Forum
Advanced Search
Filter     |   View Watchlist
[ Print Friendly ] [ Watch Thread ]

Help Me Choose! [ 1 ] [ 2 ] ... [ 63 ] [ 64 ]
Pixie
Less Than 3
#1   Posted 8 years ago
+ 19 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
We get alot of people posting questions about what they should get to enhance and enrich their vehicles.

If the knowledgebase wouldn't mind watchlisting this, I thought that anyone who had a question could ask it here, even discuss it here if required.
FunkMasta
#2   Posted 8 years ago
+ 0 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Pixie, #1:

consider it done mate.
ferretlxix
#3   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Pixie, #1:

Ok ,I'll join in on your quest.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#4   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Pixie, #1:

watching now :)
Demonwing
#5   Posted 8 years ago
+ 0 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #4:

Me first.
Let's just say I wanted to improve the power of my Grand Am.
(Not that I do, just something to consider.)
Should I go the Eaton M62 supercharger route for 3k or a NOS kit for about $300?
Could my car even handle the Eaton blower?
GM tried it out and put a tranny from a Bonnieville and some stiffer shocks on there and still never produced it. But hey, what does GM know.....
Then agian, is the NOS really worth any money?
I'd have to pay again and again to fill the tank up.
And not to mention without lighter pistons it would only kill my engine faster.
Not good.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#6   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #5:

Go super. NOS would be 100x more damaging to your engine than a super. Plus, nos licks balls.
Demonwing
#7   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #6:

Ah, but the supercharger would tear my tranny to pieces more than likely. And it's FWD, the tourqe steering would be horrendous.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#8   Posted 8 years ago
+ 2 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #7:

fine then. get a new intake/exhaust and cut your losses on the sc. Whatever you do, stay the hell away form NOS!!!
FunkMasta
#9   Posted 8 years ago
+ 2 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #8:

i agree about the naws.

blower best best. or even better yet.. sell the grand am and buy a subaru. ahah.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#10   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #9:

and you call me a fanboy :P
FunkMasta
#11   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #10:

ok ok ok...


get something awd.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#12   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #11:

lol. whore :P Even though i cant deny the power of awd.
FunkMasta
#13   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #12:

bwahahahaha I WIN!
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#14   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #13:

fanwhore.
FunkMasta
#15   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #14:

... anyway.


the blower is certainly going to remove any reliability you have in that engine. remember, you're taking a Naturally aspirated engine and submitting it to forces and power levels it is not designed to sustain. somewhere, something is going to break.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#16   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #15:

So, he might just wana skitr the problem by doing some superficial upgrades. exhaust/intake, ecu...
Demonwing
#17   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #16:

It was a "what if" situation. I'm stuck with the Grand Am, I can't afford to sell it, trade it in or anything. I'll just keep taking care of it and so far it's been okay. It will need some new CV joints here soon, but other than that nothing costly.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#18   Posted 8 years ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #17:

Ya, then do the exhaust/intake/ecu upgrade... $1500 max, and you will gain between 20 and 30 hp.
Demonwing
#19   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #18:

Lol, I can spare about $5 a week for burger on the weekends.
College is a killer.
It was just hypothetical.
Plus, it's fun to imagine.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#20   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #19:

hehehe. yes it is :)
FunkMasta
#21   Posted 8 years ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #19:

i like to imagine myself in a 22B... or the Mine's Skyline...
jwrebholz
#22   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Demonwing, #5:

What year? Four or six? What displacement? What transmission?

With none of the critical information I'd need, I can't really say what's best. I can tell you that nitrous will destroy your motor if it's not set up properly (and most people don't set it up properly), so if it's a six then you're best off with the supercharger. If it's the four it's probably the twin-cam 2.4L. Get a turbo. If you go forced-induction, you can safely run between 6 and 8 pounds of boost without risking much. Your power gains will be modest, but you won't blow up your engine.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#23   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to jwrebholz, #22:

Modest is a bit of an exageration... Most turbo cars are only running 12-15 psi... I think that if he runs with 8 or so, he would see a nice amount of power.
FunkMasta
#24   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #23:

remember guys, its not boost that matters, but cfm. ALL engines hate running under any pressure, let alone 20-30psi or even higher. its about how much air you're moving, not how much pressure you're creating. a larger turbo running low boost will make more (RELIABLE AS WELL) power than a small one at high boost.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#25   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #24:

Yes, however, the larger the turbo, the greater the turbolag. And nobody likes turbolag.
swooper74
Sponsor
#26   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #25:

I had a tiny little turbo on my old Firefly (a 1 liter, 3 cylinder engine with a turbo, go figure), no lag at all, it' was pretty sweet. I miss that car.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#27   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to swooper74, #26:

Thats because the turbo on that thing must have been microscopic. Im talking larger turbos (i.e. the ones on STIs and other super preformance cars.)
FunkMasta
#28   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Zing!     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #27:

man the STi turbo has very very little lag. it comes on so smooth that you never notice anyway.

well stock, that is. *evil grin*
swooper74
Sponsor
#29   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to 1nF3Rn0, #27:

Not that small, but not a big one by any means. Damn, that thing had a lot of jump for a three cylinder. Oh how I miss it. It was a total piece of crap, but I loved it like a child. A very ver retarded child. With rust holes.
1nF3Rn0
Heli Pilot
#30   Posted 7 years ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to FunkMasta, #28:

Well, compared to the smaller turbos ive driven, the turbo lag was very noticible to me. I dont like it, but o well..
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] ... [ 63 ] [ 64 ] [ Next ]