little narrative....awkward cameos. What were we smoking in the 90s.

    LARRY: Sticky, nobody is arguing with you. Embrace the bad.

    STICKMAN: Is that the tagline for Venom.

    MADHERO: Well like I mentioned, the people involved were kids when it came out. And I do think they've got some interesting talent involved. Mind you, its still Space Jam.

    LARRY: It’s most likely gonna just pay homage to the wackiness of the first but maybe a twinge more depth. It is Coogler after all.

    STICKMAN: It's either going to be a massive box office disaster that destroys Warner Bros, or a cultural milestone in cinema. There will be no inbetween.


    MADHERO: Alright, I think we've delayed talking about it long enough. The moment we've waited for for so long to the point that we're all just dried up turds fluttering in the wind has arrived. Its time.... to finally see Robert Redford's supposed last performance in a film ever. That, or watch dat goopy boi and his penis tongue.

    STICKMAN: Are we takling about VENnnnOoooONUMmm? Like Eminem would say.

    MADHERO: I guess its time to let the devil in. He's going knock knock. Unleash your inner anti-hero, kids, and make sure not to frighten your mom too much.

    STICKMAN: Edgy PG-13 shit is the best.

    LARRY: Their Mom doesn’t even know what Venom is so whatever



    DIRECTOR: Ruben Fleischer (30 Minutes or Less, Gangster Squad)

    STARRING: Tom Hardy, Michelle Williams, Riz Ahmed, Jenny Slete, Scott Haze

    SYNOPSIS: Following a scandal, journalist Eddie Brock (Hardy_ attempts to revive his career by investigating the Life Foundation, but comes into contact with an alien symbiote that bonds with Brock, giving him superpowers as long as they share the same body.

    LARRY: AAAAAAHHHHHH/ Oh right this looks like garbage.

    MADHERO: This movie is coming out in less than a week and I still have a hard time believing its real.

    STICKMAN: I feel like it's a figment of my imagination. A goopy wet dream.

    LARRY: You’ll believe it when his goopy tongue is down your throat.

    STICKMAN: Larry, please. I'm already horny.

    MADHERO: My penis can only get this erect. Anyway yeah, its a thing, its not connected to Spider-Man, and its marketing feels like its from the mid 2000's.

    LARRY: EARLY 2000's really.

    STICKMAN: At least he looks good? Like....Spider-Man 3  Venom...ooyy...

    MADHERO: You can feel the Evenesance flowing from it. And I'd judge that harder if this wouldn't be absolutely my shit a decade ago.

    STICKMAN: I would've been queuing up to see this when I was 14. I was the kinda kid who got excited about Shadow of the Hedgehog.

    MADHERO: YO, SAME! SHOUT-OUT TO SHADOW THE HEDGEHOG! That's honestly what this film reminds me of though. The fact its PG-13 just adds to that

    STICKMAN: It's great, it's SO DARK AND EDGY...but you can bring the whole family! Collectors cups in the lobby, kids. EDGY cups.

    LARRY: So edgy you can't even hold them. It hurts your hand.

    MADHERO: Ow, the Edge. So yeah, this film probably isn't very good. But regardless I'm looking forward to the takes. And hey, maybe it can surprise and actually not be a turd in the wind.

    STICKMAN: Watch it turn out to be amazing. Like it's actually really good  and Venom is a real sexual awakening for society.

    LARRY: There is no. Possible way. This is good.

    STICKMAN: Watch this space, kids.


    DIRECTOR: Bradley Cooper (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Bradley Cooper, Lady Gaga, Sam Elliot, Dave Chappelle, Andrew Dice Clay

    SYNOPSIS: A musician (Cooper) helps a young singer and actress (Lady Gaga) find fame, even as age and alcoholism send his own career into a downward spiral.

    LARRY: Bleh.

    MADHERO: O dang, Larry. Prepping your hot take for a probably Best picture nominee already?

    STICKMAN: This is not a film that interests me personally. But hey ho, look at those reviews though. Shows what I know.

    LARRY: I'm just genuinely surprised this gained traction, it's a remake of a film that's been remade 5 times. Suddenly we slap on Bradley Cooper and "don't look at me I'm ugly" Lady Gaga and it's a hit.

    MADHERO: Personally the film doesn't interest me in terms of genre, but hey, if its good, its good. And its pretty impressive that this is Cooper's first director gig. And hey, at least the soundtrack is probably gonna be good.

    STICKMAN: I'll put this out there right now...if this is indeed the Oscar frontrunner already? Gonna be really disappointed if it wins. I'm sure it's good...but as a best film of the year it just seems kinda...boooring?

    LARRY: If it's good, I'm all for it being good? Just seems like a very safe film to be the race's frontrunner.

    MADHERO: I feel its probably the Best Picture nominee that'll generate the most hot takes, like with La La Land and Three Billboards beforehand.

    STICKMAN: Let's not bring up La La Land, the only musical I like more than Larry.

    LARRY: This will NOT bring up hot takes.


    DIRECTOR: Malcolm D. Lee (Barbershop: the Next Cut, Girls Trip)

    STARRING: Kevin Hart, Tiffany Haddish, Rob Riggle, Yvonne Orji, Ben Schwartz

    SYNOPSIS: A group of troublemakers (Hart, Riggle etc.) are forced to attend night school in hope that they'll pass the GED exam to finish high school.

    STICKMAN: Oh. We're gonna be that way huh.

    MADHERO: O look, there's Kevin Hart playing an loud idiot again. What a stretch.

    LARRY: Would you believe me if I said I saw this...

    MADHERO: Hwhat. And we didn't even bother to ask so we could potentially review? Dang. Anyway how was it?

    LARRY: There's a reason we aren't reviewing it. It's bad.

    STICKMAN: HOOWW BADD IIIS IIT? Youtube keeps forcing me to watch it and I almost kinda miss Baby Shark at this point.

    MADHERO: O dang. Gotta say that the trailer didn't really do it for me.

    LARRY: It's just not terribly funny, and it's not a well-made film.

    MADHERO: Kind of a shame when you got people like Hart and Haddish, who can be really funny if used proper. Oh well, another forgettable comedy to add to the pile

    LARRY: To be fair, they have their moments, and the cast as a whole have talent. It's the writing and story that is garbage.

    STICKMAN: It's like they said, you need a lot of Hart, but you also need a big Johnson. Without that Johnson, it doesn't work.


    DIRECTOR: Karey Kirkpatrick (Over the Hedge, Imagine That)

    STARRING: Channing Tatum, James Corden, Zendaya, Common, Lebron James, Gina Rodriguez, Danny DeVito

    SYNOPSIS: Migo (Tatum) is a Yeti who is convinced that the elusive creature known as the "Smallfoot" really does exist where he encounters a former TV personality (Corden)

    STICKMAN: Quentin Tarantino's favourite animated movie.

    LARRY: Ugh, thank god, something harmless.

    MADHERO: Zendaya is Meechee

    STICKMAN: She sure is.

    MADHERO:I feel that had to be mentioned, but we also mustn't forget that LeBron James is Gwangi

    STICKMAN: Does he shoot some B-ball? Warner Bros Animation seems to be the adequacy factory. Cranking out 'eh' after 'eh' when it comes to their non LEGO cinematic output.

    LARRY: To be fair, they've made two non-LEGO movies. And one was Storks. So like, give em a few years to really show what they're made of.

    MADHERO: Probably. Maybe he does with Danny DeVito, who is Dorgle.

    STICKMAN: Why do you know all their names, Madthanhew. Are you secretly into feet, by which I mean Smallfoot of course.

    MADHERO: Yes, I can't stop thinking about it, like how Common is Stone Keeper. But yeah, another adequate WB Animation movie that will be mostly remembered for a silly internet song

    LARRY: What a strange fucking meme.

    STICKMAN: Needs more VENNOooOmmMM.

    MADHERO: In these times of hardships, its important to remember that yes, Zendaya is 



    DIRECTOR: Gregory Plotkin (Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension)

    STARRING: Amy Forsyth, Reign Edwards, Bex Taylor-Klaus, Tony Todd

    SYNOPSIS: A masked serial killer turns a horror themed amusement park into his own personal playground, terrorizing a group of friends while the rest of the patrons believe that it is all part of the show.


    LARRY: ...yeah, sure.

    MADHERO: Now you know that its October, because all the spoopy films are coming out the woodworks. Or at least attempted spoops

    STICKMAN: Great idea for a horror film, set it in a big colourful halloween spoopy event. Surprised it took this long to's bad I guess. Oops.

    MADHERO: I feel like maybe if it had taken a more comedic angle or gone full Final Destination, it might've been better. As it stands, it just feels like a standard slasher with an interesting backdrop

    STICKMAN: That's basically it. All style and no substance. You can have all the fun areas and costumes in the world but if you make a generic slasher you make a generic slasshherrrr.

    LARRY: I hope it enjoys it's one week of box office until Venom sucks the life out of it.

    STICKMAN: It's already tanked, Larry. It's dead.

    MADHERO: It was probably cheap, so it can probably get a few muns out of it, but a hit this ain't.

    LARRY: Yeah cost 5 million so it's already made its money back.

    STICKMAN: I'd rather see Hell Fest than  The Nun in the battle of the 2018 mediocre horror films. Buuuut I'll wait for Michael Myers.

    LARRY: ...why must we even choose?

    MADHERO: Micheal Myers seems like the best option here.


    DIRECTOR: David Lowery (Pete’s Dragon, A Ghost Story)

    STARRING: Robert Redford, Casey Affleck, Sissy Spacek, Danny Glover, Tika Sumpter, Tom Waits, Elizabeth Moss, John David Washington

    SYNOPSIS: Based on the true story of Forrest Tucker (Redford)and his audacious escape from San Quentin at the age of 70 to an unprecedented string of heists that confounded authorities and enchanted the public.

    STICKMAN: There he is. With his gun. Hail Hydra.

    LARRY: Robert Redford is, indeed, an old man. Now, with a gun. Solid title.

    MADHERO: Looks damn good for a guy in his 80's though. Anyway this looks like a fun ride, and if it really is Redford's last role, it seems like a good one to go out on

    LARRY: I don't buy that it's his last, but okay.

    STICKMAN: Actors retire all the time and then come back to win an Oscar. Or present one at the least.

    MADHERO: Redford has said before he'll retire, so take it with a pinch of salt. Even without that angle, it still looks like a fun time

    STICKMAN: It looks fine. Not my bag I guess.

    LARRY: Yeah my friend saw it and she liked it.

    STICKMAN: Meanwhile you went to Night School. You Night FOOL.


    MADHERO: O dang. With that burn, I think it might be time to move on to MOVIE OF THE WEEK! And I hope you're ready for some classic Stickman's hipster bullshit, cause we've got that in spades this week.

    STICKMAN: Its that time of year. Like Christmas and post-Christmas depression, it always sneaks up on you.

    LARRY: Ouch.

    MADHERO: It comes when you least expect it. We might as well talk about it now. So Sticky, what did you see at Bristol's animated short festival Encounters this year that really stood out and how can the commoners see it?


    STICKMAN: you say, I once again popped on down to the Encounters Short Film Festival, checked out some animated shorts but ALSO some VR shorts. I'm gonna focus on animation though, and offer two, one you can watch right now, the other I can't even find anything about on the internet. YIPPEEE. First up we have 'S He', which is a real doozy. It's about stop motion shoes.... in a hellish dystopian society where male shoes rule over everything and female shoes are kept in captivity to breed more shoes, the female ones of which get forcibly converted to male shoes at birth. Whilst the idea of stop motion shoes sounds pretty wacky and fun, it's also pretty dark and disturbing. Baby mutilation is still baby mutilation in the shoe world after all. I couldn't find anything about this film online, but apparently a feature adaptation does this space

    The other...which was showing at Encounters but I didn't technically see it there initially, is 'One Small Step'. This is a far more mainstream, polished film that replicates a 2D art style using CGI, following a young girl and her shoemaker father as they both grow up, the girl aspiring to be an astronaut, the father wanting to support her the best he can. It's very sweet and fun, but it goes to some very dark places, it's definitely not afraid to deal with the harsh realities of life at the same time as offering sentimental catharsis. You can watch that short RIGHT NOW because they put it online. HOW NICE.

    MADHERO: I can't believe the shoe getting murdered sequence in Roger Rabbit finally got a sequel

    LARRY: Twas truly a sign that we all missed.

    STICKMAN: Oh man this is like the Antichrist of animated shoe films when it comes to its violence.

    LARRY: How is the film entitled "One Small Step" NOT the shoe movie??

    MADHERO: Put that on the poster. Once again, i can contribute nothing to all of this  cause I can't see it, but its nice that One Small Step is already available

    STICKMAN: One Small Step is on the early list of eligable Oscar nominees, and I can see it going all the way to the this isn't the last time we hear about it, mmmm?

    LARRY: That's awesome. I'm looking forward to watching it.

    STICKMAN: It's a real sweet film. It's a shame S He doesn't seem to exist outside of the fever dream that is an international short film festival programme.

    MADHERO: Before you do that, what's your Movie of the Week, Larry? I'm gonna take a gander and say it isn't Night School

    LARRY: No, it ain't. My MOTW is a surefire classic that is hitting Netflix this week, just in time for the spoopy October season. It's The Shining, one of Stanley Kubrick's many legendary films and probably one of my favourites.

    The funny thing about this film is that, while it obvious sports the tension and mystery of a horror thriller, it also has many comedic elements to it, specifically Jack Nicholson's performance. Nicholson's slow descend into utter madness really puts me off through its hilarity. After all, laughter is a coping mechanism for fear, and so I feel like this is a detail that many people overlook. Nicholson's iconic lines and crazy facial expressions help a viewer cope with the crazy shit going on around them. However, this never fully encapsulates it, for the last fifteen minutes drop all the jokes and just go for straight up disturbing, which it provides with flying colors. I always love popping this on every year, and will continue to do so for a long while.

    STICKMAN: Com pway with us Danny oWo

    MADHERO: Ehh, I'll just watch the Ready Player One sequence.

    STICKMAN: The Ready Player One bit was the best part of that film. I gotta say.

    LARRY: Booooooooo. I mean, yes.

    MADHERO: Senor Spielbergo really nailed the look of it, sure. The Shining is a undeniable classic and no movie does unsettling better. That's for sure

    STICKMAN: The Shining feels like something you shouldn't be watching. The atmosphere for almost every scene feels wrong.

    LARRY: When you first get introduced to the Overlook. You feel like you don't belong there. you're intruding.

    STICKMAN: That scene where the guy's getting a blowie from a bear. That feels like I'm intruding too.

    MADHERO: What does it meaaaaaaan, ask the masses, afraid that a man can simply want a blowy from a guy in a bear suit

    STICKMAN: Why they leave the door open though, Mad. WHY.

    LARRY: Welp it does provoke questions.

    STICKMAN: It provokes somethin. It's weird and demented it works. Meanwhile Stephen King would rather the topiary comes to life and the hotel explodes. MASTER OF HORROR. Speaking of blowjobs from bears, what did you pick this week, Mad?

    LARRY: Wow. Probably my favorite segue we've ever done.

    MADHERO: Wow rude. Anyway, my MOTW is also a Netflix release. However, its an NETFLIX ORIGINAL! THE SCARIEST THING OF AAAAALLLLL!!!! Alright but really. I saw Hold the Dark, the newest film from Jeremy Saulnier, who's probably best known for Punks vs. Neo Nazis aka Green Room. Jeffrey Wright plays a retired naturalist who gets a call from a woman (Riley Keough) living in the Alaskan wilderness that her son has been killed by a pack of feral wolves, and she wants him to track them down and kill them. However, it becomes pretty clear that things aren't what they seem, and it all gets more complicated when her Iraq war vet husband (Alexander Skarsgard) comes home.

    What starts as a man vs nature story very quickly turns into an very different noir esque story, and Saulnier really does swing for the fences, and it can often feel like a bit of a mess. However, I do think the movie holds up well all together, thanks to some of the gorgeous cinematography and great acting. Its really nice to see Jeffrey Wright in a lead role again. Its a really bleak film, so its not going to be everyone's cup of tea, and its not as good as Green Room was, but I still give it a recommendation.

    STICKMAN: Bleak is indeed the word for this film.

    MADHERO: O it bleak. But the Alaskan wilderness seems like a pretty depressing place to begin with, like man doesn't belong there.

    LARRY: Fun fact: I have never heard of this film before you posted this so please tell me more.

    STICKMAN: Think Green Room but colder, slower and not involving any bands or neo nazis.

    LARRY: ....okay then that’s not Green Room

    MADHERO: Well like I said, its a man vs nature/arctic thriller that's pretty damn bleak. I'll say I hadn't paid that much attention to it either until I heard it was from the director from Green Room and was coming soon.

    STICKMAN: I only watched it because you told me that. You're a social media influencer.

    LARRY: I liked Green Room, so I’ll definitely check it out.

    MADHERO: I know what's up. You agree with my summary then, Stick? It got a lot weirder than I expected at first

    STICKMAN: It's not the film you expect going in for sure. It's a very bleak and violent...and kinda nihilistic story that doesn't really offer a lot of easy answers to anything, but proves to be an atmospheric and engrossing saga.

    LARRY: Not gonna lie, y’all are convincing me.

    MADHERO; Oh its super absorbing. Watch it on as big a screen you can.

    STICKMAN: Fo' sure. Like...on a cinema scre-Oh wait.


    MADHERO: I guess we gotta see Venom if we want to watch something in the cinema. I think that about wraps it up for episode, but the spooks will undoubtedly continue, with the perilous journey of going to space with Ryan Gosling, or the return of Mike Myers. That's right. Shrek is back.

    STICKMAN: A new Shrek film would be the SCARIEST FILM OF THE YEAR by far.

    LARRY: Damn Sticky, get up with the times.

    STICKMAN: I don't fuckin knooow, I don't watch movies. GOODBYE.

    MADHERO: We're about to endure some Bad Times.... at the El Royale, but also here. Goodbye

    LARRY: Now THATS a cliffhanger. Peace out y’all

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 117

    1 month ago



    MADHERO: Hi everyone. Hope you're ready to talk movies, because after last episode's kinda meh output (as happens on the beginning of September) and suddenly BAM, we've got all kinds of stuff to talk about, from Oscar hopefuls (and not so hopefuls) wacky Eli Roth directed family films, and the long awaited franchise of....Angelina Jolie's Unbroken. Oh, and I guess Predator returns as well.


    MADHERO: THE HYPE STARTS HERE AND NOW FOR....whatever that movie is.

    LARRY: Don’t forget about all those rampant girls with their guns. ‘Murica loves a good violent Purge ripoff

    MADHERO: No idea what you're on about ,but we'll get to that soon enough. But first, the newwwwwws.




    (NOTE: We talked about Captain Marvel before the trailer dropped. We'll be discussing that trailer on a later date)

    So we’re all pretty pumped for Captain Marvel, right? First female-led MCU movie, Brie Larson starring, some 90s action, all great stuff. AND the fandom is probably going to explode when Marvel drops the first official trailer. But for now, we’ll keep gawking at the exclusive photos Entertainment Weekly grabbed through a new spread, giving us our first looks at some of the movie’s sure-to-be highlights! We get to see a young Nick Fury, pre-eyepatch, a pack of Skrulls on the shore, and we got to see the return of Ronan and Korath, previously seen in Guardians of the Galaxy. Given that Captain Marvel is part of a Kree military team called “Starforce,” it makes sense that these characters would be included; maybe we’ll get a hint of backstory as to how Ronan and Korath became the outsiders they were back in Guardians.

    We also got to see Larson is uniform, both as a pilot and as Captain Marvel, but also in a Nine Inch Nails shirt, which is far more important. Besides that, other highlights include Jude Law as Badass McClearlyTheSecretVillain, Ben Mendehlson as SuitMan McClearlyASkrull, and Lashana Lynch as one of Carol Danvers’ oldest friends and a fellow pilot. Overall, they’re just pictures, we consider me excited anyway! The Skrulls look awesome, as does the production design both on Earth and in space. Plus, I’m excited to see Ronan and Korath and expand on their characters a little bit. So far, Captain Marvel looks to be another heckin’ good time from the ol’ Marvel Machine.

    STICKMAN: The Skrulls look too much like Dragonball Evolution. Like that's a joke, but it's literally the case.

    LARRY: I can’t say you’re wrong. Still tho, they look good

    MADHERO: I was about to say the same. No one must be reminded of that travesty. Aw well, at least the rest is looking good so far.

    STICKMAN: They could look betterrrrr. Other than that it's looking pretty coo. All your favourite Guardians of the Galaxy side characters roles?

    LARRY: Kinda incredible that through one picture we can already tell Jude Law is gonna turn on everyone. Almost impressive.

    STICKMAN: Or turn everyone on. Depending on the film's rating.

    MADHERO: I'm definitely curious what the deal is with that between Ronan and Korath. Hopefully it adds depth to both

    LARRY: Mah boi Djimon Honsou deserves his due.

    STICKMAN: What 90s trends were hot around that time in Space, which the generation of space 90s kids refuse to let die or admit to their flaws?

    LARRY: Wow this joke is already too deep for me lol

    MADHERO: Space 90s were a very different time. Its hard to judge on just a few images, but luckily we don't have to wait long for a trailer. I'll say I'm surprised they're not going the origin route, but Carol Danvers' origin is a bit of a mess, so i get it

    LARRY: They’ll probably do a few flashbacks. That should cover it.

    STICKMAN: Looking forward to that trailer, this feels like a significant chapter for the MCU both in establishing one of its most important characters but also just...having a female led/directed movie FINALLY. JEEZ. When the DCEU trumped you on that, you've cocked up.

    MADHERO: As EW states boldly: The Future is Female, but we'll about that!

    STICKMAN: I mean, surely it's the past that's female. The Space 90s, specifically.



    Although it's been a breezy year free of ever divisive DCEU films so far (Aquaman is on the horizon, mind), that's not to say we haven't been hearing about the plans, or lack thereof for Warner Bros'  expanded comic book universe. A promising trailer for Shazam and a not...soul-crushing trailer for Aquaman aside, we've heard about a lot of projects entering early development, a lot of which seem disconnected from continuing the expanded world itself, and had a deafening silence on the actual future for these films post-Justice League. Until now......sorta? Word has it that, after a failed contract negotiation for a Superman cameo in Shazam, Henry Cavill may be out completely as the Man of Steel, with plans for the characters standalone franchise seemingly on hold, and the actor having recently signed on for the lead in The Witcher TV series for Netflix.

    It's not confirmed at this stage, but it appears Warner Bros want to put Superman on the shelf for the time being, focusing instead of a Supergirl prequel, and Cavill doesn't want to wait out any longer for future roles in the series. After 3 massively divisive films, each with their own set of controversies surrounding Superman, it's not a surprise that the guy wants out....pile onto this the still as of yet unconfirmed/not denied allegations of Ben Affleck being out as Batman too? Ooy...what a mess.

    MADHERO: *Holds up action figure as dogs bark staring emotionless into the camera*

    STICKMAN: Surrealism is not an appropriate response to fan's questions, it seems.

    MADHERO: I have no idea what to make of Cavill's response to the whole thing. WB's was appropriate corporate vague, and Cavill's one was beyond weird.

    LARRY: I love how they tried using Supergirl to give this story validity when in reality it makes it even more ridiculous. As if the DCEU gave a rat’s ass about the lore.

    STICKMAN: Dang Larry, so cold.

    MADHERO: The Supergirl rumors are chump change compared to the rumor of Michael B. Jordan being Superman, which probably isn't happening, but that would be wild.

    STICKMAN: That would be pretty fun. I might have to unplug the internet for a few years, mind.

    MADHERO: Apparently Jordan's name is just in talks for almost every WB property (which is why he was linked with that Matrix reboot for a bit). Either way, even if he's not been supported by the films, I can't help but be bummed about this. You always feel like Cavill was a great Superman waiting to happen.

    STICKMAN: He looked the part and had the physicality, and the personality for sure. Unfortunately WB decided he needed to be ANGSTY and TORTURED.

    LARRY: I mean, I’m still not really buying this story. I’m sure Cavill is gonna get more chances to be Supes in more movies, I really don’t buy that DC would just drop him when he got a generally good response with Whedon’s rewrites. He finally started being the happy, charming Supes we all want to see from him.

    MADHERO: I don't think its about WB dropping him, but more so about renegotiations not working out. WB seems to be in no real rush to actaully make a Man of Steel 2, and Justice League 2 ain't happening either. At that point, as an actor, I'd probably look around for other opportunities

    STICKMAN: Like some sorta....Witcher TV show for Netflix where you get to have sex on a unicorn.

    LARRY: Yes but if this could balance Fallout and JL, I doubt he can’t continue doing that. Moustache be damned.

    MADHERO: We'll see what happens, because who truly knows for sure with the DCEU. At this stage, I'd feel pretty comfortable saying he's out

    STICKMAN: At least we'll always have Ben Affl-oh.



    So a couple of episodes, we talked about the upcoming changes of the Academy Awards, including a shorter running time, starting earlier and perhaps most of all: the introduction of a new category to celebrate Achievement in Popular Film. A lot of the discussion gravitated towards that, largely because its a terrible idea, and the category was described quite vaguely. This dunking contest has made the Academy realize that this category probably was announced too early, and has officially decided to postpone the award.b

    How long that postponement will take is unclear, but lets hope its somewhere between never and the heat death of the universe. Part of this might also be attributed to Black Panther, the movie largely considered the shoe-in for that award, having no interest and wanting to go for the grand Best Picture, with Marvel Studios/Disney now readying a big For Your Consideration campaign.  So yeah, when or whether we'll see this category back remains to be seen. Personally, I wouldnt mind if it stayed in that oven and burned to death.

    STICKMAN: I guess this idea wasn't very....POPULAR...ahah aheheheh.

    LARRY: It’s just a postponement, for all we know it could start up the ceremony after this.

    MADHERO: Well we don't know. When we discussed, we speculated on what the award meant, and that they probably had an better idea. And it turns out they hadn't. Whoops

    STICKMAN: The argument still stands that the whole point of the award just seems to be to ignore popular movies in major categories, when there are plenty of deserving inclusions. There was a brief glinting hope that they might start being more diverse with their choices when the category was first extended in nominees, but now we're back to the bullshit again.

    MADHERO: I think things got complicated with Black Panther, who could've taken that award blindfolded, rejected the concept of it and also that A Star Is Born is looking like a big hit but also the main Best Picture contender. They had no idea of the criteria and that just shows how poorly thought out this idea was

    LARRY: Yeah they definitely needed more of a thorough understanding of the award if they were gonna implement it mid-season.

    STICKMAN: It's too early to call anything the main contender for any award, but the fact that it's hard to categorise what is POPULAR and what is OSCAR WORTHY just speaks fucking volumes about how far up their own asses the people in charge are.

    LARRY: I just don’t think this is much of a deterrent. I think they are ultimately going to go through with it, sadly...just not right now.




    MADHERO: No need for the Popular Film category when that film deserves to be on there regardless. We'll see whether the category survives, but I'd like it gone forever.



    The days are growing shorter, the leaves are starting to know what that means? It's festival season… which means OSCAR BAAiaiiiIIITTT. WOOOOOO. August ended with the Venice International Film Festival, which brought with it a slew of long-awaited premiers which resulted in mostly promising buzz for the hopeful awards contending films of the next few months. First Man, A Star is Born, The Favourite and Roma all debuted to glowing reviews, the latter of which taking the main prize at this festival, with A Star is Born leading the early Oscar charge at the same time. 22nd July also received positive reviews, whilst the big point of contention this year was the premiere of Suspiria, which garnered a massively polarising reception, with those who loved it...LOVING it, and those who dislike it despising it.

    TIFF followed up soon after, with some of the same films receiving similar acclaim, but Barry Jenkins joining in the acclaim club thanks to his new film 'If Beale Street Could Talk' and Steve McQueen also garnering large praise for his dark thriller 'Widows' . Surprisingly, the winner of the important TIFF People’s Choice Award was Peter Farrelly’s Green Book, so expect to hear more from that. Outside of the awards season, one of the bigger film premiers at TIFF was the new Halloween film, which garnered largely glowing reviews, a promising start for a film that's not out for another month and is already sporting a healthy assortment of praise. It's too early at this point to call who the frontrunners are for the awards in early 2019, but with so many highly anticipated and varying films getting high degrees of praise, it's going to be a fun road to the Oscars for sure.

    MADHERO: Oscar Season Hoooooooo

    STICKMAN: Halloween for Best Picture? You heard it here first folks.

    MADHERO: I'd be down for that honestly. Maybe Jamie Lee Curtis for Best Actress? The campaign starts here

    LARRY: Festival season is so, so strong this year.

    MADHERO: Roma is apparently Mexico's official send in for Best Foreign Language film, so it'll at least get that probably. Gonna be very interesting how the Academy will react to the wave of quality Netflix releases

    STICKMAN: With a huff and a puff and a not giving any of them nominations, probably.

    Hey Larr: Phooey. Not nominating Netflix films at this point is just ignorant, especially if they already qualify.

    MADHERO: It does look like its going to be a good race. Surprised to see A Star Is Born get so much buzz though.

    STICKMAN: I thought it looked pretty droll but then the Academy loves shit like this.

    LARRY: They sure love films about art. They also love Bradley Cooper.

    MADHERO: I feel its hard to judge just based on the trailers, but I'm curious. I'm also expecting of plenty of La La Land/Three Billboards style hot takes

    STICKMAN: It's gonna be a fun few months, some real ones to watch out for, both in the awards path and out of it.



    Toy companies producing movies isn’t anything new, and now, a new opponent is ready to enter the ring with a fresh start. Mattel, the company behind beloved toy properties like Barbie and He-Man, is ready to get a piece of the franchise-pie with their new and official “Mattel Films” division, headed by “Dallas Buyers Club” producer and experienced film professional Robbie Brenner. This most likely means that the previously planned Barbie film with Sony Pictures will be canned, along with the He-Man movie that hasn’t seemed to gain much traction. And...that’s about all this means. Predictions for film projects? Maybe Polly Pocket? Hot Wheels? I dunno. Hopefully Mattel hasn’t bitten off more than they can chew. Don’t be DC, Mattel. Don’t be DC.

    STICKMAN: I'm not looking forward to any of these.

    MADHERO”I think a Master of the Universe movie has potential. If they did something like Thor Ragnarok, I think that could be really cool. Everything else.....ehh. Though to be fair, I don't know too many other Mattel properties that I could see as a movie.

    STICKMAN: I don't know if Mattel have the experience to make anything interesting or creative with these properties. They just wanna sell toys.

    LARRY: I just wanna see the Hot Wheels demolition derby movie. Like, the Fast films but past 11. That’s the only potential I see in this.

    MADHERO: Oh yeah, they own Hot Wheels. That could easily be used for a Fast and Furious knockoff

    STICKMAN: Thomas the Tank Engine versus Hot Wheels: Dawn of Justice.

    MADHERO: Its not really like Hasbro who own stuff like Transformers and GI Joe where you can see a film version. Becomes a little harder when He Man is the only one you really have, but I guess that also means She Ra, and Barbie continues to make the big bucks

    STICKMAN: Barbie had a film in the works prior to this situation so it'll be interesting to see what becomes of that

    MADHERO: Probably what Sony made at some point will be scrapped and they'll start with something more straightforward and less meta? Sony's version looked to be going pretty meta

    STICKMAN: Sony making movies is never a good idea, let's face it.

    LARRY: To be fair, Barbie has made countless animated films. I could see Barbie making huge bucks for a female demographic, and if they wanna be progressive with it, that would be even more on brand.


    MADHERO: We'll see what the Thomas the Tank Engine movie will look like soon enough. Moving on



    Its not often that we lose an icon, but I feel like that label is very much appropriate to Burt Reynolds, who passed away earlier in the month due to an heart attack. At one point in time, particularly the 70s, Reynolds was the biggest movie star in the world, with iconic films such as The Longest Yard (which played up his former college football days), Deliverance and of course Smokey and the Bandit, and later on for Boogie Nights, for which he almost won a Oscar. Afterwards, he became more known as a former icon, popping up in everything from GTA: Vice City to Archer. He was also cast in Quentin Tarantino's new film Once Upon A Time in Hollywood, but sadly passed before he could shoot any of his scenes. I did not experience Reynolds in his prime, but its hard to not see the impact he left on that era. We wish his family and friends nothing but the best in this difficult time.

    STICKMAN: Can't say I'm the most familiar with his body of work, but you can't deny he's an iconic institution of 70s culture, and his death will be felt by a lot of people.

    LARRY: Smokey and the Bandit defined the genre for me when I saw it, really sad to see he’s passed. His moustache reigned supreme.

    STICKMAN: Sometimes moustaches can be a force for good.

    MADHERO: I think there's definitely a case of a generation gap here and that we mostly experienced Reynolds through ironic/unironic admiration. Archer comes to mind.

    LARRY: Yeah, I definitely agree with that, but my generation oughta get a history lesson.

    STICKMAN: Archer was a good prompter on his cultural impact yes.

    MADHERO: To be fair to Reynolds, he was aware of his rep. He often picked roles to have fun, and didn't really challenge himself (though Deliverance and Boogie Nights were great performances in dark movies). One of his last movies, The Last Movie Star, does sorta reflect on that legacy.

    LARRY: Yeah I feel like The Last Movie Star is kinda the perfect sendoff for him. I saw the film and I’d say it pays tribute to him in a big way. And to similar stars of his generation and their lasting impact moving forward.

    STICKMAN: I'm not sure about perfect but the name certainly carries with it a poignancy now.

    MADHERO: Not sure how big his role in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood would've been, but its a shame he didn't get to shoot that. Imagine it was small, but it would've been nice.

    STICKMAN: That would've been an interesting way to bow out his career, yeah. Quite the legacy.

    MADHERO: RIP Burt. On a career filled with some amazing highs.

    LARRY: May he Rest In Peace.


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for the news, but we've got a new hot and piping review for you ready to go. Shane Black has had an interesting trajectory as a writer/director, and one of his very first jobs was punching up and being the very first victim on the Predator. So it seems fitting he's directing a new Predator 30 years later. I haven't seen it, but Sticky and Larry have, so it'll be a fun discussion cause man. The reaction is all over the place.

    STICKMAN: It's a piping hot something for sure.

    LARRY: Somebody sure was piping something.

    MADHERO: Oh boy. So anyway, guys. How is this film now that it stars less actual predators?



    DIRECTOR: Shane Black (Iron Man 3, The Nice Guys)

    STARRING: Boyd Holbrook, Trevante Rhodes, Jacob Tremblay, Olivia Munn, Keegan-Michael Key, Sterling K. Brown, Thomas Jane

    SYNOPSIS: When a young boy (Tremblay) accidentally triggers the universe's most lethal hunters' return to Earth, only a ragtag crew of ex-soldiers (Holbrook, Rhodes etc.) and a disgruntled science teacher (Munn) can prevent the end of the human race.

    STICKMAN: WelLlllLl....honestly, the Predator franchise has never been the most acclaimed, has it?  Besides the original at least. I've still managed to enjoy Predator 2, Predators and AvP in varying amounts. So, because of that I went into THE PREDATOR with reasonable hopes despite the mixed to negative reception.

    And's definitely...something. A mess doesn't even begin to describe it, but that's not to say it doesn't have a lot of plus points. Chiefly, the main cast, once they've been settled in at least, is pretty entertaining and likeable, and there's a lot of fun lines from the 'Loonies' as they're called. Action/Gore wise it's also pretty great, the film doesn't take itself seriously and as such goes pretty OTT with the violence, which...well that's what you want from a Predator film really. It's nice to see practical Predator costumes back too...for the most part.


    It's entertaining throughout, but it's a hot mess otherwise. The editing is all over the place, basic choppy cuts aside, things frequently just sorta happen  without explanation, there's a vehicle acquired midway through that is just sorta...there and never explained. A character dies and the cut is so quick you barely realise what's just happened. The 3rd act is a hot mess, clearly...hastily cobbled together from reshoots, and the final scene, clearly chopped from a mid-credits scene is a joke of a conclusion.

    LARRY: Yeah, gotta echo a lot of what Sticky is saying here. I enjoyed myself watching The Predator, and have enjoyed the majority of the franchise since the Schwarzenegger days, but this latest addition feels like Fox got exactly what Shane Black's Predator would look like, realized maybe that's not what they ultimately wanted, and attempted to hack together something resembling a balance less-than-achieved. There's a lot of interesting, subversive ideas at play here but it's all diluted with everything else the studio wanted, and so it ends up being...yeah, a mess. 

    The story is convoluted, the characters are kinda a hodge-podge, and the writing is expository as shit. That being said, everything outside of that is pretty solid. Outside of some relatively bland cinematography, the action is a lot of fun, and the Predator kills are as gruesome and amazing as you could possibly ask for. The production and prop design for the actual Predator is also pretty sleek, with the Super-Predator looking absolutely ridonkulous. So, yeah, it's a fun romp but ultimately leaves a lot to be desired.

    MADHERO: Sounds like its fun, but quite the mess. That's unfortunate to hear, especially with Black's directing track record

    STICKMAN: There's some big decisions regarding the lore of the franchise that's gonna piss a LOT of people off. At the least it tries something new but....not without mistakes.

    LARRY: This movie doesn't exactly respect the Predator universe as a whole. It makes a lot of bold choices that may or may not really service the franchise.

    MADHERO: With Black you can expect the film to not take itself all too seriously, but it sounds like this movie might be a step too far with Fox trying to hit the brakes


    LARRY: See the thing about Black is that he is clearly trying to add these new ideas about what the Predators are and their relationship to humans. If the studio hadn't been involved, I think Black coulda pulled it off. Sensitive subjects and subversive postmodern commentaries are classic Black.

    STICKMAN: It would've still be controversial, but at least fully coherent.

    MADHERO: I haven't seen the film, so I can't judge. Most of the criticism seems to be related the third act.

    STICKMAN: Third act is very dull. Knowing how it was originally intended to be before reshoots? Would've been a lot crazier.

    LARRY: It's dull but it's also really convoluted Tries to tie up all the established stuff and ends up dropping the ball. but it probably comes closest to being an actual Predator movie than the first two thirds.

    MADHERO: How fun is it before all that? Any good kills?

    LARRY: You can tell by the gruesome kills that Black was having a BALL with Predator. The violence and gore in this movie is easily it's biggest strength.

    STICKMAN: There are some fun kills, and a lot of gore, which is nice for sure. The best kill is the one that's hardest to see, which is a shame.

    MADHERO: Alright. Anything you still wanna say for the wrap up, because it sounds like that if you want to go see it, you have to keep in mind a lot of asterisks. Is it worth checking out in theaters or would you wait for a home release?


    LARRY: If you want some bloody good action, it's definitely worth ticket price, and it's got some solid laughs too, I'd say. But....yeah just know that it's gonna lack anything resembling depth.

    STICKMAN: I'd honestly say wait until a home release....I've been comparing it in my mind to Alien Covenant, which was another messy franchise film from 20th Century...that one could argue was from the saaame franchise? But at least in Alien Covenants case it looked really nice and had a solid first half run. The Predator just looks kinda bland and may piss people off too much to enjoy at that kinda price. It's a lot of fun,  and you won't come out feeling completely shortchanged, but it's a big let down and a huge mess. Definitely the weakest of the core Predator films.


    MADHERO: Alright. A mixed bag for sure. Now to see what other mixed bags there are in theaters. Or maybe there are some nice bags.

    STICKMAN: There's a mixed bag of bags.

    LARRY: A bagged mix of mixes.



    DIRECTOR: Eli Roth (Knock Knock, Death Wish)

    STARRING: Jack Black, Cate Blanchett, Owen Vaccaro, Sunny Suljic, Kyle MacLachlan

    SYNOPSIS: A young orphan named Lewis Barnavelt (Vacarro) aids his magical uncle (Black) in locating a clock with the power to bring about the end of the world.

    LARRY: I'm just happy Jack Black has work. That's my main takeaway.

    STICKMAN: I'm not.

    MADHERO: A family film starring Jack Black about wizards and stuff directed by..... Eli Roth?

    STICKMAN: This looks like effort went into it. But it just looks kinda...generic at the same time?

    MADHERO: It looks fine, but with Jack Black, the pumpkin and even a dummy keep reminding me a bit of Goosebumps.

    STICKMAN: Oh yeah. Also doesn't look very...scary for a horror film. Family or not.

    LARRY: I guess Black's into the spooky, mystical kids fare.

    MADHERO: The weird thing is that we'll soon talk Goosebumps 2 which doesn't have Jack Black. Anyway, it looks like quirky family fun and not much else. I feel this could potentially surprise though.

    STICKMAN: I was hoping for something great, looks pretty meh. Oh well.

    LARRY: I dunno, Jack Black and Cate Blanchett? Could be a sleeper goodie.


    DIRECTOR: Paul Feig (Spy, Ghostbusters)

    STARRING: Anna Kendrick, Blake Lively, Henry Golding, Andrew Rannells, Linda Cardellini

    SYNOPSIS: A mommy blogger (Kendrick) seeks to uncover the truth behind the disappearance of her best friend (Lively).

    STICKMAN: This looks pretty fun.

    MADHERO: Like everyone else, I have no real idea what to make of this film, but damn does Blake Lively look good in suits.

    LARRY: "From the DARKER SIDE of director Paul Feig" Excuse me while I gag.

