Forum
Advanced Search
Filter     |   View Watchlist
[ Print Friendly ] [ Watch Thread ]

The Hunger Games? [ 1 ] [ 2 ]
VictorZanta
Da mun
#1   Posted 9 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I have been waiting a while for this movie to be released to DVD since i missed it in the cinemas. I have heard nothing but good when it comes to this movie. I however was told to read the book because it was much better.

This question goes out to everyone who has read the book and has seen the movie as well. Which is in fact better?

Also what did everyone think of this movie? Without spoilers of course. I personally enjoyed most of it. Wasn't to happy about the ending though.
sdog180
Sponsor
#2   Posted 9 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I snuck in to see the movie before seeing avengers at midnight and thought it was pretty good. Made me wanna read the books, after hearing all the positive things about em.
pbaseball
#3   Posted 9 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I read all 3 in the weeks coming up to the premier and it was pretty awesome. Also, in my opinion, the cast itself is pretty stacked and its just going to get better. The movie is 2 and a half hours long, but it felt like it was maybe an hour because it just keeps going and never lets you down until the very end of the movie. So much fun.
Hennres
#4   Posted 9 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I watched the move without having read the books, and frankly I was slightly disappointed. I thought that the story was interesting, but that the dystopian world was poorly explained and badly represented. However, if you're just looking for an action movie that's kinda mindless, then it's quite a good film. It's very good entertainment, but it leaves me slightly underwhelmed by the political backstory
Dwarrior1214
#5   Posted 9 months ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I thought they had good actors for the movie, but if I didn't read the books, it would have made a lot less sense, they should have done more backstory in the beginning of the movie in my opinion, the beginning seemed rushed, but it was an amazing movie in my opinion.
OtakuKnight
Sponsor
#6   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
It’s a really good standalone movie. If you didn’t know there was a book for it you’d think that some of the characters need a bit more developing.

I saw the movie first and then read the books. I have to say that after reading the books, it does fill in a lot of the gaps about the character connections.
IW1911
#7   Posted 8 months ago
+ 3 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I found that the movie didn't capture the chemistry between the characters well at all. All very superficial twilight style "I like this guy but I don't know if I like this guy" shit. And as usual there are some major liberties taken with the story line, which feels far more fleshed out and much more structured in the books (Well, books 1 and 2 anyways). It's always goes back to the fact movies will never be as good as the books because every single person will interpret the books differently and take something away from it.
Kudaibergen
#8   Posted 8 months ago
- 1 Noob     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
For me the movie sucked a lot. It felt like another Twilight like movie in terms of making the whole point on three people who can't figure out their feeling to each other rather then developing good story.
fubaring0
Sponsor
#9   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
It's a really quick read and very well written young adult fiction the movie did a decent job but played it a little safe in spots.
CrackySr
Sponsor
#10   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to VictorZanta, #1:

because the screenplay was drafted by suzanne collins (the author) it is so close to the book. if you watch the film you pretty much dont need to read the book but i would still suggest it
Ayailla
#11   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I enjoyed it and couldn't see that they had changed a whole lot of the storyline. I only saw two changes (somebody correct me if I am wrong)

They changed who she got the pin from.

and they removed the fact that the beasts near the end were made out of the dead tributes. No doubt that would have been too much for a 12A to handle.

I put the second one in spoiler tags just in case people haven't read the book. That part shocked me with just how far Capitol would go for this shit.
Hawkclaw
Broccoli Rob
#12   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
Honestly, I thought the movie watered down the violence that was in the book. If they had followed the book faithfully, the violence would have probably made the movie rated R.
JamesThomas
#13   Posted 8 months ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I think the movie mostly suffers from not hearing what Katniss is thinking. The books are very internalized in that Katniss narrates everything. The only way the movie can do that is through physical movements and the camera showing you what she's looking that, which is hard if people aren't paying attention or don't care. The violence is also a factor, but it's understandable given the core audience of the film.
Stroud458
#14   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I'm refusing to watch the film until I've finished the Trilogy. Is the film based on all three books or just the first one?
CrackySr
Sponsor
#15   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Stroud458, #14:

just thwe first one but they are making at least the second and and almost gurauntee a third
Hawkclaw
Broccoli Rob
#16   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to CrackySr, #15:

