Volume 4, World of Remnant: Faunus

RWBY: Volume 4, World of Remnant: Faunus

Learn about Remnant's second humanoid species, the Faunus, as we explore their history and relationship with humanity.

Binge Mode

More RWBY

See All RWBY Videos

Other Videos You'll Like

Comments (1165)

  • TheRealWeiss

    4 weeks ago

    This is really interesting! Now I await the RWBY RPG where you can make your dream lizard Faunus...


    I mean...

    I got ahead of myself there.

  • Samuru_Ronin

    4 weeks ago

    I wish Qrow was my uncle.... that'd be sweet

  • john2477

    4 weeks ago

    How come the World Of Remnant episodes aren't being uploaded to YouTube?

  • laiyat FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    "I swear on my Huntsman License-" 

    You have a license? You need a license to be a Huntsman?? How have YOU not lost your license from drinking on the job???  whiskey

    Also, wouldn't that mean Team RNGR are Illegal Huntsmen? jaune

    • Hunter_Goldenwolf

      4 weeks ago

      I guess so.

    • blizztex99

      2 weeks ago

      No I don't Think so because they are officially huntsmen yet because they haven't graduated from beacon. But idk just guessing 

  • DanielJone10

    1 month ago

    Great piece.


    Annnnd here's the complaint about binge mode. let the actual content play before it cuts away!


    Complaint done! (Now, wasn't that easy?)

  • LightPunster FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    I don't want to get political, but there are serious parallels between the faunus and the Jews after the holocaust. Seen as animals? Given a small patch of mostly desert to be their safe haven?  Obviously you can make connections to many marginalized groups I just never noticed this one.

    • Badnik_Rose FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold TK Badnik

      1 month ago

      Excuse you, Israel is part of the Jewish holy land.

    • tastefullyderpy FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Menagerie is a parallel to Australia. A remote contant in the corner of the world,mostly desert and with deadly wildlife.

  • zero90909 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    I wonder if there would be a faunus with eagle's wings... That'd be pretty awesome.

    • Sean1647

      1 month ago

      Nothing screams " 'MERICA!" quite like an eagle wielding a shotgun-chainsaw in one hand and a rocket launcher-axe in the other. Oh and an American flag as a cape, can't forget the cape.

  • RelaxedNerd Monkey

    1 month ago

    Yay! New information. This is genuine happiness you're seeing here.

  • Ai_Kugeki

    1 month ago

    "there's a point where it tips, there's a point where it breaks, there's a point where it bends and a point we just can't take anymore"


    Who could have guessed that that was foreshadowing for the WF

  • Krons

    1 month ago

    Who is interested in learning about this Great War?

  • animalia

    1 month ago

    So I guess we won't get any Mixed Race commentary then

  • metalsluger

    1 month ago

    So why am I getting an autoplay for other videos at the beginning of the video, it is annoying I just want to read some comments during the ad.

    • RWBYFAN5277

      1 month ago

      Same here. Keeps sending me to ep 1

    • RelaxedNerd Monkey

      1 month ago

      turn off binge mode

  • RWBY_fan337

    1 month ago

    Another fantastic Lecture by Professor Qrow

    • Qgp2004

      1 month ago

      Correction Drunkle Qrow!

  • DerekDJay

    1 month ago

    1:24 beautiful Inside Out reference

    • LightPunster FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      As Donald Trump would say: "Wrong"

    • Ardax

      1 month ago

      Just because they used the generic term "bundle of joy" does not make it a bona-fide Inside Out reference, it would have to be something way more specific.

  • Mauve_Bunny

    1 month ago

    A very interesting World of Remnant episode!

  • danbonrp FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    i watch every episode on my big tv by going to rt.com on my playstation

  • danbonrp FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    i loved the way it ended

  • curvingfire

    1 month ago

    um, wait, wheres the new episode? you cant f*king do this rooster teeth, we cant go 3 weeks without a new episode!

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      It gets uploaded at 11 am US EST like it ALWAYS has


      Edit: Forgot to mention, you aren't a First member so you have to wait 24 hours AFTER that to watch it

    • danbonrp FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      have fun waiting another week lol

    • DerekDJay

      1 month ago

      they run it every 2 weeks now, it appears

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      @DerekDJay can't tell if sarcasm or ignorance

  • CaptainKirk1316

    1 month ago

    is there not going to be an actual episode today? Sorry if my ineptitude triggers some people. I'm very new to this (literally just signed up last week)

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      It gets uploaded at 11 am US EST


      Edit: Forgot to mention that you're not a First member so you aren't able to watch it until 24 hours after that


    • CaptainKirk1316

      1 month ago

      Thanks m8

  • tinwatchman

    1 month ago

    Interesting... if faunus can breed with humans, that means that they're not technically another species. At most, they'd be a human subspecies, like the Neanderthals or the Denisovans...