    MADHERO: The edge is real, but this does look a little edgier than the usual Feig fair. A lot of Gone Girl comparisons

    LARRY: But yeah, this movie looks interesting, I just hate that stupid self-awareness as though he's earned it.

    STICKMAN: Are you not a Feigfanatic, Larry.

    LARRY: Very much not. Bridesmaids is good, Spy is pretty bad and Ghostbusters was borderline garbage.

    MADHERO: I will not take this slander of Spy. Ghostbusters was pretty bad, so I'm glad this is something of a comeback and something different

    STICKMAN: Mainly I'm glad it's something different, since this looks actually watchable.

    LARRY: Yeah it looks like an interesting watch, mostly because it's so ambiguous. Like I don't know much about it but it looks stylistic enough that I'm curious to know more about it.

    MADHERO: It goes to a lot of weird places apparently. So yeah, good job marketing team on not spoiling anything

    STICKMAN: The trailer impressed me which I can't say Paul Feig has ever managed before. So that in of itself is IMPRESSIVE.


    DIRECTOR: Yann Demange (’71)

    STARRING: Matthew McConaughey, Richie Merritt, Bel Powley, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Brian Tyree Henry

    SYNOPSIS: In 1980s Detroit, Richard Wershe Jr. (Merritt) was a street hustler, FBI informant and drug kingpin—all before he turned sixteen.


    LARRY: Good one.

    STICKMAN: Pickle Rick is an internet war crime.

    LARRY: They seem to be marketing McConaughey a lot even tho...he's probably not in the movie all that much. It's centered on the kid, so...

    STICKMAN: The titular whitey.

    MADHERO: Rick and Morty jokes aside, the story behind it is wild. The movie apparently is not so much

    STICKMAN: It looked like it had all the markings of an average crime caper with a star side-character and all. A real Triple 9. A real Killer Joe.

    LARRY: A real Mud. Wait...Anyway yeah maybe I'll go see this I dunno.

    MADHERO: Killer Joe at least had William Friedkin directing it. Anyway, yeah. This looks pretty average

    STICKMAN: I'll give this one a pass. Seen too many edgy crime movies to bother with the average ones.


    DIRECTOR: Dan Fogelman (Danny Collins, This Is Us)

    DIRECTOR: Dan Fogelman (Danny Collins, This is Us)

    STARRING: Oscar Isaac, Olivia Wilde, Mandy Patinkin, Olivia Cooke, Laia Costa, Annette Bening, Antonio Banderas)

    SYNOPSIS: As a young New York couple (Isaac, Wilde) goes from college romance to marriage and the birth of their first child (Cooke), the unexpected twists of their journey create reverberations that echo over continents and through lifetimes.

    MADHERO: Oooooooo, i'm here for this overly sentimental shit.

    LARRY: I am...not.

    STICKMAN: Do you ever feel like Olivia Wilde and Oscar Isaac only signed onto this film to make out with each other.

    MADHERO: But Larry, what if I told you the audience at TIFF has compared this to Book of Henry and Collateral Beauty

    LARRY: OH BOY. Except #EndHateWatching So

    STICKMAN: This is Henry's Book of Collateral Life Beauty.

    MADHERO: From the guy that brought you This is Us, that show very popular in the USA for..... reasons? I've never seen it

    LARRY: It's popular for the same reasons you just said. It's overtly sentimental.

    STICKMAN: This is Us is the prequel to This is It, the Michael Jackson documentary.

    MADHERO: Well that explains the popularity. Otherwise yeah, I'm here for this dreck

    LARRY: I mean, I'll rent it one of these days if it's really THAT bad.

    STICKMAN: I'm booking a plane ticket to get as far away from this shit as possible.


    DIRECTOR: Panos Cosmatos (Beyond the Black Rainbow)

    STARRING: Nicolas Cage, Andrea Riseborough, Linus Roache, Bill Duke

    SYNOPSIS: Red Miller (Cage), a broken and haunted man hunts an unhinged religious sect (Roache) who slaughtered the love of his life (Riseborough).

    STICKMAN: Aww yeah. Here's my kinda shit.

    LARRY: Oh here we GO. NIC CAGE


    STICKMAN: From the director of Beyond the Black Rainbow...a film that came out 8 years ago and never released in the UK.

    MADHERO: A lot of people are saying this feels like a big comeback for Cage, and its one of his wilder roles, so that should be amazing

    STICKMAN: This director loves his red tints and I'm here for it. Also c-c-c-c-cHAINSAW BATTLE.

    MADHERO: Cage with a giant battleaxe, crazy cultists. Its going to VOD very soon after the release so it should be easy to check out hopefully

    STICKMAN: It's not out here until mid-October, and I assume it'll be a similar VOD situation....but the important thing is...this film's actually releasing in the UK. NOICE.

    MADHERO: Its in limited release here so I might need to wait for VOD as well, but I'll definitely give it a look

    LARRY: This seems like the kind of movie to experience in theaters tho. Like, to scope it out.

    STICKMAN: Well I don't live in New York Larry. SOOOOO I don't get that choice.

    LARRY: Fair enough.


    DIRECTOR: Jacques Audiard (Rust and Bone, Dheepan)

    STARRING: Joaquin Phoenix, John C. Reilly, Jake Gyllenhaal, Riz Ahmed, Rutget Hauer

    SYNOPSIS: Eli and Charlie Sisters (Phoenix, Reilly), two hitmen brothers on the trail of a chemist (Ahmed) with a unique secret formula for prospecting gold wanted by their boss.

    MADHERO: The title makes it sound like a quirky comedy, and hey, it turns out its kind of that.

    STICKMAN: This has the hallmarks of something at one pointed considered an awards  contender that just quietly got...released just before awards release season. Y'knooow. Quirky western, strong leads.

    LARRY: It looks pretty quirky but also dark. Kinda sardonic.

    MADHERO: There's probably some darkness and seriousness in there, but Phoenix and Reilly look like they're having fun.

    LARRY: Yeah but it's got a grit to it, that's what interests me. Also, JAKEY GYLLENHAAL

    STICKMAN: The double act I never thought I needed.I was wondering where he'd gotten to.

    MADHERO: Busy wearing a fishbowl on his head maybe?

    STICKMAN: I hope so. I really do.


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for all the film releases this week, but hey, that still gives us some time for MOVIE OF THE WEEK!

    STICKMAN: AAAAAGGHH. Match of the Week.

    LARRY: Yeah MOTW or whatever.

    MADHERO: Larry, how can you act so blasé about one of our main subjects. Unacceptable. For that you have to present yours first



    LARRY: Alright, well the only new movie I have seen as of late is Predator, which we already talked about, so I'd like to throw it back to a film that I always love to revisit, Edgar Wright's "Scott Pilgrim vs. The World," which is now on Netflix!! The nerdiest of Wright's filmography, I think that, while it has some issues, this is a really inspired film that takes an already stylistic comic book series and adapts it to the screen with energy, panache, and personality.

    Most people agree that the visuals in this film are mesmerizing, and the action is shot very dynamically. They feel like Smash Bros. fights sometimes, each punch packs a wallop. Plus, it's hysterically funny, Wright's quirky and offbeat humor is here in spades and is edited oh so sleekly. Admittedly, Scott is a relatively problematic character, and some of the stereotypes regarding vegans and the manic-pixie dream girl don't hold up as strongly, but besides for that, this is a super enjoyable movie that I lowkey want to rewatch this very second. But we're doing Screwvies now so let's just talk about it a little, hmmm?

    STICKMAN: This film certainly has a lot of style to spare.

    MADHERO: I actually haven't seen this movie in quite some time, so its neat to see it coming to Netflix

    STICKMAN: I do think it's main issue is that Scott Pilgrim is a whiny shit and his arc feels unearned. looks really nice and is very funny too.

    LARRY: Yeah that's what I meant by "problematic." He's sorta given the hero role despite the very, VERY shitty things he does.

    MADHERO: I feel like there's some parts in that movie that wouldn't be very 2018, and Scott Pilgrim is never really punished for his shittiness, but that's more a problem with the movie than with the graphic novel. Still, hard to focus on that with all the colors

    STICKMAN: It's very colourful. And the music is great too. Editing got that  Edgar Wright PAZAAAZZ

    LARRY: Colorful, lots of big words and bold punches. Also, pre-MCU Chris Evans sure is a character.

    MADHERO: When someone pointed out he looks like a American Kazuma Kiryu from Yakuza in that film, I can't unsee it anymore. He's definitely the most fun ex of the bunch

    STICKMAN: Oh me too. That's crazy....mhmm.

    LARRY: Wellllllll Brandon Routh I also like.

    STICKMAN: I can relate to being bifurious.

    MADHERO: What is it Sticky, my deep cut too much? How about your movie of the week? That any more mainstream

    LARRY: probs shit WOOPS DID I DO THAT

    STICKMAN: In the year of our lord 20 and 18, the state of Netflix's movie output is pretty clear. Quantity over quality. Sure, some of the stuff they've put out, or are about to put out is great...but a large majority of it is total shit, and often something bought on the cheap from a studio looking to avoid a box office disaster. With that said, it makes it a little hard to get excited for some weird cross-country family animated movie that turns up on the service. But Netflix actually payed a pretty penny for the rights to Next Gen....and well, it's got problems, but honestly? It's pretty good.

    Basically, imagine if every inanimate object in the world turned into Baymax from Big Hero 6...and then Disney went off the rails and let their films involve beating the shit out of children, suicide bombings and a dog that can't stop swearing (Which tbf is bleeped, but still).  The animation is actually really impressive, visually striking and colourful throughout...and it's one of the first animated movies to be entirely made in Blender. It has an odd blend of anarchic meta humour, dark action sequences, Disney sentimentality and poorly thought out commentary on modern society...but as a whole, it's a constantly entertaining, endearing action romp that, whilst a little dark and violent for most younger children, still provides worthwhile viewing for anyone else.... plus, it's on already own it, y'all.

    LARRY: What the hell lol Suicide bombings?

    STICKMAN: I mean, it's not like...Homeland, there's a twist but it is basically suicide bombings.

    LARRY: Damn. Sounds like this is #maturecontent

    MADHERO: That's how you know its from the same people that made 9

    STICKMAN: It's reasonably family friendly. 9 was quite unique despite its flaws, this feels a bit more like a hodgepodge of several other more standard blockbuster things.

    MADHERO: I do kinda like how in this movie everything is automated to the point of it being creepy. I know you mentioned the toilet on twitter

    STICKMAN: The living, talking, chipper toilet interesting concept. I'm not sure I'd be into that, I know SOOOOME people would be.

    LARRY: Damn this sounds like it has more depth than I imagined.

    STICKMAN: There's some depth to it, oddly, yeah. Not in that department though. I will say the main character is immensely unlikable and extremely #problematic for the majority of the film.

    MADHERO: Yeah, I've heard that complaint. Also apparently not-Baymax is voiced by John 

    Krasinski. Guess he's finally allowed to use it after A Quiet Place

    LARRY: Good one.

    STICKMAN: Out of the two Krasinksskii films this year, I know which you should watch fiiirsst. But this one ain't that bad either, give it a look PERHAPS. Speaking of things to maybe watch.....uhh....Mad?

    MADHERO: Alright, unlike you two deciding to Netflix and chill, I decided to go and see a movie in the THEATER! A lot has been made of the latest Spike Lee joint Blackkklansman, and its actually the first time I've seen one of his films in theaters, and it was definitely worth it. I knew I was in for a really wild true story (though how much of what's real in the film is up for debate), and in that sense it did not disappoint. A lot of that is helped with the acting, with John David Washington inherting some good acting genes and Adam Driver making a serious case for Best Supporting Actor. He's great.

    Besides also being very funny, sometimes uncomfortably so, and it often portrays the Klan as a bunch of idiots, its not afraid to point out the evil and death this ideology has brought us. Not too mention an ending that basically left my theatre so quiet that you could hear a pin drop, showing that we're still dealing with these dangerous idiots. So yeah, its fun, funny and important. Go see it if you haven't yet.

    STICKMAN: Cinemas are for CHUMPS. HAH. LOOOOSER.....I could've seen this film, or American Animals...but I saw The Predator instead. Why must I be such a sci-fi horror nerd.

    MADHERO: Give me your lunch money, pipsqueak. That or spend it watching true art!

    STICKMAN: Says you, you never even saw a Predator decapitate a guy.

    LARRY: Yeah I enjoyed this film quite a bit.

    MADHERO: How did the last segment go for your screening Larry? I was with an pretty much exclusively white audience, and it was still incredibly fucking awkward.

    LARRY: Well I actually saw an early theatre crew screening, which was a very diverse group. But it was still very, very quiet at the end. Personally all of this true story controversy doesn't irk me so much considering that movies change up details like this all the time and nobody would've known about it if Boots Riley hadn't said anything.

    STICKMAN: I wish I knew what was being spoken about. I wish I was more.... w o k e .

    MADHERO: well go see the film and then you know

    STICKMAN: But the moonneyyy.

    LARRY: Personally I agree with most of what you said, I think this film does a great job balancing drama and comedy, as well as nuance in the many political sides this movie explores. I also don't exactly think that the KKK guys in this movie are really as dumb as everyone thinks this film portrays them...there's maybe like one or two dummies. And...yeah the film certainly laughs at their expense. But there are countless disturbing moments that portray them as high-functioning members of society.

    MADHERO: Also I was really surprised that the actress who plays Patrice is also Liz from Spider-Man homecoming. Also one of the Klan members is Paul Walter Hauser and has cemented him as a new fave character actor

    STICKMAN: Isn't Topher Grace in this also.

    LARRY: He is!! He's David Duke.

    STICKMAN: I last saw him in...Predators. Which was a loooong time ago.


    MADHERO: Go see it, you won't regret it. I think that about wraps it up. I guess now we go and just roll around..... like a turd.... in the wind.

    STICKMAN: Is the Sonic film out next week!?

    MADHERO: Nah that ain't till next year. But we've got a Shadow the Hedgehog movie now. It might as well be now. Prepare your takes, folks. Its gonna a fun goopy ride

    STICKMAN: I've never been so aroused by goopy bois yet enraged by shitty films in my life. GOODBYE.

    LARRY: *Shivers.* B-bb-b-b-buh bye....

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 116

    1 month ago



    MADHERO: Well gang, the summer's officially over. The air is cooling (finally), the kids are going back to school and Hollywood officially stop giving a fuck for like 2 weeks and just send out whatever they happen to have lying around and put it in theaters. Yeah, except for a spooky nun (which is more than we usually get), there's not a whole lot to talk about. Good moment to catch up with stuff you've missed though.

    STICKMAN: No children, cool air, and spoopy films. Aight, I'm already happy. Let's go.

    LARRY: Can you believe some of this Summer Slump TM stuff is actually good? THAT makes me happy.

    STICKMAN: Hey, hey, Nun of us know the quality for sure.

    MADHERO: We'll go Searching for them soon. But lets go through some news first.




    And here we thought James Gunn being fired was going to be the only shock directorial exit of the last couple months. Back in March of this year, we talked about the gears of Daniel Craig's final outing as James Bond starting to get into motion, biggest news of all was that the director had been found in the Oscar winning Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire, 28 Days Later etc). Production was scheduled to start in October of this year, for a release of late October 2019 in the UK. And that was the last we heard about it for a while. Now, towards the literal backend of August, it's all fallen to pieces. Danny Boyle is out, and so the writer along with him thanks to that old chestnut, 'Creative Differences', leaving production in turmoil, and release delays of potentially an entire year in order to get things back on track.

    Back in March  we did indeed wonder if he was the best fit for this sorta film, Boyle is at his best doing what he does best...which is bold and weird. Two things a Bond film would generally try very hard not to be. Although no official news has come out regarding the specifics of why Boyle walked, but speculation has ranged from his casting choice for the villain, to standing opposed to killing Craig's Bond off at the end of the movie, bringing his era of stories to a definitive conclusion. Indeed, we don't even know if a delay is happening or not yet, it's just a safe assumption to make, given the scale of changes that need to be made to get production back on track.

    LARRY: Damn.

    STICKMAN: Damn...ielcraig.

    MADHERO: This feels very surprising and not very surprising all the same.

    LARRY: Honestly I don’t think it’s the biggest loss. Still stinks that we won’t see Boyle’s take on Bond.

    STICKMAN: He never felt like a good fit for a blockbuster franchise, but I was hoping to see him put his mark on it at the same time.

    LARRY: But Bond is such an iconic property that almost any take on it would interest me. Also, anything to wash the taste of Spectre out of my mouth.

    MADHERO: He was an interesting director for sure, and I'd have been interested in his take, but I guess they're being careful.

    STICKMAN: Does make you wonder who's gonna replace him. In Disney's case, they always go for A SAFE PAIR OF HANDS....which doesn't necessarily breed the best end results. Last time a safe pair of hands was at the helm we got Quantum of Solace, and most people hate that film.

    MADHERO: The names I've seen pop up as replacements are David McKenzie, Yann Demange and Edgar Wright, who left a Marvel property over creative difference so I can’t imagine him doing Bond.

    LARRY: I am HERE for McKenzie. Hell or High Water was awesome.

    STICKMAN: My dream director is still Christopher Nolan. He is perfect for a Bond film.

    MADHERO: I would much rather see him be at the start of a new one than jump in at the end. He's got nothing on the plate now so who knows. They better hurry up through if they want to make that November 2019 date.

    LARRY: Yeah they really need to figure that out. If Craig is on board, it’s impossible to overlook this as his final outing.

    MADHERO: I don't think they can make it, with how big Bond productions are, but not my problem. We'll get it eventually. Who'll bring it to us shall be known soon-ish. I've heard James Gunn is availible

    STICKMAN: I'd watch that honestly.



    When a genre hasn't performed well or hasn't made all the money, its easy to say that they're completely dead, or in the case of romantic comedies, relegated to Netflix. Hell, that is almost what happened to Crazy Rich Asians, but director John Chu was adamant on getting an theatrical release, less so for the genre's sake, but for Asian cinemagoers who rarely get to see themselves on screen in the West. And the gamble as paid off, as CRA is now pretty much the last major hit of the summer movie season. It had an pretty great opening weekend, with 26,2 million (after opening on Wednesday with 35 million). That doesn't seem a lot, but on the second weekend, it grossed 25 million again, with the film only dropping 6%. Normally speaking, a film drops by about 50%. That's Craaaaaaaapretty good.

    Warner Bros is laughing all the way to the bank, and with its success, has now greenlit a sequel based on author Kevin Kwan's continuation China Rich Girlfriend, who'll be adapting the book for screen adaptation. Actors Constance Wu, Henry Golding and Michelle Yeoh all have options for a sequel, but there's a good chance that list of names will grow. Its a great achievement for the genre and for Asian American cinema, which is having a couple solid weeks thanks to both this staying first for the third time in a row and Searching looking to surprise. Good job.

    LARRY: It’s almost as if representation sells. Who knew?

    STICKMAN: It's not even representation selling specifically, it's just...offering something to people who haven't been offered much of anything before. I can't believe catering to a undercatered market means you get a lot of money.

    LARRY: That’s what I’m saying. Representation does cater to the audience, usually.

    STICKMAN: It's RIIiICh they've become...AsssiiIans.

    MADHERO: Apparently 38% of its opening audience was of Asian descent. The last time it was similarly high was like 20ish percent for The Foreigner, that Jackie Chan movie you forgot about.

    STICKMAN: Jackie Chan Adventures movie when.

    LARRY: I enjoyed that movie. I still remember...

    STICKMAN: I think this year's been a real eye opener for mass appeal diversity in cinema. And I really hope that means we're going to see different voices and different cultures on the big screen in a big all kinds of genres.

    MADHERO: Its good to see something like this be so successful. Personally the movie doesn't interest me besides the Asia/Singapore backdrop having lived there briefly, but I think its a great win to see a movie like this making money.

    LARRY: With this, To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before, and Searching, August has been the month of well done, Asian-led films getting popular. It’s good times.

    STICKMAN: I couldn't give less of a damn about this movie personally, romcoms and the ilk just aren't my scene. But heeey, cool for those who're into it.

    MADHERO: I'm always up for more Constance Wu or Michelle Yeoh. Speaking of which...



    So, as you may or may not know, I adore the film "Swiss Army Man," and I consider it to be one of the best films of its year as well as one of the most creative and unique films of its decade. So color me happily surprised when, back in 2017, it was announced that the film's directorial duo, Daniel Scheinert and Daniel Kwan (known as DANIELS), officially signed on to their next feature. The film, entitled "Everything Everywhere All at Once," is being produced by, and is essentially happening because of, Infinity War directors Joe and Anthony Russo, furthering their efforts to explore new projects post-Marvel.

    The film is a sci-fi action film featuring some good ol' interdimensional fun times, and is currently negotiating to have "Crazy Rich Asians" stars Michelle Yeoh and Awkwafina to join the cast, in what role though is yet to be seen. The majority of details regarding the film's plot have been kept under wraps, but all I know is that it's fucking DANIELS, which means I will buy my ticket to whatever zany, disgusting, insane adventure they have whipped up. And with the Russos overseeing it, hopefully that will keep them somewhat practically grounded. Consider my ticket already mentally purchased.

    STICKMAN: Daniels, from Alien Covenant? Remember....remember Daniels? Anyone?

    MADHERO: Hell yeah, looking forward to more of that Daniels content.

    LARRY: Fuck yes you are.

    STICKMAN: These are the guys who made a film about a farting corpse, they’re gonna have to do a lot to impress me. At least a few Godzillas.

    LARRY: Ugh, Stix, if only you knew the brilliance of Swiss Army Man. Please just WATCH IT.

    STICKMAN: Harry Potter and the existential fart corpse.

    MADHERO: You gotta be pretty crazy to let your debut film center surrounding flatulent dead Harry Potter and one that actually has some stuff to say about the human condition.  You know its gonna be wacky, but I love the addition of Michelle Yeoh. Awkafina I haven't seen in much so can't say anything, but Yeoh has been going through a career resurgence it seems

    STICKMAN: Yeoh's awesome. I hope she's not a corpse in this, that'd be a waste.

    LARRY: Awkwafina was aight in Ocean’s 8. I’d be down for her to get a more prominent role.

    MADHERO: She was apparently one of the highlights in Crazy Rich Asians, so she seems to have a promising career ahead. Needless to say I'm excited for whatever crazy shit this is going to be.

    LARRY: I can’t help but get excited for SCI FI ACTION DANIELS LETS GOOOOOOOO

    STICKMAN: Daniels was in a Sci-Fi action movie last year...ALIEN COVENANT. y...yaaaay.



    Given 2017 ended with the seemingly eternal nightmare that is the backlash over The Last Jedi, it's easy to forget that there was a host of other releases that drew the immediate ire of the internet just from existing, most of them anime adaptations, let's face it.  One such adaptation was Adam Wingard's Death Note, a western cinematic take on the much loved cult anime series, something that was treated as a war crime even before the film's chilly reception came to pass following its Netflix release, both from fans of the anime and the uninitiated. With that reception in mind, you'd be quick to assume that the initial desires to make a series of Death Note movies would be promptly put out to pasture, right? the time of release Wingard himself had said Netflix considered the release a success and were mulling over a sequel...and now we have official confirmation, albeit as a footnote in a larger press statement from the streaming juggernaut that Death Note will be receiving a sequel at some point, in some form. At this stage that's all we know,  with Wingard maybe unable to return as director depending on the production schedule, given his commitments to 2020's Godzilla vs Kong. Presumably we'll hear more about this down the line, Netflix's policy on films definitely seems to be quantity over quality lately, but personally I found the original to be stupid but good fun all the same. A little overhated, but hardly good either. Let's hope the sequel is better.

    LARRY: Aw fuck all of this.

    MADHERO: And this is why you don't hate-watch on Netflix cause they'll get the wrong idea what with ratings mostly gone.

    STICKMAN: Have you seen the anime.

    LARRY: I didn’t see DN because IT LOOKED BAD #STOPHATEWATCHING. Also yes I have seen some of the anime, and i like it.

    STICKMAN: Sounds like the only person who actually watched it didn't haaate it...just saaaying.

    MADHERO: This movie has been on my list for a while now, but I ended up never bothering with it after some of the reviews and there simply being too many other things to watch on Netflix. I can't keep up, man. I saw the anime, but I'm pretty mixed on it tbh.

    STICKMAN: I found it to be inoffensive entertainment. Nicely filmed, great soundtrack, some fun moments. Lacks the depth and character complexity of the anime, but was it's own thing...was alright. People have this scathing hatred for it but nobody bothered to watch it. So...I feel it's hard to justify the hatred at that stage.

    LARRY: Okay, fair is fair. If it’s good, it’s good.

    STICKMAN: It's not. Sometimes films are just 'okay'. And they don't warrant praise or brutality.

    MADHERO: Well that's a given with the translation to movie. And obviously people did watch it to justify their dislike. I have no strong feelings about it either way and the fact its getting a sequel is more surprising and funny to me than anger inducing.

    STICKMAN: Well the first film always felt like a starting point for the first episode I guess. Maybe now the pieces are in motion it might prove more interesting. But...maybe not.

    MADHERO: Have you seen some of the other Netflix Original films? They don't give a damn.

    STICKMAN: Netflix just shit out movies lately, they got like, 200 coming out this year and most of them are pants. Hopefully Wingard will come back

    MADHERO: He's too busy pushing his monster toys against each other, but we'll see.



    Despite being a staple of plenty of generations' childhoods, the Looney Tunes feel like they've gotten a raw deal as of late. There briefly was that Looney Tunes show back in 2011, but that got canceled after 2 seasons, and now it seems like most of the rumblings surrounding Looney Tunes comes from the eventual Space Jam 2. Warner Bros, who own the property, have been trying to get projects off the ground, including a Marvin the Martian live-action/animated movie back in 2009, but none of it really sparked the revival. So it makes sense that they now attempt to make a movie out of one of their more foolishly determined characters: Wile E. Coyote.

    The premise of Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner cartoons are fairly simple and don't need much explanation: Coyote wants to get Road Runner for food, and tries catching through increasingly elaborate contraptions from the ACME Corporation, with hilarious and painful results. The animated movie, written by Jon and Josh Silverman (Deadbeat, Always Sunny) and to be produced by LEGO Batman director Chris McCay is titled Coyote VS. ACME, which may suggest more of a courtroom parody rather than the classic chase. That's just speculation on my part. I'm a big fan of the Looney Tunes as a kid, so I'm all in favor of some sort of revival, even if I'm sceptical of my own thought out premise. At least some funny people are involved.

    STICKMAN: Meep Meep.

    MADHERO: I wonder what role ol' Road Runner gets to play in this. Maybe he can get a lifetime supply of birdseed out of it.

    STICKMAN: Judging from previous Looney Tunes features, it's probably gonna be very meta, and maybe not super great, least this one's animated, not a hybrid.

    LARRY: See I’m all aboard for some quality Looney Tunes entertainment. But like...movies tho?

    MADHERO: Oh no doubt. You kinda almost have to to stretch it out to a 80-90 minute film. That definitely makes Coyote a weird one since he's a silent characters pretty much all the time.

    STICKMAN: I really hope they don't give him a voice. Like, please don't do that.

    LARRY: The characters have always thrived more in short spurts. They’re more of a variety hour of comedy so why make one film about one or two characters?

    MADHERO: But Larry, what about cinematic 90's classic, Space Jam?

    LARRY: It’s the same reason why the rumored Pepe Le Pew movie wouldn’t work; because the characters are best in tandem. Space Jam is fun but not your average Looney Tunes film

    MADHERO: Pepe le Pew would get crucified in the MeToo era. We could go too far and suddenly get a Loonatics Unleashed movie.

    LARRY: Holy Moses, I forgot that existed.That shit was nuts.

    MADHERO: With the superhero craze..... you never know. But no, lets not do that.

    STICKMAN: I'd honestly be down for a voiceless quirky animated film with Coyote's existential mid-life crisis from never being able to achieve his dreams.

    LARRY: Even WALL-E only did voiceless shit for 30 min.

    STICKMAN: Guess what film did no voices for the  whole 90? SHAUN THE SHEEP, SON.



    Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson continues to make moves in Hollywood, with this one being particularly interesting. THR reports that he will star as King Kamehameha I in a brand new historical epic from New Line Cinemas and Seven Bucks Productions, Johnson's production company. Entitled "The King," it will tell the story of Kamehameha's role in uniting the Hawaiian islands that were once at war with each other, fulfilling a prophecy bestowed upon him at birth. It is being described as large in scope and high in prestige, with some suggesting this may be Johnson aiming for awards glory, which would be appropriate given the team behind it.

    So far, Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?) is in the director's chair, and Randall Wallace (writer of Braveheart and Hacksaw Ridge) penning the script. So, yeah, this is a big deal, especially given that this is a passion project that Johnson has been pursuing for the better part of two decades. Given this and his co-starring role in Moana, it looks like Johnson is doing his best to pursue projects that tell stories of Polynesian people, which is awesome for representation, and will hopefully produce more quality work. Plus, I'm down for some Hawaiian Braveheart with The Rock...cuz that sounds amazing.

    MADHERO: Finally, the Dragonball movie that we all deserve after Evolution. Finally we know where Master Roshi learned the Kamehameha

    STICKMAN: Hawanime. Is this like Moana where he turns into birds and shit.

    MADHERO: But for realsies, this actually sounds like a cool premise.

    LARRY: It’s gonna be Polynesian Braveheart. What’s not to love.

    STICKMAN: I'd be more enticed if not for Robert Zemeckis, who hasn't really produced a smash hit in a long while.

    LARRY: That’s true, but he is a good director. He has vision, and no Uncanny Valley...yet.

    MADHERO: Flight was pretty good, but he's definitely not as exciting. Still a good pick, and I think this also might be a good showcase for Dwayne Johnson as an actor, not just an action hero.

    STICKMAN: I don't know if Dwayne's got the chops for something like this, but proooove me wrong. He gave a good dramatic performance in Faster, which was pretty goooood.

    LARRY: Well we’ll wait to see if Marwen is any good. Yeah it’d be nice to see Johnson flex those muscles. If he has them...

    MADHERO: I mean, he's got plenty of others to compensate.


    MADHERO: Alright, that about does it for all the news. Not the most exciting of weeks, but hey what can you do. Now it might be a bit of a dry spell, but we do actually have a review for you guys! Well, Stickman has, as he's the only one here that saw techno-thriller Searching, a movie that takes place solely on a computer screen.... or does it?

    LARRY: Ooh this’ll be interesting to hear about. Cuz I’m interested to see this too.

    STICKMAN: It does. I wanted to watch Upgrade but fuck you Cineworld yet again.

    MADHERO: Oh dang. Well Sticky, is this computer screen movie worth seeing ON THE BIG SCREEN?! Or should you go and wait to watch it on your laptop for the real experience. Take it away.

    LARRY: Possibly the first movie ever to best experience on a laptop....



    DIRECTOR: Aneesh Chaganty (directorial debut)

    STARRING: John Cho, Michelle La, Debra Messing, Sara Sohn

    SYNOPSIS: After his 16-year-old daughter (La) goes missing, a desperate father (Cho) breaks into her laptop to look for clues to find her.

    STICKMAN: Searching is an interesting film. Although its most touted feature is the format in which its presented, namely through the screens of various computers, laptops, phones and tablets, it's not the first film to do this (Unfriended for example), so it needs a bit more than just that gimmick to survive. So, does it? Well...yes, mostly.

    The film itself is a pretty standard, fast paced thriller along those lines. What makes it stand out is indeed the format presented, which is done very authentically. Everything, barring a couple copyright free swap-in websites, is completely believable and realistic, right down to the noises the various computers make upon booting up.  It's impressive how many ways the film finds to keep telling its story through this very limited focus, despite going off in so many  different places, and for the most part, does so without feeling too forced.  It's an interesting commentary on just how integral these devices are to our everyday lives. Emails, texts, phone calls, face-to-face video talks, live streaming, news's all there, and it's not always based on the internet stuff either.

    Beyond this unique and engrossing presentation , the film is pretty good, well acted, emotionally engaging and the slow reveals and various twists and turns make it a very entertaining. Its not very original or derivative in parts. The opening sequence in particular screams Up for example. On a whole, what makes this film especially entertaining is its format, but the strong performances and mostly predictable, but still engrossing narrative help too. Not a masterpiece, but you definitely could do worse for popcorn thriller entertainment.

    LARRY: Apparently the director of this film used to do advertisements for tech companies. So I’m glad to see someone who knows their shit handling how the internet looks cinematically. I can’t begin to tell you how many movies fuck this kinda shit up all the time.

    STICKMAN: Just computers in general, honestly. Almost all the OS platforms are covered at some stage.

    MADHERO: Sounds like the best thing about it is the way it presents its storytelling as well as John Cho, who has to be centre stage pretty much all the damn time. How does he do carrying this film?


    STICKMAN: John Cho really carries the film's narrative yeah, he's the emotional core of everything.

    LARRY: How’s Debra Messing?

    STICKMAN: A lot of the supporting cast is just kinda...there? Messing is okay too, she's the only other person to get a prominent screentime, but it's Cho who gives the standout performance. In some ways it reminded me of Buried with its limited cast, most of which is only heard, not seen.

    LARRY: Gotcha. Love seeing him get the spotlight.

    MADHERO: I guess with the overall premise in mind, do you think its worth seeing in theatres?

    STICKMAN: Ahh, all films benefit from the cinema, but this probably is one that you can see outside of it. There are little details on the screen at times that give hints towards later twists...which maybe you'd miss on a TV screen, but for the most part, you'd be fine. Was funny seeing Windows XP on a cinema screen, though.

    LARRY: It is funny to consider that this may actually benefit from a computer screen as the vessel. Considering it is made to represent experiencing things through a screen.

    MADHERO: Ah, good ol' Windows XP. The memories. Sounds like a  really neat thriller that might not do much new naratively, but a lot more aesthetically and visually. Its kinda remarkable to pull off.

    STICKMAN: Well what's interesting is that the film doesn't just use a stationary screen. It does zoom in and pan out and around, it's not a static experience.

    LARRY: Still tho, no other film besides maybe Unfriended can say anything close to that. Almost every film is intended to be seen and benefits from a cinematic experience.

    STICKMAN: This is definitely THE computer-screen film to watch.

    MADHERO: Alright, any last thoughts you want to get out there before we wrap up?


    STICKMAN: Final thoughts are that I'd keep your expectations in check for the story itself, but you'll likely have a good time regardless. Also...Pokemon is weirdly integral to the narrative so that's something.

    LARRY: I’m definitely gonna check this out in theaters.


    MADHERO: Oooooooooooh, now you've got my interest. The real Pokemon movie before Detective Pikachu next summer. Alright, that does it for Searching. Now its time for the other movies out in theaters, and boy howdy do we have not a whole lot to show.


    LARRY: Let’s get these morsels over with.



    DIRECTOR: Corin Hardy (The Hallow)

    STARRING: Demian Bichir, Taissa Farmiga, Jonas Bloquet, Charlotte Hope, Bonnie Aarons

    SYNOPSIS: In 1952 Romania, a nun, a Catholic priest and a novice (Fermiga, Bichir, Hope) investigate the mysterious suicidal death of a nun at the Cârța Monastery.


    MADHERO: Welp, its all of us going back to Sunday School and learn how to scare people through Youtube Ads

    LARRY: I am still dumbfounded in the existence of a Conjuring Cinematic Universe of all things...

    STICKMAN: The spin-off to the sequel to The Conjuring. That's a prequel.

    MADHERO: They make a lot of money and are cheap. What's there not to get?

    STICKMAN: I'm dumbfounded by the marketing to this film...we haven't actually had a real trailer for this film yet. And it's out in, ohhh....5 days?

    LARRY: Keeping it ambiguous Stix, c’mon.

    STICKMAN: Yeah but there's ambiguous and then there's. What is this movie.

    MADHERO: There's a spooky nun in it and that's all you need to know. It adds to the myyyyyyyyyyyystery

    LARRY: At the cinema I work at, the cardboard standee thing has literally 10 spooky nuns on it.

    STICKMAN: Honestly the Nun in Conjuring 2 was one of the least scary parts, but there you go. If this film is good I'll go watch it, Conjuring 1  and 2 are fantastic, and the Annabelle prequel was a lot of fun too.

    MADHERO: Directed by Corin Hardy, who's Crow project very recently went up in smoke, so for him I hope this is a good showing.


    DIRECTOR: Pierre Morel (Taken, The Gunman)

    STARRING: Jennifer Garner, John Gallagher Jr, John Ortiz, Method Man

    SYNOPSIS: When Riley North's (Garner) husband and daughter are killed in a drive-by shooting by members of a cartel and the killers walk free, she takes matters into her own hands and seeks vigilante justice against those who destroyed her life.

    MADHERO: Death Wish: Jennifer Garner Edition

    STICKMAN: I mean, basically.

    LARRY: I never saw Jennifer Garner as the Death Wish-type.

    MADHERO: I guess its more interesting then it just being another Bruce Willis vehicle. Normally this part would be played by him or a Liam Neeson, so its a nice change of pace. Garner is one of those actresses that deserves more work than trying to get Ben Affleck get his shit together.

    LARRY: Remember when she was a mom in Love, Simon?

    STICKMAN: Is this the sequel to Love, Simon.

    LARRY: I hope not.

    MADHERO: No, cause I didn't see that. She did have some action moments in Daredevil/Elektra, but the less said about that the better.

    STICKMAN: Things didn't work out so good for Simon. Or is that the boyfriend? I ain't seen that film.

    MADHERO: We ain't talking Love, Simon. Anyway this movie looks ok, I guess. It really is just Death Wish but with a woman., which I guess is at least something different

    STICKMAN: At least  the haunted husk of Bruce Willis doesn't linger over this film.

    LARRY: He’s too busy bring a superhero with Sam Jackson

    STICKMAN: More like a superzeroooo. Oh shiieet.


    DIRECTOR: Jonathan and Josh Baker (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Myles Truitt, Jack Reynor, Zoe Kravitz, Dennis Quaid, James Franco, Carrie Coon

    SYNOPSIS: Chased by a vengeful criminal (Franco), the feds (Coon) and a gang of otherworldly soldiers, a recently released ex-con (Reynor) and his adopted teenage brother (Truitt) are forced to go on the run with a weapon of mysterious origin as their only protection.

    STICKMAN: I like the alien helmet guys. I have a cool helmet fetish.

    LARRY: More like, KID. W-w-with a gun!!! Not my best....This looks okay.

    MADHERO: I'm starting to feel like the "From the producers of Stranger Things and Arrival" is some sort of death sentence. We saw it with Darkest Minds and now this.

    LARRY: Wah-oh.

    STICKMAN: It's up there with FROM THE PRODUCER OF THE WALKING DEAD for sure.

    MADHERO: I do actually like the look of the film in the trailers. I feel like this has cult movie written all over it. The reviews have been mixed, but more positive among audiences that saw it.

    LARRY: It just doesn’t have enough for me honestly. Looks kinda generic.

    STICKMAN: I like the look of the film yeah, and the music in the trailer is pretty cool. And I like space robo helmet bois with cool guns that zoop over police cars. If it turns up on Netflix maybe I'll give it a bash. I've watched worst Netflix films.

    LARRY: Yeah it’s a rental kinda movie.

    MADHERO: I do feel like this has Netflix movie/series all over it. Maybe its the Stranger Things tag.

    STICKMAN: Needs more of that sick sick Stranger Things intro music.


    DIRECTOR: Chris Weitz (The Twilight Saga: New Moon, A Better Life)

    STARRING: Oscar Isaac, Ben Kingsley, Lior Raz, Melanie Laurent, Nick Kroll, Joe Alwyn, Haley Lu Richardson

    SYNOPSIS: 15 years after World War II, a team of secret agents (Isaac, Raz, Kroll etc.) are brought together to track down Adolf Eichmann (Kingsley), the infamous Nazi architect of the Holocaust.

    MADHERO: Oscar Isaac: Nazi hunter should probably be a thing I should be more excited for than I am.

    STICKMAN: Now, this is an interesting real life story. I watched a documentary short about the actual events and they're really fascinating, this film seems a bit too hollywoody though.

    LARRY: Nick Kroll doing drama? Now that’s a sight. Oh yeah, and Nazis or whatever...

    MADHERO: He did good in Loving,  so he has acting chops. There's a pretty decent cast in this, and the story behind it is wild.

    STICKMAN: It's a really crazy story yeah. I'd recommend just reading up on it instead of watching this film.

    LARRY: Totally forgot about Loving. Yeah the cast is good, and as someone very interested in WWII on film, I feel almost obligated to give it a shot. But...I dunno, I guess it just seems a little sensationalized?

    STICKMAN: I'd seek out the documentary short if it's still around honestly. That was great.

    MADHERO: I feel like this is probably best served watching a documentary on than the movie which probably cleans some of the harder edges off of it.

    LARRY: Yeah I’d imagine so.

    STICKMAN: The documentary short just presents the facts and doesn't make a big epic drama out of it. And that's good enough honestly. Short was called 'The Driver is Red'

    LARRY: I’ve read up a lot on Eichmann and his career so seeing it in a narrative form could be captivating. But yeah, I’d rather watch a doc on it.


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for movies coming out. Like we said, not a lot to discuss, but hey, that's what MOVIE OF THE WEEK IS FOR! And hey, new month, so expect a million new Netflix movies suddenly on the feed.

    LARRY: Damn...

    MADHERO: Yep, why go for a expensive movie when you can stay at home and just chill. The perfect cinematic experience.

    STICKMAN: I don't have to see anyone that way.