And supposedly a different director. This time one who has experience making action/violent movies. Good news in my opinion because I found those parts lacking in Hunger Games.
Stroud458
#17   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to CrackySr, #15:

Cool. Thanks.
Stroud458
#18   Posted 8 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
Is it Katniss as in Cat-niss or Kate-niss?
Ayailla
#19   Posted 8 months ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I read it as Cat-niss. And that's how they pronounced it in the film.
CrackySr
Sponsor
#20   Posted 7 months ago
+ 1 Cool     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Stroud458, #18:

Gale also calls her Catnip
Paladincross
#21   Posted 6 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I tried watching the movie a 2nd time, but I fell alseep. I prefer the books now. I think I should sell my copy at Disc Replay and get a little money back.

Post edited 11/17/12 6:09PM
Stroud458
#22   Posted 6 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Paladincross, #21:

Same, the movie, compared to the books, was awful.
Paladincross
#23   Posted 6 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to Stroud458, #22:

I enjoyed it the first time, but now, I think I'll just stick with the books.
miexriir
Me
#24   Posted 6 months ago
+ 2 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
There are a lot of things from the book that are hard to transfer (well) onto film, like Katniss' thoughts, and there were some things left out/wrong like the beasts and the pin, but on the whole honestly I thought it was good. It captured the intensity of the games, and the insight into the game makers side of it all was cool, and also just the way they portrayed the capital was so spot on, and really intricate. I think they really captured the world well with the costumes and the glamor. The cinematography was also really really good for the most part and was able to capture Katniss' emotions on whats happening, like especially with the scene at the start of the games (with the audio ringing/silence), or the tributes and their outfits, idk I just thought it was good. For the most part it was true to the book, and I really appreciate it, and things they changed I can understand because it's a long movie (though I don't know what they'll end up doing with Madge for the future but..)
UndeadSpider
Gunner
#25   Posted 6 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
Thought the movie was good although the violence was brutal as it was in the book but that really matter that much. Still not hopeful for the mockingjay movies.
nozume
Sponsor
#26   Posted 5 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
The movie was okay. The only issue I had was I had a major headache due to the camera movements. I understand what they were trying to do, but really, my head that day.

Glasses + 3D Glasses + Jittery Camera Movements = Ugggghhhh
miexriir
Me
#27   Posted 5 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to nozume, #26:

I didn't see it in 3D, but I know what you mean about the shaky camera stuff. Shaky cam shots work well for the games because it's supposed to be chaotic, but I couldn't help but notice how it was overused in the beginning of the movie in district 12. It both undermines the effect if it's used a lot and just is visually upsetting
Paladincross
#28   Posted 5 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to miexriir, #27:

The movie had shaky cam shots, like "Cloverfield"?
CJdeetdidee
SOTN
#29   Posted 5 months ago
    [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
I don't know why but I couldn't keep entertained with either the movie, or the book.
MissFrances
Fences
#30   Posted 5 months ago
+ 1 Ditto     [ Reply ]   [ Quote ]
In reply to miexriir, #27:

I've literally just rewatched this film and I thought the exact same thing. I wonder if they were using it to try and emphasise how poor the area is, but it was really just uncomfortable to watch and actually took away from the shots that could actually give you a good impression of the area, simply because you couldn't see them properly!

Obviously bits are lost from book to movie but I like the scenes they made up to cover that, like the conversations between Snow and Seneca, that weren't in the book but give a bit more understanding of the situation.
I actually like film-Katniss more than book-Katniss. She's written super whiny in the book. But then she's a teenage girl being sent to fight for her life so I suppose you can forgive her for feeling hard done by.
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ Next ]