    • DerekDJay

      1 month ago

      On Earth, humans are technically animals so it shouldn't be a surprise. You could breed a human and a bonobo for all I know.

    • RudeOstrich FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Not true. Lions and tigers can breed

    • Vakama905

      1 month ago

      Yes, lions and tigers can breed, but their offspring will always be sterile, meaning they are, in fact, different species. Same goes for horses and donkeys, you can breed them, but you're only going to get a sterile offspring.

    • Ai_Kugeki

      1 month ago

      In Ireland a farmer cross bred a goat and a sheep, the offspring  (geep) was fertile.

    • tinwatchman

      1 month ago

      @DerekDJay - Er. No. That's... really not how it works. Like... at all.


      Please don't try.

  • SikeSky

    1 month ago

    Qrow casually contesting Morgan Freeman for best narrating voice.

    • IadFoc

      1 month ago

      I vote Qrow!

    • MattanzaMafiaFedora FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      And doing a bloody good job at it, if I do say so myself.

    • Zourin FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      We need Qrow's cover of "titty sprinkles"  to settle this feud


    • Hunter_Goldenwolf

      4 weeks ago

      Imagine your life narrated by Qrow

  • OtaGamer FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    I'm so happy that Reptile Faunus have been confirmed. Opens up a lot of possibilities for canon and fan characters.

    • LewisRoantr1 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Indeed.

    • Ice-crime

      1 month ago

      My snake faunus oc isn't against the lore anymore! :D

  • Macheno

    1 month ago

    It would be nice to see some sort of prequel about the Great War or the group of people and faunus that survived on the village of Sanus.  benson

  • skylarlegacy

    1 month ago

    Can we talk about the fact that the Menagerie village looks remarkably like the one from the character short where Ruby fought the gorilla Grimm? Well, except a clock tower instead of the bell tower in the village here...

    • SpaghettiOs

      1 month ago

      Err that is not at all what it looks like. Menagerie is like huts, the trailer showed cobble and other materials. The town Ruby fought Harambe in was actually a village RJNR was passing through for their journey, not Menagerie. 

  • silencednight01 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    who else keeps on reading this as "World of Remnant: FunHaus"

  • Wraith_412

    1 month ago

    #FaunusLivesMatter

  • nojkoor1584 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    People prejudice against Funhaus is completely logical.  Oh we are talking about faunus, my bad.

  • DontTellPike FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold Test Subject

    1 month ago

    At a quick glance at the title, I thought it was a RWBY Funhaus episode!

  • StanDaMan

    1 month ago

    I actually managed to think of something nobody else has said anything about as far as i know. So since animals like dogs & cats have different breeds, does that mean there could be different breeds of faunus?

    • tinwatchman

      1 month ago

      I hope not. Breeds imply that someone bred them. Which is... a creepy thought.

    • StanDaMan

      1 month ago

      oh yeah i forgot that's how breeding works.

  • Acnologia420

    1 month ago

    So will the next episode be about Blake a lot of people are saying that cause of this Faunus wor I hope so I wanna see blakes parent and how they will react to sun we know the dad probably gonna treat sun like shit and the mom gonna assuming there dating and welcome him embarrassing Blake can't wait 

    • PrimeVesper

      1 month ago

      Holy shit, that's exactly what happened

  • neutron67

    1 month ago

    I can remember back in RWBY Volume 1 when Blake was talking to Sun about the change of leadership of the White Fang. It reminded me of the Civil Rights movement and made me think of the different approaches Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had.

  • teamMAZE

    1 month ago

    I have been thinking that perhaps the former leader of the White Fang is Blake's father. Maybe he stepped down because...things were getting bad...and he wanted to keep his family safe...and maybe Blake stayed put to fight for what she thought was right. Until she didn't. 

  • RSR123

    1 month ago

    I know they joked about faunus hunting in RWBY Abridged, but I didn't expect it would be cannon

  • Sean1647

    1 month ago

    Faunus Lives Matter  blake

    • Heiwa

      1 month ago

      Ditto

    • FightFalcon FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      no lives matters

    • Sean1647

      1 month ago

      @FightFalcon Hello Bartender, can I get a glass of bleach. Why yes, Lemon Flavor is my favorite.