    MADHERO: Indeed. So Stickman, what movie did you watch to avoid everyone else?


    STICKMAN: WELLLLLL....what I watched was the horror movie that made the big mistake of opening on the same day as A Quiet Place here in the UK, and promptly died. Ghost Stories, a British horror based on a cult stage performance by a group of British comedians, is a strange, strange film, and not perfect by any means. It follows a debunker of the paranormal as he's challenged by his childhood inspiration to disprove the three spoopy cases that made that childhood inspiration start to believe in ghosts and the devil himself.

    It plays as a bit of an anthology, telling three short horror stories featuring different characters, wrapped around the narrative of this investigation. Needless to say, not everything is at its seems, and it's not going to end the way you think it will. On a whole, it's an interesting film with some fun moments and solid acting. Not fully successful in its finale, but successful enough to be enjoyable.  That's basically the film on a whole, entertaining, but not fully formed. If you're looking for something different and fun for your horror viewings, you can do worse than Ghost Stories.

    LARRY: The posters for this film are WILD.

    MADHERO: Was this the movie with Martin Freeman with giant devil horns on the poster?

    STICKMAN: Yes it is. The posters are fucking awesome. There's nothing in the film as good as those posters, sadly.

    MADHERO: Ah, yeah those were some neat posters, and I'm sad to say I haven't seen anything from this movie otherwise.

    LARRY: Same. Sounds insane tho.

    STICKMAN: I think this is going to end up a cult favourite in the years to come, especially if it ends up on Netflix.

    LARRY: That name, Netflix, has come up AGAIN. Must be some big thing or something.

    MADHERO: Hmm, why would you say that, Larry? Is it relevant to your Movie of the Week?

    LARRY: My movie is To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before, the latest in a slew of Netflix-based romantic comedies that have been taking the world by storm. This one also happens to star Lana Condor, a Vietnamese-American actress, another win for representation. It revolves around her character having five secretly written love letters mysteriously sent to each respective subject, which leads to one of the five to strike a deal with her to act as his fake girlfriend in order to make his ex-girlfriend jealous.......yeah so the main thing the whole movie advertised has very little to do with the actual plot. But whatever.

    The film itself begins rather promisingly. Condor is a great lead, who actually tackles a character who isn’t your average passive, head-over-heels romcom protagonist. It does sadly succumb to the stupid “misunderstanding” trope and gets to an painfully obvious ending. Aw well. The film is still relatively well shot and competently done, it just could’ve been so much more given its general intelligence and tone. Hopefully this is a step forward in Netflix actually honing in on subversive, compelling entries into the genre.

    MADHERO: Damn, the Asian American crowd has been killing it this past month.

    LARRY: That’s what I’m sayinggggggg

    STICKMAN: Why can't Asian-Americans make a horror movie for a change. Stop rom-comming.

    MADHERO: I saw this in the background as my sister was watching it and it looked like cute fluff. Its quite funny to see a lot of people go head over heels for this movie.

    STICKMAN: If I wanted cute fluff  I'd look up some furry porn, I dunno.

    LARRY: It is cute fluff in a lot of ways, but in others it provides some genuine drama. I just wish the climax wasn’t so badddddd

    STICKMAN: You haven't sold me on this film I gotta say.

    MADHERO: Glad to see Lana Condor get more work because her name is cool as shit and should be on more posters and she deserved more to do in X-Men Apocalypse.

    LARRY: I’m not trying to sell it. I didn’t even plan on watching it until I saw all the hype. I’m just saying it shows promise in regards to Netflix’s new mission.

    STICKMAN: What a great MOTW. Whaaaaat's neeeeEEEexxxxxxt

    MADHERO: Oh, well, sorry to disappoint, but with me not seeing Blackkklansman until Monday, I instead am going to talk about Tag, the summer comedy you probably have already forgotten about. The story (which the movie's advertising very much wants you to know its based on a true story) is about a group who have been playing the same game of tag for the past 30 years, with the game having been used to stay in touch over such a long period of time. Its obviously a fun story, and there's moments where the movie does  manage to get that out, particularly thanks to its cast, with Jon Hamm and Hannibal Burress being highlights.

    That said, the movie feels trapped in a very traditional American comedy, and whenever the movie decides to get serious, it can't help but feel like you're watching a completely different film. It can't really decide what it wants to go for at points and it makes it odd when things suddenly become deadly serious. Still, for the most part you can simply turn your brain off and have a couple of chuckles. This story probably deserved a better movie, but what we got was ok, I guess.

    STICKMAN: Woopiiiiie. Insert Hawkeye joke here.

    MADHERO: I will say that the CG on Jeremy Renner's arms is quite impressive. I wouldn't have known they were broken if nobody told me.

    LARRY: It’s completely seamless.

    STICKMAN: We truly have entered a new era of breaking actors limbs as much as we want, and still being able to seamlessly edit that out.

    MADHERO: Its the most remarkable thing out of this otherwise farily unremarkable movie.

    LARRY: I mean, I had fun with it.

    STICKMAN: We've really dropped the ball on MOTW today.

    LARRY: Found the ending to have a surprising amount of heart. And the action to be surprisingly solid.

    STICKMAN: I hate wacky comedies that get soppy on me. That's not what I came for! I DIDN'T COME TO FEEL.

    LARRY: Yeah but it’s not cheesy It’s genuinely good.

    MADHERO: I found the ending to have the same issue with it being weirdly dark. That might've worked better if it hadn't gone wacky during most of the runtime.

    STICKMAN: I hate it when games of Tag turn dark. Like you tag someone so hard they fall off a cliff.

    LARRY: It’s a bit more than that. It got me, that’s all I’ll say, no spoilers.

    STICKMAN: One rental, a Netflix and a 'should be on Netflix' rental. Good job boys.


    MADHERO: Sorry. Next time, we'll be more hype for our Movie of the Week. Its gonna hopefully help that there's a Predator on the loose who really wants quality movie recommendations or else he'll rip your spine out. So you know, stakes.

    STICKMAN: Bill Cosby escaped from jail!?

    LARRY: Again, it’s the Summer Slump™️

    MADHERO: Sure. Also a giant crabhead looking alien, but Bill Cosby as well. Gotta watch out. Later!


    LARRY: Adios!!

  • 8 or Higher, Bro! (August 2018)

    1 month ago


    Here's the newest IMDb list for all of you to read with your eyeballs! There's a solid selection this month I think, including some major surprises for me personally and a couple of things that might make fans of a certain production company that runs a certain website that a certain idiot is writing a certain post on at this very moment very happy.

    Run wild, my friends! Have fun! Watch the stuff!...

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 115

    2 months ago



    MADHERO: What's up guys, hope you're enjoying the end of your summer vacation. Hopefully its spent in Singapore surrounded by insanely wealthy socialites and living a life of luxury. Instead of us, trapped in a crappy dimly lit apartment, trying desperately to clean up all the puppet jizz that's literally everywhere and went on for way too long. Its a felt Jackson Pollock if there ever was one. So yeah, I had hoped for a slightly better end to the summer season, but here we are.

    LARRY: Damn that was quite a descriptive intro, Mad. Not sure I’m happy about it.

    STICKMAN: Puppet Jizz is our lives now, we might as well accept that.

    MADHERO: Once you've seen a puppet blow its load, its hard to forget. Anyway, we might as well take a break and go talk about some news.

    LARRY: *shudders*




    Normally, we wouldn't be talking the Oscars until at least October, but recent changes have sounded off the biggest change to the Academy since 2009, when they expanded the Best Picture nominees from 5 to a maximum of 10. That change, initially implemented to get more known films in the biggest category, has largely failed, and the show in general continues to decline in ratings, with the latest show scoring the lowest ratings in their history. This has led to some pretty major changes which have been received... let's say mixed.

    Under pressure from ABC, the show will be cut to 3 hours, as well as from 2020 on, will be held earlier in the year. That shorter length will mean that some award winners and speeches will be done whilst commercials are going on and will appear later at some point in the broadcast. While I don't think anyone will disagree with the length, its shitty that some smaller awards will not be allowed to shine to millions. The more egregious decision, comes in the form of a new category: Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film, meant to highlight the blockbusters that generally have an hard time getting nominated. Pretty much everyone has dunked on this decision, with it being a pretty blatant attempt to get films like Black Panther on the ballot which is otherwise a less sure thing. As of right now, its hard to say what the award even means, but it can't help but sound condescending to both normal and unorthodox Best Picture nominees. Look forward to our predictions at the end of the year.

    LARRY: I’m still waiting to hear exactly what that award even means, to be honest. But on paper, it doesn’t sound like a good idea.

    STICKMAN: Siiiiiigh. The Oscars just don't get it.

    MADHERO: O those poor blockbusters. Now we finally get to see Vin Diesel win a Oscar for Fast 10.

    STICKMAN: Everyone's asked them to take mainstream cinema more seriously, instead they're throwing it the world’s worst  bone.

    MADHERO: Its doing what the Best Picture award was meant to do when it expanded, which it did in the beginning (Districht 9, Avatar, Toy Story 3) but only made room for more "arty" films. Which should be fine, the best films should be nominated, but it didn't help matters.

    STICKMAN: The best films should be nominated, but I think we can all agree that they generally aren't. Some? Maybe. But not most.

    LARRY: The best films from the general consensus, sure. Arthouse films generally always have a strong showing.

    MADHERO: Its still really difficult to know what this category is going to entail. That's up for speculation, and the Academy has stated that films nominated for this new category can still get nominated for Best Picture, but that road feels a lot more difficult now.

    LARRY: Yeah, again, so many factors could determine what this award means. I’m waiting to hear those before I blow a gasket. But I can see why people aren’t happy.

    STICKMAN: My main thing right now is presenting some of the awards outside of the show. That's fucking stupid.

    LARRY: Yeah I HATE that. That’s upsetting me more, honestly. The Tonys do that and it’s so annoying.

    MADHERO: It sucks for the lesser categories who won't get a chance to shine, so that ABC can add more staged invasions of cinemas with hot dog cannons.

    STICKMAN: There shouldn't be "lesser categories" though. The awards are a celebration of cinema and the people who make them. Not just Brad Pitt getting a free pizza.

    LARRY: Exactly. Every category is worthy of being showcased.

    MADHERO: I can't pretend to care as much about Short Documentary as I do the main categories, but it’s still nice for those people to get recognition, like the winner of Best Short doing her speech in sign language.

    STICKMAN: It's not about what one person cares about, though. It's about the achievement of reaching that level of recognition, and also shining a spotlight on less celebrated corners of the medium. I FEEL.

    LARRY: If someone is getting an award, it deserves to be recognized as a part of the ceremony. Period. This is only going to create a more thorough dichotomy between types of awards, which sucks because everyone in the industry works hard.

    STICKMAN: Instead of adding a Popular FIlms category they should be adding Stunt Work or Motion Capture .

    MADHERO: We're going to see what happens in terms of ratings. Its obvious thosr have continued to decline which is why it has happened. Will this change things? i doubt it, but we'll see in late February.


    So, we’ve known for a while now that, despite the trailers receiving mixed reactions and the actual film not having even been released yet (oy...), Sony is putting its bets on Venom to kickstart a brand new cinematic universe focused on the many supporting baddies in Spider-Man’s rogues gallery. We knew they were working on several different projects, but perhaps we didn’t realize just how deep this delusion goes. Somehow, they seem to be topping their last ridiculous effort to MCU the Spidey universe, which was canned after ASM2 was a commercial and critical failure.

    Besides for our goopy friend’s cinematic return, which is now probably going to be PG-13 instead of R to potentially crossover with Spidey’s escapades in the MCU, we got Morbius starring Jared Leto, the previously announced “Silver and Black” movie, focusing on Silver Sable and Black Cat, will now be two solo films, with original director Gina Prince-Bythewood most likely going from director to producer. As far as new stuff, Richard Wenk is writing a solo film for Kraven the Hunter (now THAT’S a movie I would pay to see), we are also seeing Sony pushing diversity in a trio of solo films for Silk, a Korean-Amerixan female superhero, Jackpot, an older heroine (and, depending on which identity they choose, a lesbian), and Nightwatch (not much there but he’s cool I guess). While all of these plans sound ridiculously out of nowhere story-wise and have barely even begun development, at least there’s diversity I guess. The bottom line is that clearly Sony has learned nothing since their last fuck up, and if Venom turns out to be as shitty as it looks, we’re looking at yet another cinematic universe going up in flames...or down in goop...I dunno.

    STICKMAN: Make it stoOoOOop.

    MADHERO: Extreme Detective Cooper voice: ITS HAPPENING AGAIN!

    STICKMAN: Why can't they wait and see what the response to Venom is before making 50,000 film plans and shoving teasers for them all into their movies. Did they learn nothingggg from Amazing Spider-Man?

    LARRY: Apparently not. Literally nothing.

    MADHERO: Just you wait when they revive that Aunt May spy prequel thing

    STICKMANLast Saturday at 10:37 PM

    Oooyyy. I will say, the focus on diversity is great, I think that's important, although I feel for Sony it's more them sniffing the cash train that was Black Panther, but there you go.

    LARRY: What’s hysterical to me is that, with the Fox merger, it’s only becoming clearer that Sony has no reason to own the characters it has the rights to. They simply don’t understand how to do the cinematic universe. It’s so fucking frustrating.

    MADHERO: I mean, they own the license still. Its very much a miracle that Spidey is in the MCU, but the way they're handling this now just screams like they're reviving their Amazing Spider-Man plans, which crashed in a wall.

    STICKMAN: Amazing Spider-Man as a series was really dogged down by the need to establish a UNIVERSE with over-arching mysteries and characters who will become more important later on. Except it didn't work because they didn't make a good enough film with that.

    LARRY: I loved that stupid plot line about the Sinister Six in ASM2. It was so pompous, it was almost like watching a trainwreck happen before it actually happened.

    STICKMAN: Venom looks to be another car crash, prove me wrong, Sony,  I'd love for it to be great, but yeah. Unlikely.

    MADHERO: I feel like Venom is probably going to be its own self-established thing with major sequel bait, but that the films are going to be separate for now. I do find it hilarious they're trying to go PG 13 now.

    LARRY: It looks like a total misfire. Going PG-13? What a joke. You joke about him dismembering people limb from limb and then just like...cutaway? Bullshit.

    STICKMAN: Especially after the trailer's edgy obsession with body parts.

    MADHERO: To be fair, they never promised a R-rating. It just seems like that was the initial plan and they backed out. There's some pretty edgy content in the trailers and that'll be softened, like a turd.... in the wind.

    LARRY: A goopy black turd.



    A couple episodes ago, we talked about the disappointing news that was James Gunn being fired as director of GotG Vol 3 following a resurfacing of offensive tweets by a right-wing campaign to get him discredited. It's fair to say the story has been a source of constant interest from the various entertainment news outlets of the world, and whilst not much has actually changed, there's still a lot more to unpack. There was apparently some pressure from Marvel Studios towards the heads at Disney to reinstate him as director, including the whole Guardians cast signing a letter. For one fleeting moment, rehiring seemed a possibility, with studio head Alan Horn meeting with James Gunn to discuss things, but he’s ultimately decided to stick to their gun(n)s and not rehire him for the position.

    However, in a move that somewhat negates any moral high ground the studio has by sacking him as director, they still intend to use his script, which does mean he'll still both be credited, and paid by the studio, but seems weird after everything that’s happened. Dave Bautista specifically being very vocal and scathing about the situation, threatening to quit. Despite this, Disney seem to be refusing to budge on the issue,. For Gunn though, there's plenty of interest from other studio's, so he'll find new work, but that does not change the fact how much of a shame this is.

    MADHERO: God, this has only been going on for a month but already feels like forever.

    LARRY: They will use his script but not have him on as director? So...acknowledge his place in the film’s production and credit him yet act as tho he’s this disreputable, offensive person that doesn’t hold Disney’s values?

    STICKMAN: Movies sure are a thing.

    MADHERO: Its a complicated scenario, and it'll likely still use his script albeit with some polishing. Its still a first draft. They can't use it without reaching a settlement with Gunn, but the chance of him directing seems to be officially over.

    LARRY: Alan Horn can go suck Venom’s big tongue for all I care. The man is a hypocritical asshole with no backbone. This is the same dude who banned publications from going to see early critic screenings because of good journalism. I can’t say I’m surprised but I can I’m angry as hell.

    STICKMAN:  Are you telling me Disney aren't the house of magic and wonder and are instead a money-grabbing, cynical corporation teeming with greed and corruption?

    MADHERO: It continues to suck. The reason why especially.  It was all so very unnecessary

    STICKMAN: This situation sucks, especially now they're not even taking any moral high ground and are instead being stubborn about a rash and uncoordinated termination of a major player in their biggest live action franchise. But there you go, Christopher Robin out now in cinemas.

    LARRY: Alan Horn, the man who succumbed to an alt-right rapist and his stupid smear campaign.    

    MADHERO: Oof. Nothing more to add there.

    STICKMAN: None of us are getting jobs at Disney in the future now.



    For fans hoping to see two Hollywood Chris’ on screen together at last, those dreams may never see the light of day, sadly. We know that there's a Star Trek 4 in development, having recently hired a hired a director in SJ Clarkson: the first woman to direct one of the films. We also knew it was going to involve some time travel, which would let Chris Hemsworth return as Kirk's father, whom he played before his breaktrhough as Thor.

    However, it now seems that negotiations have fallen through for both Chris Pine and Chris Hemsworth The studio is attempting to lower the Chris’ pay cuts due to the last film, Star Trek Beyond, underperforming, but the Chrises won’t budge. And it’s not hard to see why: Pine and Hemsworth are both big players in massive franchises, so to have their pay cuts lowered for a franchise that may not even be worth their time? That’s no good. Thankfully, the remaining mainstay cast members are likely to return, like Zoe Saldana and Jon Cho. But will the series’ main character have to be recast? We’ll have to wait and see.

    MADHERO: Well this sucks. Was really hoping for a Star Trek 4 and it was surprising they went through when Beyond underperformed

    STICKMAN: Can't wait to see what timeline altering bullshit they come up with for Kirk suddenly looking like another vaguely attractive white man.

    MADHERO: Hohoho, Chris Pine is not vaguely attractive. I guess with Wonder Woman he has another franchise to fall back on.

    LARRY: I mean...this won’t stop ST4 I feel. The episodic format makes things a lot more flexible. I can see them leaving Kirk behind and introducing some new protagonist.

    STICKMAN: I feel like there are more people than you'd expect that would be mad about a recast.

    MADHERO: There were people mad when this movie happened, and hell, they just casted a new Spock in Discovery. We know that Chekov won't be recast after Yelchin's death, but either way its a complex scenario. You can’t really skimp on budget with something like Star Trek,

    LARRY: But they sure can try. It’s even funnier cuz it’s the company’s fault Beyond underperformed. It was marketed poorly.

    STICKMAN: There's a lot more space action film competition now then there was when the first Star Trek film came out. Gotta stand out or be fantastic, and Beyond was...okay.

    MADHERO: It’s a shame that it underperformed when it’s probably the best in the trilogy. That Sabotage sequence remains fucking awesome.

    STICKMAN: Sabotage bit was great. Rest of it was....fine.

    MADHERO: We'll always have Discovery, the return of Picard, and that weird Tarantino thing that may or may not happen.

    LARRY: That’s true, it’s not like ST is dead. It’s kinda going through a resurgence.

    STICKMAN: Star Trek Discovery took a weird ass turn in the last half of the season, but it kinda worked. Maybe this next Star Trek movie should take risks and not play it safe or repeat previous stories. Or just...y'know, not boothherr.

    MADHERO: Or go where no one has gone before.



    It remains hard to believe, but we are getting an Sonic the Hedgehog movie in 2019. We all lost our collective minds when we heard that Jim Carrey was going to play Ivo Robotnik/Doctor Eggman, and we've now seen set photos showing the movie takes place in Green Hill and there will be a chase scene in San Francisco, maybe something similar to City Escape in Sonic Adventure 2. Of course, one of the bigger questions still remained: who would be playing Sonic? Would Roger Craig Smith reprise his role, or would we get some stunt casting and see Jaleel White return? Not the case, as the role has now gone to Ben Schwartz, who's probably best known for being Jean Ralphio in Parks and Recreation.

    Considering Jean Ralphio was an annoying little prick trying way too hard to be cool, its good casting. Schwartz seems really excited about it on his Twitter account, which can't help but be endearing. It also continues his weird crusade to play every blue-tinted characters from 90's childhood, playing Leonardo in the new Ninja Turtles series, Dewey in the Ducktales reboot, and he was a Smurf in the Lost Village. While my excitement for the film mainly revolves around the inevitable meltdown of the Sonic fandom, I can't deny this is pretty good casting. Now to see what he actually looks like.


    MADHERO: As Ben Schwartz said: I'M SONNNNNNNNNNNNIC!

    STICKMAN: Set photos showed Sonic driving a Range Rover or something and I just...this film gonna be a glorious trainwreck.

    LARRY: I don’t really know Ben Schwartz super well. But from what I’ve seen, he is kinda funny. Would make for a good voice role.

    MADHERO: He's great as an annoying douchebag in Parks and Rec, and that at least are some parts of Sonic's characters. He's also a pretty good voice actor, so he's actually a pretty good choice imo.

    STICKMAN: I feel Roger Craig Smith was an obvious choice to make, he's the modern Sonic voice actor and does a great job, but oh wellllll.

    LARRY: This movie clearly has no intention of replicating modern Sonic lol. At least not in actually interesting ways.


    LARRY: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Jim Carrey as Doctor Robotnik has my ticket purchased. This movie could look like the dirtiest turd and I would pay for a ticket.

    MADHERO: I'd have probably gone for Roger Craig Smith as well, but I think Schwartz is a good choice. But hey, I'm just sitting from afar waiting for the bomb to go off

    STICKMAN: I am also waiting for the fireworks but doing so without paying to see the movie. This and Detective Pikachu make 2019 the year of Live Action/CGI mascot video game movies. And I mean...that's a thing?

    MADHERO: 90's video game movies we should've gotten 15 years ago.

    STICKMAN: Can't wait to hear your reasoning for being all on board with a stupid Sonic movie where Green Hill is an American town and Sonic drives an SUV but are also massively opposed to the mere existence of Detective PIkachu, Larry.

    LARRY: Jim. Carrey. Period. Does it look like I’m acknowledging my decision here is rational?

    MADHERO: I'll be sittign from afar, thinking about my former Sonic fan days and laugh.

    STICKMAN: Sonic is dumb and anyone who likes Sonic games is dumb. 


    As the Summer season draws to a close, we inevitably, as film nerds  start to turn our attention to Oscarbait season. With that potent October-December period approaching rapidly, and the big film festivals gearing up their tantalizing lineups of acclaimed directors and rising talents, we of course, start to get our first look at these potential awards frontrunners. Last episode we talked about Barry Jenkins' 'If Beale Street Could Talk', which is looking very nice indeed...this week we've got our first look at Alfonso Cuaron's next movie, Roma. The director of Children of Men and Gravity takes his time making films, but they tend to come out of it pretty damn well, and this seems to be no exception.

    Promising to be a far more personal and intimate film than his previous two releases, Roma is a black and white, Spanish language production that aims to have a limited theater release (Presumably for awards eligibility) followed by a release on the increasingly robust Netflix, who seem to have their hands on several of the biggest contenders for the coming months. The film is set in 1970s Mexico, and is based on Cuaron's own experiences growing up in a middle class home during an escalating and ultimately bloody clash between government forces and student protesters. The trailer showcases some beautiful visuals, and some of the gritty street-level chaos he previously showcased in the spectacular Children of Men. On a whole this is clearly a smaller scale, niche affair compared to his previous sci-fi blockbuster, Gravity, but it's looking very bit as promising at this moment.

    MADHERO: Man, this was a gorgeous trailer. I honestly didn't know this movie was going to be black and white honestly.

    STICKMAN: I'm always here for black and white films that utilise the contrast to make great visuals.

    MADHERO: It definitely looks to be Cuaron's most personal film, which is funny after such a big film like Gravity. He takes his time, but he always delivers.

    LARRY: Yeah it’s a good trailer. Makes me curious to learn what the actual plot is about considering the trailer does nothing to show me. But hey, it beats black and white waves for 30 seconds.

    STICKMAN: I explained what the premise is, bruh.

    LARRY: Yeah the trailer doesn’t do that. That’s my point.

    STICKMAN: It conveys a mood and hints towards a time of cultural tension.

    MADHERO: Its a bit more interpretative. It’s really weird how slow Cuaron works. I really thought there was something between Children of Men and Gravity, but nope. Then again, the latter took quite a while to get made. Going back to Mexico, to essentially his childhood is gonna be an interesting experience.

    LARRY: Aesthetically it’s nice, but I wanted a few more concrete details. I’m mixed with Cuaron personally, so I’m hoping this return to his roots makes for something less pretentious and more personal.

    STICKMAN: I feel it said plenty without any words, which was cool. But there you go. I love Cuaron, even his Harry Potter film was the best one.

    LARRY: I wasn’t a huge fan of Gravity. But I do like Children of Men and Azkaban.

    MADHERO: To me, Cuaron hasn't gone wrong for me yet. Its gonna be a different ride from him, but I'm sure it'll be amazing.


    MADHERO: Alright, I think that's about it in terms of news. The end of August is upon us, and we actually have an event movie to end the summer with a bang. Just a bummer that event ain't for us. Damn you under-served market who finally get to see themselves on screen! I have nothing for me, a white man!

    STICKMAN: We have an event movie? Is it Godzilla?

    LARRY: I say it’s an event movie for everyone!!

    MADHERO: I'm of course referring to puppets everywhere who finally get to see themselves on screen, and I guess Asian people as well get something nice.

    LARRY: We can all celebrate representation!! Those puppets need love!!

    STICKMAN: #MakePuppetsJizzAgain

    MADHERO: ....Let's talk about the Asian movie first.



    DIRECTOR: Jon Chu (Jem and the Holograms, Now You See Me 2)

    STARRING: Constance Wu, Henry Golding, Gemma Chan, Michelle Yeoh, Awkwafina, Ken Jeong, Lisa Lu, Chris Pang, Sonoya Mizuno

    SYNOPSIS: Chinese American economics professor Rachel Chu (Wu) accompanies her boyfriend (Golding) to Singapore for his best friend's (Pang) wedding, only to become thrust into the lives of Asia's rich and famous.

    LARRY: Visual splendor and representation? Nice.

    STICKMAN: See, this film isn't not for me because of who it's about, it's not for me because it's a romantic comedy. Looks very nice visually, for sure.

    MADHERO: So as someone who grew partially in Asia, its funny to see this film come to life in such extravagant fashion.

    LARRY: Yeah, it’s a romcom, but after Love, Simon, I’ve come to accept the importance of the genre if it means good representation, and I’m here to support that.

    MADHERO: Yeah, its funny, with the traditional having largely been relegated to Netflix. Apparently they were very interested in distributing this, but the director really wanted a theatrical release

    LARRY: And for good reason.

    STICKMAN: I think it's great these films exist but I'm a lonely man without anyone to hold me at night and I care not for the romance of others.

    LARRY: If that doesn’t summarize Sticky perfectly, I don’t know what does.

    MADHERO: Its basically the Asian version of Black Panther. Its great that it not only does representation well, but that its also a pretty good romantic comedy.

    STICKMAN: I bet it has better CGI than Black Panther.

    MADHERO: Don't need no CG when you have Michelle Yeoh.

    LARRY: How did we get two Akwafina movies this year...?

    MADHERO: Well when you need as much Asian actors as you can, it just sorta happens. Like I said, its not for me, but I'm glad so many people get to see themselves represented. And hey, my sister liked it.

    STICKMAN: Representation is important, films that aren't romantic comedies are more important, though.

    MILE 22

    DIRECTOR: Peter Berg (Deepwater Horizon, Patriots Day)

    STARRING: Mark Wahlberg, John Malkovich, Lauren Cohan, Iko Uwais, Ronda Rousey

    SYNOPSIS: An elite American intelligence officer (Wahlberg), aided by a top-secret tactical command unit, tries to smuggle a mysterious police officer (Uwais) with sensitive information out of Indonesia.

    STICKMAN: The Overwatch movie we've all been waiting for.

    LARRY: Oh hey, Mark Wahlberg.

    MADHERO: I guess the 22 refers to the Rotten Tomatoes score

    STICKMAN: OOHH SHIT B-B-BUURRN. What a perfectly good waste of Iko Uwais.

    LARRY: Now I just wanna rewatch The Raid.

    MADHERO: Mark Wahlberg can play a lot of things. A genius is not one of them. Also wasting Iko Uwais through shitty editing should be a war crime. I saw some clips and its Taken 3 levels of cuts.

    STICKMAN: Disgusting. The Raid 2 is where it's really at. Get that man a John Wick movie stat.

    MADHERO: This is the 4th Peter Berg/Mark Wahlberg joint, and maybe its time to call it quits on this relationship.

    STICKMAN: Mark Wahlberg should try some brighter colours one day. Less black leather, maybe a nice pink number?

    LARRY: A few warm blues. A neon purple?

    MADHERO: Lets eat a Wahlburger and get outta here.


    DIRECTOR: Brian Henson (Muppet Christmas Carol, Muppet Treasure Island)

    STARRING: Bill Barretta, Melissa McCarthy, Maya Rudolph, Joel McHale, Elizabeth Banks

    SYNOPSIS: In a world where puppets exist but are reviled by society, puppet private investigator, Phil Phillips (Bill Barretta), reunites with his ex-partner Detective Connie Edwards (Melissa McCarthy) to find a serial killer who murdered Phil's brother and is now targeting the cast members of the 1980s television series The Happytime Gang.

    MADHERO: Oh man, what a journey this has been.

    STICKMAN: If you can call plummeting off a cliff a journey.

    MADHERO; One part of me is amazed this movie is actually coming out. The other is annoyed that it looks kinda bad.

    STICKMAN: The trailers are just so embarrassing and edgy. This is a disaster.

    LARRY: I know this isn’t really clever at all, but yeah, this movie looks really bad.

    STICKMAN: Mellisa McCarthy, want to give her a chance  and not just immediately assume everything she's in sucks? But then...she stars in films like this? It's like a warning sign.

    LARRY: McCarthy self-enables her own shitty spiral of films. She collaborates with similar filmmakers multiple times, and sticks to a relatively similar style of humor in each film.

    MADHERO: I don't think you can accuse of being safe with a project like this, but yeah, not a fan. The original pitch sounded really clever and interesting in that it took a hardboiled noir approach. That seems all gone in favor of way more puppet jizz.

    STICKMAN: We don't get many puppet films, can we like, not make them awful when we do them? Lets make a puppet horror movie where the humans are the monster.

    MADHERO: Stickman, you should probably check out Puppet Master soon.


    DIRECTOR: Albert Hughes (From Hell, The Book of Eli)

    STARRING: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Leonor Varela, Jens Hulten, Johannes Johanesson

    SYNOPSIS: After a Steppe bison hunting expedition 20,000 years ago in Europe goes awry, a young man (Smit-McPhee) struggles against the elements to find his way home, all the while developing a friendship with a wolf.

    LARRY: Ooh doggies.

    STICKMAN: Oh good another dog movie.

    MADHERO: Boy meets dog meets Ice Age meets The Revenant

    LARRY: What a mixture.

    MADHERO: Apparently this movie is actually pretty good. I get the feeling this probably sat on a shelf and they're only releasing it now to be rid of it

    STICKMAN: Also it looks nice visually but other than that it seems very generic and obviously heavy on the MAN'S BEST FRIEND sentimentality which is very overdone. Marley and BC.

    MADHERO: It does look very pretty in the trailers. Also apparently the actors don’t speak English, which is a nice risky move.

    LARRY: I have a friend who saw it and surprisingly liked it, so I may give it a shot. Not on the top of my list, tho.

    STICKMAN: I figured they weren't speaking English since nobody talks in the trailer apart from an obviously forced in narration.

    MADHERO: That felt very old school. It was weird.

    STICKMAN: Anyway this movie looks okay and it's got doggies in it so.


    DIRECTOR: Oliver Daly (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Alex Neustaedter, Becky G, Thomas Jane, Dominic Rains

    SYNOPSIS: A.X.L. is a top-secret, robotic dog who develops a special friendship with Miles (Neustaedter) and will go to any length to protect his new companion.

    MADHERO: The first man/dog relationship? FUCK THAT! GIVE ME ROBO-DOG!

    STICKMAN: The sequel to Alpha, but like, the 8th installment in the series where things got a bit out of hand. And they end up in space or whatever.

    LARRY: On the other hand....... I’m just surprised the name AXL made it past the writer’s room.

    STICKMAN: Shoulda called it Bark and BYTE.

    MADHERO: This again feels like someone that sat on a shelf and is only now coming out to be rid of it. Also no surprise its coming from Global Road, a studio that's begging to die.

    STICKMAN: I mean the robot dog is cute I guess. I'm getting Monster Truck vibes though.

    LARRY: It’s pretty ferocious looking. Not very cute.

    STICKMAN: Nah. You shouldn't judge a robot by its weaponry Larry, did you learn nothing from The Iron Giant.

    MADHERO: Its very much a grown up Monster Trucks, but it probably wasn't as pointlessly expensive.

    STICKMAN: You better believe we got sick bike tricks, robot dogs, you betcha. Don't even worry about it.

    MADHERO: You can either watch prehistoric doggo's or future doggo's. What a time to be alive.

    LARRY: I choose no doggos, thanks.

    STICKMAN: I'm really more of a cat person.


    MADHERO: Alright, no dogs then. Then maybe we'll go for MOVIE OF THE WEEK


    MADHERO: I don't think there's any dogs involved  in my movie. Don't really know if its also the case for you guys.

    LARRY: There are....I think no dogs. I honestly cannot recall.

    MADHERO: Maybe they're hidden under all those hoods. I guess that's kind of a tease of what you're talking about, so maybe you go first.

    LARRY: Wowwwwwwwww. Alright, well here goes nothing...


    LARRY: My MOTW is the ridiculously spelled BlacKkKlansman, the latest Spike Lee joint. As I’m sure we all know, Lee can be a bit hit or miss because of how politically volatile and strongly stylistic his filmmaking is. However, I can attest that this is one of his better joints, and arguably a return to form to the nuanced, powerful days of “She’s Gotta Have It” and “Do The Right Thing.”

    Naturally, a story about a black cop infiltrating the KKK seems to be pretty straightforward, but believe it not, Lee doesn’t paint one side as a clear hero, bringing multiple sides of the discussion into the light, from cops, to Jews, to black protestors, and not shying away from seeing the shades of gray. Beyond this, there is also incredibly poignant, almost disturbing juxtaposition that makes for some of the most intense and captivating scenes of the year. Beyond this, it has an excellent cast, smart cinematography, pitch-perfect pacing, and an ending that, while a bit too indulgent in my opinion, will surely leave people speechless. Along with Blindspotting, this is a film that takes its politics and uses them to portray an interesting, hilarious, and action-packed narrative.

    MADHERO: Ooooooooh, things about to get spicy in here.

    LARRY: I’s good. It’s very good.

    STICKMAN: I can't work out if this is a comedy or not. Trailer gave off comedy vibes but I've been hearing a lot of people talk about how shocking and upsetting it is.

    LARRY: It has comedic elements for sure, but it is rooted in drama.

    MADHERO: I figured as much. A lot of Spike's movies still have some comedy in them. Do the Right Thing is also a drama steeped with a lot of comedy.

    STICKMAN: I guess the drama just tilted on the comedic angle a lot.

    LARRY: Yes, especially when it comes to David Duke.

    MADHERO: Speaking of the Dukester. How's Topher Grace? I hear he and Adam Driver might be up for Best Supporting Actor.

    STICKMAN: Venom himself up for an Oscar? What crazy times.

    LARRY: I think Driver comes much closer than Grace. No question.

    MADHERO: I'm gonna see this film as soon as I can. I don't think it'll have the same response as it'll have in the States, but that's stating the obvious.

    STICKMAN: I'm pretty sure it's not screening at my cinema but then what else is new. Guess I'll wait and seeee.

    LARRY: Hopefully you’ll get the chance to see it!!

    STICKMAN: SPEAKING OF...uhh....what's your film Mad.

    MADHERO: Well. Its up to me to bring it back to the mainstream and go for something the whole world can enjoy. Does a movie like Avengers Infinity War even need introduction? Chances are that you've probably seen it, enjoyed all the memes and are chomping to bits for the eventual Avengers 4 to come in 2019.

    Its been a film where we had to dedicate an entire spoiler special to, and for good reason. A lot happens in Infinity War, and it really does feel  like its the endgame, even when we'll get a whole other batch of Marvel movies afterwards. It breaks so many rules in the movie playbook: it doesn't really have a set protagonist/main character, and it ends in a really unexpected fashion. So by this point, you already know whether you're with this film or not. Its gonna be impenetrable for anyone that's not been on the MCU ride, but for the millions that are ,its a great time that leaves you begging for more.

    STICKMAN: Never heard of it.

    LARRY: Avengers? Sounds like some arthouse indie.

    MADHERO: Oh. Well, guys, there's this thing called the MCU. There's 20 of them, and you need to see at least half to get this movie sooooo..... GOOD LUCK!

    LARRY: Meh, I’ll pass.

    STICKMAN: I'll have to check it out some time I dunno. Not really my thing.

    MADHERO: Well when you do, lemme know what you think. These films are really funny, but this one is definitely more of a bummer that won't make you feel so good, but it has some great action along the way.

    STICKMAN: I'll stick to the DCEU I thin-I CAN'T EVEN JOKE ABOUT THAT.

    LARRY: I mean, it’s not like this film has both John Brolin AND RDJ. I mean, that may make me reconsider.

    MADHERO: Quite a few actors, yeah. Too many some would say. Anyway, what's your MOTW Sticky? Is it something we've all heard of?

    STICKMAN: OH LOOK, IT'S A QUIET PLACE. The hit horror movie of's a hit movie anyway, whether or not you consider it horror, or merely an intense sci-fi drama is up for debate, and the real hit HORROR of the year so far has to be Hereditary...but...there's one thing you can't deny about A Quiet Place, which is that it's very good indeed.

    Starring that guy from The Office and Emily Blunt as parents trying to protect their children, both born and unborn in a post-apocalyptic America, where aliens that hunt based on even the smallest detectable sounds have invaded and wiped out most of the population. Those that survive have to live in basically total silence, making for a very unique and constantly tense cinematic experience, which made for a fantastic, oddly surreal time at the cinema, and I'm sure will still work well now it's on the ol' home videos. Again, as a horror film it's somewhat lacking, I feel, but as a drama, and a high concept sci-fi film? It's really great stuff, and well worth a watch, providing you can deal with the tension, and the feels.

    LARRY: So, yeah, this movie is damn good.

    MADHERO: Oh hey, I've heard about this movie, which may or may not be good considering you're meant to be quiet.

    STICKMAN: It's all very hush hush. But not like the movie, Hush.

    MADHERO: It remains really weird that it was John Krasinski directed this film. It’s definitely something you expect from a new genre filmmaker. Not Jim of the Office.

    LARRY: Yeah, I agree that this movie makes for a very unique filmgoing experience. Actually forces the audience to shut up.

    STICKMAN: He does a good job in the directing seat, but also gives a great lead performance. He's a real go gette.r that Jim.

    LARRY: I absolutely loved Krasinski in this film. Hard to imagine him as macho but then you give him a beard

    STICKMAN: Now he's a real daddy type.

    MADHERO: Slight weakness to nails tho.

    STICKMAN: Oof. Chekov's Nail. But yeah, just imagine The Last of Us with the sound turned off and you've got a good idea of this movies tone.

    LARRY: Perfect description, honestly. Except no infection and zombies and stuffz


    MADHERO: Cool. I think that about wraps up everything. Its time to go back to school as Hollywood faces the September Slump. Guess we'll just go to this not at all creepy Sunday School.

    LARRY: Uh oh

    STICKMAN: There are Nun scarier schools than that.

    MADHERO: Well its either that or....... damn.... September Slump is gonna make this difficult to discuss. We'll make it work though. Laaaaaaaaater



  • Mile 22 Is Sloppy, Choppy, and, Worst of All, Kind of Boring.

    2 months ago


    I was looking forward to Mile 22. I knew it wasn't going to be high art or even giant budgeted spectacle, but there's plenty of room between those two things for a fun movie.

    The premise is simple: a squad of badasses have to get from point A to point B in a certain amount of time and pretty much everybody in-between those two points is trying to kill them. We've seen this one done before. The low key, but still pretty solid, Bruce Willis starrer 16 Blocks did it and The Raid kind of did it as well, but the twist here was it was a modern warfare take of a trained group of people instead of one guy fighting his way through some baddies.

    When you add in Peter Berg directing, Mark Wahlberg starring and a team comprised of people like Ronda Rousey, Lauren Cohan, Iko Uwais and John Malkovich as their eye-in-the-sky overseer then you have the makings of some real fun B-grade entertainment.

    The problem is they fucked it up on a fundamental level. 


    Structurally this thing was doomed from the script stage. Wahlberg and his team don't even start on their title 22 mile trek until halfway through the movie so the whole reason you want to watch the movie feels rushed. I could forgive that if they spent the first half of the movie really focused on character, making us care about the team before they go into the shit, but instead they spend that time trying to be quippy while over-explaining a hilariously convoluted plot.

    The Raid's Iko Uwais is a cop who has knowledge of the location of some deadly powder that I guess acts like a nuclear bomb, irradiating entire cities if sprinkled on the ground. He'll tell the US where all this stuff is if they can get him safely out of his country. It's 22 miles from the embassy where he's being held and the airplane that will take him to America and it's up to Mark Wahlberg and his crew to get him there.

    We don't really need anything else plot-wise, but nobody told director Peter Berg or screenwriter Lea Carpenter that. No, there's a subplot about evil Russians infiltrating the mission and a ridiculously in-depth backstory on Mark Wahlberg's childhood. I get that we need these characters to have personality and tics, but making Wahlberg's character an autistic genius who puts together “impossible” puzzles in his spare time doesn't really match up with the high-strung 'roid rage character he plays for most of the movie. In fact it seems like the only reason we're given that particular backstory is so he has a reason to snap a rubber band around his wrist over and over again in his many monologue scenes.

    Critics were unkind to Ben Affleck's The Accountant, but at least his character is consistent. His ability to be an incredible assassin was directly tied into his character making his autism work for him. There's definitely a conversation to be had about using a real thing that real people have to integrate into their lives this way in movies, but we can all agree that Affleck's character being autistic meant something to that film's story We don't get anything like that in Mile 22.

    They tell us Mark Wahlberg is a genius, but we never see any evidence of it. He's just a good soldier. He doesn't ever outthink his opponent or show more focus or anything. He's just good at shooting and working under fire. That's it.

    The movie also lets down his squad. Ronda Rousey is established as a good fighter and you know she's tough because she says “fuck” a lot and... then doesn't do anything with her. The Walking Dead's Lauren Cohan is given some dramatic meat with a pending divorce and child custody battle brewing while she's supposed to be dealing with this intense situation. Cohan does a good job showing the character's ability to compartmentalize without making her feel cold and uncaring about her family, but that doesn't change the fact that for the first half of the movie her character doesn't do much more than awkwardly get angry at phone calls with her soon to be ex, inexplicably played by Berg himself.


    Iko Uwais is the standout here. His character is mysterious, multi-layered and the only one who gets a chance to really show off just how formidable he is. It might help that he also choreographed most of the fight scenes and he's involved with roughly 90% of them, but it's a testament to just how effortlessly badass he is that his choreography shows through Berg's quick-cut editing style at all. The geography is rarely established and the hand to hand scenes are shot so close and cut so quickly that it's doubly frustrating for anybody who has seen The Raid films and know what Uwais is capable of.

    They try to do something interesting and different with the ending. Naturally I won't go into any detail on that, but I will say I liked the direction, but it was too little too late at that point.

    So the movie fails on a character level, on a pacing level and on a fun action film level. Those are the three things that should have been a given with this idea and talent involved. The movie was a big whiff for me and I'm no film snob who thinks everything should be a Criterion film. I walked in excited to have a good time at the movies and left angry at the missed opportunity here.

  • Rodriguez Does Rodriguez

    2 months ago



    Alright. I came up with this idea months ago. This has been a long time coming.

    I, Gianella Rodriguez, have decided that it is imperative that I go through acclaimed director Robert Rodriguez’s filmography and watch it all. Why, you ask? Because I’m a tad unhinged and am attracted to doing mildly not-normal things. You know how Andrew Panton went a month only eating chicken when he won a round of PUBG? I live for that brand of strange self-infliction except I doubt this will be a painful process because I like watching movies and I like Robert Rodriguez. One day I’ll pull a ‘watch Grown Ups 2 every week for a year’-esque project but today’s not that day.

    I have equal admiration and resentment towards Robert Rodriguez. Admiration because he changed the filmmaking game with ‘El Mariachi’ (which I haven’t seen) and resentment because he owns the Twitter handle @Rodriguez and while no one else is more deserving of that ownership than he is, I covet the hell out that. I think he’s cool, we’ve got the same last name, I’m gonna watch all his movies. Simple.

    Here’s how I think it’s going to go down. I’m going solely off the Wikipedia page and as of August 2018, it lists 20 films that he has directed (including his short film Bedhead and not including 100 Years because c’mon). The plan (which is less of a plan that I came up with and more a plan that just conveniently fell into my lap) is to watch around about a movie a week and topping it all off at the end with Alita: Battle Angel which is set to come out this December. How effortlessly convenient.

    So there you have it. I’m calling this Rodriguez Does Rodriguez. It’s like the only reason I’ve been put on this earth is to do this.

    (You can also follow this journey on my blog or on Letterboxd - I'm posting on here too though because if you scroll down enough you'll see exactly when I came up with this idea, lmao)

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 114

    2 months ago



    MADHERO: Oh bother, it looks  like we're in the  tailend of the summer already. That sure went by quicker than expected. We're seeing the last summer movies popping up to see if they can get some of that scrum diddly munny. And hey, its surprisingly packed with content, be it Disney playing with your feels, giant sharks and passe internet memes. Everyone is represented.

    STICKMAN: “When you become an adult, all summers waste by, as do days, months, as we know it. It's all passing as by and we're never going to accomplish all our dreams before we die.” - Winnie the Pooh.

    LARRY: Man I didn't realize Pooh was such a tormented figure...

    MADHERO: Its usually delivered with more whimsy. This is more something the Meg would tell after it chomps you, but enough about that.




    Its that time of the year again: another Star Wars movie is officially in production. No, not the Last Jedi remake everyone (actually no one) is craving, but Episode IX, which releases in December 2019, giving us a nice break after Solo, not that too many saw it. Anyway, while plot details are kept under wraps. We have returning director JJ Abrams join Twitter and reveal a behind the scenes picture, and we got some word of the casting. The usual suspects are of course there (Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Adam Driver etc.) with the cast now being joined by Keri Russell (The Americans), Richard E. Grant (Logan, Game of Thrones) and relative newcomer Naomi Ackie.

    Mark Hamill, despite all the conspiracies, will be in the film as well, presumably to annoy Kylo Ren a bit as a ghost, as well as Billy Dee Williams returning as Lando. The big question was of course going to be Carrie Fisher, who died in late 2016. Instead of going with CG (a la Rogue One) or recasting, the film will use previously unreleased footage of The Force Awakens to put her in the film.  How seamless this'll be remains to be seen and it’s going to be quite the challenge, but its a great last tribute for her and her iconic presence.  More will likely be revealed around the year, but this seems like a good start.

    STICKMAN: Woooo

    MADHERO: JJ Abrams is on twitter and that's at least one good thing to that hellscape. And I guess this is nice as well

    STICKMAN: JJ Abrams' Twitter is just a Cloverfield sequel in disguise.

    LARRY: I'm happy to see they're at least trying to give Leia the ending she deserves

    MADHERO: The story was very much that Force was going to be Han's story, Jedi Luke's, and IX's would be Leia's. Obviously a lot has to be reconfigured to make that work. We don't know how much extra footage there is to work with, but I admire what they're doing for sure in regarding Fisher's legacy.

    LARRY: Yeah, woulda been reeeeeeeeally bad had they CGI'd it. CGI Leia in Rouge One was really weird for me.

    STICKMAN: I don't really see how they can't use CGI, but I guess the face at least will be authentic? I dunno.

    MADHERO: I think it'd be weird. It was weird in Rogue One and to use if for someone that recently deceased would've just felt wrong. Don't think response would be good, even if it would've been understandable.

    STICKMAN: After Last Jedi I can't say I'm particularly excited for a continuation of these films, but hey ho, I'm sure I'll be hearing about it 100% of my time on planet earth in the coming months towards release anyway.

    LARRY: That's the spirit!

    MADHERO: Well its got ya boi back. Will get his own emoji and everything.  Will also be neat to see Billy Dee Williams back, and I'm super curious about Russell's role because she's an great actress.

    STICKMAN: #JJAbrams forever.

    LARRY: Personally I'm excited for Episode IX. Russell is a great actress, happy to see her included. Billy Dee is gonna rock socks as Lando, and I'm also curious to see how Luke's storyline will be concluded as ghost Luke. All in all, lots to look forward to.

    MADHERO: Hes gonna annoy Kylo Ren to death and just chug all the space milk he can find.

    STICKMAN: All I know is with two massive saga-ending films releasing in the same year, in addition to Frozen 2....Disney gonna be rolling in fucking money.



    Over the last year, it's fair to say Netflix have been  starting to show their true financial muscle in terms of greenlight...and even acquiring big budget or high profile film releases exclusively for their service. the most recent and notable of which was The Cloverfield Paradox from Paramount. Now it's the turn of Warner Bros to quickly drop and sell off a big budget project of their own, and 

    it seems like good news for Andy Serkis at the very least.

    The first news to come out was that Warner Bros had dropped the rights to their take on a live action/CGI hybrid Jungle Book adaptation, Mowgli. That entered pre-production around the same time as Disney's massively successful live action/CGI remake of The Jungle Book, and has lived in its looming shadow ever since. Several name changes and delays later, and Warner Bros seem to be done with it. It's now coming exclusively to Netflix, with its release date pushed back to sometime in 2019. Further good news for Andy is that Netflix has also greenlit his longtime passion project, which is a live action/CGI motion capture remake of Animal Farm, the seminal George Orwell work most well known in the cinematic world for its problematic 1954 animated adaptation. With Netflix in charge, hopefully this long-planned movie will be a bit more true to the original novel, but either way, Netflix is now the home of all things Andy Serkis, it seems.

    MADHERO: I don't know whether to feel good or bad about Mowgli being moved to Netflix, but it probably saved WB a big dud and a smudge on Serkis' directing career so maybe its for the best.

    STICKMAN: I'd imagine even if it is good, it would've been a bust financially.

    LARRY: Yeah I agree. "An actually dark and gritty Jungle Book" probably doesn't sell tickets.

    MADHERO: Even if the original trailer was impressive, the Disney version loomed so large that Netflix was probably the best option. I do hope the film is actually good as well. Its got a great cast and visuals looked impressive.

    LARRY: If anything, it coming to Netflix gives it more accessibility, not to mention a theatrical run on top of that so Serkis' work can still be appreciated on screen.

    STICKMAN: Andy Serkis' directorial debut got a positive reception even though it looked sentimental as fuuuuck. At least this is more in the wheelhouse you'd expect from the guy.

    MADHERO: Netflix continues to be a bit of a dumping ground for movies that studios don't really know what to do with (Annihilation, Cloverfield Paradox). Hopefully this one is more of the former

    STICKMAN: And how about that Animal Farm, eh.

    MADHERO: That's gonna be a weird one, since that's a pretty simple story that I'm not sure needs the live-action treatment, but I trust Serkis and I'd imagine he could play a pretty good Napoleon.

    STICKMAN: I'm excited for that performance mostly.

    LARRY: I'm hella excited for it, tbh. I'm always here for an Orwell adaptation.

    STICKMAN: And at least the CIA aren't involved this time...THAT WE KNOW OF.



    When the Coen Brothers make moves, the film world listens. Originally meant to be an anthology television series for Netflix, "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs," is now a feature-length film that will make its premiere at the heralded Venice Film Festival. The film, starring Tim Blake Nelson as Scruggs and set along the Western frontier, will retain its anthology structure throughout its running time at a 132 minute length. After premiering at the festival, it is set to hit Netflix alongside a theatrical run for awards consideration.

    "Scruggs" joins a long lineup of Netflix acquisitions hitting it big at Venice this year, including Alfonso Cuaron's return to Spanish-spoken filmmaking "Roma," Paul Greengrass' account of the 2011 Norway terrorist attacks in "22 July," and a newly restored version of the once uncompleted Orson Welles project "The Other Side of the World." Venice is looking to be embracing Netflix films, and streaming platforms in general, with Amazon Studios and Luca Guadagnino's "Suspiria" remake also hitting Venice. This is in stark contrast to Cannes, who have recently taken the controversial stance to ban entries that are not theatrically distributed in France, which many have seen as a direct response against Netflix. Either way, we'll see if Venice's acceptance of Netflix will pay off, as this year's festival race is capped with countless big players, and will for sure be one to remember.

    STICKMAN: Is it bad I'm kinda disappointed this isn't a TV show any more. Seems like a lot of stuff from this is gonna be cut forever, and I wanted to see a Coen brother take on a TV shoooow

    MADHERO: I'm kinda mixed on it. I'd have been very interested in what a Coen anthology series would've looked like, and making it a movie seems fine to me, cause they're great filmmakers, but you always go and ask what could've been.

    LARRY: Fair point. But 132 minutes is a loooooooong time. You can fit a lot in there.

    MADHERO: Yeah. With it just being over 2 hours, you can't help but wonder how much was cut. While Fargo the tv show is very much its own thing separate from the Coen brothers, it does give a bit of a glimpse of what it might've looked like  as a tv show.

    STICKMAN: Love me some Fargo, also love me some Alfonso and Greengrass...and Suspiria. This is the rare film festival that is speaking to me before it even starts.

    LARRY: This year's festival circuit looks amaaaaaaaaaazing. And I'm hella glad to see Venice embracing Netflix projects too.

    MADHERO: Yeah, tons of great films coming to Venice. That's usually the start of Oscar talk alongside Toronto. But we're getting new Greengrass and Cuaron,  but also directors like Yorgos Lanthimos and Damien Chazelle's First Man.

    LARRY: Lanthimos' new film looks crazy. Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz, Victorian drama, lots of weirdly wide angles.

    MADHERO: I mean, its Lanthimos. Crazy is what you get. Suspiria is gonna be a tense ass 2.5 hours.

    STICKMAN: After Killing of a Sacred Deer I can't say I'm super interessteed. The rest I'm all into. We're all huge La La Land fans here, right?

    MADHERO: It is interesting to see this festival embrace streaming ventures as much as they do when you compare it to Cannes. Does make you wonder what we'll see come Oscar time. Mudbound got some nods, but could we see a Netflix Best Picture film nominee soon?

    STICKMAN: It'll happen eventually. Maybe not this year though.

    LARRY: Mudbound was one of the best films of 2017, so let's hope so. Netflix does good stuff. It deserves recognition.

    STICKMAN: The Cloverfield Paradox's campaign for Best Picture starts HERE.

    LARRY: Eh, not that.



    Chances are that at some point last week, someone in your feed shared the pretty damn wild Daily Beast article chronicling the life of Jerome Jacobsen, an ex-cop who through his job as head of security at a marketing firm managed to get extremely rare pieces of McDonalds' Monopoly game: pieces he used to scam McDonalds to about 24 million dollars worth of prizes. The story involves a network of mobsters, psychics, strip-club owners, drug traffickers and a family of Mormons. It all ended in FBI's Operation: Final Answer, which is a pretty great name. The article is wild, and definitely worth a read if you have the time.

    This story was a lot, so naturally a massive bidding war ensued for the rights. Fox eventually won to the tune of 1 million, beating Warner Bros and Netflix in the process. Ben Affleck is now in line to direct the film, with his good buddy Matt Damon in line to play Jacobson, and Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick (Deadpool) are writing the script. This has all the ingredients to be something amazing. While Affleck is more in the news for being tired of Batman, his dumb phoenix tattoo, and the disappointment of his last movie Live by Night, he's still a pretty great director with 3 great films under his belt, and its nice to have him just behind the camera this time. I can't wait to see this real life Coen Brothers movie to hit the big screen in 2019/2020.


    MADHERO: But we have food at home.

    STICKMAN: Sweet memes.

    LARRY: Is that a John Mulaney reference? Because if so, good work.

    MADHERO: It’s an reference to an internet alignment chart, but sure. Let's go with that. Anyway this story is pretty wild.

    LARRY: Yeah this is one of those weird things you hear about and then immediately forget about. Remember when Tetris became a movie?

    STICKMAN: I can't wait to see if this film can get the image rights to McDonalds AND Monpoly for this heist movie where they both get fucked over.

    MADHERO: Not to mention Hasbro, who own the Monopoly liscense. There's quite a few hurdles to go through, but either way there's still a really weird story there. Also I fail to see what Tetris has to do with this.

    LARRY: I’m saying that this is weird and merely a blip, like the Tetris news. Weird projects get made and then forgotten about. Nice to see Affleck doing a new project tho

    STICKMAN: Remember Ben Affleck? What happened to that guy.

    MADHERO: But there’s actually a great story here, so its not like Tetris. Did you read the article, Larry? Live by Night was a bit of a dud both critically and commercially, but he still has 3 very good movies under his belt.

    LARRY: Yeah I read it. I also read once they were developing a movie about the woman who sued McDonalds over the hot coffee she spilt on herself.

    STICKMAN: Maybe she can have a crossover in this.

    MADHERO: And then it all turns out to be a part of The Founder Cinematic Universe and Michael Keaton recruits everyone to take down Burger King.

    LARRY: Get that made, dammit.

    STICKMAN: LET'S DO IT, MOVING ON, apologies to Matt Damon, we ran out of time.



    Remember Home Alone? The cherished Christmas family classic about a little boy left behind by his family, and having to ward off burglars and shit? Well...what if instead of a child, it was Ryan Reynolds, and instead of going on charming escapades with burglars and church and shit, he was getting stoned off his ass? Interested?

    Well...I present to you STONED ALONE, a R rated spiritual successor for Fox, who own the franchise. Keeping the home invasion theme but adding an adult and heaps of that sweet sweet 'Mary Jane', Ryan Reynolds will potentially play a 20 year old (Yes, I know) stoner who gets left behind by his family when they go on a ski trip, and gets baked instead. He's also producing the film, and the director of the upcoming, reasonably well received 'Never Goin' Back' is set to direct. This...sure is a film project? It has the potential to turn out fun in a dumb way, but it's just baffling we even got to the point where a weed-centric reboot of Home Alone became a thing to begin with.

    LARRY: Oh wow we actually went with this.

    MADHERO: As many a wee lad of the 90's, I grew up watching the Home Alone movies on home video and all I can really say to this is: fucking what now?

    STICKMAN: Why couldn't they get Mcahaheleey KAlukin back for this, I'm sure he's a massive pothead now.

    LARRY: What is the plot even gonna be? Is Ryan Reynolds gonna talk to animals again?

    STICKMAN: He's gonna be Deadpool but ruder, cruder, and without access to a time machine.

    MADHERO: Culkin's too busy filming the Pagemaster NES game review with AVGN. I can maybe buy this with Culkin, but Reynolds are a 20's something is bridge too far.

    LARRY: It would be SO MUCH BETTER with Culkin.

    MADHERO: It kinda feels like something that gets left on the cutting room floor of National Lampoon, or maybe a Funny of Die skit.

    STICKMAN: Or even worse, one of those EPIC MOVIE style films. What if...Home Alone but WEED? BWAHAHAHA. And then Batman turns up and does Gangham Style.

    LARRY: I don’t see how this film can work, to be honest. But I’m sure Seth Rogen is gonna get attached and everything will be fine.

    STICKMAN: Fuckin weed dude, ahuh huh huh huh uh uh u uh uh

    MADHERO: Ok, lets not go that far. Those films died a deserved death. I can't really see how this would work as a full length film, let alone a Home Alone revival, but maybe they'll deliver the next Harold and Kumar or something.

    STICKMAN: De Niro for Stoned Alone. He plays a 20 year old pothead. Stick a baseball cap on him  and nobody will notice the age gap.


    Mah boi Barry is back, y'all. After taking the indie world by storm with his 2016 Best Picture winner, "Moonlight," writer/director Barry Jenkins is returning with his new film, "If Beale Street Could Talk," and its first trailer has officially dropped!

    Based on a novel by acclaimed black author James Baldwin (whose voice is prominently featured in the trailer through voiceover), it tells the story of Tish and Fonny, a young black couple, and the struggles they face when Tonny is falsely accused of rape and goes to prison. It's not clear how closely the film will follow the novel, but what we do know, based on the trailer, that it will certainly feature many emotional highs and lows. The cast is filled to the brim with talent, from Regina King and Brian Tyree Henry to Dave Franco and Diego Luna, and the trailer looks to continue Barry Jenkins' career of exploring the black experience on film with exquisite cinematography. Here's to another rousing success when it premieres at TIFF this year.

    STICKMAN: I have no idea what I watched but it was lovely.

    MADHERO: I can't say much about the story since I haven't read the book, but my god, this trailer really was beautiful to look at.

    STICKMAN: That brick pavement/house shot though. Moonlight was a fuckin outstanding movie, not to mention pretty devastating.

    MADHERO: Its the same cinematographer from Moonlight, James Laxton, and that film also found beauty in the normal and even decrepit.

    LARRY: The cinematography looks to use a lot of the same techniques and color tones of Moonlight. Lots of darker lighting and muted tones. My favorite shot personally is in the train station.

    STICKMAN: Let's not forget the 50,000 slow motion smoking shots. That's his thing I guess. We all have our kinks.

    LARRY: Very a e s t h e t i c

    MADHERO: It seems a tad brighter than Moonlight, but I may be misremembering sone of it. This is a film you know is going to get major play come Oscar time, which is probably why its heading to Toronto. It'll be very interesting to see Jenkins tackle a period piece after Moonlight, which felt 

    almost timeless in a weird way.

    STICKMAN: Moonlight covered a child growing into a man and yet felt lost in time simultaneously. So yeah, period is a weird choice but I trust hiiiim.

    LARRY: I’m just excited to see a black artist tackle the work of someone considered one of the most brilliant black authors and writers...ever. I’ve read a lot of Baldwin’s work and it’s incredible. Not the first thing I’d pick to translate to film, but leave it to Barry.

    STICKMAN: Always Bet on Barry.

    MADHERO: I have not read his work because I'm a uncultured swine, but I understand his importance in African American history.

    STICKMAN: I am not familiar with the work buuuut that means the film feels very mysterious to me and I'm kinda into that. Let's all get Breakfast at TIFFanies.

    LARRY: It’s gonna be a ridiculously diverse season, lemme tell ya.


    MADHERO: Speaking of an incredibly diverse season, that's what we have if you wanna go to the theaters. Its got a little bit of everything. Jason Statham fighting a giant shark, Disney playing with your nostalgia of things you love, a Spike Lee joint and even......A YA ADAPTATION?! REALLY?! IN 2018! Dang

    STICKMAN: Alright, who messed with the space time continuum.

    LARRY: I’ll take End of the Summer for 200.

    MADHERO: Alright. This boy inspired by the author's son is now all grown up and played by Obi Wan Kenobi in this new Disney movie.




    DIRECTOR: Marc Forster (World War Z, All I See Is You)

    STARRING: Ewan McGregor, Hayley Atwell, Jim Cummings, Brad Garrett, Toby Jones, Peter Capaldi, Nick Mohammed, Sophie Okonedo

    SYNOPSIS: Christopher Robin (McGregor) is now all grown up and has lost all sense of imagination. Pooh and his friends from the Hundred Acre Wood re-enter Christopher's life to help him find it again.

    LARRY: 200 in the bagggggg Anyway I heard this is good if you have a soul.

    STICKMAN: That seems like a shitty stance to make but there you go. Maybe people are fed up of Disney's factory made nostalgia sentimentality bullshit.

    MADHERO: Boy this film is seeing some division between critics and audiences, that's for damn sure. Critics seem much more mixed on it, but audiences that have seen it seem to really like it.

    STICKMAN: Cinema audiences eat up Disney's shit like it's fine dining so that's probably why. Usually critics do too, so I dunno what happened here.

    LARRY: Apparently the first 10 min are just reeeeeeeeally sad and nostalgic and it’s got all the feels. It wears its heart on its sleeve, I guess.

    STICKMAN: Gosh where have I seen that before.

    MADHERO: Someone's being cranky. Maybe Sticky needs a Pooh bear in his life to deliver some folksy simpleminded wisdom

    LARRY: Still waiting for my Paddington vs. Pooh cage match.

    STICKMAN: I dunno, usually the reviews for these kinda films are through the roof for the same reasons audiences enjoy them, but not this time, something obviously went wrong, and it's not just YOU DON'T HAVE A SOUL DISNEY NO MAKE YOU CRY.

    LARRY: It was just a joke, Stix lol

    MADHERO: Feels hard to say whether its genuine since I haven't seen it. I probably will with the family though. I loved Winnie the Pooh back in the day, and this probably ain't no Toy Story 3, but it might hit some similar beats. That or you can be a total Eeyore about it.

    STICKMAN: I shall passssss, if you can believe it.


    DIRECTOR: Jon Turteltaub (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, Last Vegas)

    STARRING: Jason Statham, Li Bingbinb, Rainn Wilson, Ruby Rose, Winston Chao, Cliff Curtis

    SYNOPSIS: After escaping an attack by what he claims was a 70-foot shark, Jonas Taylor (Statham) must confront his fears to save those trapped in a sunken submersible.

    MADHERO: And now for something completely different.



    MADHERO: Look man, I only know so much about American gameshows and that's all I had. Now lets talk about Jason Statham fighting a giant prehistoric shark.

    STICKMAN: It sure is a film, could be fun and entertaining, could be awful. The trailers suggest it could go either way, and nobody's seen it yet.

    MADHERO: I feel like this movie is getting a lot more hyped than something like this normally would. Maybe all those years of Sharknado releases have made us soft on shark movies.

    LARRY: I have yet to see why people are that engaged with it, but if it’s silly fun then I’ll have silly fun.

    STICKMAN: Sharknado, of course, on its sixth and "final" installment this month. Which will win the hearts of shark movie lovers this SUMMER.

    MADHERO: Has Sharknado had Megalodons yet? It probably has, but I really don't care.

    STICKMAN: The Meg is a weird film to be made in a post Sharknado world...shark movies are kinda the thing of low budget TV  fare these days. But here we have THE STATH in IMAX fighting a absolute unit.

    LARRY: He better punch the shark

    STICKMAN: He will. I'm sure. I will say, this film has the best use of "Opening Wide" on a poster in cinema history.

    MADHERO: The posters for this film in general have been great. Props to the marketing team.


    DIRECTOR: Susanna Fogel (Life Partners)

    STARRING: Mila Kunis, Kate McKinnon, Sam Heughan, Hasan Minjai, Justin Theroux, Gillian Anderson

    SYNOPSIS: Audrey and Morgan (Kunis, McKinnon) are best friends who unwittingly become entangled in an international conspiracy when one of the women discovers the boyfriend who dumped her (Theroux) was actually a spy.

    LARRY: My parents say this yesterday and said it was a clunker. Apparently it’s gratuitously violent

    MADHERO: O hey, there's Larry's parents' mini review. Also that's a shame. Going from reviews, it sounds like it wasn't really able to get the tone right between action and comedy.

    STICKMAN: The Evil Dead of romantic spy comedies.

    LARRY: A thumb gets cut off apparently and my mother just can’t stop saying how much she hated that scene.

    STICKMAN: Your parents should do this show instead of us.

    MADHERO: I mean, I've probably seen worse, but I guess if its not what you expect, it can be pretty odd. And violence like that can be really funny if its played for laughs. I hear it just kinda loses steam and falls prey to improv.

    STICKMAN: I find comedies with excessive, realistic violence to be an odd combo.

    LARRY: It sucks too cuz I like Mila Kunis and Kate McKinnon. Sucks to see them in a stinker that’s kinda meant to be a vehicle for them.

    MADHERO: I guess you're better off renting Spy.

    LARRY: Ew No. That movie is overrated and bad.

    STICKMAN: Johnny English is the real MVP. Spectre was a good romantic horror, at least.

    LARRY: 600. Lets keep the bit going.

    MADHERO: This Spike Lee joint starring Denzel's son tells the crazy true story of a black man infiltrating the KKK, and no, its not the Chappelle sketch.

    STICKMAN: DJANGO UNCHAINED. Wait, this isn't 2013. FUCK


    DIRECTOR: Spike Lee (Da Sweet Blood of Jesus, Chi-Raq)

    STARRING: John David Washington, Adam Driver, Laura Harrier, Topher Grace, Corey Hawkins

    SYNOPSIS: Ron Stallworth (Washington), an African-American police officer from Colorado, successfully manages to infiltrate the local Ku Klux Klan and become the head of the local chapter.

    STICKMAN: Oh shiiiiiit, this looks pretty coooool.

    MADHERO: This movie looks wild and I'm so fucking here for it.

    LARRY: Some fo’ real, fo’ real shit. Topher Grace as David Duke. The best supporting actor race begins NOW.

    STICKMAN: This is gonna be so controversial when it comes out and I'm  here for this.

    MADHERO: That was not something I saw coming. But yeah, I'm mainly ready for this to turn some heads. Spike Lee can be a bit of a wildcard, but Jordan Peele may have given him a proper projectile. Plus this is one of those crazy ass stories that you need to see on screen.

    STICKMAN: I find Spike Lee hit and miss, but this is looking like a real hit. Good luck spelling the name though.

    LARRY: Looks to have solid performances and a multi-faceted story. Let’s hope it works. Also Adam Driver as a guy pretending to be a Klan member is a hilarious aesthetic.

    STICKMAN: Adam Driver as anything is a hilarious aesthetic.

    MADHERO: This is definitely going to be in the conversation come Oscar time.


    DIRECTOR: Jennifer Yuh Nelson (Kung Fu Panda 2 + 3)

    STARRING: Amandla Stenberg, Mandy Moore, Gwendoline Christie, Harris Dickinson, Skylan Brooks, Bradley Whitford

    SYNOPSIS: Imprisoned by an adult world that now fears everyone under 18, a group of teens (Stenberg, Dickinson, Brooks) form a resistance group to fight back and reclaim control of their future.

    MADHERO: Oh man. Talk about being late to the fucking party. This is like coming to the club at 5 AM, asking where everyone is, and getting told that the party was yesterday and the bar is going to be demolished.

    STICKMAN: Oopsie. Live action directorial debut of one of animation’s few female directors. It's crazy to think how big YA books were just a few years ago. Now they're basically all dead.

    LARRY: This looks like if every major young adult thing and the X-Men had a disgusting baby.

    MADHERO: I do feel bad for director Jennifer Wuh Nelson after coming from Kung Fu Panda 2 and 3. But yeah, this seems like something that sat on a shelf and no one knew what to do with.

    LARRY: I still think the shot in this trailer where the boy telekinetically has the girl float over is suuuuuuuuuper rapey. Every time I see it in a theater, it gets worse.

    MADHERO: Also I don't know why they gave Gwendoline Christie such a terrible wig.

    STICKMAN: She can't catch a break. Somebody give her a good role.

    MADHERO: She'll always have Brienne of Tarth. Moving on.

    LARRY: 800!! Wait I guess this is 1000 now

    STICKMAN: I'd like to phone a friend, Chris.

    MADHERO: This outdated internet meme grew in popularity thanks to a webseries and free video game about collecting some scribbles.

    STICKMAN: Keyboard Cat.

    LARRY: Nyan Cat


    DIRECTOR: Sylvain White (The Losers, The Mark of the Angels)

    STARRING: Joey King, Julia Goldani Telles, Jaz Sinclair, Annalise Basso, Javier Botet

    SYNOPSIS: A group of teenage girls (King, Telles etc.) attempt to investigate the mystery of the Slender Man (Botet) after a friend of theirs goes missing, only to become haunted by the Slender Man themselves.

    LARRY: Arguably a worse meme than the two we dropped.

    MADHERO: Another one late to the party.

    STICKMAN: Hey I have an idea, let's release a film based on a real children related knifing on the same day as the knifing happened guys. Oh wait oops. Now people are mad.

    MADHERO: Slenderman probably reached the height of its popularity back in 2012 with the Slender game, but of course that stabbing made the whole thing rather.... gross. Which is why they probably moved it to August, but now Sony wants nothing to do with it

    STICKMAN: I'll give this film credit for having some inventive visuals at least. Could've put in zero effort but they  put in a solid 10% at the least.

    LARRY: Still a hard pass.

    MADHERO: I honestly don't find Slender Man all that scary. Sure, the concept of making children do horrible things, maybe, but its a tall pale guy in a suit with  some tentacles.

    STICKMAN: Slender Man is the long arm pasty white boi.

    LARRY: Yeah I just had no connection to the source material and this looks like...a little too generic for me I guess. And you know I don’t do well with horror.

    MADHERO: Well you're in luck, what with Sony sending it out to die, you'll never have to bother with it

    LARRY: Yayyyyyyyyy

    STICKMAN: I mean, I'll check it out on Netflix maybbeee. Horror films and whatnot.


    MADHERO: Speaking of Netflix......HOW ABOUT SOME MOVIE OF THE WEEK?!

    LARRY: Yeeeeeeeeeee

    MADHERO: Ironically though, I don't think any of us have a Netflix movie, with us all seeing a movie in the theater where its usually nice and cool and we get to survive this awful heatwave.

    STICKMAN: Air Con in cinemas is very important. As was Con Air in cinemas.

    MADHERO: Sticky, fellow survivor of the European heatwave that swept the nation. What's your movie of the week?


    STICKMAN: WELLLL, it's a film that I not only had to survive a heatwave for, but also a month long football delay for to. For most folks who are reading this(?), Ant-Man and the Wasp probably feels like a distant blip on the movie radar. It came out early July in the US, but it's taken an whole month to reach the UK, thanks in part to the World Cup, and a knock on effect of Incredibles 2 also being delayed. THAT SAID...I finally saw it, and it was definitely worth the wait.

    It's a really funny film, with super creative action sequences that play with size, both big and small really well, there's a lot more SIZE PLAY as it were, in this film, compared to the first. Whilst the previous film was a heist, this one feels like a game of hot potato with a science laboratory, which I certainly can't say the same of for many other films.  Most importantly though, in with the laughs and the action, is a really charming and likeable cast, one you actually want to spend time with and root for, even more so than the first, with side-characters a little more fleshed out this time. Also..ANTSSS.

    LARRY: Oh hey I enjoyed this one too.

    MADHERO: I only saw this very recently as well, though the delay wasn't as long here

    STICKMAN: Football is a bad boy

    MADHERO: I'm ok with it. But yeah this movie is a lot of fun. Nice to once again have something smaller after Infinity War

    LARRY: Indeed. Lots of fun action beats too.

    STICKMAN: I continue to enjoy the many scales and tones the MCU can provide whilst still feeling cohesive. This film isn't heavy on the references either which is nice.

    MADHERO: It definitely is lesser MCU in my opinion, but its still a fun time and the size changes are a lot of fun

    LARRY: Dem post-credits tho.

    STICKMAN: I wouldn't call it lesser MCU at all, the stakes are lower, sure, but it's still a ton of fun and I really like the main cast. The post-credits scene felt...inevitable but also jarring given the initial ending of the film.

    LARRY: No yeah it being lower stakes doesn’t make it lesser MCU. Most of my favorite MCU movies are comedies. Or are moreso comedic in tone.

    STICKMAN: I laughed a bunch and it looked amazing in IMAX, so I'm a happy boy. WHAT ABOUT YOU, SOMEONE ELSE, WHaT DID YOu WATCH.

    LARRY:, I should go see it in IMAX. I feel like it’s worth it.

    MADHERO: Well, Larry. Did you see your film in IMAX?

    LARRY: Nope! It isn’t playing on IMAX. Too low-budget.

    STICKMAN: Must be pretty SHIT THEN

    MADHERO: Oh. One of those. Well, spill it out.

    LARRY: My MOTW is Blindspotting, the feature debut of director Carlos Lopez Estrada and the writing debut of rappers/spoken word artists Rafael Casal and Daveed Diggs. I know this movie doesn’t have a set UK release, but let’s hope it does because this is easily one of the best films of the year.

    The film tells the story of two friends: Collin, a black man about to be finished with year-log probation after a two month prison sentence, and Myles, a family man with a wife and son. Both live in Oakland and soon begin to struggle with their friendship as gentrification of the city showcases their differences in privilege and identity. It’s a very political movie and touches upon a lot of topics, but first and foremost, it’s the story of two friends seeing things for what they really are. It’s excellent written, balancing humor and suspense excellently. Beyond that, there’s a lot of solid editing and cinematography on display, and its incorporation of spoken word especially gives it an extra kick of originality. I’m just happy to see a relatively underground, low-budget indie film be woke not for the sake of being woke, but through its storytelling. Be sure to check this one out when you can.

    STICKMAN: Oh hey, following up a movie I had to wait to watch with a movie I can't watch, NICE. This looks cool though.

    LARRY: Sorry Stix. Let’s hope it’s successful enough here in the states to go wider.

    MADHERO: I hadn't heard of this movie beforehand but I'm hearing more about it and that's its supposed to be really good.

    LARRY: It’s excellent, make no mistake. They’re also coming out with rap EPs based on the characters.

    STICKMAN: I've been hearing a lot of buzz. What do Larry's parents think of it though I wonder.

    MADHERO: Daveed Diggs is really going on up in the world. He's been killing it recently.

    LARRY: Love Diggs dude. The man is a BEAST. His rapping is insane and he does some incredible spoken word in this film.

    MADHERO: He's got the Snowpiercer TV series coming up and seems to be in demand. I've seen the film described as a comedy, but how funny is it?

    STICKMAN: Snowpierecer huh. Ahem

    LARRY: It’s definitely very, very funny, but it has its fair share of “holy fuck” moments.

    MADHERO: Great to hear its getting the attention it deserves.

    LARRY: Fun fact!! When I went to go see Sorry to Bother You, the same theater was hosting Blindspotting’s premiere. Coulda met Daveed Diggs if I had tried.

    STICKMAN: But you failed. Now we move on to Mad's film.

    MADHERO: Alright. My film is a movie that needs no introduction. Its quite remarkable how remarkably consistent the Mission Impossible films have been since 3. They've been one of the most solid and consistently entertaining action films out there, and they consistently impress with their audacity. Whether its climbing the tallest building in the world, hanging on a plane, and in the case of Fallout, doing a halo jump. Its all really exciting stuff.

    And in Fallout, its fairly early on and doesn't let up. I've seen a lot of people make the comparison to Mad Max Fury Road, and while its not quite as manic as that, its got some remarkable pacing for an close to 2.5 hour movie. The plot itself is fairly standard Mission Impossible stuff, but Henry Cavill's mustache proves to be a really fun addition, being a hammer compared to Tom Cruise's scalpel. So yeah, if you're in the mood for jaw dropping action, Fallout is the way to go.

    STICKMAN: HELLL YEAAHH BOOIII. This film was fucking craaazy. I saw this in IMAX and that halo drop was INSANE!


    LARRY: I wanna see this so bad. it came out when I was traveling, so I didn’t catch it opening weekend, but I’m going to catch it this week.

    STICKMAN: This one is the best of the most recent three for sure.

    LARRY: Wow. That’s saying a lot really. Protocol and Rogue are both excellent.

    MADHERO: When I saw Ant-Man, they showed footage on how they did the halo jump, and it absolutely boggles the mind. While Infinity War spectacle is nice, its great seeing these real life stunts as well.

    STICKMAN: They really are, like Mad said...3-6 have all been consistently great. They're all really good except 2, which is really bad.

    LARRY: I like ‘em all. Except 2, yeah.

    STICKMAN: Fallout is potentially the best of the series, but I'll require a rewatch for that  I BELIEVE.

    MADHERO: So yeah, go see Tom Cruise break his ankle on IMAX. Highly recommended. Can really hear that crack.


    MADHERO: Anyway I think about wraps up everything. We'll be going through the last doldrums of summer trying not to get covered in puppet jizz.

    STICKMAN: It's too late, that happened a long time ago.

    LARRY: Ewwwwwwwww NOOOOO

    MADHERO: Eugh, fine. Then lets see if we can escape Indonesia via Mark Wahlberg, or meet up with some insanely wealthy Asians.


    STICKMAN: Puppet jizz though.

    LARRY: NO.

    MADHERO: This next episode might get nasty. Later everyone.

  • 8 or Higher, Bro! (July 2018)

    2 months ago


    Here's my replacement for Best & Worst! Every single month, I will curate an IMDb list of films and TV shows I rated 8 or higher in that particular month that I will share with you and only you. This way I can give you the random recommendations without having to spend like an hour writing out long paragraphs on every single movie. It's the best of B&W without the boring work on my end! And yes, I am making a How I Met Your Mother reference with that title. 

    So here's my first 8 or Higher, Bro IMDb list! Enjoy!...

  • The Guardians of the Galaxy Stand With James Gunn. Will Disney?

    2 months ago


    It's been less than two weeks since the movie world was rocked by James Gunn's removal as the main creative force behind the Guardians of the Galaxy movie. By now you've all probably read a dozen different think pieces and articles detailing the reasons why and arguing whether or not it was the right call by Disney's Alan Horn, so I will do my best not to rehash the same arguments here, but I do want to talk through my personal thoughts about whether or not it was the right choice a bit now that the dust has settled a little bit.

    Horn has unquestionably been one of the strongest executives in Disney's history. Under his watch Marvel was brought into the fold (remember Iron Man and Captain America were Paramount films), Star Wars was bought and relaunched, Pixar was fully integrated into the company and the live-action remakes of classic Disney movies have been raking in money hand over fist. The studio has grown into an entertainment behemoth with all the positives and negatives associated with that.

    An example of the positive side is the money the studio was willing to invest in a relatively unknown comic book property spearheaded by a writer/director most known for offensive humor-filled horror just because he was backed by Marvel's Kevin Feige. The negative side being how quickly they dropped the very same guy at the first sign of controversy, even after he made 1.6 billion dollars for the studio with just two movies.


    I disagree with Horn's decision to part ways with Gunn, but I'm still trying to understand it. The biggest deal of his reign as chairman is this pending merger with Fox. It not only takes out a chief rival, it also sets Disney Studios up for the world of tomorrow by giving them a huge amount of diverse IP to utilize with their subscription-based streaming service.