  • ShippingIsMagic FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    Now I wonder if this video is gonna be delayed (or not released at all) on YouTube as the previous World of Remnant

    • Mattlikethepaint FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      To be fair most of the comments on these videos I've seen on Youtube are complaining that it's not a real episode; This isn't sponsor only so if people want to watch it then they can come here

  • Red_Like_WhiteRose

    1 month ago

    Can we all just take a moment to appreciate the WOR artstyle. Blake's silhouette looks so nice.

    =^..^=

  • TheJean

    1 month ago

    At 3:48 you can see a island that look a wolf or the white fang.

    • Irishwolfkick

      1 month ago

      This video is only 4 minutes long what are you talking about 

  • XenoRoku

    1 month ago

    does anyone else think that the next world of remnant is about the white fang based on the ending?

    • SpaghettiOs

      1 month ago

      No it just means that the White Fang are trying to start a revolution against humans. Listen to what Qrow said.

  • CPEcho13

    1 month ago

    Wait, if faunus traits are dominant, then wouldn't that mean that they would outnumber the humans?


    They have dominant genes and night vision. Even without the dominant genes, the night vision alone would give them a big advantage over humans. While human settlements could easily be wiped at night time, faunus settlements would have a far easier time defending themselves at night.. The only logical reason for Humans to outnumber faunus would be that faunus appeared later on Remnant than humans. Much, much later.

    • CPEcho13

      1 month ago

      *wiped out Dammit, I need to start proofreading stuff before I click on Submit.

    • DeathBySquirrel FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Or possibly humans simply breed more (and have a preference for humans), and in a world where there's a dangerous top predator species (The grim) pure numbers can be more of an advantage than individual strength.

    • YoBoySarge FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold You just got sarged

      1 month ago

      Humans might have founded the kingdoms and let the faunus out to dry or many were killed during the faunus war and great war

    • LewisRoantr1 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Probably a mixture of humans developing earlier then the Faunus did, and as well as Anti-Faunus behaviors which went on for the last few centuries manage to kill off enough Faunus to keep them as a minority species. Not enough so they'd end up going extinct, but enough so that humans still outnumber the Faunus even today. Or maybe some Faunus breeds aren't as fertile as humans are, meaning their reproduction cycles are lower for some breeds.  

    • ChivesSmith

      1 month ago

      Maby humans technology advanced quicker, or the faunus were less aggressive and just got picked off one by one.

    • GenericTag

      5 minutes ago

      @All of you: Or maybe, like this episode said, it's because humans were actively hunting faunus. Also, dominant does NOT mean more common. It just means that trait isn't "hidden" by a similar trait inherited from the other parent. Having 5 fingers plus a thumb is actually a dominant trait, but not very common. 

  • drader1000

    1 month ago

    so if a bull faunus and a wolf faunus can breed to make a different faunus, wouldn't it be a possibility that a breed of faunus could potentially be endangered or almost completely extinct? it would be hard to make a breed of faunus completely extinct I guess since if enough different faunus breed with each other it will eventually make a multitude of different faunus than the original, but I think that's interesting that there exists, basically, an unintentional, or maybe intentional, fault in the breeding process but at the same time a way to counter balance that fault, however small the counter balance may be.

  • CaptianTitus

    1 month ago

    I,m Looking forward to the Great War video so it can finally answer some of the questions i have.

     

    1. What was the technological level at 80 years ago (It is mentioned by Jaune that his sword was used by his Grandfather in the Great War and going by the design style i would say mid to late medieval period however it has been hinted at in the Vacuo video that technology was at our modern era such as the person with the mini-gun)

    2 How Large was the war/ How many people were involved and died (No matter how you look at it The Great War would have been nowhere near the size of the First World War and the easiest way to see this is population.

     

    2A

    Remnant had 4 Kingdoms during the war fighting in contrast to that of our world where 42 nations took part in either the Entente or Central Powers and that is not including their respective Empires.  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participants_in_World_War_I)

     

    2.B

    Cities It has been said that Towns are made for those who do not wish to live with the rules of Kingdoms given the fact that apart from Atlas no nation has a military its easy to see how this is enforced. As such the Kingdoms consist only of cities and there has been no indication of a city in Solitas at the time only Mantle and whilst Cities hold larger populations than towns it would seem that they aren't massive super cities like we imagine them more like what we have now for Capital cities such as London Tokyo, Paris, Shanghai and New York. And in terms of cities there are very few of them in the modern era.