    The timing of this decision can't be coincidence. Just a week before the shareholder vote to approve the merger right wing pundits started spamming the internet with Gunn's offensive joke tweets from 6-10 years ago. With a deal this big any and every little thing can screw it up, so I have to imagine taking a calm, measured approach to this potential scandal was less of a priority than making it go away as quickly as possible.

    That feels right to me, although I'll be the first to admit I don't know the daily ins and outs of Disney's executive life.

    So, he made the call and fired Gunn from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which was written and expected to go into production possibly as early as the end of this year or the beginning of 2019.

    But now what? That's the question.

    The shareholders have voted to approve the merger and Disney is now facing more pressure from the entertainment industry over their decision to fire Gunn than they ever did from Mike Cernovich's mobs demanding Gunn's head. Actors, directors, producers and nearly all the entertainment journalists have all spoken out about how this is, frankly, bullshit.

    Just today the entire Guardians of the Galaxy cast put out a joint public statement calling for Gunn to be reinstated. And when I say “entirety” I mean it. Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista (who has been the most vocal about this from the day Disney fired Gunn), Karen Gillan, Bradley Cooper, Sean Gunn, Vin Diesel, Pom Klementieff and Michael Rooker all signed a measured, passionate defense of Gunn.


    Would all these people be willing to band together and refuse to work on the next Marvel movie if Disney doesn't reconsider? What about refusing to do any promotion for the next Avengers movie? Maybe, maybe not, but either way it's a big deal in this day and age for these high profile people to take a stand against what they view as an injustice, knowing damn well it puts them all in the crosshairs of the people organizing these obviously politically motivated, targeted attacks.

    Even someone as inconsequential as me got targeted over my support of Gunn, with dozens of random Twitter users calling me a pedophile apologist because I dared defend a guy who once made bad jokes about the subject 10 years ago. I can't imagine what Chris Pratt's social media is going to be like in the wake of this.

    I don't claim to know James Gunn's heart. I've met the guy a few times over the last 10 years and get along pretty well with him on a movie geek (and cigar appreciator) level. I first interviewed him for his great horror comedy SLITHER and have talked to him a few times, both on and off the record, in the years since. I may not know him well, but my impression of the man is the same I get from reading the Guardians cast's letter or the description of him I see repeated over and over again from people who have worked with him.

    Yes, he's got a dark sense of humor. That's obvious from his filmography. You don't start your career in Troma if you're a Sunday school teacher. You don't get your big break writing a hard R-rated zombie movie if you're scared of crossing lines. You don't make a movie like SUPER if you have any qualms about offending people to get a message across.

    Beneath that humor, though, is heart. The message of the Guardians movies isn't to be cynical assholes that like to shock people. Quite the opposite, actually. It's about shedding that devil-may-care persona and being able to fully love. It's about the strength of the family you choose, not necessarily the family you're born into.


    Movies aren't made by a single person, but it's clear that without Gunn's voice Guardians of the Galaxy wouldn't have been the lightning in a bottle experience it was. That's why, creatively, the cast and many entertainment reporters feel like Disney is cutting its nose off to spite its face here and why they're imploring the studio to reconsider.

    Will Disney listen?

  • The End of Best & Worst

    2 months ago


    We had a good run here for awhile, but all good things must come to an end. Before I go any further, let me make it perfectly clear... I'M NOT LEAVING THIS SITE! I love posting on RT and I will not be abandoning this account anytime soon. In fact, I'm already working on something new to replace this with. This is just the end of this particular series.

    I'm making this decision for a couple of reasons...

    1.) It kinda got boring. For awhile there, this was something I was just doing because I felt like I had to. I wasn't enjoying writing these posts, it felt like an annoying grind and it lost its appeal very quickly.

    2.) I changed my viewing habits. Recently, I made the decision to not see every single movie that comes out like I was before. Obviously, that puts something like this in an awkward position. I don't really see the point in doing a monthly blog post of best and worst movies if I'm not making the effort to see as many movies as possible.

    So that's it. It's over. Don't go away because I will be doing something else real soon! Until then, maybe check out some of my podcasts...

    Clark Film- 

    The Clark Sessions- 

    The Television Archive- 

    CBM Weekly- 

  • A Peek Behind The Curtain Of Robert Rodriguez's and James Cameron's Alita: Battle Angel!

    2 months ago


    James Cameron took a very long break after the exhausting production and release of Titanic. People forget now, but the common thought in Hollywood was that Cameron was working on a Heaven's Gate-level bomb. Too much money was being spent on a romantic historical romance, they said. The audience just wasn't going to show up. Then the movie made two billion dollars.

    It was twelve years before Cameron made another movie and that next movie was almost Alita: Battle Angel. In fact, he was developing it alongside what would become Avatar and went back and forth between the two on which would be his Titanic followup. At the end of the day his script for Alita was just way too long and Cameron couldn't manage everything he wanted to do in just one movie, so he shifted focus to Avatar and once again made box office history.

    Cut to 2015. Robert Rodriguez was having lunch with Cameron and asked him what projects he worked on that never happened. Cameron mentioned Alita and Rodriguez asked to read it, all 180+ pages of it.

    Rodriguez was immediately enamored with the story, based on the Japanese manga, of an android girl discovering her history and deciding on whether she was going to be a force for good in the world or the brutal weapon she was constructed to be.

    So Rodriguez came back to Cameron with an interesting request: Could he edit the script? He was clear that he didn't intend to rewrite it. He said he could edit the material already there down to a shootable version and Cameron could do whatever he wanted with the result... Re-develop it for himself, throw it out, whatever.

    Cameron said sure, go for it and four months later Rodriguez sent him the drastically shorter script and when Cameron and his longtime producing partner Jon Landau read it they were astonished because while the script was shorter by a third they couldn't tell what had been snipped. Everything they wanted to say with this story was there. The action set pieces were still there and still thrilling, the tale of a girl transitioning into womanhood was still at the forefront. It was the movie Cameron had in mind, just more concise.

    He was so impressed with the work Rodriguez did he figured he had found the man to actually make the movie a reality. Once again Avatar took priority for Cameron who was neck deep in all the sequels he was writing, so he tasked Rodriguez with directing Alita. Cameron was always a phone call away to answer questions and Cameron's right hand man, Jon Landau, was always at Rodriguez's side.


    You'd think that could be suffocating for a filmmaker who has defined his career by getting his complete vision on the screen doing as much of the movie as he could. From operating his own camera to writing, producing, composing, editing and even doing his own VFX, Rodriguez has a reputation for being a lone wolf, creatively speaking.

    But in this case his vision was to make this film as much like a James Cameron movie as possible. He underlined this to me when I visited the Austin set of Alita: Battle Angel last year. He said he didn't want to make a Troublemaker Studios movie, he wanted to make a Lightstorm movie, which is why all the footage from the trailers look a bit different from what you expect from a Robert Rodriguez joint. Lots of CG and dynamic action, yes, but also huge practical sets and a little bit more breathing room when it comes to the editing and character moments.

    Wrongly or rightly Rodriguez's style has become synonymous with greenscreen filmmaking pretty much since Sin City. But that's definitely not his approach this time out.

    The result is an approach that hopefully takes the strengths of both Lightstorm and Troublemaker and melds them into something new and unique. The integration was so important to Cameron that he even had a sign put up at his California offices that said “Troublemaker West,” and Rodriguez answered by putting a sign up in his Austin studios that said “Lightstorm South.”

    A full year of preproduction went into designing this crazy world. James Cameron's art team worked hand in hand with Rodriguez's Austin team and came up with designs that are both faithful to the look and feel from the original Manga while also being something that worked for the big screen.


    In the Battle Angel world cybernetic augmentation is the norm. Sometimes it's slight... a hand, a foot, an arm. Sometimes it's major. There's one character, played by Jackie Earle Haley, that is pretty much just a human head on a gargantuan 8 foot tall robot brute body.

    The design team took that year and cranked out many variations of cybernetically enhanced people. I saw art of an old man playing a double-necked guitar with robotic arms that had two hands, one for each neck of the guitar, for instance. You've seen the trailers by now, so you've seen a glimpse at how far they've gone to populate this world.

    The majority of the film takes place in Iron City, a poor slum city that lives off the discards of the rich, exclusive, protected floating city above them. This is where Christoph Waltz's Dr. Ido finds a broken Alita (played entirely in motion capture by Rosa Salazar) in a junkyard. Something about her moves him and what he does to help her might give a hint at what exactly he feels for this person.


    She awakens with a new body constructed with loving care and attention to detail. Floral patterns are intricately carved with silver metallic flourishes. It's a small body, built for a child. We find out Dr. Ido built this for his sick daughter, with the intention of giving her back her mobility and freedom, but he was too late. In short he begins to view this stranger as the daughter he never had.


    This is a story of second chances. Ido has a second chance at being a father and Alita has a chance to be a different kind of person. She may not remember her past, but her past remembers her and it's not exactly filled with rose pedals and puppy dogs.

    For the set visit I was walked around Iron City, which was built on Troublemaker's backlot, just across the fence from where I sit typing this over at Rooster Teeth's Austin Studios offices, as a matter of fact. On screen the city will tower dozens of stories tall. They didn't go that far in reality, but they did build multiple connected city blocks up two stories. CG will take care of the rest, but the foundation will be real. Every wall, window, door, sign, road, step will be real so it won't just look like actors composited against a CG backdrop.

    Iron City had a very Rodriguez feel. This place looks like futuristic Desperado. Heavy Latino influence, but mixed with a handful of other cultures, especially Asian, to create a new blend that's lived-in, patched together with every available resource and feels like it's covered in dust.

    The only filming I got to witness with my own eyes was a crowd scene as spectators cheer and boo the players of a brutal but popular sport called Motorball. If you've ever seen the James Caan Rollerball, think of it that way, but with way more robot augmentations that allow for some crazier games.

    Christoph Waltz was in the stands watching on nervously. Alita is taking part and the deck is stacked against her. While in the stands Waltz recognizes some of her competitors as assassins and tries to warn her that this isn't just a game and her life is in danger.

    One thing I noticed is that most of the extras weren't dressed super futuristically. This isn't Blade Runner where everybody is wearing plastic ties and holding glowing umbrellas. There was a punk vibe to those in the stands, but still pretty modern-looking.

    In short everything I saw and personally experienced felt every measure the combination of James Cameron and Robert Rodriguez I was promised by producer Jon Landau at the beginning of the visit. They're taking some wild swings with this one, particularly in the design of Alita herself. 


    Much has already been made about the giant anime eyes. Some hate it, some love it, some are just perplexed by it. It's weird and so will a bunch of this movie, but that's usually the secret to Cameron's success. Giant CG blue cat people was weird as hell, too, but then became the biggest movie in the world for a decade.

    There's no guarantee this movie will hit anywhere near Avatar levels. In many ways it's a harder sell and the filmmakers seem to know this.

    When asked if this movie was being planned as the start of a franchise or a complete one off, Landau gave a real interesting answer. He said they didn't want to have the hubris to assume a sequel, but they wanted to be smart and have some pieces in place for further films. That's the reason for the slight change in the title. The original manga is called Battle Angel Alita. The reason for calling it Alita: Battle Angel makes it easier to title potential sequels, like Alita: Fallen Angel, etc.

    I myself can't make any kind of final judgment call on what we'll be getting come December 21st, but I can say whatever the final product ends up being it wasn't haphazardly thrown together. It has two insanely creative filmmakers joining forces with all the strengths of their individual teams and some of the best effects houses in the world to tell a futuristic action adventure with actual time spent on character development.

    Anyway, I hope that gives you guys a little peek behind the curtain at what's been going on with Alita: Battle Angel. Thanks for reading along and thanks to Fox and Troublemaker for letting me wander the streets of Iron City and letting all you guys know about what I saw.


  • At the Screwvies: Episode 113

    2 months ago



    MADHERO: It is upon us once again. The Great Comic-Con News Flood.  That time of year when every studio decides to tease whoever is crazy enough to make the trip to San Diego and stand in line for literal days to get into Hall H to get a small teaser none of us get to see, except for Warner Bros, who does release its stuff. It was enough for Larry to say " fuck that" and go see family abroad instead.

    STICKMAN: The great Comic Con flood has consumed Larry. He won't be seen for at least two weeks. Thoughts and prayers.

    MADHERO: Tis a shame. Who knows what our theater expert would think of Mamma Mia. Now its up to us heathens to talk about it. But before we do that, might as well dip into said flood and find the good stuff.

    STICKMAN: I hope there's a big lizard boy in there.




    Okay, so...this is maybe one of the most shocking, out of nowhere news stories we've ever covered on At the Screwvies. Marvel may have sat Comic Con out, but they've stolen the media spotlight big-time, for all the wrong reasons. James Gunn, director of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 1 and 2  has been fired from Marvel Studios, Disney, and production of Vol 3 following a right-wing internet campaign calling for his termination, following the re-emergence of offensive tweets from over 9 years ago.

    The tweets in question were poorly conceived jokes about rape and pedophilia that, at the time, weren't nearly as controversial as they are now. These were tweets that had already been brought to light in 2014 following his hiring for the first GotG film, where Gunn apologized profusely and everything moved on smoothly.  These same jokes are now deemed reason for instant termination. These actions of course, were spearheaded by a far-right personality most well known for the moronic 'Pizzagate' debacle, and he himself is known, to this date to make poor taste comments regarding the semantics of rape. This situation is truly perplexing, and somewhat depressing. Whilst the jokes in question are indeed awful,  this is something dealt with a long time ago, and Gunn has proven himself to have evolved since then. His sudden termination throws the future of the MCU into chaos, as both GotG3, and the wider cosmic side of the series leaned heavily on the style/tone he established in two highly loved, financially successful films. Drax actor Dave Bautista has already rallied support to the director,  as well as support from Zoe Saldana, Karen Gillan, his brother Sean Gunn and Chris Pratt, so it's going to be interesting to see where things go from here. A shitty, shocking situation for sure.

    MADHERO: Well, this was quite the shocker

    STICKMAN: Genuinely didn't believe it when I saw the tweets. I thought it was a joke.

    MADHERO: I heard it from Hollywood Reporter, who don't usually report bullshit. I honestly did not know there was a controversy going on, even when Gunn explained on Twitter about his past tweets. I never in a million years thought it would lead to this.

    STICKMAN: I'm in a fortunate enough position where I don't hear about this shit until things like this happen. So yeah, this came completely out of nowhere.

    MADHERO: I think the biggest bummer of the situation is how it isn't actually done by people who care that Gunn tweeted something offensive. They just wanted to punish him for being vocally Anti-Trump. Disney of course was in a similar situation with Roseanne Barr, but that was incredibly recent and continuous behavior, whereas Gunn's was close to a decade now.

    STICKMAN: Yeah, this was never a campaign for decency, it was a revenge crusade. It's a fucking shitty situation and the people who made it happen are a brigade of spineless cunts. Not that cunts have spines, generally.

    MADHERO: Pretty much. Lets not mince those words: those jokes made by Gunn were pretty fucking bad, and he admits as much. He's very much shed that needlessly provocative image and become a much better person as a result. While I have no doubt that GOTG Vol. 3 will probably turn out fine regardless, it feels like a far bigger issue than just 1 movie. This really sets a dangerous precedent.

    STICKMAN: The things he said were bad, but if we don't give people the chance to atone and grow from these things, what hope do any of us have, really? We've all said shitty things online, ill-informed,  backwards or heat of the moment kinda shit. I'm sure we'll (mostly) much better people now.

    MADHERO: You can't really expect a human being to be flawless throughout their whole life. Its gonna be interesting what happens and if Disney will turn this decision around with pressure from the cast. My guess is they won't, but we can hope for the best.

    STICKMAN: I'd really like to see Disney just be like....alright, our bad, sorry guys, and this situation resolves itself. But I see it as a bridge burned, that'll be hard to repair. It's just a damn shitty situation and nothing good will come from it.


    As part of the big Warner Bros trailerpalooza, we got our long awaited trailer for the next DCEU/Worlds of DC goaround: Aquaman. Much pressure exists on this movie what with the character initially introduced in Justice League, which didn't exactly do great and left people mixed on Jason Momoa's interpretation of the character. Plus, Aquaman has always been an easy punchline for being able to talk to fish and not much else. DC has desperately tried to make him cool, with some hilarious results. But still, with all these movies, there's always the hope that this'll be more of a Wonder Woman than BvS, because we all want these to do well.

    With all that pressure, this trailer actually comes out of it pretty well. We get a quick dose of his origin and the overall story (evil half brother Patrick Wilson is taking the throne and is ready to wage war with the surface) as well as a quest to get some magical macguffins to seal his claim to the throne. Easily the highlights are the shots of Atlantis and the creature design, with an surprisingly accurate Black Manta and some wild underwater monsters and armored sharks. It looks pretty damn wild and varied. James Wan is a very capable filmmaker who already succeeded under enormous pressure with Furious Seven. Hopefully, he can do the same with this.

    STICKMAN: I'm very conflicted.

    MADHERO: It was probably the weakest of the trailers we'll talk about, which doesn't include Crimes of Grindelwald. I'm really impressed with the world design, and that's cause I absolutely adore underwater life, so I'm feeling cautiously optimistic. Key word being cautiously.

    STICKMAN: I'd be very cautious yeah, this is the last of the DC films that were in the works after the BvS fallout, so there's no telling how much it was affected. Some parts of it look amazing visually, other parts look awful...that crowd cheering scene? Oof.

    MADHERO: The shark in the aquarium doesn't look great either, as does Amber Heard's wig. Still, don't wanna reel on effects too much when they're still going through work. Will judge after the release. I'm surprised how cool Black Manta looks all things considered.

    STICKMAN: Black Manta did look cool, and some parts of the film looked fun, they definitely seem to have balanced the tones out a bit more.

    MADHERO: It probably looks the most like an MCU film of any of the films they've released so far. I think one of the things that gives me hope is James Wan, who's proven himself under enormous pressure as a very capable blockbuster filmmaker.

    STICKMAN: James Wan needs to escape from the DC lot at Warner Bros, run to the horror department and start making The Conjuring 3 already, for fuck's sake.

    MADHERO: Why do that when you make all the spin-offs? Its gonna be interesting how this does after Justice League tanked, but I wanna believe in lil Aquabro, cause I'm a glutton for punishment.

    STICKMAN: Aquabro was awful in Justice League and I have no reason to trust the DCEU at all. Prove me wrong, Warner Bros, prove me wrong.


    Whilst we were all expecting the Aquaman trailer to finally drop at Comic Con this year, and indeed this was confirmed well in advance...the jury was definitely out on the April 2019 DCEU follow-up getting anything shown off outside of the fabled Hall H. Despite this, Warner Bros surprised us all with our first, rather substantial trailer for SHAZAM, and things are looking quite different from what we've seen from the DCEU prior.

    And it is indeed a DCEU film, which wasn't 100% clear prior to this trailer, but is now deafening clear thanks to its frequent use of Justice League themed t-shirts, a batarang, and some expositional newspapers. Other than that, you could be mistaken for thinking we had established a very different DCEU, because this film is looking very bright, bubbly and comedy-centric, everything DCEU film's prior (With the exception of Wonder Woman) stood violently against.  We're introduced to Asher Angel's Billy Batson, who after moving in with a new foster family, who's other child is the wheezy asthma kid from last year's IT, is chosen by the titular hero to embody his many powers, activated by saying his name, which of course, turns him into Zachary Levi, who's on fine form as a kid turned superhero adult. After that we see him and his foster brother testing out his abilities, and encountering Mark Strong in shitty makeup. The whole film looks a lot more fun than anything we've seen from DC lately, and hopefully that will pay off for a fresher, more entertaining movie next April.

    MADHERO: Well hey, we might have been proven wrong.

    STICKMAN: Well...this could go wrong very easily, but it is a promising first look.

    MADHERO: This trailer is very confident in its tone, a very clear idea what it wants to be. The training sequence and finding out about the powers feels very Chronicle almost, albeit a lot nicer in tone.

    STICKMAN: It's like Chronicles but with actual superheroes and less child far at least. And a lot less Max Landis, which as we all know is the best thing.

    MADHERO: Exactly. While I was a little surprised by his casting, I can't deny that Zachary Levi is pretty much a perfect fit as a child stuck in the body of a superhero. He seems to be having a lot of fun in this trailer.

    STICKMAN: He was the most assuring part of the trailer, he's doing great in that role, we can already tell.

    MADHERO: Yeah, his performance (and to an extent Asher Angel's performance as kid Billy Batson) are what going to make or break this movie. Its gonna be interesting how Mark Strong is gonna fit in it. He's not in it much but his role is also pretty comedic apparently.

    STICKMAN: I'm more hopeful for this than Aquaman that's for sure, which is kinda sad when you think about it.

    MADHERO: Its a much more smaller film than that one. Plus its completely fresh. I was happily surprised, and hope the film will as well.

    STICKMAN: It just makes me want to shout out...hey this looks neat.


    Its been a while since M. Night Shyamalan produced what's probably his greatest twist of all: the fact his movie Split, a neat little Blumhouse thriller showing off James McAvoy's acting range, turned out to be the long awaited sequel to 2000's Unbreakable, Shyamalan's interesting take on the superhero genre (even more so today, now that they dominate the Hollywood landscape). With Split being a huge success, the long awaited crossover was announced fairly soon after, with the film shown off where else: Comic-Con.

    Picking up close after Split, it  shows David Dunn (Bruce Willis), James McAvoy's many personalities and Samuel L. Jackson's Mr. Glass stuck in a psychiatric ward, questioned by Sarah Paulson on their supposed delusion of grandeur. We get a bit of a recap of what every character's been up to, with McAvoy continuing kidnapping girls and Bruce Willis going all pre-cog on us. We get some teases of the inevitable clash between the hero and villain, as it looks like Brucie might be in a bit of a pickle. Its looking atmospheric, intriguing and it looks like M. Night is able to make Bruce Willis give a shit. That's remarkable on its own.

    STICKMAN: I'm in the minority who thought Split was a huge pile of shit, so I'm not really feeling this weird crossover with cliche dialogue.

    MADHERO: Oh daaaaaaaaaaaang. Someone's raining over the parade with their perfectly valid opinions that I happen to disagree with.

    STICKMAN: Itsone of those films I genuinely don't get the mostly universal love for? The dialogue was really  bad, and whilst James McAvoy gave a very diverse series of performances, they were all pretty camp and sometimes offensive. Also, I don't really get what Glass' super power is...he's...easy to hurt? Amazing.

    MADHERO: Well he'll be one orchestrating the confrontation in all likelihood. Plus he’s super duper smart. I know you really did not like Split, but what about Unbreakable?

    STICKMAN: Unbreakable was pretty good but I don't think it's aged super well. Given Bruce Willis hasn't given a damn in anything since Looper, I dunno what to expect from his role in this. Samuel L Jackson is always worth turning up for, though.

    MADHERO: Well Shyamalan has managed to wrangle some of his best performances out of him in Sixth Sense and Unbreakable, so I hope he does the same here, cause no one wants to go to a movie theater seeing Bruce Willis not give a shit. They can do that with his Direct to DVD movies.

    STICKMAN: And any other movie he's starred in since Looper. Anyway, I'm not particularly interested in this, but I guess it's neat that Unbreakable is getting a sequel...I guess. Mhmmh.


    Oh boy OH BOOOOYY. Now this is what I was wanting from Comic Con most of all. With a May 2019 release, it wasn't a done deal that this would have anything to show for itself outside of Hall H, but after a somewhat shoddily produced teaser trailer, and MONARCH based viral marketing campaign made a splash on the internet earlier in the week, this became a done deal. And thus, here it is...and holy shit, what a first impression it makes.

    Oh boy OH BOOOOYY. Now this is what I was wanting from Comic Con most of all. With a May 2019 release, it wasn't a done deal that this would have anything to show for itself outside of Hall H, but after a somewhat shoddily produced teaser trailer, and MONARCH based viral marketing campaign made a splash on the internet earlier in the week, this became a done deal. And thus, here it is...and holy shit, what a first impression it makes.

    Following on from 2017's Kong Skull Island , and more specifically the 2014 previous Godzilla film, the next installment in Legendary's semi-successful 'Monsterverse' is seeking to remedy the less lauded aspects of the previous Godzilla movie, namely it being too dark and...well, lacking much in the way of Godzilla...and is doubling down, or moreso quadrupling down on the monster madness.  Godzilla, Rodan, Mothra and King Ghidorah all make an appearance in this trailer in some capacity, with the latter two being teased oh so deliciously. The premise seems to involve young girl Madison (Millie Bobby Brown) and her mother (Vera Farmiga, continuing her Worst Mom Ever streak) taking her along as she awakens the four most deadly kaiju, or 'titans' on the planet, supposedly in order to restore balance to a dying Earth. But judging from the devastation displayed in the trailer, with Washington DC looking less like a city and more like a burning sand pit? She's not done a very good job. Overall this is a fantastic first trailer, demonstrating the same style of epic visual splendor as the first film, albeit one more visible, and loaded with glorious monster carnage. ROLL ON MAAAAAY.

    MADHERO: Holy fuuuuuuuck. I don't know what it is about the MonsterVerse, but they've got some of the best trailer editors working on it. Skull Island had some amazing trailers, and this really comes out kicking.

    STICKMAN: They really know how to sell a film, hopefully this time they'll be able to make a film that lives up to that standard too. I liked Godzilla 2014 a lot, and Skull Island was really fun too, but both of them were pretty flawed at the same time.

    MADHERO: I think the 2 biggest complaints about Godzilla is that it didn't have enough Godzilla or kept relentlessly teasing him, and the fairly generic bad monsters as the bad guys. And this trailer, while just a small snippet, seems to suggest they're fixing both.

    STICKMAN: Oh boy oh boy. We got the goodies this time, with more yet to be seen within the film, apparently. If Gigan turns up, who's the best Godzilla monster, I will scream.

    MADHERO: Godzooky or GTFO. Its gonna be pretty wild if there's more than just these 4, but they'll no doubt be teasing throughout the marketing. Gigan is probably a bridge too far, but maybe Barogun, or Gamera for maximum crossover appeal.

    STICKMAN: No doubt we'll find out before the film comes out, because merchandising leaks and WHAT NOT. But I  was already stoked for this film, obviously...but the trailer...which not only existed, but managed to be better than anything any of us could have expected? OH MAN. Now I'm horny.

    MADHERO: That Mothra shot was fucking gorgeous.

    STICKMAN: There's so many great shots, but yeah, that one, with the music and all, FUCKIN MAJESTIC AS HELL. Mothra gonna fuck shit up.

    MADHERO: A lot of shit is gonna get fucked looking at the trailer. Its gonna be a blast.



    When it comes to WB'S DC productions, its always a bit of a wait and see what actually gets made or not. For a while, it felt like we got a new announcement every week, and who knows what even goes ahead. One of those pitches was a standalone Joker origin story directed by Todd Phillips (The Hangover trilogy) which would not be the origin of Leto Joker (guess we'll never know who tattooed Damaged), but in the style of a 70's or 90's Scorsese crime film. It all sounded a little silly, but not only is it happening: its got a star, a name and even a release date.

    Simply titled Joker, it will star Joaquin Phoenix of all people as the Clown Prince of Crime before he fell in a vat of acid, and Zazie Beetz (Domino in Deadpool 2) is in talks to be his love interest, as well as Robert de Niro just to add to the Scorseseness of it all. Shooting is supposes to happen in September, with n release date planned for October 2019, which is really fucking fast for this type of film. That speed is thanks to the relatively low budget (around 55 million), which gives them the oppurtunity to be more experimental and hard edged (its almost definitely rated R). Needless to say, this is a weird project, and giving Joker an origin is a bad idea. But Phoenix is one of my favourite actors and I'm very curious with his take, and he picks his projects carefully. So yeah, very conflicted about this

    STICKMAN: Like you say, promising cast and all that...and although the Joker has had origin stories, they tend to be parallel to another story, I'm not sure I'd dedicate an entire solo-film to this alone.

    MADHERO: Well the Joker is still an insanely popular character that they'd like to make money on with more than just Batman films that aren't being made right now. Its all sounding like a one-off experimental type thing.

    STICKMAN: I'm not even sure Joaquin Phoenix is suited to the role, necessarily. He's a great actor, but I can't really picture him in white makeup and red lipstick, prancing around like a murderous clown.

    MADHERO: Yeah, but we said the same about Heath Ledger back in the day. Phoenix has a lot more range than people give him credit for, but I don't really know how to compare to any of the other Jokers that have been on screen.

    STICKMAN: It's not entirely assured that he will be the Joker as we know him in this film. It depends on how they play it. It's a weird idea, and like you say, it could work big time, and open the door for more experimental DC films that offer more than just blockbuster entertainment, or it's going to be a massive disaster and the only one of these we see.

    MADHERO: It feels more something like Logan than anything done beforehand. That's probably what they're going for. I have no idea what to make of it, but its coming out fairly soon, so I guess we'll find out.

    STICKMAN: The close release date is also a bit troubling. BUT OH WELL. It's not like DC have ever made a bad mov-oh.


    MADHERO: Phew,  I think that about does it for all the news out there. You almost forget that with all this talking and announcing and whatnot, that Hollywood actually releases movies as well. Its almost.....impossible to follow everything.

    STICKMAN: So much news, hoo wee. So much news.

     MADHERO: Its alright, Stickman. We could go at it again, but let's focus on this varied list of films of which we're only interested in one.

    STICKMAN: What a great idea....I guess?



    DIRECTOR: Christopher McQuarrie (Jack Reacher, Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation)

    STARRING: Tom Cruise, Rebecca Ferguson, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames, Michelle Rodriguez, Alec Baldwin, Sean Harris, Henry Cavill, Angela Bassett

    SYNOPSIS: When an IMF mission ends badly, the world is faced with dire consequences. As Ethan Hunt (Cruise) takes it upon himself to fulfill his original briefing, the CIA begins to question his loyalty and his motives.


    MADHERO: Apparently the best action movie since Fury Road according to some critics, and if that isn't enough to get you interested, well I don't know what will.

    STICKMAN: I'm fuckin pumped as HELLL. The last few Mission Impossible films have been really great, so I'm glad this has not only continued that trend, but upped it again? How many other franchises top themselves at film 6.

    MADHERO: Its weird. I always like these films, but then I don't really feel excitement up until the moment they're almost out. And its pretty wild  it just keeps going with the spectacle. Guess it helps having someone as insane as Tom Cruise.

    STICKMAN: They fucking throw him out of a god damn plane in this one. They literally have to launch Tom Cruise into space next time to beat the stunts in this one.

    MADHERO:  Also I guess now we know that Cavill's Justice League ruining moustache was worth it.

    STICKMAN: I hear his villainous motivation in this film is chasing all the girls.

    MADHERO: Ooooh. Topical. Reports are that the last half hour is an absolute ride and I'm here for it.

    STICKMAN: I'm fucking reaaadddy. Gonna see that shit in IMAX, even though they've forced it to be in 3D here. FUCK.


    DIRECTOR: Ol Parker (Now Is Good)

    STARRING: Amanda Seyfried, Meryl Streep, Lily James, Cher, Dominic Cooper, Christine Baranski, Julie Walters, Pierce Brosnan, Colin Firth, Stellan Skarsgard

    SYNOPSIS: Sophie (Seyfired) is pregnant with Sky's (Cooper) child while running her mother's villa. Sophie will find out more of Donna's (Streep, James) past and how she came to start up her villa without a mother to guide.

    STICKMAN: Oh shit, here we go again.

    MADHERO: Credit where credit is due, that's the best sequel title since Electric Boogaloo.

    STICKMAN: I feel like this joins the likes of My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2 in the camp of...REALLY...A SEQUEL AT THIS STAGE?

    MADHERO: The original Mamma Mia feels like it released a million years ago and yet it was only 2008, which was.....10 years ago. Fuck.

    STICKMAN: It's the same age as The Dark Knight. And clearly, has had the same impact on modern cinema.

    MADHERO: To be fair, its not a film made for us. Its a light fluffy jukebox musical and it apparently gets the job done. Better than the first, but stuck using ABBA's B material with a few repeats. Hopefully now they're given to people who can actually sing.

    STICKMAN: For me, the original was like getting a hammer to the balls and I couldn't sit through 5 seconds of it. This is getting a 2D IMAX screening through...for those who want the ultimate....Mamma Mia...experience...Mamma MiMAX?

    MADHERO: I saw the first one with my family and it was not a good time. Luckily, I don't have to see the 2nd one, but I hope those that do will have fun.


    DIRECTOR: Aaron Horvath, Peter Rida Michail (episodes of Teen Titans Go)

    STARRING: Scott Menville, Greg Cipes, Khary Payton, Tara Strong, Hynden Walch, Will Arnett, Kristen Bell, Nicolas Cage, 

    SYNOPSIS: The Teen Titans (Menville, Cipes etc.) learn that almost every hero in the DC Universe has their own films. However, they find a window of opportunity for their own movie by having their own nemesis: Slade (Arnett).

    MADHERO: Boy this could not release at a better time after that Titans trailer.


    MADHERO: Got fucked so hard that he's not in this movie, but Alfred is. Yet they did get Wil Arnett and cast him as Slade/Deathstroke.

    STICKMAN: Batman's in the movie,  he's played by Jimmy Kimmel. So that's another reason not to watch this film I guess.

    MADHERO: O dang, my bad. Its made for kids, so its fine. We can watch Titans instead, like adults too cool for school.

    STICKMAN: I think maybe all its forms, just aren't for me. I'm too...complex..and dark...and alone. You see. Hnngh. Sometimes, the darkness, feels good.

    MADHERO: Let the kids have their goofy cartoon again. I will grumble in the corner wishing for my old Teen Titans while the writers point and laugh at me.

    STICKMAN: What annoys me about Teen Titans GO is that they know it sucks...they know people want something else, and that's the joke? If you're aware of the problem why not course correct instead of laughing about how bad you aAAaAAAArre.

    MADHERO: Because META!



    DIRECTOR: Antoine Fuqua (The Equalizer, The Magnificent Seven)

    STARRING: Denzel Washington, Ashton Sanders, Pedro Pascal, Jonathan Scarfe, Melissa Leo, Bill Pullman

    SYNOPSIS: Robert McCall (Washington) learns that one of his longtime friends has been murdered. McCall decides to return to his old ways and seek out, find and punish the perpetrators.

    STICKMAN: Who saw this getting a sequel.

    MADHERO: Worse. Who saw this getting a sequel and NOT call it The Sequalizer.

    STICKMAN: Ahh, huge missed opportunity. Shut it down.

    MADHERO: It feels weird that this is Denzel's first every sequel. The Equalizer was a perfectly adequate dad action movie. And the sequel is....just doing that again, but now its REVENGE!

    STICKMAN: I've never seen the previous looked...fine? Nothing amazing, which seems to be an accurate summary.

    MADHERO: I feel like Washington as a actor and Fuqua as a director can do way better. I'm more baffled by its existence than the film itself, which just looks really generic.

    STICKMAN: Yeah, you'd feel Denzel would be above this, but hey ho. Gotta pay the bills.

    MADHERO: We all fall prey to the easy paycheck. Speaking of which....


    DIRECTOR: Stephen Suscu (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Colin Woodell, Betty Gabriel, Rebecca Rittenhouse, Andrew Lees, Connor del Rio

    SYNOPSIS: A teen picks up a new laptop from a lost-and-found bin and finds a cache of secret files on it. While on a video call with his friends, he discovers the disturbing nature of the files

    MADHERO: Boy this really is the "boy, who'd have throught that'd get a sequel" type of episode.

    STICKMAN: I mean it's a horror film, and a bad one too, that means it's GUARANTEED to get a sequel.

    MADHERO: I don't think I ever saw the original, and don't really have plans to tbh. Instead of a spooky cyber ghost, it seems to be criminals now.

    STICKMAN: That's not nearly as stupid though. It just won't work.

    MADHERO: I don't really have many strong opinions for this film. Its reviews have been surprisingly decent. And lord knows I've felt tense awaiting a Facebook message, so you know you can milk horror out of it.

    STICKMAN: The basic premise of a found footage screen capture film is neat...and there's a more promising looking film along that nature coming out in the future, as for this one....passssss.

    MADHERO: Also, before I forget. Apparently this movie has 2 different endings, so you may get something completely different depending on where you see it.

    STICKMAN: That's kinda weird, but neat. I GUESS.


    MADHERO: Alright that's it for all the movies. A lot of sequels for movies made for your mom or dad. But if Mission Impossible ain't for you. Don't worry. There's always MOVIE OF THE WEEK!


    MADHERO: As it turns out, its quite difficult to go see a movie on vacation because you're supposed to do other stuff, but I think I've managed.

    STICKMAN: Did you though, did you reaaaaally?

    MADHERO: I meaaaan......ok fine. Here it is.


    So with me having gone on vacation, I haven't really been watching a lot of movies in the theater since Incredibles, so I had to look at what came out on DVD, and noticed a film that might actually really benefit from having a home release. With Comic-Con going on, there's probably no better time to talk Ready Player One again: the ultimate movie for you to go "hey, I recognize that" made by one of the greatest directors of all time.

    Now RPO is definitely not one of Spielberg's better films, but it does do a good job in erasing a lot of the navel-gazing and in-love-with-itself attitude of the original novel its based on. Its a ginourmous roller coaster ride, and Spielberg is an expert craftsman of those, but hadn't really done one since Tintin in 2011. The action is absolutely bonkers to follow, which makes spotting some of the references difficult. Luckily, you can now pause the movie whenever you want and look, and spot that supposed Amaterasu from Okami you desperately tried to find but couldn't. It'll probably take all day, but its something to keep you busy.

    STICKMAN: I haven't seen this film but I hear it's got Xenomorphs, Master Chief and Mecha-Godzilla, so that's worth something.

    MADHERO: All of those are pretty damn easy to spot. MechaGodzilla especially.

    STICKMAN: A giant robo-boy with missiles is hard to miss I guess. Some people seem to love this film and others seem to hate it with a fiery passion.

    MADHERO: I thought it was fine. Again, it removes a lot of the more problematic elements of the book, but it still has a pretty clunky script and really underdeveloped characters. Its a movie you go to for the rollercoaster ride, and not necessarily the story.

    STICKMAN: Seems like it's at least fun, and full of things to point at and go "There they are"

    MADHERO: Too many things, which is why watching it at home is perfect. Because damn it, Hello Kitty is there somewhere.

    STICKMAN: Hello Kitty is piloting Mechagodzilla, duh.

    MADHERO: What about your film? Is Hello Kitty in there?

    STICKMAN: Hello Kitty was never really here. SOOOO, although I saw Incredibles 2 last week and liked it quite a lot, we've spoken about that a lot recently, so I thought I'd go to the DVD releases and talk about my current favourite film of the year,  YOU WERE NEVER REALLY HERE. Previously mention Joaquin Phoneix stars in, maybe one of his best roles as a tormented, broken rescuer of kidnapped and trafficked young girls. And when I say broken, I mean...TRULY broken. I've never seen another performance like this, it's quite spectacular.

    Beyond his performance alone, the visuals are spectacular, and the sound design is incredible. The soundtrack, by Jonny Greenwood, of Radiohead and Phantom Thread fame is one of this year's best too. It's not an easy watch, this film very quickly goes to some dark places and never comes back out...and this is a arthouse/narrative hybrid film, so some people may find it a frustrating watch, but for me, it's an experience the likes of which I've never seen at the cinema, and I can confirm, it's still marvelous on Blu Ray too.

    MADHERO: Oh. I don't think Hello Kitty is a part of this.

    STICKMAN: I mean she might turn up, I won't spoil it for you.

    MADHERO: Joaquin Phoenix is one of my favorite actors, so I'm still very much planning on seeing this. Lynne Ramsey as well really impressed/depressed me with We Need to Talk About Kevin, and I think this might do the same.

    STICKMAN: She's a great director, Kevin like you say, was a great, but depressing film...this one's a weird mixture of emotions, dark, upsetting, but in a weird way...kinda uplifting? I dunno, maybe it's just the music doing that. It's a unique cinematic experience, that's for sure.

    MADHERO: You see this play in Oscar time? I feel like this is something that's really going under the radar.

    STICKMAN: I feel like this is the sorta film that'll get shut out...early in the year release, difficult subject matter and obtuse presentation. Sound Editing nomination seems pretty guaranteed though.


    MADHERO: Awesome. I think that about wraps everything up. No vacations for now, which is good because you might be cornered by your former stuffed animals or a huge shark. There's really no inbetween.

    STICKMAN: Do you mean...PooooooooOOOOOooooOOOOOOOOHH!?

    MADHERO: Yes, Pooh. The silly old bear is giving Obi Wan a bit of a bother.

    STICKMAN: Well, as the bear himself would say "Fucking hell". GOODBYE

    MADHERO: Later everyone. Don't let Slenderman catch you.

  • Daveed Diggs, Rafael Casal and Carlos Lopez Estrada Reveal How Friendship Made BLINDSPOTTING Possible!

    3 months ago


    Summer movie season is in full swing right now. You can still find at least three superhero movies in theaters as well as a big, dumb action movie staring The Rock and the latest Mission: Impossible film hits screens in a little over a week. But that doesn't mean there aren't smaller, more meaningful movies out there.

    One is coming out this weekend called Blindspotting. I saw this film at Sundance and raved about it back then. Now you have a chance to see what I was talking about. Starring Hamilton's Daveed Diggs, Rafael Casal, Janina Gavankar and Jasmine Cephas Jones, this is one of those everything movies. It'll make you laugh, it'll make you cry, it'll make your butthole clench in pure tension. You know, everything.