     

    Vale:5 (If you include Patch)

    Mistral: 3 (Mentioned I think there may be more)

    Atlas: 2 (If you include Mantle)

    Vacuo: 1 (If you include the settlement around Shade Academy)

    Menagerie: 1 (Not included as it was given to Faunus after the Great War.

     

    These are all the Cities of the Modern Era for Remnant (besides a few which may or may not exist in Mistral)

     

    Compare this to the fact that the United Kingdom in the modern era has 69 Cities and you can see the massive difference and if you then added the towns, villages hamlets and etc and you have an estimated population of 65.1 Million as such i doubt that there is more than a population of 50 million Humans and Faunus combined on the planet.

     

    So in the end i think depending on the era of technology the amount of people who died in the Great war at max is about 900,000 and that is if technology was at our level and killed 1.8% of the Remnants population.

     

    Anyway that my opinion what do you think

    • CaptianTitus

      1 month ago

      Sorry meant Remnant population is 150 million living in urban environments


      Now that i think about it there is probably more but it is incredibly doubtful the entire planet even has a population has of 500 million.


      And travel isn't easy as said by Qrow there are only towns between cities no mentions of Motorways (Highways for Americans) and whilst its shown there are cross continental trains such as the one the Schnee company uses to transport dust to vale where it may then be moved else where in the world. These probably come under constant attack due to the fact of its sheer length and that robots are needed for the trains defense when Blake and Adam stops the convoy. 


      Then there is the matter of little available space something which our history was something different whenever we wanted to expand in history we simply used armies to face other groups of humans who got in the expanders way. Then add the fact that Glynda mention the word centuries then we know that Soul Beings have had time to expand but the sheer amount of Grimm has stopped them which is why Kingdoms were founded first in DEFENSIVE positions rather than back on Earth for many different reasons such as:


      River's where the first Civilizations were born as the land was fertile and warm enough to grow crops.


      Key Crossroads where towns were establish due to the fact that they either connected civilizations with a modern example being Turkey a key point between Europe and the Middle East. Or they were established on key trade routes where cities would flourish like in Italy before the Reunification.


      Religious places yes there are probably some religious towns or villages in Remnant most likely Mistral but its doubtful cities were built around them like they are here such as Jerusalem or Damascus.


      Defensive where they were established to defend another more important area such as the choke point of a country like a mountain pass or defend a route to the Capital.


      But when said in all the Kingdoms videos the locations picked were all defensive.


      Vale: Mountains and Shallow Oceans

      Mistral: Cliffs

      Mantle/Atlas: Freezing cold

      Vacuo: Natural oasis with barriers


      Which leads another question why is there not a Kingdom on the island of Vytal 


      Vytal like Remmnant despite looking different still has some similarities in continent climate and as such i can see Vytal's geographical size and position similar to my country the United Kingdom (Vytal is that island in the centre of the geographical map South of Atlas North East of Vale and just of Sanas)


      Both are small Islands surrounded by even smaller islands located just of the main continent with a channel separating them from the continent both are surrounded by water and most likely sit on the edge of named different bodies of water. 

      UK: English Channel, Irish Sea Celtic Sea, North Sea and Atlantic Ocean 

      Vytal: Channel to the South, Ocean to the East, Ocean to the West, Ocean to the South East and South West 


      And so unless this place has no natural barriers at all then i would find this place one of the easiest places to completely get rid of Grimm as once they were all eliminated from the island there wouldn't be any way for them to sneak back on. Which would allow for a quick expansion with a strong military force located in what seems to be a fertile region with access to multiple bodies of water.


      As such if i was ever to write a story for RWBY it would be located on this island as the Fith Nation called the nation of Great Vytalia.


      Anyway thanks for reading Your thoughts






          


    • YoBoySarge FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold You just got sarged

      1 month ago

      And I thought i was obsessed

    • Shrekinator

      1 month ago

      @CaptianTitus That's a little less than half of the U.S.'s population... I find it kind of funny. An entire world less populated by a mere country on our planet.

  • user-57f6d6914cd25

    1 month ago

    This isn't about the episode but I would LOVE to see RWBY Grimm Eclipse on console. (360 XB1 PS3 PS4)

  • ZackTan

    1 month ago

    I am still paying monthly for the first membership only for the sake of rwby, but now I somehow felt that it made no difference now, as the main content kept on delaying despite the "early access" and unexpecting to get short 3 mins instead of 15 mins per week out of generally four weeks a month, it happening more than twice, that makes you mostly pay an early access of mostly 3 min shorts a month, and paying more next month too, just to get "the early access of the last episode that should already be out, or even paying more for the ongoing series." That sure sounds like my monthly insurance subscription.  

    Not saying its a bad thing though, just a complain and an info for those rwby only fans contemplating to join the membership. 

  • Mitchmeow310 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    My dyslexic brain read the title as "World of Remnant: Funhaus" and I was very confused for a moment

  • towerpower123

    1 month ago

    Where is Episode 5?! 

    I HAVE NEEDS!!!!

    • Snowyamur FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold Founder of the RDDT

      1 month ago

      2749237bc07f6ffb930325c16f288e82.jpg

      Man, RT seriously needs to make this poster actual merchandise.

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago


      tumblr_inline_neacd5hMVy1t1foa1.gif

    • Robby2244

      1 month ago

      We all do and I agree

    • Robby2244

      1 month ago

      I have to agree in every single way 

  • ProfileForRWBY

    1 month ago

    They put a skull on Charizard island and did not talk about it. Someone revoke Qrow's drinking privileges!

  • blameTheDog FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    I'm hoping that RWBY Chibi will have an episode or two dedicated to Qrow's drinking stories. He seems to have either seen a lot of amazing things, believes he has seen a lot of things, and/or swears he has seen a lot of mini skirts.  tucker

    • JamesRaynor

      1 month ago

      The hell with RWBY Chibi, that's just a distraction like Teen Titans Go! And for the studio, a colossal waste of time and money! They should drop RWBY Chibi and focus more on the official RWBY series so that we don't have to wait once every damn week!

      They know I'm right! Whoever thought up of a Chibi-version of RWBY was and is a village-idiot and a worse drunk than Qrow!

    • Anemone071

      1 month ago

      I think Chibi is better than the actual show.

  • AxiosDignum FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

    1 month ago

    @nicus9 Yes how dare they spend money specifically to see a show they like ahead of time and also to support roosterteeth for making a show they enjoy. And First membership does get you extra content. After shows don't go to the public. I know when shows come out because I have been watching RT for a long while. I, on the other hand, never knew about the exact location of schedules. I never knew there was a 100% legit schedule, therefore I didn't look for it, I am just happy with any episode, be it the main show or awesome lore.


    "If the audience doesn't want to spend time looking for it that is their decision and they lose the right to complain."

    If they don't even know it exists in the first place, they can't decide to look for it. That's like saying if you didn't like either of the last presidential candidates and decided to vote for someone else or not vote this time, that they can't complain at all. The blame doesn't fall upon one person for not having the ability to do something. It would be cool if they added a link to Gray's journal in the description of the Rwby episodes, that way people can find the schedule much faster.

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      I have no idea which of my comments you are replying to but I'm fairly certain you're putting words in my mouth.


      I never said people shouldn't support Rooster Teeth. That much should be obvious as I myself am a first member and thus are helping support them. I'm really not sure which of my words you're trying to twist around are. The only thing I can think of is when people say, "First memberships are a waste of money" and I reply "If you don't feel it is worth your money, then don't spend it. No one is making you." I don't think that statement is all that extreme or strange. I think that's fairly common sense and does not reflect poorly on RT or anyone nor is it telling people they shouldn't support RT. I'm telling them to not spend their money on something THEY view as wasteful.


      And, again I don't know which comment specifically you are referring to, but I know for a fact that in the past I said that first members don't get extra content IN THE RWBY SERIES. The "after shows" or podcast post shows or first exclusive videos are, naturally, only for first members. So again, you're putting words in my mouth. Specifically for the RWBY series (and only looking at the RWBY series) you do not get extra content, you just get earlier access to content.


      "I am just happy with any episode, be it the main show or awesome lore."

      Good for you? I'm not sure why we're discussing this but I'm glad you enjoy the show. They work very hard on it I'm sure. I like it too (hence me being here).


      "If they don't even know it exists in the first place, they can't decide to look for it."

      No I'm actually pretty sure you can. There is even an English word for it, it is called "searching." I believe Google is founded on that very idea. You aren't sure if something exists or where it is located, you look for it. If you find it, GREAT! You are done. If you don't find it, "Huh either I can't find it or it doesn't exist. Oh well."


      Not everyone is going to care about the schedule. Some people (like you and I apparently) enjoy the show no matter what comes out. Other people (the ones complaining) apparently do care. They don't like WoR. They want to know in advance if they are coming out. They have a desire to find this knowledge. They have the means of looking for this knowledge ("searching", there's that word again). Whether they find it or not, who knows. But I can guarantee that the vast majority (if not all) of the people complaining didn't try. 