    Blindspotting is about a man in the final days of his parole who witnesses a policeman shooting an unarmed man. He's traumatized by the incident, but can't speak out for fear of revealing that violated his parole. At the same time his crazy best friend isn't helping matters by constantly acting as the well-intentioned, but bad influence in his life. 

    It's a great film and I was super excited to sit down with the two leads, Daveed Diggs and Rafael Casal, alongside their director Carlos Lopez Estrada to talk about how this film about friendship was actually born out of friendship as well as just how great their supporting cast is and how they struck an authentic balance between real world issues and escapism entertainment.

    It's a good chat. Enjoy!


    Eric Vespe: Hey, guys. So, I saw the movie at Sundance and flipped for it. It spoke to me in a way I wasn't quite expecting and I think it's because of the way the humor of the film pushes the narrative. It's a movie with deadly serious content, but first and foremost it's almost a buddy comedy. I cared about the stakes of the movie because I cared about the friendship between you guys. Was that your way into the story?

    Carlos Lopez Estrada: The movie is based on friendship. It sounds like a corny thing to say, but it's true. The movie's a result of the friendship between Rafa and Daveed for... how many years?

    Daveed Diggs: Hella years.

    Rafael Casal: (laughs) Hella years. We're coming up on two decades.

    Carlos Lopez Estrada: Then there was a friendship between Daveed and myself. It started professionally and then...

    Daveed Diggs: It became romantic.

    Carlos Lopez Estrada: It wasn't romantic, it was just physical. (laughs) Then through Daveed I met Rafa. It's oversimplifying the process a little, but a lot of people came to (the movie) because of friendship. (Producers) Keith Calder and Jess Wu have been working with these guys for 9 years as well. A lot of the actors are either friends or friends of friends of people who these guys have worked with. It is a family endeavor and I'm glad to hear that energy translates when you watch the movie. Calling this movie a passion project is a serious understatement. They could probably tell you a little more about the real genesis.

    Daveed Diggs: (to Rafa) You said something great a little while ago about humor and male relationships... about how men interact with each other.

    Rafael Casal: Just say it's my quote, but Daveed will say it.

    Daveed Diggs: Rafa says that one of the ways that men stay friends with each other is by making jokes. That's what we do. We're always sort of covering up...

    Rafael Casal: It's the barrel roll out of tension. We have two main emotions that men are socially accepted to express. It's anger and humor. Those are the two conditioned ways to fluctuate. 

    Really the movie runs the way heterosexual male friendship tends to toggle. It's devoid of too much talk about feelings and it's very much humor-humor-humor until it boils up and because of that I think the characteristic of the film I love the most is just how much they try to keep bringing humor into it until it's completely impossible. Even in the end it's Miles' final barrel roll that gets us to a place of hope between the two of them, by trying to get them to laugh. That's the survival nature of friendship.

    Daveed Diggs: It sets up this thing where you can't trust humor any more. It's not enough. But then the final statement is pretty much if we acknowledge that we both changed we can still make jokes.


    Eric Vespe: I relate to that a lot. It's also important for audiences to know, too. You can tell people Blindspotting has great messages about gentrification and police brutality and the unfairness of the parole system and their eyes might glaze over. It might sound like homework. But if you can tell them it's a funny movie and you're going to connect with the characters that changes the conversation that gets people to give it a shot.

    Daveed Diggs: The buddy comedy in a world that won't let it be one... the reason that we say that sentence so much is because that sentence, and when you see the movie you'll get this, is to me the definition of what “Blindspotting” is. You say “a buddy comedy in a world that won't let it be one” and all people hear is the “buddy comedy” part and the second half is lost. You don't entirely know what it means, so your eyes float to “buddy comedy.”

    The first press we ever got was “Rafael Casal and Daveed Diggs are doing a buddy comedy set in Oakland.” Yeah, we gave you the full sentence, but that's where your eye went.

    The in is that it's a buddy comedy, but it doesn't ignore the world that it exists in and it's that world that won't let it be one. The inherent seriousness of the time we're in gives you the buddy comedy, but puts it in the world that we're in.

    The world just unfolds as it is, which is why I never throw out the gun control and violence themes or even really police shootings. We're just now starting to add that because we're being told to. (laughs) We're being told it's helpful.

    Eric Vespe: Speaking of, your character witnesses a police shooting and the guy playing the officer is Ethan Embry. He's so damn good in this thing. He's a deeply flawed character, but not a one-dimensional bad guy. I felt I was empathizing with him and I never in a million years would have thought I'd do that with a person in his position.

    Rafael Casal: The amazing thing about empathy is all you actually have to do is make them human. You'll forgive so many flaws in a character's personality or political position as long as they feel full and human.

    Daveed Diggs: And I don't think we're even asking for forgiveness. It's just that you can sort of understand it. What we don't see is him over there and laughing and high-fiving two weeks after he shot a kid. His life probably sucks. You don't have to let him off the hook for being poorly trained and for shooting somebody because he was scared of a person running away from him. You don't get off the hook for that. You don't get brownie points for that, but also your life is probably pretty shitty.

    From our perspective (Ethan's character) couldn't reconcile with his wife after that. There's no turning back from that. The great thing about Ethan as an actor is that he made that whole movie in his head. He had the whole story of that officer in his head.

    Rafael Casal: The other side of this film.

    Daveed Diggs: And he asked us a ton of questions about it. We didn't write that into the script, so he came to us and asked us questions. Where is this guy from? Does he have other infractions?

    Rafael Casal: Do you think he came from the military? He gave it that much thought. I don't think at any point Ethan was trying to create a character that he thought was morally right. He just wanted a three-dimensional human being who is also a product of his surroundings and biases.

    Daveed Diggs: I don't think Ethan likes him very much!

    Rafael Casal: But I think he got him, which is nearly impossible when you read this script and invest in the main characters. To be able to find a sincere way into that officer...

    Daveed Diggs: It's a thing we asked of everybody involved in this film. So much of the focus is necessarily on us, but it was really important to have all these characters who were fully realized and felt like they had their own lives. So everybody had to do that work, without necessarily the lines to support it. Jasmine (Cephas Jones) came to the Bay a little bit early and just hung out. She's soooo New York.

    Rafael Casal: She's so Brooklyn! She was there for two days. She came to the Warriors parade...

    Daveed Diggs: It happened to be when the Warriors won the title.

    Rafael Casal: She hung out with two of the women who here character is based on and within two hours had the speech pattern down and was just walking around with it. They did her hair and I just kept forgetting that was Jasmine. It was magic.

    Eric Vespe: Janina (Gavankar) is great, too. One of my favorite scenes in the movie is when she's doing your hair. It's the most romantic not-romantic scene ever. It's romantic in that these are two people who get each other and care for each other, but they're not at a place where they can become an item again.

    Daveed Diggs: We auditioned here by seeing if she could braid hair. She can't, so that's an incredible acting job. You'll see she focuses on the back of the head. (laughs)


    Carlos Lopez Estrada: I think Janina is one of those casting stories that I'll always remember because she came in to read towards the later end of the process. We had seen a lot of actors, some very, very talented people came in to read, and we were having a hard time making a decision. It was an important role. Then she walked into the room and did a handful of things that no one had done and I think understood the depth of the character in ways that we hadn't even fully grasped.

    We had a conversation with her about the script and about how she related to it being an Indian woman and understanding how minorities feel. It's just one of those things I'll never forget. She walked out of the room and we all just looked at each other and said, “Wow. How could we not work with this woman?”

    Daveed Diggs: She taught us things about Val in the audition.

    Rafael Casal: She totally changed the character.

    Daveed Diggs: There's that moment at the end of that scene after their hug she just said “Okay, bye” and walked out. No one else had played it that way. There was always this longing pathos thing, but she did it that way and I was like “... okay.” I was reading with her.

    Rafael Casal: She just cut the scene off!

    Daveed Diggs: All of us were like “That's how that scene was supposed to go! Shit.” It gave her so much more agency than I think even we were giving to that character. The best of our abilities we were still two dudes trying to write women and she came in and was like “This is how I would do it in this moment.”

    Carlos Lopez Estrada: She's not like Val, but in many ways she is. She'd come up to all three of us and we would give her direction and she'd say “Actually, I'm not sure if I agree with that” and we'd have these really interesting conversations.

    Rafael Casal: She really took Val from us.

    Daveed Diggs: Thank goodness.

    Rafael Casal: She'd be like “Val's this person. I know her better than you, so we're going to do it this way.” We were like “Okay!”

    Eric Vespe: It's a tough character because that archetype could come across as naggy.

    Daveed Diggs: It could come across as naggy, I know! It's tricky. There was an edit where we failed her, really. There was an early edit where she came off that way and it wasn't because of her performance, it was because we were choosing the wrong shots. For time we cut a bunch of things out, so we had to go back put more of her in. She gives this wonderfully nuanced performance with so much empathy in it, but for time we cut a lot of those moments and we were watching it going “We have to put that back.”

    Rafael Casal: There's the balance of sweet and stern and she gave us so many different takes of each one in each scene. Compiling that, you have to have just the right amount of Val's sweetness and kindness that you understand why her and Collin were together, but also just enough coldness that you get that this isn't a happily ever after thing.

    Eric Vespe: Absolutely. I love the movie and I think a lot of people are going to love the movie as well. Thanks for taking the time to talk to me.


    The movie's out in select theaters this weekend and goes wide on July 27th. If you like good things, go watch it!  

  • The Aquaman Poster Is Released And The Internet Is Already Clowning It

    3 months ago


    My history with the modern DCEU is a little rocky, but I'm by no means a DC hater. Growing up the only good comic book movies were DC films! Superman and Superman II, the two Tim Burton Batman movies. Hell, I even liked Supergirl as cheesy as that was.

    The Dark Knight was my favorite movie the year it came out and I still hold it up as a masterpiece of popcorn entertainment.

    DC is just having some trouble finding its footing in the Marvel era. It's a tough road to hoe for Warner Bros. We've seen so much of Batman and Superman, so how do they both give us what we want and also something new?

    There's no easy answer to that question, but I think the key lies more in their less-familiar characters. Wonder Woman has been all over pop culture, but she never got her moment in the sun quite like she did in her own standalone movie. Patty Jenkins embraced the good-hearted Diana and also made her a badass who will stand up and fight for those that can't. It was more than just "cool moments." 

    Could James Wan work similar magic for Aquaman? I'm optimistic, not because I have any deep love or nostalgia for the character (I don't), but I like Wan as a filmmaker. He's got a great eye and distinctive voice. 

    While I think they blew it pretty hardcore with Batman V Superman and Justice League, I still hold out hope DC rights the ship. 

    So, when I share some images of the internet joshing the new Aquaman poster know it comes from a place of good fun. Here's the official one:


    The movie could be amazing, but that poster is pretty silly. Even DC fans are making fun of it. Looks like a photoshoot at the local aquarium. People have pointed out that the big mean shark on the right side of the poster is a stock image that you've seen a million times before, but hey, short cuts happen.

    The internet isn't as forgiving as I am, though. Here are a few of my favorite instant photoshop jobs I saw today:




    Alright, the last one is kinda mean and snarky, but it made me laugh.

    One nice thing I'll say about this poster though is that it shows a lighter, more fun vibe. I've seen a few clips and unfinished effects shots from this movie at various Conventions over the last 12 months or so and Wan isn't shying away from making this weird as hell, which is why I'm still hopeful we'll get something special out of this movie when it premieres this holiday season.

    In the meantime I'm sure we'll be getting a new trailer soon since they're going to be doing their big Hall H presentation at Comic-Con this week. We'll know soon enough exactly what kind of movie we're in for here.

  • Skyscraper Is Just As Silly As You Expect, But Also Pretty Fun

    3 months ago


    It's hard to remember in these days of comic book movies being all the rage, but the state of the big studio summer blockbuster was pretty dire before movies like Blade, X-Men and Spider-Man changed the game. For every Independence Day we get a dozen Dante's Peaks.

    Enough time has passed that it's strangely nostalgic to see a traditional big, goofy disaster movie again. Skyscraper is by no measure a serious attempt at drama, but it's not trying to be. All it wants to do is entertain you by throwing one of the most charismatic action stars in history into increasingly ridiculous set pieces as he has to scale a burning building to rescue his family. If you can accept it on its own level you should be able to have some fun with it.


    In terms of scripting it's a great example of set up and pay off. In fact you could almost call Skyscraper Chekhov's Gun: The Movie.

    If you're unfamiliar with the term, Chekhov's Gun simply means if you show a gun a wall at the beginning of a story by the end of that gun better have gone off. It's a storytelling principle that is in place so writers don't promise things they don't deliver on.

    The first act of Skyscraper is all about showing us stuff that pays off later. We're walked through this magnificent high tech tower in Hong Kong called The Pearl and things big and small are set up to be revisited later, from giant wind turbines to a garden section in the middle to even a sword hanging on the wall of the CEO's penthouse apartment.

    While the script, written by director Rawson Marshall Thurber, won't be winning any awards it's tighter than you'd expect and does right by its lead characters. Yes, there's Dwayne Johnson's one-legged security specialist Will Sawyer who is instantly likable and heroic and all that, but there's also his wife, Sarah, played by Neve Campbell, who skirts the typical damsel in distress trope. She's always proactive from scene one and nobody's victim. She's smart, kind, supportive, instantly catches on that something's wrong and calmly goes about finding a way out for her and her children. In any other big blockbuster type movie she'd just be waiting for the hero to come rescue her, but not here. It's a welcome breath of fresh air and Neve Campbell gives it her all.

    Johnson is his typical bundle of muscle, sweat and charm. Gotta hand it to The Rock. That dude never phones in a performance, which is crucial when you're dealing with a story as silly as this. You want to see The Rock trying to jump into a fiery building from a construction crane.

    Skyscraper really is The Towering Inferno mixed with Die Hard, but leans more towards Towering Inferno than you may think.

    Despite what the many sequels try to tell you, the original Die Hard worked because Bruce Willis was an everyman, not an action hero. Willis has taken the mantle of the action star post-Die Hard, but you have to remember up to that point he was a comedic romantic leading man, famous mostly for his quick-witted banter with Cybill Shepherd on Moonlight. He wasn't a muscle-bound action hero, he was just a dude who got hurt and didn't just shrug off his injuries.

    That's not what Skyscraper is. It is physically impossible to make The Rock an everyman, and that's a compliment to the hardest working man in show business. Seeing him kick ass is why people buy tickets to his movies. He's more in the Schwarzenegger mold than early Willis and he uses that to his advantage every time out, especially in last year's Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle where his perfectly sculpted body was the central joke.

    In short, Skyscraper delivers on what it promises. I doubt it'll ever be anybody's favorite movie, but it's an audience pleaser and never gets boring, which is the worst sin a movie like this could commit

  • Indiana Jones 5 Delayed! Disney shifts their schedule around!

    3 months ago



    There was a massive shift in Disney's release schedule today. Most of these new dates affect movies still in development, so don't worry. Avengers 4, Captain Marvel, Episode IX, Frozen 2 and all those are still coming when you expect them.

    Most of the moves are earlier than previously announced, the one exception being a big year push for Indiana Jones 5. Originally slated for 7/10/2020 the movie will now come out 7/09/2021. It makes sense, especially with the news that Solo's Jon Kasdan was reportedly doing a big rewrite after Spielberg regular David Koepp had his shot at the script.

    It's a bummer, but as long as they get it right and wash away the taste of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull they can take as much time as they need. 


    Mary Poppins Returns moves up a week from December 25th to December 19th, The Rock's Jungle Cruise movie will release October 11th, 2019, Maleficent 2 will hit theaters May 29th, 2020 and an Untitled Marvel movie moves from July 30th, 2021 to February 12th, 2021.

    It's a good bet that the Untitled Marvel movie will be a Black Panther sequel since it's moving from a coveted summer slot to February, which was very, very good to the first Black Panther film, but that's just a guess. 

    So that's the big update. Still can't wait for Spielberg and Harrison Ford's final outing with Dr. Jones. Call me an optimist if you want, but I have a good feeling that they'll knock it out of the park.

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 112

    3 months ago



    MADHERO: Hello everyone. I hope all y'all are enjoying your summers. Its been fun with my World Cups and all that. It distracts from the fact that for some reason Ant-Man and the Wasp hasn't released here yet but it has in the US. What the hell, Marvel? We had a good thing going with this whole "getting the movies early" thing and you betray us like that? Damn.

    LARRY: Gee......can't imagine what that's like....heh heh


    MADHERO: Laugh it up, Larry. Laugh it up, you American swine. Hope you had a good 4th of July btw.

    LARRY: Aight fuck off both of you lol

    MADHERO: Wow rude. Might as well talk some news to ease the pain.





    Y'all ready for more non-MCU Spider-Man Sony extended bullshit? We got a whole bunch for you today. Biggest story being the announcement of a Morbius the Vampire solo-film, presumably set within the same universe as this year's crappy looking Venom...which is being directed by Daniel Espinosa who brought you Safe House (Crap) and Life (Pretty good). More interesting/troubling is the casting of Morbius himself, none other than Jared 'Damaged' Leto.  We also got word of ANOTHER Spider-Sony-Spin-Off, featuring Silk, a character who has similar powers to Peter Parker, but not quite the same self-control, and a bit more of a darker background. Considering her character exists as a connective tissue to the story of Peter, it's going to be weird to see how they make a film for her without including him? But then this is Sony, and Sony gonna Sony.

    And FINALLY...we've got some more news for the actually really promising looking Enter the Spider-Verse animated movie. The good news? Spider-Man Noir is going to enter the scene, which is awesome. The ....slightly confusing news? He's going to be played by Nicolas god-damn Cage. Not who I'd of picked, but there you go. With all this going on, in addition to filming on the recently named Spider-Man: Far From Home? We're suddenly drowning in Spider-People. Where's the bug spray when you need it.

    MADHERO: Ok, so what ca-raaaaaaazy method thing is Jared Leto going to do playing a vampire?

    STICKMAN: He's going to drain people's blood for real.

    LARRY:He's gonna starve himself to get white and skinny, and then actually hang out with bats and shit. Look out for the Vox. article y'all

    MADHERO: And only wanna work at night or something because it adds to the "realness." So I can understand Venom getting a spin-off, but who the fuck is asking for a Morbius movie? He's not even in Top 20 Spider-Man villains.

    STICKMAN: When you take into consideration who's off the table because of the MCU....Vulture, Scorpion, Shocker, Mysterio....and then take into account what they're already planning with Venom and shit. It's not surprising we ended up with Morbius.

    LARRY: start scraping the bottom of the barrel. On a side note, WHERE IS MY KRAVEN SPINOFF?! I WANNA BE CATERED TO TO

    MADHERO: You wonder what it will take for Sony to go "fuck it, here's Ben Reilly, the Scarlet Spider."

    STICKMAN: Please no.

    MADHERO: I guess maybe that's the plan with Silk, having a Spider-Man esque character but not Spider-Man. She's a neat character, but her story is linked with Peter's and like Venom, I don’t know how you dance around it.

    STICKMAN: Sony will try their best and fail miserably though I'd imagine.

    LARRY: Just a reminder that Venom still looks like shit. No reason to have any faith in any of this.

    MADHERO: They must be feeling really confident about Venom to go full steam ahead with this, even with Silver and Black put on ice. Its just.....ugh. I thought we were passed this.

    STICKMAN: They were feeling confident about Amazing Spider-Man 2, so I don't think their confident means anything. But about Enter the Spider-Verse, right?

    MADHERO: That's weird casting but I'm into it. I doubt he's in it much. Also who'd have thought Cage would both play Superman and Spider-Man in 2018?

    LARRY: Not familiar with this Spidey, but I’m definitely interested.

    MADHERO: Also should probably mention, RIP Steve Ditko, co-creator of the webhead, who passed away at the age of 90. Wouldn't have Spider-Man without him. May he rest in peace.

    STICKMAN: Yeah, that was a sad thing to hear. Influential don't even begin to describe him.

    LARRY: A comic book legend, condolences to his friends and family.



    Another day,  another anime for Hollywood to  adapt/ruin. This time, its the turn of mecha anime series Gundam to go through the Hollywood grind, with production company Legendary announcing that Anime Expo that they're working on an live-action adaptation of the property, with Cale Bayter (producer of Pacific Rim) overseeing the project alongside the Sunrise creative team, the rights holder of the franchise. The movie, based on the press release, will follow the original Universal Century storyline, in which Earth finally achieves space colonization,  but ends up in civil war for autonomy and independence....THROUGH MECHAS! Cue messages about colonialism, anti-war and so forth.

    Gundam in and of itself needs no introduction, being one of the biggest Japanese franchises of all time, making billions with its dozens of tv series, movies and of course merch. Lots and lots of merch. With it having gone on for so long, I've personally always found a tad impenetrable, with literally dozens of shows and continuity that's been going on since the late 70s.  So a major Hollywood movie to provide as a starting point seems good, but that said. Hollywood's anime adaptation track record is.... not great. Expect to hear more soon once we get to the director/producer/casting stage.

    STICKMAN: Giant robots back at it again.

    LARRY: Well, you can thank the international box office for that. China makes big bucks.

    MADHERO: Gundam is super huge in Asia. Not sure how big in China, but as one of the biggest mech series of all times, it'll likely find its audience worldwide.

    LARRY: Big mechs. Something we can all bond over.

    STICKMAN: When are we going to get Gundam & Pacific Rim Vs Godzilla & Mothra All Out Monster Robot Attack Battle Royale

    LARRY: 20-Never

    MADHERO: Its a bit weird to talk about it, because I've never been able to get into Gundam because of the age old "where the fuck do I start." I know Wing is popular in the US because it aired on Toonami at the time, and one of the newer ones outside the continuity is supposed to be pretty good.

    LARRY: Yeah I've seen mostly Wing.

    STICKMAN: I'm always a huge fan of giant robots with big swords and guns and shit, but like you say...where does one even start with any Gundam series.

    MADHERO: I need to know the one with the big windmill bot and the one with Big Zam so I can go "oh hey, Big Zam"

    STICKMAN: Nice reference DUDE.

    LARRY: #BigZam2018

    MADHERO: More details to come soon. Then we can talk about how they're blowing it.



    Sometimes, this 24 hour news cycle blesses us with news that could only exist within the very moment in time it is revealed, and god dammit, this is one of those times. Jim Carrey is currently negotiating to play Eggmanm, yes really, in the new 2019 film adaptation of Sonic the Hedgehog from Paramount and Deadpool director Tim Miller. No, this is not a joke. He would joining the likes of James Marsden and Tika Sumpter, with newcomer Jeff Fowler set to direct. Still not a joke, stay with me.

    The very image of Carrey sporting the bald head, goggles, and spruced up mustache is enough to make any Jim Carrey fan absolutely squeal in delight. For all we know, this could be a return to form for Carrey, known for his over-the-top, wildly physical performances. Or this could be one of the most absurd, ridiculously cringe-y takes on Robotnik in the franchise's history. I don't know. But either way, I'm happy to see Carrey getting another role, as he is one of my all-time favorite comedians. Though he has some controversial opinions, and is probably a bit more than insane in the membrane, he still holds a special place in my heart and I look forward to seeing what comes of this, should it solidify.



    MADHERO: I made a Twitter post with the news that literally was just Fucking WHAT! and it got over 400 RT's. It was wild.

    STICKMAN: I like how you're on board with this but will burn Detective Pikachu to the ground.This Sonic movie is sounding like the biggest traincrash in cinema history. I'm here for it.

    MADHERO: Jim Carrey was certainly not who I had in mind for the role, but I'm kinda there for it just to see it. Everything I hear from this movie doesn't exactly fill me with confidence.

    LARRY: Because Jim Carrey is kinda perfect for Eggman, tbh. Put him in the makeup and suit and he could kill it. He's lanky and physical, does voices, is over the top, THAT'S EGGMAN.

    STICKMAN: Eggman is the least lanky person I ever saw. He's literally a ball.

    LARRY: Have you seen that guy's legs?

    MADHERO: Maybe he's thinking of Sonic 06 Eggman. It would be his first role in a mainstream film in a while. His last was....shit, Dumb and Dumber 2?

    STICKMAN: Sonic 06 Eggman is a cursed nipple monster.

    LARRY: Yeah, that's the closest he's come to being actually recreate-able for a live-action film. Just put him in a fatsuit and it’ll be fine.

    MADHERO: Wake me up when we get a Blonic movie.

    LARRY: The point is, Eggman has never been this character we put on some fucking pedestal so I don't see how this couldn't work. Or, if it doesn't work, it's gonna be amazingly awful and we'll all get a good kick out of it.

    STICKMAN: If you put Eggman on  a pedestal he'd roll off and crack open on the floor.



    There's so many long-running slasher franchises around, it's often hard to remember them all. One of the more successful, whilst still mostly cult-based series' is Child's Play, better known by its later titular character, Chucky. Child's Play was a pretty big hit back in the late 80's/early 90s, ending its cinema run in 2004 with Bride of Chucky, before later seeing a revival in two direct to DVD sequels in 2013 and 2017.  Last we heard, the franchise was going to continue via TV with the original creators and Brad Dourff back as Chucky. So that makes it odd to hear that a SECOND Child's Play project is in the works, and it's a reboot.

    MGM have fast-tracked a contemporary remake of the original movie with newcomer Lars Klevberg at the helm, and the producers of last year's smash-hit...IT (Sorry) keeping things in check. Presumably this would follow the trend of most horror reboots and be a more gritty and serious take on the gloriously campy original, which could work, or not... It feels a bit like the Evil Dead remake paired with Ash vs Evil Dead, but at least the latter only came to be AFTER the movie. A strange situation, but who knows, maybe we'll get something fun out of both.

    LARRY: Fuck Chucky. That little satanic booger gave me nightmares as a kid.


    LARRY: He can go to hell.

    STICKMAN: Hi I'm Chucky, wanna play?


    MADHERO: One of the Mexico players's nickname is Chucky because he scared his teammates as a kid. And one of those teammates: Larry Fried.

    LARRY: Damn straight. On a serious note, yeah I think Annabelle has the sorta "creepy doll" horror market right now. Not sure we need yet another.

    STICKMAN: I'm a big fan of the original Child's Play but have never seen any of the sequels, not sure people are chomping at the bit for more killer doll movies. Annabelle's boring tho, just turns her head and shit.

    MADHERO: Chucky ain't really scary as an adult, but I can see as a kid why he'd be terrifying. I feel like this new take would go an Annabelle take, which seems...... not my jam

    STICKMAN: Annabelle and Chucky should do a crossover movie.

    LARRY: Annabelle is the new Wife of Chucky! Bam, hella marketing deal, wow.


    MADHERO: We're doing the work for them. Let's see how this pans out and whether this new take will be anything worthwhile.



    If you're a child of the 90's, there's a good chance you've come across a Direct to DVD Disney sequel in your life. From Lion King 2, Aladdin: Return of Jafar, Bambi 2, and so many different sequels of varying but mostly bad quality. All of those films were made  by DisneyToon Studios,  which has now been shut down effective immediately, leading to the firing of 75 employees and the cancellation of a new Planes and Tinkerbell movie.

    Starting out as MovieToons, where they made not only those sequels, but other smaller films like the Ducktales movie, the Winnie the Pooh sequels, and probably most famous for 90s kids everywhere:  A Goofy Movie. A lot of these films were made under the leader of Michael Eisner, but when Bob Iger took over and John Lasseter became head of animation, he restructured the company to focus on spin-offs like Tinkerbell and Planes. With the rise of streaming, their existence became redundant (this was already planned for a while and not just caused by Lasseter's exit). Its sad for the people that lost their job, and I wish them success in finding something new.

    STICKMAN: I do wonder if there wasn't a need for studios like this to make easy, cheap(ish) content for their new streaming service. Surely that's the new direct to DVD home.

    LARRY: Absolutely.

    MADHERO: I imagine there's other studios for that. Disney ain't exactly strapped for content with or without a Fox deal.

    STICKMAN: I can't say I was exactly a big fan of their output. Even 90s Kids favourite, The Goofy Movie, which is some real cringe I gotta say.

    LARRY: I love some DisneyToon films, the Goofy films especially, but...yeah their legacy will always be marred by a fuck ton of shitty cash grabbing sequels sadly.

    MADHERO: A Goofy Movie is really fun, but super cheesy. Their output was not the best, a lot of it was terrible, but they did the best with what they had to work. Like, there's some surprisingly decent sequels in the mix. Lion King 2 is better than it has any right to be.

    LARRY: For every Lion King 2, there's about three Hunchback 2's. So.

    STICKMAN: Shame to hear about the people losing their jobs. At least the studio got a good run at it. We'll never see Planes in space now.

    LARRY: No yeah, seeing people lose jobs always sucks. This is sad news. I just felt like it was inevitable at some point.

    MADHERO: It sucks for the people that lost their jobs. Hopefully they'll find something soon. Its a weird legacy to have, but I've watched plenty of the films they made, and especially as a kid, they entertained, so thanks for that.

    STICKMAN: Thanks for the Goofy internet memes.

    LARRY: Long Live The Goofy Movie. And An Extremely Goofy Movie, that film is awesome.



    Nothing like some solid post-Civil War period dramas to get your engines revving. One that has been often adapted is "Little Women," a novel by Louisa May Alcott about the story of the March sisters and their relationships over the course of several years. It has been many feature films, a musical, a BBC mini-series, and even an anime. But now, Greta Gerwig will helm a new feature film adaptation after her debut with Lady Bird, and it has recently scored some major talent, including "Lady Bird" stars Saoirse Ronan and Timothee Chalamet, as well as Meryl Streep, Florence Pugh, and Emma Stone.

    Their roles are unknown, and they are still negotiating, but if they were to come on board, it would be an excellent cast already, and they are still looking for more. And....yeah, this is a solid story with strong female characters, and Gerwig has proven she has a strong directorial voice with Lady Bird. I think this could be a great project for her, as it is another coming-of-age story, though a lot more period, which provides a fun challenge. Here's hoping this turns out good, or shall I say....ahem, "ASTONISHING." That's a reference to the musical. None of you get it. Sigh.

    MADHERO: Guilty as charged, I didn't get it, but I'm in for whatever Gerwig does next after Lady Bird.

    STICKMAN: I don't even know what this film's about. Is it a sequel to The Borrowers.

    LARRY: No, silly.

    MADHERO: Do I need to watch the anime to understand it?

    LARRY: Noooooooo

    MADHERO: In all seriousness, that's a really amazing cast of actors, with 4 Oscar nominees and Pugh is also a really big talent. I can't say I'm familiar with the material, but Gerwig really impressed me with Lady Bird, so I'm really curious what she does next. Does sound a little more "traditional" though.

    STICKMAN: I have yet to see Lady Bird but I shall see it at some point. This film doesn't exactly scream out at me interest-wise, but hey ho. Good cast, good director.

    LARRY: Yeah the story is a little...ahem, plain. It's strictly a family drama and little else, but it's an actor's piece usually. So, at the very least, we'll see some damn good performances probably.

    MADHERO: Confirmed to be sweeping the 2019 Oscars.

    STICKMAN: Meryl Streep in a movie that's less about telling a story and more about her getting an Oscar nomination? I can't believe it.

    LARRY: Probably.

    MADHERO: So yeah, new Gerwig project with major talent. Exciting stuff. I'll just watch the anime and skip to the part where the robots pop up.

    STICKMAN: This one's for you, Greta. I know you're a fan of Screwvies.


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for the news, and now its time once again for a review! We've been doing a lot of those recently. While the song in the trailer may say that it takes two to make a thing go right, Larry has to do it on his own, as he's the only one here to have seen the 20th MCU film: Ant-Man and the Wasp. What with it not being out here yet and stuff.

    STICKMAN: Time for me to go bury my head in the sand and scream for a while.

    LARRY: Geez you're so passionate about this lol


    MADHERO: Ant-Man is a lovely man and I want to see him on his anty adventures, but you did, Larry. Once again, Ant-Man opens after a Avengers film to provide a bit of a breather, and hey, its the first time a female character is in the title. So Larry. Does it get the job done?



    DIRECTOR: Peyton Reed (Yes Man, Ant-Man)

    STARRING: Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly, Michael Douglas, Michael Pena, Michelle Pfeifer,  Hannah John-Karmen, Walton Goggins, Laurence Fishburne

    SYNOPSIS: Scott Lang (Rudd) tries to balance his home life as a father with his responsibilities as Ant-Man. When Hope van Dyne (Lilly) and Hank Pym (Douglas) present him with a new mission to bring to light secrets from their past, Lang teams up with Van Dyne as the new Wasp.

    LARRY: I'd say so, yeah. I really enjoyed the first Ant-Man, I found it to be incredibly funny with excellent performances from Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas. It brings the same, laugh-a-minute comedic stylings from director Peyton Reed while also supplying kickass, creative action sequences. The performances all across the board are excellent, it feels closer to an ensemble piece this time around and its great.

    The film also has a lot of heart concerning Janet Van Dyne's character, as well Scott Lang's daughter Cassie, which helped balance out the humor. What really holds it back is the story, which, while entertaining, is just a tad too jumbled. It has one too many characters and sideplots to truly feel cohesive, and so it lacks smoothness there. Otherwise, I had a blast with it; I'd definitely consider it one of the funniest Marvel films to date.

    MADHERO: Marvel seems to have really found their knack when it comes to comedy. Obviously we know that's there, but what always really stood in the first Ant-Man were those small scale battles, like on a toy train track or a briefcase. Are those types of fights still there?


    LARRY: Absolutely!! There are plenty of fun moments where Pym's tech is used to resized household objects, and I got a real kick out of them. I don't wanna spoil them, but needless to say they're lots of fun. They reeeeeeally ran with it here.

    MADHERO: That's great to hear. There's a lot of fun shrinking and growing in the trailers, so I'm in for that. The Wasp is now in the title, and does she do enough to earn the equal billing? Its a good thing to finally have a female character in the title.

    LARRY: Yeah, Evangeline Lily is a great actress and she carries a lot of the film's emotional moments, along with Michael Douglas. They have a great chemistry with each other as father and daughter. Same goes for her and Rudd, though I value them more as fun partners than the romance they keep trying to push.

    MADHERO: How about some of the newer additions. I don't know how much Ghost is in it, but her suit design is really cool. Same goes with Walton Goggins. And of course, Janet van Dyne herself: Michelle Pfeifer and Laurence Fishburne defecting from the DCEU. How are they all?


    LARRY: Again, I said this film is largely an ensemble piece, as everyone really gets to shine. Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost is a solid villain with a backstory that helps make her feel more connected to the MCU than most other throwaway Marvel baddies. Pfeiffer and Fishburne are as excellent as you'd expect, managing to find the depth and nuances in otherwise small roles. Goggins is great, but I found his character to be ultimately expendable; they don't do much with him and it doesn't add much to the film. Wish they cut all that out. OH AND SHOUT OUT TO RANDALL PARK He's hysterical in this as a police chief watching over Scott Lang on house arrest.

    MADHERO: Good to know that everyone in the essemble brings their A-game. How connected do you think everything feels? We know this takes place before Infinity War, so we're good on that part, but do we need to do any more MCU homework?

    LARRY: Not really, you arguably don't even have to have seen the first Ant-Man to follow it, though it would probably help if you did. It connects with Civil War a little, but the movie explains it fairly well. Ya may wanna stay during the credits, though, heehee.

    MADHERO: Awesome. I think that's enough questioning. Anything you want to say in your wrap-up?


    LARRY: This is definitely a comedy first, so go in expecting lots of laughs and less major epic mind-blowing superhero explosions and such. Peyton Reed has proved he has a strong comedic voice with this sequel and I look forward to seeing if they continue having him tackle the Ant-Man character. It's tons of fun.


    STICKMAN: I have a question. Does at any point, Ant-Man go small, climb inside  Thanos' ass and then turn into Giant-Man, thus defeating Thanos.

    LARRY: Sadly, no.

    MADHERO: Ah dang. I was hoping for that. Guess I'll just look at some of the other movies to see if they do have a small man climb into Thanos' ass.

    STICKMAN: Let's hope, what else is out.



    DIRECTOR: Gerard McMurray (Burning Sands)

    STARRING: Y’La Noel, Marisa Tomei, Melonie Diaz, Lex Scott Davis, Joivan Wade

    SYNOPSIS: To push the crime rate below 1% for the rest of the year, the New Founding Fathers of America (NFFA) test a sociological theory that vents aggression for one night in one isolated community. But when the violence of the oppressors meets the rage of the marginalized, the contagion will explode from the trial-city borders and spread across the nation

    MADHERO: Hoho, guess we're startin' SPICY!

    LARRY: Guys, The Purge just works. It just works.

    STICKMAN: Maaaaan The Purge, what  a waste of space. Every time you hope maybe this time they make it work, but they always fuck it up. If John Carpenter had made this film it'd be great.

    MADHERO: I find it interesting how the films have gotten angrier and definitely a lot more left-wing. Don't see many movies teasing using an MAGA hat.

    STICKMAN: It's all so shallow though. There's no actual commentary, it's just saying the things and pretending that's strong thematics.

    LARRY: This film is apparently explicitly political.

    MADHERO: You mean these movies aren't particuarely subtle?

    STICKMAN: mean more they always market themselves as political films but all they do is say BLACK PEOPLE ARE OPPRESSED and then blow a door up or whatever.

    LARRY: Eh, the other films have apparently not really been that politically relevant, unlike this one which deals with race and class and poverty.

    STICKMAN: Larry I've seen the films. They all deal with race, class and poverty.

    MADHERO: I've seen Anarchy and Election Year. They are SUPER Political. I thought it was ok. From the reviews it sounds like its once again split.

    STICKMAN: Election Year was also SUPER shit.

    LARRY: Well clearly neither Anarchy and Election Year gave much of a shit about the actually oppressed people.

    STICKMAN: Larry you ain't seen the films stop telling us what they are.

    MADHERO: Maybe we should hold a purge but have it be about dumb hot takes and just have them all out there instead of murder.


    DIRECTOR: Genndy Tartakovsky (Hotel Transylvania, Hotel Transylvaia 2)

    STARRING: Adam Sandlet, Selena Gomez, Andy Samberg, Asher Blinkoff, Kevin James, Steve Buscemi, Kathryn Hahn

    SYNOPSIS: Dracula, (Sandler) and his family (Gomez, Samberg) and friends (James, Buscemi etc.) take a vacation on a luxury Monster Cruise Ship. There, Dracula becomes attracted to the ship's mysterious captain Ericka (Hahn), who is secretly the great-granddaughter of his archenemy Abraham Van Helsing.

    MADHERO: Now that he's finally finished Samurai Jack, Genndy Tartakovsky is back on his Adam Sandley/vampire bullshit.

    STICKMAN: Hotel Transylvania is the cinematic equivalent to me eating a Mars bar and going into a horrific sugarrush.

    MADHERO: The Hotel Transylvania movies are.....fine. They're fine. Super bouncy which is something Tartakovsky is a big fan of when it comes to comedy. I found them both to be average and a tad too hyperactive, but then again I'm old and tired.

    LARRY: I genuinely don't get it. The first HT was fine. Average. Mediocre, really. WHY DID THEY MAKE TWO MORE.

    MADHERO: Because they make money?

    LARRY: God why must they make money... Whatever, passity pass pass on this one.

    STICKMAN: Adam Sandler is very much the modern Dracula.

    MADHERO: A lot of "ehh, its fine" movies make lots of money. Look at Minions.

    STICKMAN: But I hear it's got political subtext though. Inequality for monsters.


    MADHERO: The status quo of heteronormality and the nuclear family. But with MONSTERS! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO



    DIRECTOR: Rawsom Marshall Thurber (We’re the Millers, Central Intelligence)

    STARRING: Dwayne Johnson, Neve Campbell, Chin Ha, Pablo Schreiber, Bryon Mann

    SYNOPSIS: former FBI agent Will Sawyer (Johnson) lives in the tallest and "safest" skyscraper in Hong Kong as head of security with his family (Campbell, The building comes under attack by terrorists, forcing Sawyer to take action.

    STICKMAN: Oh no, Adam Sandler smashed the ceiling of this skyscraper and caused a disaster.

    MADHERO: Die Hard but......with an amputee and in China?

    LARRY: I just wanna watch the scene where The Rock uses his leg to go down the elevator shaft or whatever. I'd pay ticket price for that alone.

    MADHERO: I just wanna see him miss the jump and fall to his demise.

    STICKMAN: I want to see the same shot of him in a helicopter wearing a white t-shirt again. From all his other films.


    STICKMAN: Insert searing commentary on giving disabled actors disabled roles here.

    MADHERO: When we'll discuss Dwayne Johnson's careeer, a lot of these types of films will pop up. The very average films he elevates with his charm but are pretty much films you watch on Netflix or on a plane.

    STICKMAN: I saw the whole film in a trailer I saw in IMAX 3D, I think I'm set for Skycraper, thanks guys.

    LARRY: Jumanji 2 was good tho...but I did watch it on a plane.



    DIRECTOR: Boots Riley (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Lakeith Stanfield, Tessa Thompson, Jermaine Fowler, Terry Crews, Danny Glover, Steven Yuen, Armie Hammer, David Cross, Patton Oswalt

    SYNOPSIS: In an alternate present-day version of Oakland, telemarketer Cassius Green (Stanfield) discovers a magical key to professional success, propelling him into a macabre universe.