      Now if they actually look for it and don't find it, then that's a toss up. It could easily be RT's fault (which I'll touch on later). Or maybe they didn't look hard enough. Or maybe they just got unlucky, who knows.


      "...if you didn't like either of the last presidential candidates [...and...] not vote this time, that they can't complain at all."


      I would say that's a fair statement. If you have the power the power to do/change something and willingly choose to not do it, then you shouldn't complain.

      "Hey there is a driverless car slowly rolling towards me at 2 mph. I could just walk out of the way but instead I'm just going to stand here and get hit...... OH WHAT THE HELL WHY DID I GET HIT?!" Because you had the power to do something and didn't. That simple. I think anyone who saw that happen would call that person an idiot and say they don't have the right to complain.


      "The blame doesn't fall upon one person for not having the ability to do something."

      I don't even.... what? We literally JUST said they had the ability to do it. Now you're saying they don't? They have the ability to watch RWBY but somehow the internet doesn't allow them to search for anything else? Man that's a shitty ISP.


      "It would be cool if they added a link to Gray's journal in the description of the Rwby episodes, that way people can find the schedule much faster."

      I agree with this statement 100%. I have made that point/suggestion myself on multiple occasions (quite possibly in whatever comment of mine you're referring to). But just because something isn't perfect doesn't mean it can't be used and it doesn't fulfill its duties.

    • AxiosDignum FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      @nicus9  "Well if they spent money for First ONLY for RWBY then that is their own fault. First doesn't get you anything except 24 hours earlier access. You don't get extra shows, nothing." These were your own words. I dislike your attempt to say I was twisting your words. You said it was their fault if they spent money for just one show. I never said you said to not spend money to support rt, don't be the such a hypocrite. Also did you really compare walking out of the way of a car as a choice vs not voting for one of the 2 main candidates? One of those choices is way out of your hand in comparison to the other. My reason for using the US election as an example was the fact that they have no control on what happens. 1 person can't change the election. Your example of walking away from a slow car holds no legitimate meaning in this situation. 


      "Well if they spent money for First ONLY for RWBY then that is their own fault. First doesn't get you anything except 24 hours earlier access. You don't get extra shows, nothing. "


      "And, again I don't know which comment specifically you are referring to, but I know for a fact that in the past I said that first members don't get extra content IN THE RWBY SERIES. The "after shows" or podcast post shows or first exclusive videos are, naturally, only for first members. So again, you're putting words in my mouth. Specifically for the RWBY series (and only looking at the RWBY series) you do not get extra content, you just get earlier access to content."


      Just because you said RWBY in your comment, that doesn't instantly mean it is just about RWBY unless you specifically say it is only about RWBY. We(or at least I was) [were] talking about First Membership which does give you extra content..


      "If they don't even know it exists in the first place, they can't decide to look for it."

      "No I'm actually pretty sure you can. There is even an English word for it, it is called "searching." I believe Google is founded on that very idea. You aren't sure if something exists or where it is located, you look for it. If you find it, GREAT! You are done. If you don't find it, "Huh either I can't find it or it doesn't exist. Oh well."

      Well you missed the point of this right away. If they don't know it exists and don't see it in the RWBY Group page, then it's not their fault. You are assuming that it would be the first thing anyone would see.


      "I don't even.... what? We literally JUST said they had the ability to do it. Now you're saying they don't? They have the ability to watch RWBY but somehow the internet doesn't allow them to search for anything else? Man that's a shitty ISP."

      This was about the ability to vote and still have it not affect anything.


      For reference sake, this was the comment I was originally responding to.

      "Well if they spent money for First ONLY for RWBY then that is their own fault. First doesn't get you anything except 24 hours earlier access. You don't get extra shows, nothing. They are essentially just support the creators which is great. They aren't doing it to get access to any specific kind of shows. And they are welcome to get rid of their first membership at anytime if they don't want to support RT anymore.

      And if they don't know where the schedule is, shouldn't they should search for it? Now should RT make it easier to find? Yes, most definitely. But it DOES exist. If the audience doesn't want to spend time looking for it that is their decision and they lose the right to complain."


      You and I are mostly like minded.The main problem I have right now though is how asinine the chat box area is. It takes too long to find the comment you wouldintend to reply to in the first place.

    • nicus9 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      FYI you messed up the notification. Note how the at sign in @nicus9 isn't blue. All you need to do is type at and then my name. You don't need to manually add a hyperlink or anything. Just type my name with an at sign in front of it and it'll auto notify me that you responded. As you said, its a pain the ass to find out if someone responded to your comment otherwise.