    MADHERO: Well this looks.....wacky.

    STICKMAN: Wait a sec, I feel a freestyle rap coming on. In character of course.

    MADHERO: Is this character oddly homophobic?


    MADHERO: So yeah, weird lead actor controversy aside, this movie looks pretty dope and wild.

    LARRY: I'm super excited. Cast looks amazing, editing looks nuts, I'm here for it.

    STICKMAN: My interest has been a bit tempered by current eventtssss but yeah it looks fun. It's not out here though so never mind.

    MADHERO: One hell of a cast, and a real sense of style and place. Reviews at Sundance say that it goes to some pretty crazy levels, and I guess that's what happens when you let a creative mind like Boots Riley go nuts on his first feature.

    LARRY: Apparently this is based on an album, fun fact.

    STICKMAN: Is it an rap album, Larry. A character based one.

    LARRY: Oh shut up lol

    STICKMAN: Sorry to bother you, Larry!


    DIRECTOR: Bo Burnham (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Elsie Fisher, Josh Hamilton, Emily Robinson, Daniel Zolghadri

    SYNOPSIS: A teenager (Fisher) tries to survive the last week of her disastrous eighth-grade year before leaving to start high school.

    STICKMAN: A24 back at it again.

    LARRY: The indie champ is blessing us with two big hitters this month. Bless.

    MADHERO: O good, the horror of facing my awkward teenage years on screeeeeeen. I'm not prepared.

    STICKMAN: Is this scarier than Hereditary in that regard.

    LARRY: Probably.

    MADHERO: Watching the trailer already made me nervous. It kinda makes me glad that social media wasn't as much a thing when I was in that grade, cause howee.

    STICKMAN: Is Bo Burnham a real name or is it like a joke one.

    LARRY: It's real, Stix. Bo is short for Robert.

    MADHERO: I've heard this movie  be called the anti-John Hughes movie, so I guess this ain't gonna romanitcize high school a lot.

    STICKMAN: A24 are in the business of making good films, or at least conceptually interesting ones, so I wouldn't expect to go into this to be bored.

    LARRY: Not even a little. This film is probably a slow burn, grounded comedy but I'm down for that. I think Bo Burnham is a really smart, talented comedian and I'm excited to see how his voice translates to film.

    STICKMAN: I just hope Black Philip turns up in this, wearing a little goat school uniform, eating an apple.

    MADHERO: If the trailer already made me feel awkward, I don't think I can take 90-100 minutes of that. Anyway, that's it for all the movies this week, but at least we got MOVIE OF THE WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK


    MADHERO: As always, we discuss DVD/VOD and cinematic releases here. With this current heatwave, it might be nice to escape a bit and go to a nice refreshing cinema, which I think we all did, so great plan, everyone!

    STICKMAN: It's my only escape from the constant nightmare of football.

    LARRY: And the constant nightmare that is my life.

    MADHERO: Oh.....this got dark way too quick. Uhmmmm.... LARRY WHAT'S YOUR MOVIE OF THE WEEK?



    LARRY: My MOTW is one of the many excellent documentaries to grace indie theaters as of late, with this one having been released wider about a week or so ago, “Won’t You Be My Neighbor?” Focusing on the life and times of ordained minister and “Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood” host Fred Rogers, the film discusses the impact he had on not only children’s television, but also on his audience and those around him.

    Beaming with a warm positivity and kind demeanor, he was truly a one-of-a-kind figure. Many are calling this film a sort of shining light in the darkness that is the Trump era, but I personally disagree; this isn’t because it’s bad, rather because this film is much better seen as a humble documentary that will stand the test of time for its heartfelt story. Its really just a plain ol’ celebration. That being said, if you’re looking to feel a HELL of a lot better for any reason, this is surely going to inspire you in more ways than one.

    MADHERO: Mr. Rogers feels like a very American thing, but one that America could really use right now. It's been doing very well for a documentary and I've heard nothing but good things.

    STICKMAN: If it's making people feel happy and inspired, great. I just feel like this is such an American thing and I have no idea what it's about, and it seems mostly based in nostalgia for the guy.

    LARRY: Ehhhhh it is nostalgic in a lot of ways but it doesn’t alienate those who are unfamiliar. You get a good amount of background.

    STICKMAN: I feel like there's a connection that has to have already been made in order to connect with the film on the same level.

    LARRY: I disagree to some extent, but alright.

    MADHERO: I guess that's my biggest question: whether someone who doesn't have an past with Mr. Rogers would feel the same way, but I guess its ultimately about a guy who was decent to his very core and helped people with that.

    LARRY: If it does ever come by you, I wouldn’t think twice honestly. It’s just very feel-good, but it doesn’t patronize.

    STICKMAN : Everyone I've seen who saw the film had a longstanding relationship with the dude, and I doubt it'll come out here, so I guess we'll never know.

    MADHERO: Aight, you grump, what's your Movie of the Week?

    STICKMAN: Well my film's fucking miserable so we're gonna throw Mr Rogers out the window now. A few years ago, a film called Sicario came out. A very dark and nihilistic thriller/drama about cartels, crime and the lengths we should go to stop bad people. A lot of people loved it, we did here at Screwvies, but nobody expected  a sequel. Nonetheless, we got one. Here it is. Sciario 2: Day of the Soldado, or whatever it is depending on where you live. Although it lacks the dark beauty and punch of the original film, as well as Emily Blunt, Sicario 2 is still ride that should entertain, if not slightly disappoint fans of the previous.

    Needless to say, this is not a happy movie, even more so than the first. This is full on hands dirty nasty, indefensible shit. After an opening 10 minutes that in my opinion go a bit too far in terms of violence, the rest of the film provides a good thriller with an interesting, if somewhat unlikeable cast. It doesn't hold a candle to Sicario, but the sequel is still a good time...if by good time you mean feeling like you've been slapped in the face with someone's dismembered hand for two hours.

    MADHERO: Fun time for the whole family it sounds like.

    STICKMAN: I mean, there sure is... a family in one sequence.

    LARRY: Wow what a ricochet for my choice. Nice work, Stix.

    MADHERO: Is there anything as good in the movie as the dinner table scene or the one at the border. I've been tempted, but I feel like the parts missing are too essential.

    STICKMAN: There's nothing quite as potently memorable in this film, no. There's some shocking sequences, but the most shocking feels almost...overboard?

    LARRY: Impressive that it manages to break though desensitization.

    STICKMAN: I think it sometimes tries too hard to do that.

    MADHERO: I haven't heard much from the overall plot, but some of it sounds a tad..... stupid.

    STICKMAN: It's hard to discuss without spoilers, but it's to interpretation depending on where you stand at the end.

    LARRY: Benicio fucking banging the gun seems fairly stupid.

    STICKMAN: I mean that bit's awesome yo. Benicio Del Toro is great in this , in general. He doesn't have the same mystique though. OH WELL.

    MADHERO: I guess so that he can shoot faster. It looks cool in the trailer at least. I feel like this is going to be a Netflix movie for me. I have too many reservations to go see it in theaters. But man, who'd have thought Sicario would be a franchise.

    STICKMAN: It was a fun experience in the cinemas....but what about you, Mad...did you see anything...INNN...teresting?

    MADHERO: Alright, time to bounce back to family friendly fun, but DEFINITELY NOT A KIDS MOVIE! As we already discussed in the previous episode, I've waited FOURTEEN YEARS for an Incredibles sequel. That original is easily one of my favorite Pixar movies and maybe even one of my favorite superhero movies. I was super excited for the sequel, but also of course a bit cautious. Could it live up to my high expectations? We know that long awaited Pixar sequels can disappoint (hi, Finding Dory).

    Luckily, Incredibles 2 does not disappoint at all. I don't think it transcends the original, in that it doesn't have quite as many iconic moments as the first one, but its still an incredibly fun superhero romp. Its also really funny, with Jack Jack really bringing the most of the laughs.  So yeah, glad to see my expectations were met and I await an Incredibles 3 should they decide to get around that.

    STICKMAN: What about that Bao though.

    MADHERO: Bao was so fucking cute and heartwarming.

    LARRY: Y’all heard my thoughts last episode, seems to concur with Mad. Not better than the original but a worthy successor.

    STICKMAN: I'm curious about the level of sentimentality in this film, I haven't heard much about tears being jerked or nothing, which is odd for a Pixar movie in this day and age.

    MADHERO: Yep, said movie is very good. Not original good, but definitely worthwhile. I don't think there's much tearjerkery involved.

    LARRY: Yeah it’s not Inside Out level or anything. The third act is pretty straightforward, too much action to cry about.

    STICKMAN: Nice, that's a fun change of pace. I'm always down for action over crying.

    MADHERO: Its definitely interesting to see these characters now compared to 2004. Shows just how far we've come with CG animation.

    LARRY: Ugh the animation is so much better. Watching it a second time makes it even clearer.

    STICKMAN: I hear it makes the original film kinda hard to watch now.

    MADHERO: I haven't tried that yet, but I can imagine. We'll see when I rewatch it... again, because its The Incredibles

    STICKMAN: I have only seen it once and I guess I should rewatch it soon and see if I want to watch a sequel.

    LARRY: Yeah it would help I suppose.


    MADHERO: I think that about wraps everything up for today. Join us next week when we all get a movie at the same time. I dunno, I haven't checked the overall schedule for Mission Impossible. So no idea when we all get to see Tom Cruise jump out of a plane.

    STICKMAN; Tom Cruise is a crazy person and will strike again if we're not careful. Also UK GETS MISSION IMPOSSIBLE TWO DAYS EARLIER THAN THE US. MWAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA.

    MADHERO: Couches everywhere be warned.  Also avoid your mom cause Mamma Mia 2 is happening as well. Don't wanna get involved in that mess. Aight bye

    LARRY: Tom Cruise jumping out of things might as well be America’s new kink. Adios muchachos.

  • Best & Worst Movies of June 2018

    3 months ago


    The Summer blockbuster season is still in full swing and it has really picked up in a massive way! For the first time in quite a while, this has been a legitimately extraordinary month for film. A bunch of really good to great stuff has come out that has impressed the hell out of me and very few films disappointed (not to say there weren’t bad movies). So let’s talk about the best and worst movies of June!

    Before I begin, a couple of disclaimers…

    1. This is based on movies that I SAW in June. Some of these movies may have officially come out in previous months and have only just come to my area. Other movies might have come out in June, but have not yet come to my area, so I haven’t seen them.

    2. This is purely based on MY OPINION. Some movies in The Best category might be movies you hate. Some movies in The Worst category might be movies you love. That is completely fine! Film is subjective and you are absolutely allowed to disagree with me. All I ask is that you don’t be a dick about it. Respect my opinion and I will respect yours.

    Now let’s begin!

    The Best:

    Hereditary- This is quite possibly the best horror movie I’ve seen in years (certainly the best of this year)! The performances are all phenomenal, Ari Aster’s direction is exquisite, the visuals are incredible and the sound design is insanely good. Of course, this film is also extremely terrifying. It crafts incredibly tense sequences and genuinely unsettling scenarios where you honestly forget to breath all without using a single jump scare, which I didn’t think was possible in the modern day. The characters are extremely deep and compelling and the plot itself is brilliantly written, complex and actively defies horror conventions. It also does an amazing job of filtering itself into the subgenre of a family drama with horror elements in it. Once you realize that this film is far more about a familial conflict than anything else, it becomes even more brilliant on an extremely subtle level. It never overloads with exposition in any way, opting instead to simply keep the mystery going as long as possible without being pretentious, it has powerful themes of grief, mental illness and familial dysfunction and the ending is extraordinary! This is an incredibly stunning, intense, refreshing, mind blowing horror film that I absolutely adored! If you can see past the slow burn pacing for a unique payoff, then go see this immediately!

    Incredibles 2- The Incredibles is one of my favorite animated films. I’ve been waiting for this sequel since I was seven years old and it did not disappoint! THIS FILM IS… wait for it… INCREDIBLE! It’s every bit as good as it’s predecessor and I was blown away! The animation is extraordinary, the voice acting is great, Brad Bird’s direction is phenomenal and Michael Giacchino’s score is fantastic. Just like the first, this continues to provide a brilliant exploration of everyday life through a superhero lens, expertly bringing them down to our level. The Incredibles themselves continue to all be extremely compelling characters with fantastic arcs all around and demonstrating the qualities of what is essentially a sitcom family with superpowers. Jack Jack is easily the highlight of the film with the development of his powers and excellent comedic moments (look for a racoon), there are a bunch of new characters that are all fun and interesting and the villain is very menacing and layered and very compelling. I especially love how deeply linked this film is to the first. It honestly feels like one movie in every single respect. Seriously, watch them back to back, everything lines up. It brings Super legalization to the forefront in a very believable way and doesn’t just act as a wave of nostalgia. This is very much its own thing and never feels like it presents any unnecessary callbacks. The plot itself is brilliantly written, subversive and mind bending and it’s absolutely hilarious. This is a massively evolutionary, satisfying, immensely entertaining sequel that is everything I could have ever hoped for and one of the best movies of the year! The Incredibles is back and just as good as ever!

    Won’t You Be My Neighbor?- This is quite possibly the best documentary of the decade! It’s an extraordinary look at Mr Rogers and his show and everything about it is brilliant. The documentary filmmaking on display is incredible with not a single frame wasted and the interviews are extremely well done and personal. It brilliantly explores Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood, it’s history and everything that made it work so perfectly. It paints an extraordinarily detailed and compelling picture of Fred Rogers as a human being. It also takes the time to explore the cynicism and disbelief around the kindness of Mr Rogers as well as his impact on children’s television and individuals. It’s all done with a refreshing lack of sensationalism and massive amount of heart and acts as a plea for positivity and kindness in our bleak modern day world. It’s a delightful, wondrous, emotional, poignant, magnificent doc and one of the best films of the year! If it’s playing in your area, go see it immediately! This is a film every person in the world needs to be exposed to!

    The Worst:

    Action Point- I did an entire episode of Clark Film about how I refused to review this movie. That should tell you pretty much everything you need to know.

    Best F(r)iends Volume 2- There’s honestly not much to say about this movie that I haven’t already said about the first just two months ago. It’s every bit as hilariously bad as you would expect. The performances are awful (especially Wiseau and Sestero), the direction is shit, the visuals are shit, there’s tons of audio issues, the music sucks, the dialogue is shit, the characters are still nothing, the plot becomes flat out nonsensical, there’s so many weird and confusing sequences that feel kinda pretentious and, as you would expect, it is absolutely laughable. This is yet another magnificent trainwreck and the absolute definition of so bad it’s good. When this eventually makes its way to VOD or Blu-Ray, watch it immediately! It’s… something.

    SuperFly- No. Just… no. The plot itself is meandering and overstuffed, the characters are nothing, the pacing is atrocious and there are a ton of laughably stupid moments. Don’t bother with this one, it’s dogshit and nobody cares!

    And now we’ve come to the end! If you want to listen to my dumb voice talking about these and other movies, listen to my podcast, Clark Film, at and on iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play Music and all your other podcatcher apps. Raw video versions can also be found at

    I’ll be back here with another installment of Best & Worst next month!

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 111

    3 months ago



    MADHERO: GOOOOOOOOLAZO! Oh I'm sorry, I'm just pre-occupied with the World Cup and not all too much with movies. It happens. Anyway, since Hollywood and America is general don't give a shit, they might as well get their dinosaur movie now: one that's been out here for weeks now. Don't see that very often.

    LARRY: What cup? Do you put like worldly drinks in there?

    STICKMAN: I am taking the ball and going home

    MADHERO: Oh no, the ball is gone. Guess the World Cup is cancelled. Might as well get into some movie news for distraction.

    STICKMAN: That's more liiiike it. HEERE WE GOOOO




    Well this is an interesting turn of events. Even with the tumultuous production, I don't think anyone expected Solo: A Star Wars Story to outright bomb. After all, its Star Wars, and Star Wars is too big to fail. Welp, like Icarus, it flew too close to the sun and its wax wings melted. As it stands, Solo made 344 million in 4 weeks on a 250 million budget (a budget that ballooned thanks to extensive reshoots after the director shakeup). That may seem like a profit, but with added marketing costs, its pretty safe to say to call Solo a dud. What caused that is still up for debate, be it poor marketing, too much competition, or fatigue. Whatever it is, Disney seems to have gotten the memo, as Collider reports that all planned Star Wars spin-offs are on hold.

    Disney themselves hasn't confirmed it, but they hadn't officially confirmed the films were in production either. The spin-offs included a Obi-Wan movie made by Stephen Daldry, and a Boba Fett movie with James Mangold and Simon Kinberg. This does not include the new trilogies at work by Rian Johnson and David Benihoff & DB Weiss. This is in all likelihood for the best. The A Star Wars Story branding  always seemed like a good way to show the other parts of the universe, and not go back to characters that we already know. Rogue One, some characters aside, was much more separate and told its story with a different tone. As much as I'd like to see Ewan McGregor get his fair due as Obi Wan, I'd rather see something different, and not get a SW movie every year. Star Wars is not Marvel, and hopefully that's something Disney learns with this debacle.

    STICKMAN: Star Wars is DEAD. Goodbye, so long.

    LARRY: Okay but this hasn't been confirmed. So like, it's good news but we don't knowyet.

    STICKMAN: THEY'RE DEAD, LARRY. Disney ain't gonna come out and announce they fucked up yo.

    MADHERO: Guess we'll have to wait for that Last Jedi remake to fix everything

    LARRY: I'm ALL for these one-offs getting canned. Just gotta wait and see.

    MADHERO: I trust Collider on this. They tend to be a reliable source. Besides, Disney never confirmed these movies were in development officially, but they defnitely were

    STICKMAN: I wanted Caravan of Courage 2. i'm honestly more interested in seeing Solo Star Han Solo Wars Story Solo A Han now it's this big mess, it doesn't sound like a bad film really.

    LARRY: It's not bad, not at all. It's…. fine.

    MADHERO: I think its ultimately for the best. Star Wars just isn't a franchise where releasing yearly like Marvel works, or maybe only once a year on December. I like Solo, but its not something you need to go out and see

    LARRY: this only fulfills my core belief that the most important part of SW, no matter how you slice it, is the core trilogy and the main story being told.

    STICKMAN: I still feel it's utterly crazy how poor it's done. I think we all knew it wouldn't do as well as previous ones...but sorta fail. Damn. Disney losing money on Star Wars is not something I expected this soon after they started.

    LARRY: I'm not hankering for an Alden Han action figure, so properly supply the low demands...

    MADHERO: I didn't think it would break the billion, but I'm shocked it genuinely bombed.

    STICKMAN: That said, if it causes the necessary course correction? Glad to hear it. I could not deal with annual Star Wars marketing hype and eventual discourse. Let's keep it 2-3 years apart, chaps.

    MADHERO: Rogue One made a billion, so there's something in here that made it not work. My main guess is that it didn't feel different enough. We'll see what happens to Obi and Boba, but they go through some retooling.

    LARRY: If anything, this just means more NEW stories in a galaxy far, far away. New, original shit. And I'm all here for THAT.

    STICKMAN: I want a gritty R rated seedy bounty hunter film. Something completely detached. That, or Caravan of Courage 2. Good luck remaking Last Jedi, you fucking stupid losers.

    MADHERO: Maybe someday. For now the only confirmed movie is Episode IX on December 2019. We'll just have to wait for that. Moving on



    Although it seems like a long time away just how game-changing the momentum of the #MeToo movement was, it actually isn't that long ago since John Lasseter, co-founder of Pixar and face of modern Disney animation was outed by a lot of staff as a bit of a massive creep. Being overly touchy feely and obscene with practically all of his female co-workers, he was asked to take a "six month sabbatical" to reflect on his actions and allow Disney as a company to mull over his future with the studios.

    As it stands, The future lies in the hands of others, because he's not getting his job back. Disney've decided to give the two separate roles to long-term, proven members of the company. Pixar's new lead will be Pete Docter , the director of some of Pixars most well known films such as Monsters Inc, Up and Inside Out. Meanwhile Disney Animation's new head will be Jennifer Lee, who co-directed and wrote their biggest most recent hit, Frozen,  in addition to writing the story for Zootopia and Wreck it Ralph. These both seem like good choices for the future of the two biggest animation studios in the business, so hopefully they can maintain, or improve upon the quality of what Disney and Pixar are outputting. Given Pixar's most recent release, The Incredibles 2 easily took the mantle of Best Opening for an Animated Movie in the US this weekend, it doesn't seem like Pixar at least, have much to worry about.

    MADHERO: It was always going to be interesting what they'd do next, cause Lasseter returning seemed like it would create a ton of backlash, but they nailed it on both accounts.

    LARRY: Yeah, these are two solid picks. I personally like Docter's work a LOT more than Lee, but both are confident filmmakers and know how to tell stories that resonate with people.

    STICKMAN: I think most people prefer Pixar to Disney animation in general honestly. Unless it's Cars.

    MADHERO: Docter has been a part of Pixar since the very beginning. It only makes sense that he was one of the guys in line for the role. Lee hasn't been around as long, but has shown her skill

    LARRY: Well when you make FROZEN, you got cred.

    STICKMAN: I kinda thought Unkrich might be the guy, since he worked with Lasseter a lot and then did Coco, BUT...this is good too. Now how about canceling that Toy Story 4, eh? EHHH?

    MADHERO: Also, while we're at it: dammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmn, Incredibles 2 made some moolah

    LARRY: It deserves it honestly. It's a worthy sequel by a talented filmmaker.

    MADHERO: The highest grossing opening for a non PG-13 movie is nothing to sniff at.

    STICKMAN: I hear Bao is the real star tho. Clearly.



    So, as we've all known for a little while now, Diana and co. are coming BACK for another adventure in a sequel to the smash hit Wonder Woman film. Patty Jenkins and Gal Gadot are set to return, and Kristin Wiig will be playing Cheetah, but besides for that, we haven't heard much about this follow-up. Well, recently we've learned some new details, some cool, some JUICY.

    First off, it's official title, "Wonder Woman 1984," confirms that it will be taking place during the 80s, and it is currently in production. However, what shocked many fans was an official set photo revealing that Chris Pine will be returning as Steve Trevor....but nobody really knows how exactly. Did they resurrect him? Is the photo just a flashback? Is it a young relative of Trevor? Needless to say, speculation is high. And as if that weren't enough, another set photo has revealed that WW's famous invisible jet may jussssst be making an appearance as well, though this has yet to be confirmed. We'll probably find out soon enough though, as we will be getting a teaser this coming Comic-Con.

    MADHERO: Chris Pine with a fanny pack is my new aesthetic.

    LARRY: Okay butttttttt it does kinda undermine his death scene.

    STICKMAN: Gimme that Invisible Jet boys.

    MADHERO: The Inivisible Jet is only something that can be done if you're confident, and I guess that's the case what with Wonder Woman doing so damn well.

    STICKMAN: It sure does, Larry. It suuuuure does. It's like they're bringing him back because he was liked and not because it does anything good for the stoooory.

    LARRY: I'm kinda hoping its a flashback...

    STICKMAN: He's got a dang fanny pack dude.

    MADHERO: Lets be clear: we still don't really know what the story is here. Its probably Steve Trevor.....OR IS IT?! Could it be a red herring? We can only speculate

    LARRY: I reeeeeeally hope it's a red herring. Like a dream sequence or something. I just love that scene from the first WW and this desecrates it.

    STICKMAN: I hope this is a more confident sequel now we've laid the groundwork. The first film has some great moments but was on a whole kinda eh, I feel. That final boss fight was grade A shit, for instance.

    MADHERO: My guess is that he's a bigger part of the story. Maybe something with the space time continuum because that tends to happen in superhero stuff. Out of all DCEU movies, I worry least about Wonder Woman

    LARRY: Yeah let's hope Jenkins can just go all out and not have to stick to trope.


    Its been three years now since Creed came out, and I feel we almost forgot how much of an achievement it really was. It seemed like such a dumb idea to contiue the Rocky series, which had a perfect ending with 2006's Rocky Balboa, and to have it be about Apollo Creed's son, but somehow it all came together, thanks to a great performance from Michael B. Jordan  and Sylvester Stallone (who really should've won the Oscar) as well as Ryan Coogler, who brought a realism and humanity to the series that felt lost. That said, depsite all that, the sequel has been met with trepedation, with the biggest reason being Coogler not returning, with Stallone initially directing  before backing down and giving it to relative unknown Steven Caple Jr, and co-writing Cheo Hodari Coker (Luke Cage).

    Despite that, the premise had always remained the same: Adonis fighting the son of Ivan Drago, the man who killed his father in Rocky IV. Despite that premise, we actually don't get to see Dolph Lundgren in this teaser. Much of it is on Creed, focusing on his need for revenge and Rocky and his girlfriend Bianca trying to back him down from it. We get some training montage moments, including a reference to Muhammed Ali's pool photo, as well as plenty of teases of Ivan Drago's Large Adult Son Viktor, who as it turns out, is an absolute unit that might not be easy to take down. Besides that, there isn't enough there to judge based on this trailer, which is very much in teaser mode. I hope its good, but I continue to have my doubts about whether this will succeed.

    STICKMAN: Glad Assassin's Creed got a sequel.

    MADHERO: They definitely changed a lot with this sequel. Guess the reception got to them loud and clear.


    LARRY: That underwater boxing shot tho. Shot of the YEAR

    MADHERO: Guess now we know where Michael B. Jordan got his profile pic from. Also I feel so bad for the girl who's retainer broke after seeing him in Black Panther. Her teeth are gonna break from this movie.

    STICKMAN: I ain't seen Rocky  1 2 3 4 or Creed. So I' I guess. Hellooo.

    MADHERO: You only need to see 1 and 4 to get Creed, but you don't need to. Helps with the legacy part, but  it feels surprisingly separate. Its also a great movie.

    LARRY: Creed I was awesome. Let's hope Creed II is even better! SON OF DRAGO

    MADHERO: I've seen the actor in question and holy fuck. I'm in awe of the size of that lad.

    LARRY: It's nuts, I'm so ready for that long take.

    STICKMAN: I'd take that long....drago? Let's move on.


    When most people hear Tim Burton, the last thing they probably would associate him with is Dumbo, the classic Disney animated film about a big-eared circus elephant. Well, turns out Disney isn't most people, as a while back Burton signed on to direct a live-action remake of that very film, and we have recently gotten our first look at the latest Disney live-action reboot via a teaser trailer.

    And...yeah, it has a bunch of things you'd expect from Dumbo by Burton. An eery yet childlike cover of a well-known song (this one being Baby Mine, a lullaby that originated from the original film), a CGI elephant with some big ol' peepers, not to mention Michael Keaton and Danny DeVito in the same film! Honestly, it looks fine, sorta channeling the more neutral element of Burton's direction. It's kinda as if they just got rid of the weird, dark, cooky crap and kept the whimsy. I'm just hoping Pink Elephants on Parade is as much of an acid trip as it was in the original, cuz sometimes ya just gotta scare the kiddies. Anyway, this is happening, suck it up Sticky.


    MADHERO: Is it weird that this looks restrained for a Tim Burton movie despite having Danny Devito with a large hat?

    LARRY: I mean, Nobody's gonna go see a dark Dumbo. You HAVE to restrain Burton.

    STICKMAN: Tim Burton should be locked up and given a haircut.

    LARRY: I certainly agree with one of those things.

    MADHERO: Definitely feels more like Big Fish Tim Burton than Alice in Wonderland Tim Burton. The movie already looks a lot different than the movie, which was only an hour long. For one thing, no racist crows so that's a good start

    LARRY: Yeah...though I love the song they sing. DANNY DEVITO SHOULD SING IT.

    STICKMAN: I think it looks god awful but what else is new. People'l still go to see this in droves and make Disney another billion they can spend absorbing the entire entertainment industry instead of MAKING TRON 3.

    MADHERO: Michael Keaton with longer hair looks weird these days

    LARRY: And like...combed and slick? It's odd.

    STICKMAN: Tim Burton's hair merged with Michael Keaton's, forming a superhair.

    MADHERO: What like in Dragonball Z?

    STICKMAN: Sure Mad, like in Dragonball Z. I'm gonna address the...ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM...Dumbo looks ugly as fuck, y'all.

    LARRY: Why exactly did they make him CGI? Take an actual elephant and give him big ears.

    STICKMAN: Ain't gonna use a real elephant, sun. That's animal cruelty mister.

    LARRY: Make it hybrid. Plenty of films have done hybrid shit like this successfully.

    MADHERO: What like in Fullmetal Alchemist? I'm not sure why I keep referencing anime. We should probably move on

    STICKMAN: That dog deserved better.



    Another day, another Roald Dahl movie remake, huh? Robert Zemeckis, director of oh so many films, including a little known franchise called Back to the Future, who's latest film 'Welcome to Marwen' got its first, fucking weird as hell look via a trailer this week, is in final negotiations to remake The Witches. A dark fantasy book released in 1983, with a creepy-ass, not all that great film released in the early 90s, The Witches is a story about a recently orphaned boy and his grandma, who just so happens to be a former witch-hunter, staying in a hotel, where the boy gets on the wrong side of a witch meeting, and ends up turned into a mouse. 

    What happens next is a mixture of silly and also kinda tragic. The original story is very dark, whilst the film is a bit more campy, infamously scary witch make-up aside. A dark childrens film with a lot of potential for uncanny valley SFX seems pretty suited to Zemeckis, who previously directed the gross looking  Polar Express, Christmas Carol, and then produced the disaster of Mars Needs Moms, which got his animation studio shut down.With the promise of a narrative more in keeping with the book this time, it seems like this film will rustle some jimmies when it some point in the future.

    LARRY: God I love this. Can't wait for more Zemeckis Uncanny-Valley CGI.

    STICKMAN: Stuart Little prequel got dark yo.

    MADHERO: The most interesting thing about this project is the involvement of Alfonso Cuaron and Guillermo del Toro. That seems like it could make for an interesting vision along with Zemeckis

    LARRY: I mean, it's totally called for. The Witches are like....mouse-like demons.

    STICKMAN: Guillermo del Toro could take a shit on the floor  and I'd still pay to see the visual mastery of it.

    MADHERO: The 90's movie's make up was W I L D

    LARRY: It really was a marvel. Let's hope that tradition continues

    STICKMAN: Can't believe they really turned a boy into a mouse, that was dedication to practical effects that you just don't see these days.

    MADHERO: Don't see that make up magic these days. No wonder Rick Baker retired. Its been a while since Zemeckis has done anything for kids. I guess the last thing was his motion capture stuff and that died an ultimately deserving death

    STICKMAN: It's been a while since Zemeckis did anything for anyone, FRANKLY. STEP YOUR GAME UP BOY. DON'T GIVE ME THAT WIRE SHIT. Steve Carell as an army man? Shiieeet.

    LARRY: I mean...Zemeckis has another animated mo-cap movie coming out soon.

    STICKMAN: Never forget Mars needs Moms.

    LARRY: *shivers*


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for the news. Now its time to talk some DINOSAAAAAAAURS! Yes, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, the sequel to the mindblowingly successfull 2015 film is here to blow up the island once and for all. Now the movie has been out for a while in Urop, which gave me plenty of time to.....not see it. But hey, Stickman did at least, and with the US release now here, Larry did as well.

    STICKMAN: It feels so long ago now it might as well be on DVD.

    LARRY: Might as well have just come out on DVD here.

    MADHERO: Ooooooooooh boy, some drama. The reception has been mixed so far,  and we'll see how it goes here. Since you saw it earlier, how about you start, Stickman? What did you make of this Dino Crisis?



    DIRECTOR: Juan Antonio Bayona (The Impossible, A Monster Calls)

    STARRING: Chris Pratt, Bryca Dallas Howard, Ted Levin, Toby Jones, Justice Smith, B.D. Wong, Jeff Goldblum

    SYNOPSIS: When the island's dormant volcano begins roaring to life, Owen and Claire (Pratt, Howard) mount a campaign to rescue the remaining dinosaurs from this extinction-level event.

    STICKMAN: WELLLLLLL, for me, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom was a mixed bag, but an entertaining one. I feel largely the same as I did with the previous film, but I feel the sequel had some more visually striking moments. Narrative wise it's kinda about to the same quality as the first World film, it's less a well-thought out story and more an excuse to string our band of forgettable human characters through a series of exciting dinosaur set-pieces. This time, as the slogans all said, THE PARK IS GONE, so much as with Jurassic Park 2, it's a post-collapse attempt to rescue some of the dinosaurs, this time because the island is exploding for some reason. 


    That's all entertaining enough, if not insanely loud in IMAX to the point where my headache lasted all day, but the film lives or dies by its second half.  A silly, but fun horror'esque sequence which feels a bit more like Resident Evil  in parts than anything Jurassic Park we've seen before. The acting all around is...fine, nothing amazing, the real star of the show is the special effects, and what they do with them. The dinosaurs are a pleasing mixture of practical and CGI, with it getting harder and harder to tell the difference these days. There's some really badass action/horror sequences featuring some dinos we know, and  one we meet for the first time in this film, who was awesome. The ending leaves it open for a hopefully more interesting sequel, but this is perfectly enjoyable popcorn entertainment, nothing amazing, but nothing awful either. And that opening sequence was fun tooooooo.

    LARRY: Well we can agree that the opening was fun. Felt closer to Jurassic Park than anything in the first film.

    STICKMAN: Yeah boooi, them lightening flashes tho.

    MADHERO: Well there's something you agree on. How else do you feel about the film, Larry?

    LARRY: Yeah, not a fan here folks. I'm not a fan of the first Jurassic World; in fact, I wasn't sure how you could be much dumber than what it presented, but leave it to Colin Trevorrow to always one-up himself, giving us one of the sloppiest, most ridiculous stories I've seen in a modern blockbuster, full of holes you could lead a T-Rex through.


    Several things don't make sense, certain ideas just come and go like nothing, and it leaves on an ending that is perhaps the most shockingly absurd in the entire franchise. As Sticky said, the acting is fine, but the characters themselves are just as hokey, some even more cardboard than before. The film is tonally all over the map, even Giacchino's score sounds largely uninspired. If it wasn't for J.A. Bayona's solid direction, this film would be an utter trashfire. The cinematography has plenty of fun, striking shots that have that thriller, suspenseful energy of the original film's climax. But even with that said, he can't help what is an utterly shit script and a story that reminds me why blockbusters can be so downright stupid.

    MADHERO: O daaaaaaaaaaamn, we've got ourselves some disagreements here. IMO Jurassic World probably is the best JP sequel and it was fun entertainment, but nothing more.

    STICKMAN: I don't really see the issue with dumb blockbuster entertainment. Is it as good as Jurassic Park? Fuck no, but this is our fourth sequel, and none of them have been, so I don't see why this is one is suddenly so egregious to people.

    LARRY: I wish I could go into the ridiculousness, but that would be too spoiler-y. I'd much rather sit through either Lost World or 3 than either Jurassic World or Fallen Kingdom.

    STICKMAN: It's dumb as a box of rocks but it's well crafted stupidity, if you come for dinosaur carnage and not an Oscar winner, you'll have a good time.

    LARRY: But the action isn't even that gooooooooood. Besides for the opening sequence, and one really solid kill, most of the action is really generic and just people flying around everywhere.

    MADHERO: How about the more Resident Evil style 2nd half of the film? I hear that mostly features a big mansion and a new dino in the Indoraptor. How's that thing?


    LARRY: Oh you mean Indominous Rex but way more boring?

    STICKMAN: Psschh. The Indoraptor was awesome, I gotta say. Like, again, it's stupid that it exists, but it does, and they made great use of it.

    LARRY: It's literally just a do-over. How can you genuinely excuse this movie for literally RECYCLING its predecessor?

    STICKMAN: They are completely different.'s a different size, it's a different style, and it's in a different location. Calling it the same is as good as saying Jurassic Park is the same as this film because it GOT DEM DINOS IN IT.

    MADHERO: Are any of the other dino's used well? I hear a lot of fun is had with a Pachycephalosaurus

    LARRY: Oh, the one with the big head? Made for okay comic relief for like two scenes. One of the film's many fun concepts that aren't really used to their full potential.

    STICKMAN: He was a good boy yes. I don't know why you're surprised this film is stupid. I went in knowing that and got a dumb film with some awesome set-pieces, a couple surprisingly emotional moments, and a tantalising premise for the third movie. Do I like everything about it? No. Do I think it's great? Not really, but I had fun. That's kinda...what I went for? I'm not trying to defend this movie as a masterpeice but I don't really understand why you hated it so much.

    LARRY: Well given a different director, I was hoping it would be less stupid. Something we can both agree on is Bayona is a far better director than Trevorrow.

    STICKMAN: He's better in his element of horror for sure. I think Terevoerorwow directed the larger scale action better.

    MADHERO: I don't think there's ever been this much of a debate in a review before. Obviously you two aren't going to agree, but are you interested in where its going next, because obviously there's a new one coming.  I think we had enough arguing for the day. Any more final thoughts for the wrap up?


    STICKMAN: I think on a whole, it's about the same quality as Jurassic World but with a less interesting concept (e.g. The park being open and shit), it's's got some stupid moments and leaps of logic, but it delivers dinosaur action, a degree of heart, and a welcome heap of horror. Not great, but fun. Just like the previous one.(edited)

    LARRY: Well, I didn't like the last one, so I don't like this one. But for me, the plot is even worse here, and I found it pitiful how it literally recycles elements from the first film. The worst part is that there are some reeeeeeeally interesting ideas here that get shoved away for dumb dino action when that was never the sole element of what made Jurassic Park great. Sorry for expecting a film based on Jurassic Park to have a good story with good characters and genuine stakes. Also the ending still has my jaw on the floor.


    MADHERO: Oof, well with all said and done, how about we move on from all the island-exploding Dino Crisis shenanigans. Now its time to talk some more movies......all 2 of them. Yeah not a big week this time around

    LARRY: Womp womp


    MADHERO: Uhoh, things about to get political in here. Lets quickly move on to something as to avoid that.



    DIRECTOR: Stefano Sollima (Gomorrah, Suburra)

    STARRING: Benicio del Toro, Josh Brolin, Isabela Moner, Jeffrey Donovan, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Catherine Keener

    SYNOPSIS: The drug war on the US-Mexico border has escalated as the cartels have begun trafficking terrorists across the US border. To fight the war, federal agent Matt Graver (Brolin) re-teams with the mercurial Alejandro (del Toro).

    MADHERO: Fuck, that avoiding politics business didn't work

    LARRY: Ouch that edge

    STICKMAN: Benicio del Toro  fingerfucks a gun and has a good time.

    MADHERO: I'm still baffled that this movie exists, let alone coming out next week

    STICKMAN: It's kinda weird, I loved Sicario but the sequel I'm all over the place on so far. Like you say, was anyone expecting or wanting a sequel in the first place?

    LARRY: I haven't even seen the first.

    MADHERO: I thought Sicario was great, but not necessarily something that warranted a sequel. Focusing on Del Toro's character is an interesting angle, but with Villeneuve, Blunt and Deakins gone,  you miss some key ingredients

    STICKMAN: And the reviews are kinda a mixed  bag with a mildly positive slant so far. Not as good as the first, but I mean...the fact it isn't completely awful is amazing.

    MADHERO: I think the glue holding this together are both del Toro and Brolin, as well as writer Taylor Sheridan. He's been doing great things so far.

    LARRY: I do love me some Sheridan.

    STICKMAN: I want to like this, but I'm on the fence, the fact that I'm mulling between this or Han Solo says a lot about my mixed feelings.


    DIRECTOR: Charles Stone III (Lila & Eve, Step Sisters)

    STARRING: Kyrie Iriving, Lil Rel Howery, Shaquille O’Neal, Chris Webber, Tiffany Haddish, Nick Kroll

    SYNOPSIS: Dax (Howery) convinces former basketball playground legend Uncle Drew (Irving) to join a street ball tournament after losing his basketball team to his rival Mookie (Kroll)

    LARRY: Gee, I have a hankering for some Pepsi right now...

    MADHERO: Larry, you gotta help here, because I'm lost

    STICKMAN: What the fuck this shit, boy. Explain yourself, America.

    LARRY: Okay so this is based on a Pepsi advert. And everyone's careers are so desperate that they expanded it

    MADHERO: Like all great films are.

    STICKMAN: You put guys in old man makeup and try to do a comedy based off a fizzy drink commercial and I'm not gonna rush out to see this...if it indeed even comes out here. Because I mean, why would they do that.

    MADHERO: We wouldn't have Pepsiman without Pepsi, and Space Jam existed because of an Nike ad as well. I guess its something about commercials that get turned into feautre length basketball movies

    STICKMAN: Why we get this shit but we never got a Creature Comforts movie, dawg. Aardman where you at.

    LARRY: That's a quality concept.

    MADHERO: Because stop motion takes far more time than making a young basketball player look old. Get this b-ball shit outta here. The REAL shit is on right now.

    STICKMAN: Is it the Tennis. I hear Andy Murray's knee injury could take him out of the running.

    MADHERO: At least its nice to see Lil Rel Howery in more stuff.

    LARRY: That's true.


    MADHERO: Anyway, that's about it from the movies out this week. Not much to work with, but luckily there's MOVIE OF THE WEEK!

    LARRY: Yeeeeaaahhhhh

    STICKMAN: But Mad, with all that football on, who has time for things that aren't football inbetween or on days without a match where you might go see, oh I don't know, Ant-Man and the Wasp maybe.