      Also I recommend if you're posting something long like this that you use italics for quotes and separate out your paragraphs more (yeah I know, RT's website sucks for it) but its really hard to read/follow and respond otherwise lol.



      "You said it was their fault if they spent money for just one show." - Axios

      "Just because you said RWBY in your comment, that doesn't instantly mean it is just about RWBY unless you specifically say it is only about RWBY. We(or at least I was) [were] talking about First Membership which does give you extra content.." - Axios


      In your original post back on page whatever of the comment section, you said this.


      "People who spent money on First for RWBY alone...." - Axios

      I then replied with this

      "Well if they spent money for First ONLY for RWBY then that is their own fault. First doesn't get you anything except 24 hours earlier access. You don't get extra shows, nothing." - nicus (removed your bolding and added my own)


      You were the person who started limiting that we were talking about RWBY series alone and nothing else. I continued that train of thought with its limitations that you started. You only bolded part of the sentence that is valid. I bolded the rest of my quote that you should have. I used the words "only for RWBY" and the very next sentence built off of that idea (hence it being in the same paragraph). It was implied I was still talking about RWBY only because the sentence preceeding it limited it to such. 


      However, I can see how you might have misunderstood me and missed that implication. For that I apologize for not being clear enough, but the fact is that I was still talking about RWBY and only RWBY. You simply misunderstood my comment and I wasn't as clear as I could have been.




      "I never said you said to not spend money to support rt, don't be the such a hypocrite." - Axios


      This was the very first sentence in your original post above


      "Yes how dare they spend money specifically to see a show they like ahead of time and also to support roosterteeth for making a show they enjoy." - Axios

      That is a pretty biting sarcastic comment that HEAVILY implies that I was against people spending money to support RT.



      "Also did you really compare walking out of the way of a car as a choice vs not voting for one of the 2 main candidates? One of those choices is way out of your hand in comparison to the other. My reason for using the US election as an example was the fact that they have no control on what happens. 1 person can't change the election. Your example of walking away from a slow car holds no legitimate meaning in this situation." - Axios

      There are two responses I need to make to this.

      1) I believe the statistics say that 52% of the American population did not vote in the election (I could be wrong on the precise %). I would be willing to bet almost every single one of those people believe their vote doesn't matter. However that one vote multiplied by the 52% of the populate that believe that? Mathematically, that does change it, which means the person who believes their vote doesn't matter is incorrect and they can control the election. However, that ultimately doesn't matter and here is why.


      2) You say my car analogy is bad when in reality I'd say it is reversed. This is what you originally compared the election to:

      "If [the viewer] don't even know [the schedule] exists in the first place, they can't decide to look for it." - Axios

      Here is why it is reversed. You don't need a group of people to vote in order for one person to go look for a schedule. You only need that one person to decide to go look for it. So here are the analogies spelled out:


      Original Subject:

      RT Viewer deciding to look for the schedule = One person needed to change the outcome (that one person deciding to put in the effort to look for it)


      Analogies:

      Election Analogy = Group of people to change outcome (who is the president)

      Car analogy = One person needed to change the outcome (them stepping out of the way and not being hit by the car)


      Now which analogy would you say is more closely related to the original statement? The only reason why I responded to the election analogy is because you brought it up. I'd argue your election analogy "holds no legitimate meaning in this situation" whereas mine is much more closely related.



      "Well you missed the point of this right away. If they don't know it exists and don't see it in the RWBY Group page, then it's not their fault. You are assuming that it would be the first thing anyone would see."  - Axios

      I don't think I can miss the point if that point wasn't in your statement. Here is your statement again:

      "If they don't even know it exists in the first place, they can't decide to look for it." - Axios


      You didn't say, "If they don't know it exists, its not their fault." You said "if they don't know it exists, they CAN'T look for it." Those are two very different statements. I responded to the statement you made, not the one you meant to make. You did mention "blame" later on in the paragraph but there was the election analogy between so it is hard to make that connection as the subject had abruptly changed. This appears to be an example of you misspeaking and you trying to imply something that I couldn't follow due to the poor choice of words.


      And neither you nor I ever brought up the RWBY Group page at any point in this conversation.


      Now as I said in my post above, I agree that they need to make it easier to find the schedule. But just because it is hard doesn't prevent people from looking and finding it (case in point: I found it). And I believe if they are as upset as they appear when they post their comments ranting about how "AWFUL" WoR episodes are, they should use that "passion" to search for the schedule that does in fact exist, whether they know it or not. 


      Now if they looked and failed to find it, that is an entirely different matter. This is how I view it:

      If they posted a rant/insult comment but they actually looked for a schedule and didn't find it = not their fault

      If they posted a rant/insult comment but they didn't bother to look for a schedule = is their fault


      As I said, I'd be willing to bet money that the people complaining did not look for it.



      Also an important self observation I feel I should point out, my problem with people isn't them complaining or hating WoR or RT. That is perfectly ok. If they want to believe it is the worst show ever made that is their right. However, if someone starts being hostile/complaining and insulting people but provides no constructive alternatives, then I will most likely just be hostile right back. 


      There was comment on a previous page where they essentially said they HATED WoR but they explained why and they gave ideas on how RT could improve. If you go look, I responded to that person and complimented them on how they posted and explained why my views differed from theirs in (what I believe was) a mature manner.


      As I said in that post, my problem isn't with people hating WoR or RT. My problem is with how they choose to express that hate.




      "I don't even.... what? We literally JUST said they had the ability to do it. Now you're saying they don't? They have the ability to watch RWBY but somehow the internet doesn't allow them to search for anything else? Man that's a shitty ISP." - nicus

      "This was about the ability to vote and still have it not affect anything" - Axios

      As I mentioned above, you don't have to "vote" in order to look for a schedule. You just do it. The election analogy was faulty.


      "You and I are mostly like minded.The main problem I have right now though is how asinine the chat box area is. It takes too long to find the comment you wouldintend to reply to in the first place." - Axios

      And again we agree 100% on this. I've made many suggestion posts pleading they fix it lol. We can dream. One day.... one day....

  • Reaperof1000 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold The Dark Fox

    1 month ago

    Ok, so I take it from this that there is a slim possibility that a faunus-human pair could give birth to a human baby with faunus genes correct? (This is the basis for an OC of mine, a Faunus boy born to a human couple, but the mother has faunus in her bloodline...) 

    • PastaPlate

      1 month ago

      From a standpoint of real-life biology, it should be completely feasible, and may or may not involve any mutations, to the faunus part of genome. 

    • YoBoySarge FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold You just got sarged

      1 month ago

      Maby the faunus gene is similar to the y chromosome, you either have it or you don't

    • kris7145

      1 month ago

      Yes but I'd put it out there that it is highly unlikely, being faunus likely requires *very* large amounts of different genes and to mutate every single one of a human's genes required to match faunus genes all at once would be almost impossible

    • Reaperof1000 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold The Dark Fox

      1 month ago

      kris7145     You are correct that it would be an extremely rare case, but I actually went and worked out a few Punnett squares where such a genetic mutation would be far more likely, not requiring the mutation of all human DNA, just the bit that would make the human DNA dominant over a recessive Faunus gene. 

    • RudeOstrich FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Actually, its not possible. It said that a human\faunus mix is more likely to have a faunus baby, making the faunus gene dominant, and the human gene recessive. Therefore, their human child would have to have two human genes, and no Faunus genes. So their kid would not inherit any Faunus genes from them

    • Reaperof1000 FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold The Dark Fox

      1 month ago

      RudeOstrich Well what I meant was that the gene passed on to the child would be a recessive Faunus trait. Under normal circumstances the Faunus gene would still be dominant to a human trait, regardless of if it was a recessive gene or not. I was saying that an extremely rare instance of a mutation in either the human or faunus gene could cause the human gene to become dominant over the faunus, allowing for a human to be born of a faunus/human couple that would then be able to have a faunus child, even with the other partner also being human. 

  • Nnox_Inkuree

    1 month ago

    Huh, I can imagine being born with a Faunus trait must be a little uncomfortable for the mother. You know, a tail in addition to childbirth.  

    • TheMightyWill

      1 month ago

      I imagine something like horns would be more painful than just a little tiny tail 

    • Z.Gen FIRST Member Star(s) Indication of membership status - One star is a FIRST member, two stars is Double Gold

      1 month ago

      Not necessarily.  Look at newborn animals.  Those with horns tend to have little knubs that grow out over time after they're born.  Tails likely wouldn't cause too much trouble at all, if any.  


      ...though I suppose it'd depend on the tail.  But monkey and dog tails would be really small, I think, in 'proportion' with the newborn's iddy-bitty arms and legs (just look at kittens).  Anyway, since babies are supposed to be born headfirst, tails aren't really likely to cause trouble. 

    • Nnox_Inkuree

      1 month ago

      I actually was thinking of a scorpion tail, something with venom. But yeah I concede the point to you guys