    MADHERO: Yeah.....where's the time. Still, there's actually plenty of good movies out there to go see right now even with the football, should you want to avoid. So Sticky, what did you watch to avoid anything besides Iceland?

    LARRY: Something shit I bet. Oh, sorry, that was a reference to Iceland.

    MADHERO: wow rude


    STICKMAN: WELLLLL, I watched a film I technically wasn't able to see, but did so legally anyway. Thus well and truly defeating 'THE MAN' once and for all. We've talked about The Breadwinner a few times on the show, and it finally came out in the UK about a month ago, but was literally screened in like, 2 cinemas, meaning I couldn't see it. But I HAVE SEEN IT NOW, and it was....real damn good.

    It's refreshing to see a movie like this be both so dark and full frontal in its subject matter, but also completely accessible and charming for multiple age groups. The narrative following a young girl living in a Taliban controlled region of Afghanistan, where women, and girls are treated like dirt and basically have no rights. Her father gets imprisoned and she ends up having to disguise herself as a boy in order to keep her family alive. There's dark moments, hardships and violence , but it's all presented through the eyes of a child, and with a beautiful animation style that alternates between simplistic but expressive 2D animation, and paper cut-out style fantasy sequences. It feels authentic and believable, and it's genuinely one of the best animated films I've seen for a while.

    MADHERO: This movie is on my Netflix watchlist since it released on that here but I've yet to find the time to watch it.

    STICKMAN: You should find the tiiiime, it's real goooooood.

    LARRY: I watched this and thoroughly enjoyed it for many of the same reasons. If Coco hadn't been nominated, this would've deserved the Oscar honestly.

    STICKMAN: It's kinda a shame Coco was so good, because this would've made a very worthy winner.

    MADHERO: I don't doubt it. Cartoon Saloon has been doing excellent work throughout and they definitely deserve more credit.

    LARRY: Yes. Tells a captivating story with some of the most gorgeous animated sequences I've seen. So much color, so much imagination.

    STICKMAN: Cartoon Saloon deserve way more love, honestly. This is their best film too. It's a real beaut.

    LARRY: Mmmhm. Couldn't recommend it enough.

    MADHERO: What about you, Larry? What did you see? Something in the theater with your friends like a normal person does?

    LARRY: My film is Incredibles 2, which I was lucky enough to see as part of a double feature, alongside its predecessor, in glorious 2D IMAX on my 21st birthday last week. And....yeah, ya can't ask for much of a better present than that. Lo and behold, after 14 years of waiting, Incredibles 2 is more than a worthy successor to the original; while it doesn't reach the brilliant levels of 1, it has just as much comedy and heart, with even better animation and action. It improves in so many ways and ultimately brings the Incredibles to a new generation of fans while satisfying the older generation with plenty of fan-favorites and references to the original.

    I think this film does a great job in genuinely balancing storylines. We have something for everybody here, whether it's the female empowerment of Elastigirl, the bumbling parental struggles of Mr. Incredibles, or the silliness and slapstick of Jack-Jack. It covers many bases but never feels rushed or over-balanced. The story ultimately has some new things to say about the media and perception and family, though its third act does sorta drop everything for some typical action. Again, not as great as 1 but still a fun romp. Overall, I had a blast with it, so much so that I'm probably gonna see it again very soon.

    MADHERO: Oh hey, seeing the movie pretty much everyone in America went to see

    STICKMAN: What about the Bao tho.

    LARRY: Bao is easily one of Pixar's weirdest and most emotional shorts. Loved it.

    STICKMAN: That's the good shit.

    MADHERO: Its funny how very little time has passed in-time and yet its been 14 YEARS!!! Is that in any way noticable in the animation? Incredibles 1 is when Pixar first went full human

    LARRY: Well, people tend to forget the very end of Incredibles 1 is three months after the main events of the film. So SOME time has passed. Just not...14 years.

    STICKMAN: I've seen The Incredibles once...when it came out. All I remember is NO CAPES.

    LARRY: The animation is wholly and completely better. More defined, more dynamic and vibrant. Seeing the end of 1 in better animation just kinda made my heart soar.

    MADHERO: I remember really wanting the actual Incredibles 2 when I was a kid. The Gamecube game about taking down the Underminer, which I guess is non-canon now. It wasn't a particuarely good game, so ehhhhh.  I'm seeing this as soon as I can with the fam.

    STICKMAN: Speaking of seeing something...what did you watch, Mad? Something you haven't watched yet and will be writing about tomorrow instead, I bet?

    MADHERO: So yeah, there's been a World Cup going on, and because of that I really haven't had much time to watch movies, even with the Netherlands not even qualifying for it and therefore having no emotional anchor to really watch it. Some may know that out of the 3 of us, I'm probably the most forgiving of the original Pacific Rim's faults, of which there are plenty. I just found it an extremely enjoyable film, one that probably wouldn't be as good without a gifted filmmaker like Guillermo del Toro. Case in point: Pacific Rim Uprising, a film which I enjoyed, but one where you can tell something is missing.

    Watching giant robots beat the shit out of giant monsters is always fun to watch, and if Uprising does something better than its precursor, its setting most of its action scenes during the day when you can actually see things, which is always nice. Its brisk at less than 2 hours, there's a fun "turn your brain off" aspect to it, and I do think John Boyega is a more interesting protagonist than Charlie Hunnam was. But honestly, it does sort of feel like the heart is ripped out of it. The original Rim wore that on its sleeve, and this meanwhile feels much more made-by-committee and generic. If you're not in that picky of a mood and wanna watch some robots fight each other, you can do far worse, but I'd personally stick to the original

    STICKMAN: Pacific Rim was poopy.

    MADHERO: I'll stick with it till the end of time, but it aint no masterpiece.

    LARRY: I surprisingly enjoyed this. Though I'm still not over Charlie Day fucking a Kaiju brain. One of the weirdest movie moments of 2018.

    STICKMAN: Oh no, not that again.


    MADHERO: I feel you kinda overblew that. Its weird for sure, and it leads to an....interesting performance. I just wanted robots fight monsters and I got that.

    LARRY: Mad, c'mon. They play the song "I Wanna Know What Love Is" And he literally looks like he's getting off.


    MADHERO: He does not stick his peepee in a brain, no.

    STICKMAN: THANK FUCK. That's been two weeks of suffering, hearing about that.

    LARRY: Anyway yeah Boyega is great in Uprising, and not enough people are giving him solid credit for this. It proves he can genuinely lead a film. I just thought he was genuinely funny.

    MADHERO: Well he carried a lot of Force Awakens. I liked him, but I wish he was given more personality than "I'm sad and angry at my dead dad"

    STICKMAN: "Pacific Rim Uprising is brain fuckingly good" - At the Screwvies, 2018.


    MADHERO: I think that about wraps up everything. Afte collosal dino's, we're now going small, almost like a..... flea, or a gnat.

    STICKMAN: Nah that's not till August I think.

    LARRY: ..ouch.

    MADHERO: Well, we're talking about it anyway. And hey, there's always POLITICS via The Purge. Whatever floats your boat. TIme to get back to the fooootball

    STICKMAN: Purge probably isn’t out soon here either. O WELL, GUESS I’LL DIE. SO LONG!

    LARRY: Adios muchachos

  • At the Screwvies: Episode 110

    4 months ago



    MADHERO: Hey, everyone. Welcome to NOT E3. Y'know, cause it ain't E3, but like E3, we do have trailers. Boy o boy do we have trailers. So many trailers that we can't cover them all. Its literally madness.

    STICKMAN: It's MoviE3. It's time to experience entire movies within the space of two minutes.

    LARRY: Literally. So....many....trailers.

    MADHERO: So yeah, I hope you like trailers. As well as long awaited animated movie sequels. Got those in spades as well.

    LARRY: Ooh damn, that's true. But that doesn't roll off the tongue.



    So it feels like its been a while since we've seen Hiccup and Toothless, hasn't it? Not that weird when you consider the sequel came out in 2014. Since then, most of the dragon exploits had been relegated to Netflix, but now here we are, with a teaser trailer for what is billed as "the epic conclusion," and it looks.... well gorgeous for one thing. There's really something about this franchise that makes Dreamworks bring their A-game.

    Most of the trailer consist of the introduction of the Light Fury, a white female version of Toothless who seems to be from a hidden world where all dragons are from, and Toothless' goofy flirting that once again confirms that he's a sweet boy. Said sweet boy is also hunted by F. Murray Abraham though, and Hiccup, now chief of the village, seems to have some tough decisions ahead of him. Also Toothless goes full Thor at the end, so that's neat. Considering the trailer begins with "When I was a boy, there were dragons" there's the suggestion things might be a bit of a bummer. I feel like HTTYD is probably Dreamworks' strongest franchise, so I'm very curious how they stick the franchise and actually give it a proper conclusion.

    STICKMAN: Continued adventures of franchise I don't care much for.

    LARRY: Continued adventures of franchise I used to like but now don't care much for. Its sequel is trash.

    MADHERO: I feel so weird being the one here that genuinely likes these movies considering the high regard they have on the internet. And I can't disagree more on that opinion on the sequel.

    STICKMAN: Most people love this shit, you've been stuck with the two losers who don't. The sequel is better than the original but it's not really a big contest in terms of overall quality for me. STILL...this one looks more of the same.

    LARRY: Ohhhhhh it so is NOT better. In my opinion anyway.

    STICKMAN: I gave HTTYD the ol' college try and neither film impressed me. Happy others are excited thoooough, all about that Toothless.

    MADHERO: This is truly a curse. Can't deny this is looking really pretty though, right?

    STICKMAN: It looks very pretty yeah.

    LARRY: Yes, the animation is stellar. But who the hell asked for Toothless to get a fuck buddy?

    STICKMAN: I wish it were me. That mating ritual bit was pretty amazing.

    MADHERO: Director Dean DeBlois has already said on a Reddit AMA that one of the big themes of the film is letting go, so my guess its going to be a bit of a bummer.

    STICKMAN: Letting go of the last Dreamworks Animation franchise worth even once iota of a damn.

    LARRY: Until Shrek 5 anyway.

    STICKMAN: HAHAAHHAA. Good one Larry. Maybe one day Toothless will stop  hunting the white dragon and settle for a handsome lizard boy.

    LARRY: Hopefully this one turns out better than 2. If it's better, I'll watch it.

    MADHERO: I'm looking forward to seeing my sweet dragon adventures, even if these 2 mooks don't see it.



    Ever since the first LEGO Movie, we’ve all been curious to see how they plan to follow it up given its massive success. Well, to be honest, it looks like they’re doing a fine job thus far. The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part is set five years after the Duplo aliens took siege of Legoland (aka the end of the first film), with the world becoming a Mad Max style apocalypse which seems to bum everyone out except Emmett.

    And now, after Emmett’s friends are kidnapped by a mysterious alien, seemingly from Lego's Friends line, indicating the sister is oncer again more involved, it is up to him and his plant to save them. With a zany plot like this and a very similar tone and style compared to its predecessor, things are looking good for this sequel. It looks to have plenty of laughs, and Chris Pratt as Emmett seems to have not lost ANY of its luster as a fun protagonist to follow. Let’s hope Lord and Miller, alongside co-writers Dan Lin and Roy Lee AND directors Mike Mitchell and Trisha Gum, can pull this one off!

    MADHERO: I always appreciate the use of Beastie Boys' Intergalactic

    STICKMAN: Loving the idea that this, a story that's a sorta embellished retelling of a boy's imagination, has a gender politics callback to the previous movie that occurred years before this one. Other than that kinda cringey looks to be a fun continuation of the original movie.

    MADHERO: The Friends line-up being a thing here does sorta suggest we're going to be seeing more of that here, especially with some of the comments made. I do think Lord and Miller said that they wanted to do more with Wyldstyle/Lucy that they ultimately ended up doing, so I guess this is part of that, even if it involves kidnapping

    LARRY: Yeah it doesn't look like a change in directors really made much of an impact. Watching Duplo fuck up Bricksburg is gonna be a weird sequence.

    MADHERO: As a Brooklyn 99 fan, I'm really happy that they added Stephanie Beatriz to the cast. She's great on that show. My main hope is to see some FUCKING BIONICLE!

    STICKMAN: I would literally scream if Bionicle turned up.

    LARRY: Brush off all that "sorry we forgot about you" dust.

    MADHERO: The people demand it, Lord and Miller. Do the right thing.



    Hey, it's your boi The Stickman,  in 'Horror movies that caused a lot of buzz at Cinemacon but are now finally getting a first look online' Corner.  Halloween...the direct sequel to Halloween...but not the remake of Halloween, no, the original Halloween. There was once a point in time where a new Halloween movie release was about as exciting as having toast for breakfast, it’s now  been almost 10 years since the last installment, as it, along with most of the titans of the slasher genre have tried and failed to adapt to modern temperaments. That said, it's fair to say people are rather excited for this entry, a retcon of all Halloween's that followed from the 1978 classic that sees Laurie Strode and Michael Myers face each other again, for presumably the final time.

     In what's a reasonably substantial first trailer, we see Jamie Lee Curtis back as Laurie Strode, now a hardened, combat ready woman eager to finally get her revenge on the man/monster who turned her life upside down forever. After an asylum bus crash, an escaped Myers returning to the scene of his original crime, it seems she'll get her chance. It's hard not to be wary of a Halloween movie, and a slasher movie in general, after so many years of mediocrity and lazy filmmaking, but the winds seem to be moving in the right direction for this one, and hopefully it proves to be a crowd pleaser this...HALLOWEEN. Halloween, the sequel to Halloween...out Halloween.

    MADHERO: I liked the part where they made fun of the sequels and talked about Myers being Strode's brother as something made up.

    LARRY: It's very fashionable nowadays to be self-aware, it seems.

    STICKMAN: It's always a good idea to shit on slasher movie sequels.

    MADHERO: He got his ass beat by Busta Rhymes in one of them. They deserve all the beating and being removed from canon. It really looks like its going back to basics, and there's some really fun imagery there what with the mental ward and all.

    STICKMAN: That was surprisingly cool imagery for a Halloween movie. I think this kinda looks like an Aliens equivalent to Alien, where the unprepared victim becomes the attacker of sorts in the follow-up and I am HEEEERE for this.

    MADHERO: Jamie Lee Curtis definitely gives off a Sarah Connor in T2 kinda vibe, and that's a very interesting way to go, especially when compared to H20, which made her suffer from PTSD.

    LARRY: As someone who isn't really into Halloween all that much, this kinda makes me intrigued to watch them all.

    STICKMAN: I wouldn't. Halloween 1 is the classic, Halloween 3 is the cult favourite, the rest are kinda...garbo.

    LARRY: But won't this one feel great if it's any good given how trash its been?

    MADHERO: Just watch the original. That's an absolute classic and the only one important here. And yes, also Halloween 3

    STICKMAN: Halloween 3 is the real Halloween movie, where's THAT sequel.

    MADHERO: The Silver Shamrock must live. Also John Carpenter may not be directing, but he's doing the music so get ready for some synthy tunes

    STICKMAN: I am ready for some John Carptenter beats.

    LARRY: They better not fucking modernize him. If I hear a fucking trap beat over the fucking Halloween theme...

    STICKMAN: You can't modernise John Carpenter, he's like 900 years old. Also sweet dreams, anyone who's closets don't shut properly.


    WHAT'S THIS? A TRANSFORMERS MOVIE THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE ASS?! Ok maybe that's harsh, but damn, this was a weird surprise to see. The Transformers spin-off Bumblebee always seemed like a bit of a dumb idea, and to be fair it still is, but there's something to be said about the lack of Bayhem and throwing in a spice of Iron Giant that just makes this feel more hopeful about this spin-off that may or may not launch a cinematic universe, what with Last Knight not doing great.

    The trailer doesn't really go into much detail, with Hailee Steinfeld's Charlie getting a Volkswagen Beetle, who as it turns out, is the Transformer with the inability to talk that we we all know and love(?), 20 years before he would go and pee on John Turturro.  The rest of the trailer shows some action, but much clearer, and also a tease for Starscream, who doesn't look like a metal Dorito this time and looks like his original form and color scheme. So yeah, I'm pleased by what I'm seeing. I really do hope Travis Knight and co manage to stick the landing and remind me why I liked this franchise in the first place. It'd be nice not to second guess being a Transformers fan.

    STICKMAN: Bumblebee is a cutie. Protect him.

    LARRY: I’m honestly here for this film.

    STICKMAN: I'm not here for this film, but I'm here for Bumbleboi. By making him cute they're setting us up to cry when he gets thrown through the ringer.

    LARRY: This looks far more in line with what a Transformers spinoff would look like if the original films weren’t ass.

    MADHERO: I think the important factor here is that this is the first Transformers movie without Michael Bay, and one that doesn't cost like 300 million or so. This is a much more smaller scale and intimate story, with some bot action for good measure.

    STICKMAN: There's rumours that after this they are aiming to change up the Transformers movies in general, without Bay. That'd be nice.

    LARRY: That’d be lovely. Let Knight take over for all I care.

    STICKMAN: No no, Travis Knight needs to come back to LAIKA. WHERE HE BELONGS.

    MADHERO: With Last Knight being a disappointment at the box office and plans for TF 6 canceled, I really do hope this'll be a good new direction for them. Also, OG Starscream is making me more hype than it should.

    STICKMAN: As someone without any connection to the original stuff, and not being a fan of the movies at all...I don't have a huge amount of interest in this, but Bumblebee is my favourite and he's the best thing about this already sooooo.

    LARRY: Also, to all of the people trying to add a sexual tension between Steinfeld and Bunblebee........please stop.

    MADHERO: I haven't seen any of that, but I'm sure that exists and I'm scared to look.


    My favorite trailer we are discussing today is for Spider-Man: Enter the Spider-Verse, a film that…honestly just has everything in its favor. While I still wish we got just a bit more plot squeezed out, we got to see plenty of new glorious characters: Miles’ father, a police officer and a total “dad”, Myles’ mentor, what appears to be an old and worn out Peter Parker (though some have theorized otherwise…),  played by Jake Johnson. Oh, and the amazing reveal of SPIDER-GWENNNNNNN (Hailee Steinfeld). Amazing to see her in cinematic form.

     We also get more of that luscious, vivid animation; this is honestly my favorite part. It feels like a damn comic book, from the colors, to the movement, to the pure energy bursting through it. Not to mention actual comic book descriptions appearing on screen. It really doesn’t look like any animated film out there. Needless to say, this film is gonna be a doozy when it hits us in December.



    MADHERO: It sure is a good time to be a fan of Lord and Miller or Hailee Steinfeld. That or animation in general. Weird to think that this has a lot of the same animators as The Emoji Movie.

    STICKMAN: With stuff like The LEGO Movie and this being around, it's really nice to see mainstream animation becoming more visually diverse, I hope the trend continues.

    LARRY: Yeah this just looks like boatloads of fun, nuff said. It’s a movie that speaks for itself.

    MADHERO: Well its nice to see that they're tackling Spider-Verse, which both serves as a good way to introduce Miles Morales and the other Spider-Men out there. That's a story not unadaptable, but definitely a lot harder in live-action.

    STICKMAN: I'm still not sure just how they're tackling it honestly. There's no mention of these different spidies being from different dimensions, but there's 3 of them...and Spider-Gwen just casually turning up kinda suggests there is dimensional play at wooork, right?

    MADHERO: Its really cool to see Spider-Gwen in there. Read her comics if you haven't and want a alternate take on the Marvel universe. It's really good.

    LARRY: Ugh it’s so COOL to see her realized on screen. I’m gonna nerd out SO HARD.

    STICKMAN: I like that we've got an older Peter Parker too, there's a lot lot to be excited about. Miles' dad is a lot funnier in the film than he is in the comics.

    MADHERO: Its also cool to have Morales as the lead. It may not be Black Panther level, but its up there. That and along with the amazing animation makes it all seem very exciting. Hopefully it pays off.

    LARRY: My boi SHAMEIK MOORE finally getting some more work.

    STICKMAN: God if this film blows I'm going to be SO DISAPPOINTED.


    STICKMAN: I'm happy for Venom to die so I get a good Miles movie. I'm MORE than happy.


    Although the follow-up film from 'Call me by your Name' director Luca Guadagnino was always going to be a hot topic,  after news of all the Amazon Studios luncheon discourse from the remake of 70s horror classic Suspiria broke out, it's fair to say a lot of people were looking forward to seeing the film for themselves. WELL, the first teaser is out, and whilst it doesn't deliver on the grisly sequences that caused canapes and mini-sandwiches to be dropped to the ground a couple months back, it did instead deliver a rather promising and effectively eerie experience for sure.

    Bolstered by what's already a very exciting and creepy score by Radiohead singer and first time film composer Thom Yorke, we didn't see a lot of disturbing scenes at all really, but instead the hint of the horrible deeds to come just out of frame.

    Although notably lacking the psychedelic colours of the original film, it seems to be following a similar direction in terms of location and narrative, albeit perhaps with a more intense and graphic modern horror mentality. Ignoring the music and visuals, Tilda Swinton and Dakota Johnson are the stars of this teaser, them...and a rather unpleasant looking metal implement draped neatly on a table covered in blood. I guess we'll find out where all that raspberry jam came from later this year, but with the  highly toted extreme violence and now a very promising teaser that's gotten the film a lot of attention? Suspiria has a lot to live up to.

    MADHERO: This is one spoopy trailer. Well, more unsettling really.

    LARRY: Lots of teasing and good shots. Saving the spoopiness for the film.

    STICKMAN: It's pretty great that we've got two great looking horror trailers this week, and they couldn't be more different if they tried. Arthouse disturbing horror versus popcorn entertainment. I'm down for both, and this looks great so far.

    LARRY: Plus you got Hereditary out right now. Good time for horror.

    MADHERO: I do notice that Jessica Harper is listed in the credits, and she's the original lead in Suspiria. Could this be....A SEQUEL?!

    STICKMAN: OH MY GAWWWWD It's probably just a cameo to be fair. Maybe we find out where all the colours went.

    LARRY: Oh lordddddd

    MADHERO: Sucked out like in Paper Mario Color Splash. Its an interesting stylistic choice when compared to the original, which is super colorful and adds to its psychadelic nature. This one seems more muted, but from what we've heard, will probably still be batshit insane.

    STICKMAN: I'm so down for it. If people walk out the cinema, it's gonna be amazing. I do wonder if we're going to get to see any of the grisly details prior to release, or if they're saving the nightmares for the big screen.

    MADHERO - Last Sunday at 1:09 AM

    Shout-out to the Twitter account as well which has been having fun.

    LARRY: Also a really nice logo. Can’t wait for when they begin competing for Oscars.

    STICKMAN: And that SCORE. My crazy dancing boy Thom Yorke giving us that creepy synth goodness. The members of Radiohead will soon be composing all movies.


    MADHERO: Its gonna be a goodun for sure. Alright., we had plenty of trailers, but we also have plenty of FILMS COMING OUT!


    MADHERO: Sorry. Yep, so much so that Larry has only gone and seen one of them already. Genderswapped remakes are really hot right now, what with Ghostbusters totally not causing any controversy, and that Overboard remake.....existing I guess. We now move on to Ocean's 8, although here its more of a sequel from what I've heard. I dunno, didn't see it, but Larry sure did.

    LARRY: Well, it is technically a sequel I suppose.

    MADHERO: Alright, enough set up. How does this destroy the Hollywood patriarchy? Also is it any good?


    OCEANS 8

    DIRECTOR: Gary Ross (The Hunger Games, Free State of Jones)

    STARRING: Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway, Mindy Kaling, Sarah Paulson, Awkwafina, Rihanna, Helena Bonham Carter, Richard Armitage, James Corden

    SYNOPSIS: Debbie Ocean (Bullock) attempts to pull off the heist of the century at New York City's star-studded annual Met Gala. Her first step is to assemble the perfect crew (Blanchett, Kaling etc.)

    LARRY: So I didn’t initially plan on seeing Ocean’s 8, but my friend got access to an early screening of the film this past Wednesday, and it was free, which me likey. So, I decided to give what looked like an unnecessary cash grab a chance, and I was surprised at how much I ended up enjoying myself.


    It’s no masterpiece by any stretch—it doesn’t even touch Ocean’s 11, though it probably falls in the middle between Ocean’s 12 or 13 in terms of quality. However, it’s cast is very strong, each being their own distinct personality while having a fun chemistry with one another, and the script has many genuinely funny moments, which unfortunately is somewhat rare for these gender-bent reboots. It’s heist isn’t particularly that clever or inventive, but it still delivers the suspense that any heist movie should strive for. Its problems lie in the storytelling, with a third act this is ultimately pointless and poorly structured. Plus, it doesn’t seem to have much to say other than....female empowerment yay. But, for a film with little to offer thematically or sub-textually, it, at the very least, is a fun time at the movies for those looking for some laughs and good times. I certainly didn’t regret not paying for it.

    STICKMAN: Does it do anything different to draw in someone like me, who didn't like the Oceans films priorrrr?

    LARRY: Oh, definitely not I’m afraid. This is an Ocean’s film, through and through.

    MADHERO: The cast looks like its having a lot of fun. Are there any that in particular stand out and ones you could've done without? The previous Oceans movies had Clooney, Pitt and Damon and the rest besides Cockney Don Cheadle were pretty disposable

    LARRY: I mean, yeah some are clearly funnier than others. Sandra Bullock is thriving in this role, and Blanchett provides some of the best lines. Anne Hathaway basically plays a parody of herself and is excellent, and probably the biggest surprise was Sarah Paulson being pretty great. The most disposable is probably Mindy Kaling, cuz she gets the least amount to do and the most clunkers in regards to jokes.

    MADHERO: Well that's unfortunate, considering how fun Kaling is on stuff like The Office. How much is there in terms of connections to the other Oceans movies? Some cameos maybe?

    LARRY: Yes, a few distinct cameos and Clooney’s character being dead (not a spoiler, it’s literally in the trailers). These appearances have little weight on the story, they might as well be slightly elevated Stan Lee cameos. One of them is actually arguably a MASSIVE plot contrivance

    MADHERO: O dang. RIP. So yeah, sounds like its a fun if rather disposable film. Nothing wrong with that, and a good two hours, but you won't be thinking about it much after. That a fair assumption for your wrap up?

    LARRY: Yeah, it’s disposable for someone like me. But I’m sure some people will really enjoy it. It’s also worth noting that Gary Ross is a solid director all things considered and it’s cool to see him getting big films like this, even if they ultimately aren’t his strongest work.

    STICKMAN: I'll give it a hard pass.


    LARRY: Yeah, I didn’t expect otherwise lol. I would’ve passed too, but free movies and fun friend timessssss. Also, Cate Blanchett forever has my heart now. With this, Blue Jasmine, and Carol, she may be my new favorite actress.

    STICKMAN: She's pretty neato beans.

    MADHERO: She's pretty Incredible. Speaking of which.....

    STICKMAN: Niiice

    LARRY: Wowwwwwww



    DIRECTOR: Brad Bird (The Incredibles, Ratatouille)

    STARRING: Holly Hunter, Craig T. Nelson, Sarah Vowell, Huck Milner, Samuel L. Jackson, Jonathan Banks, Bob Odenkirk

    SYNOPSIS: Bob Parr AKA Mr. Incredible (Nelson) is left to care fort he family (Vowell, Milner) while Helen AKA Elastigirl (Hunter) is out saving the world in a campaign to bring “supers” back.


    STICKMAN: I'm in the minority where I wasn't like...super into The Incredibles? I liked it, but I didn't loooove it. I've only seen it the one time and that's when it first came out.

    LARRY: Well it’s time to revisit it!! I’m seeing a double feature of both films, which about to be the highlight of my Summer.

    MADHERO: It sure has taken their sweet time getting there. I've been wanting a sequel to this film since I was 10, and I'm 24 now. That's fucking wild. Anyway, this looks like fun.

    STICKMAN: Sounds like it's gonna deliver the goods, too.

    LARRY: Reviews are hella positive. I JUST WANNA SEE IT ALREADY

    MADHERO: Yeah, I honestly wasn't sure what to expect from the trailers, but the impressions from critics that watched it have been extremely positive

    STICKMAN: The trailers seem to be hiding a lot of the film, which is a good thing if what's being hidden is great.

    LARRY: Can’t wait to relish in shady Bob Odenkirk.

    STICKMAN: I've yet to see anyone call it a tearjerker, which is a miracle given Pixar made this film.

    MADHERO: Yep. Apparently Jack-Jack and Edna steal the show, so I'm very curious why what they do. And Odenkirk in your movie is never a bad thing.

    LARRY: Ednaaaaaa.Brad Bird’s greatest accomplishment.

    MADHERO: 14 years I've waited, so I'm definitely seeing this asap. If this makes me want a Incredibles 3 and I'll only get it when I'm 38, I'm going to be pissssssed.


    DIRECTOR: Jeff Tomsic (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Ed Helms, Jeremy Renner, Jon Hamm, Jake Johnson, Annabelle Wallis, Hannibal Buress, Isla Fish, Rashida Jones, Leslie Bibb

    SYNOPSIS: A group of ex-classmates (Helms, Renner etc.) meet up and organize a game of tag that finds them traveling across the country.

    STICKMAN: Here's where Hawkeye was. "Sorry I couldn't fight Thanos you guys, I was playing Tag"

    LARRY: Yeah he had to get his arms CGI’d.

    STICKMAN: That's a fun tidbit for this otherwise soso looking film.

    MADHERO: Just hanging out with the coach from Spider-Man Homecoming, so there's your MCU connection

    LARRY: If Tag became canon with the MCU, I’d have zero problems with that.

    MADHERO: For a comedy, this does actually have a pretty interesting cast. I guess Buress, Johnson and Helms are people you expect in a comedy like this, but less so with Renner and Jon Hamm, and people don't give enough credit to how funny Jon Hamm is.

    LARRY: Don’t forget my boi Jake Johnson!!

    MADHERO: I'm not the biggest fan of that guy, but that may be cause I can't stand New Girl.

    LARRY: Go watch Safety Not Guaranteed and get back to me.

    MADHERO: O yeah he was in that. That was good. But yeah, fun comedy about a weird real life story and will likely be about the real tag being the friends we met along the way.

    LARRY: I’m excited for this one!! Cast looks great, humor looks funny, and even some fun physical comedy. Ticket sold for me.

    STICKMAN: I'll be here, not watching.


    DIRECTOR: Ari Aster (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Toni Collette, Alex Wolff, Milly Shapiro, Gabriel Byrne, Ann Dowd

    SYONPSIS: When the matriarch of the Graham family dies, her daughter, Annie (Collette), suspects a presence was left behind. With the household under threat by a supernatural force, Annie must explore the darkness to escape their inherited fate.

    STICKMAN: OOOooOooh.

    MADHERO: Prepare for the spoops delivered straight by A24.

    LARRY: Gotta love that divisive D+. Some people just can’t handle the spoops.

    STICKMAN: The best horror films make people angry. Strong reviews but a mixed audience reception, someone called this film emotional terrorism, and I'm here for this.

    LARRY: I completely agree. Just fascinating to note that.

    MADHERO: The Alamo Drafthouse apparently had some people wear heart monitors during the screening and some shot up to 165 Bpm which is pretty wild.

    STICKMAN: I can't wait to have a £10 heart attack.

    LARRY: I’m genuinely scared to go see this one. I don’t do well with horror.

    STICKMAN: I'll hold your hand babe.

    MADHERO: The film goes quite batshit at the end, so my guess that when it all gets a little too in tents.

    STICKMAN: Another solid 2018 horror film. BRING IT ON I SAY.


    DIRECTOR: Drew Pearce (directorial debut)

    STARRING: Jodie Foster, Sterling K. Brown, Sofia Boutella, Jeff Goldblum, Bryan Tyree Henry, Dave Bautista, Jenny Slate, Zachary Quinto, Charlie Day

    SYNOPSIS: Set in riot-torn, near-future Los Angeles, 'Hotel Artemis' follows the Nurse (Foster), who runs a secret, members-only emergency room for criminals.

    LARRY: Poor everyone in this film... Doesn’t seem to be doing too hot.

    STICKMAN: This feels like such an under the radar release for something seemingly so high profile, given the cast.

    MADHERO: You know this is one of those films that got made when John Wick got really popular . Definitely has that vibe, even if it apparently doesn't have nearly as much action as expected.

    LARRY: I’d go for Bautista alone.

    MADHERO: Its a genuinely great cast. Jodie Foster, who seems to be having a lot of fun, Sterling K. Brown, Charlie Day, Sofia Boutella, Jeff Goldblum. I feel like this is going to get a cult following very soon

    STICKMAN: Jodie Foster alone y'knooow, but oh welll.

    LARRY: Hopefully Charlie Day doesn’t fuck a Kaiju brain in this film...

    STICKMAN: Wait what.

    MADHERO: I think that's from Uprising. Also gross.

    LARRY: I wish it wasn’t a thing. But it certainly is.

    STICKMAN: I'm so confused.

    MADHERO: I could've gone my life without knowing that. Anyway, this might be for people who want something smaller, but probably don't expect much in the way of action that the trailers might tell you.

    STICKMAN: Why he fuck the braaain though.

    MADHERO: See Uprising and find out.


    DIRECTOR: Director X (Across the Line, Center Stage: On Pointe)

    STARRING: Trevor Jackson, Jason Mitchell, Michael Kenneth Williams, Lex Scott Davis

    SYNOPSIS: Youngblood Priest (Jackson), a cocaine dealer, decides to make one more deal before getting out of the business and turning his life around.

    MADHERO: From Acclaimed director....Director X

    STICKMAN: My...favourite?

    MADHERO: This is one of those cases where this is beyond our scene, cause he's directed stuff like the Hotline Bling video  and plenty more music videos. It just really caught me off guard and thought it was funny

    LARRY: Its funny. Ya won’t catch me near it tho.

    MADHERO: Of all the movies to remake, Superfly seems like such a weird one since its such a part of its era and genre. That film basically  started the blaxploitation genre.

    LARRY: Yeah. Not sure if we need more blaxploitation....

    MADHERO: Well maybe it was a Black Dynamite style homage. This just kinda feels like a really standard gangster film.


    LARRY: Yeah the name of the director is more interesting than the film.

    MADHERO: This is one of those reboots that we really could've done without.

    STICKMAN: I wasn't aware of it prior to this episode, and I'll forget about it soon after.

    LARRY: Weird how something managed to topple Ocean’s 8 for most unnecessary reboot. What a world.


    MADHERO: Right, that about does it  for the films out this week, but luckily there's MOVIE OF THE WEEK!

    STICKMAN: Niiice

    MADHERO: Its a bit of a weird week, what with a pretty big movie that;s out right now  here in Europe but not quite yet in the US, but we figured something out, and I think we have quite a eclectic list.

    STICKMAN: But I saw the big blockbuster movie of the week though.

    LARRY: Proud to always deliver those subversive indie hitters.

    MADHERO: Subversive indie hitter, you say? Well then, Larry. What's your Movie of the Week?


    LARRY: I’m sure some of our readers in the states have seen the occasional ad or trailer for this film online since its premiere at Sundance, and if you would’ve skipped it based on that and that alone, I wouldn’t have blamed you. But do NOT let its marketing fool you; American Animals is not your average heist film. Not even close. What the marketing has been deceptively (and I say that as a compliment) hiding is this film’s clever blending of both documentary and narrative techniques to create its own strange specimen of a genre.

    I don’t want to spoil how, it’s best you go in blind, but hot damn did it throw me for a loop. What follows is an interestingly crafted story that had me engaged from minute one; with a strong directorial voice from Bart Layton, a great cast led by Evan Peters and Barry Keoghan, and some ingenious editing, It masterfully plays with audience perception in ways that few films ever have and probably ever will. Even though it ultimately doesn’t do as much with its world as I would’ve liked to see, it nevertheless is a minutely flawed but still thoroughly enjoyable, darkly funny experience that I couldn’t recommend enough. One of my favorite films of the year thus far.

    STICKMAN: This looks like it could be a fun heist capperrrr.

    LARRY: Oh, it’s so much more than that my friend.

    MADHERO: I honestly had only vaguely heard of this and haven't seen any trailers for it. Cool poster though. Do creepy looking flamingos come into play?

    LARRY: I mean, I didn’t think it looked creepy per se. But there is indeed a flamingo. It is a cool poster, with an aesthetic heavily featured in the film.

    STICKMAN: It makes me want to play Hotline Miami  for some reason.

    LARRY: Whenever you guys get it, you gotta go see it.

    MADHERO: A good heist film is always fun to watch. I guess this one is a little less expensive than the one in Oceans 8

    STICKMAN: I wanna see an animal heist movie that isn't The Nut Job.

    LARRY: Okay but I wanna stress. This is NOT just a heist film. Don’t go in expecting anything like Ocean’s. I swear, the blinder you go in, the more it’ll surprise you in the best ways.

    MADHERO: Alright, Sticky. What's your Movie of the Week?

    STICKMAN: This week's E3, so what better time to look at a movie based on a video game that didn't do very well critically or financially! Hurrah! The third installment in the movie versions of the popular series, and a reboot more on par with the gritty game reboot....reboot...TOMB a film that isn't perfect by any means, it's got a long wrong with it, and when compared to the game itself, lacks the same ambition, scope or its own film? It's pretty good honestly.

    The opening scenes prior to her actual adventure are probably the best parts, since they do their own thing and show the character with a lot of heart and personality. Once things get to the island, it's a little less engaging, but it's still fun, with enough discourse-inducing deviations from the source material to make it a fresh experience even to those who've played the game itself.  Again, this ain't a great movie, but it's easily the best video game  movie to date that isn't Resident Evil Vendetta, which is the Citizen Kane of video game movies.

    MADHERO: This one is definitely the most appropriate for this time of year.

    STICKMAN: Lara Croft was even at E3. You're WELCOME GUYS.

    LARRY: I still have yet to see this, though I’ve been meaning to.

    STICKMAN:It's fun, I'm not going to pretend it's an amazing movie, but as a fan of the franchise I enjoyed it. It's biggest flaws are how it isn't like the game, so if you haven't played the gaaaame...

    MADHERO: Its been interesting to see this come and slightly go. Wasn't a huge hit but definitely successful.

    STICKMAN: It was a mild success but it didn't quite hit the cultural zeitgeist, as tossers would say.

    MADHERO: It wasn't no "Jolie posters everywhere " type of success. Does make me wonder what the plan is. Still, it can comfortably hold the crown for best Hollywood video game  game movie for now.

    LARRY: Personally I’m only interested in still seeing this for Vikander, cuz I hear she is quite good in it. And I’m happy she got this opportunity.

    STICKMAN: She's a great Lara yeah. I think the first 20 minutes are the highlight and then it loses its way a bit, STILL...worth a watch maybe. I don't know if it'll get a sequel given it was a tepid box office success, but who knooooows. Anyway, what'd you watch Mad, some weird Netflix release?

    MADHERO: My Movie of the not for the faint of heart  Seriously, while the trailer may not seem that scary, it not does prepare for the absolute mayhem that unfolds. Bone Tomahawk follows sherrif Kurt Russell as he and a posse go into the wilderness of the Wild West after a couple of people are kidnapped by a clan of troglodytes, who as it turns out, are cannibals, so that's fun. The film itself takes a while to get going, with you mostly alongside these characters and what the harsh environment is doing to their mental state.

    But once it gets going, oh lord does it get going. Any gorehound will probably have their moments of OH MY FUCKING GOD. There's one sequence there that's so bad that I had to pause and make sure I wasn't feeling ill, and I'm generally pretty good when it comes to that stuff. Its fucking insane, and much credit to S. Craig Zahler, who assembled quite a good cast and immediately becomes a different voice in Hollywood. He seems to have cemented that with Brawl in Cell Block 99 as well. So as mentioned, not for the faint of heart, but you're in for a great ride if you're prepared.

    STICKMAN: I like movie horror gore, but I don't like Westerns. What a sticky situation.

    LARRY: I’m interested now that I hear it’s bonkers.

    MADHERO: A Western can often be boring. This one is definitely not, but you need to take the time before it gets to the crazy shit

    STICKMAN: So it's like Dust till Dawn, which I didn't realise was THAT movie until it happened. And then I was like...oh.

    MADHERO: Sorta. You get hints here and there, but there's definitely the moment where the brakes go off and its full speed ahead.

    STICKMAN: Cannibals always have that effect, I find.

    LARRY: I’m down for some good ol’ fashioned gore.

    MADHERO: Oh this ain't good ol fashioned. This goes really, really hard. You are not prepared for the "wishbone scene"

    LARRY: Honestly I wish more films went as far as you say this does. Studio films are afraid of their audiences getting petrified. But man, gore tends to enhance a film if it’s done properly.

    STICKMAN: We should aaaaalll watch Dredd.

    MADHERO: Its on Netflix here, but it should be on digital for relatively cheap. Check it out for sure if you want something different. Don't have a weak stomach though

    STICKMAN: My stomach is strong and hearty, except when eating oranges.


    MADHERO: Alright, that's it for this episode. Next up we're going to talk about DINOSAURS!  That's always fun.

    STICKMAN: I love Dinosaurs. Maybe too much.

    LARRY: DINOSSSSSSbutalsolazyandhackneyedstorytellingBUT DINOSSSSSS

    MADHERO: Its for a Jurassic World sequel though, so y'know, prepare for takes.

    STICKMAN: I've seen it already so y'all gotta check yourself.

    MADHERO: Oh shiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. Find out what Stickman thinks about his lizard bros......NEXT TIME!


    LARRY: Peace out, home skillets.